Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Historical information
This a previous edition. For the latest publication, consult
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
, Third Edition, 2017
.
Table of Contents
Home Page
Introductory Pages
Parliamentary Institutions
Parliaments and Ministries
Privileges and Immunities
The House of Commons and Its Members
Parliamentary Procedure
The Physical and Administrative Setting
The Speaker and Other Presiding Officers of the House
The Parliamentary Cycle
Sittings of the House
The Daily Program
Questions
The Process of Debate
Rules of Order and Decorum
The Curtailment of Debate
Special Debates
The Legislative Process
Introduction
Historical Perspective
Types of Bills
Form of Bills
Structure of Bills
Stages in the Legislative Process
Notes 1-50
Notes 51-100
Notes 101-150
Notes 151-200
Notes 201-250
Notes 251-300
Notes 301-400
Notes 351-400
Notes 401-450
Notes 451-500
Notes 501-526
Delegated Legislation
Financial Procedures
Committees of the Whole House
Committees
Private Members’ Business
Public Petitions
Private Bills Practice
The Parliamentary Record
Appendices
House of Commons Procedure and Practice
Edited by Robert Marleau and Camille Montpetit
2000 Edition
—
More information …
16. The Legislative Process
Print this section
|
Open/print full chapter
[501]
P.D.G. Hayter, “Royal Assent: A New Form”,
The Table
, Vol. XXXVI, 1967, pp. 53-4.
[502]
For a description of the ceremony in the presence of a monarch, see
May
, 22
nd
ed., p. 565, note 4. King George VI gave Royal Assent in person to certain bills of the Parliament of Canada (
Journals
, May 8, 1939, p. 437; May 19, 1939, pp. 525-6).
[503]
May
, 22
nd
ed., pp. 564-5. In 1965, an incident occurred in the British Parliament that led to the abolition of the ceremony of Royal Assent. While the House was engaged in passionate debate, Black Rod knocked on the door of the House of Commons. A number of Members protested and rushed the Bar of the House to prevent him from entering. They refused to attend the ceremony and continued to debate, even after the Speaker had left the chair (
Hayter
, p. 54).
[504]
However, the adoption of this procedure did not lead to the abolition of the traditional ceremony, which the British Parliament still uses at the time of prorogation, nor does it offend the Queen’s prerogatives in this regard (
Hayter
, pp. 55-7).
[505]
Debates
, March 30, 1933, pp. 3551-2; March 29, 1984, p. 2544. In the last 15 years, there have been a number of proposals for reforming the procedure for giving Royal Assent. In 1985, the Special Committee on Reform of the House of Commons (McGrath Committee) recommended that a formula be adopted for Royal Assent to be given in writing (see the Second Report of the Committee, p. 118, presented to the House on March 26, 1985 (
Journals
, p. 420)). In its response to the Committee’s report, the government at the time indicated that it wanted to modernize the procedure for signifying Royal Assent, in consultation with the Senate (
Journals
, October 9, 1985, p. 1082). The Committee’s recommendation was supported by the Board of Internal Economy at its meeting on June 11, 1986 (
Journals
, October 10, 1986, p. 72). In 1993, the Standing Committee on House Management presented a report on parliamentary reform. In its 81
st
Report, the Committee agreed to act on the recommendation in the McGrath Report (Standing Committee on House Management,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, Issue No. 53, April 1, 1993, p. 31). The Senate has also expressed interest in reforming Royal Assent. In 1985, the Fourth Report of the Senate Standing Committee on Standing Rules and Orders recommended that a simplified procedure be adopted (
Senate Debates
, November 6, 1985, pp. 1448, 1469). That report prompted a debate (
Senate Debates
, November 7, 1985, pp. 1480-2; January 22, 1986, pp. 1860-2; January 23, 1986, pp. 1873-5) and was followed by the introduction of a government bill, Bill S-19,
Royal Assent Act
, which was debated at second reading in July and September 1988, a few days before dissolution of the Thirty-Third Parliament (
Senate Debates
, July 26, 1988, pp. 4122-3; September 20, 1988, pp. 4463-4). On April 2, 1998, another bill (Bill S-15) to reform Royal Assent was introduced in the Senate, this time by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, Senator Lynch-Staunton (
Senate Journals
, p. 576). After being debated at second reading, the bill was referred to the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs on June 9, 1998 (
Senate Journals
, p. 788). The Committee reported it with amendments on June 18, 1998 (
Senate Journals
, pp. 862-3; 898-9). On December 8, 1998, after being debated, the bill was withdrawn (
Senate Journals
, pp. 1170-2). On March 10, 1999, Senator Lynch-Staunton introduced a new bill (S-26) that was virtually identical to the former Bill S-15, as amended by the Committee (
Senate Journals
, p. 1334).
[506]
According to some observers, the Canadian ceremony seems to be the one that most closely resembles the original ceremony (
Wilding and Laundy
, 3
rd
ed., 1968, p. 642). Most countries with a parliamentary system on the British model have abandoned the ceremony of Royal Assent. In the Australian Parliament, the ceremony has not taken place since the early years of the Australian Commonwealth. The usual practice is for the chamber that has initiated the bill to transmit copies of it to the residence of the Governor General, who affixes his or her signature. In New Zealand, the Governor General has not attended in person to assent to bills since 1875. The Governor General simply signs the two copies presented and returns them to the House with a message informing the House that assent has been given.
[507]
Normally, assent is given only once in a sitting. There was a deviation from this practice on July 17, 1980, when the House was called to the Senate at noon and again at 9:00 p.m. in order for other bills to be assented to as well (
Debates
, July 17, 1980, pp. 2998, 3044-5, 3051).
[508]
Standing Order 28(4). This provision was added to the Standing Orders in June 1994 (Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs,
Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence
, Twenty-Seventh Report, June 9, 1994, Issue No. 16, p. 3;
Debates
, June 8, 1994, p. 4997; June 10, 1994, p. 5183).
[509]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 9, 1966, pp. 2472-3; February 27, 1969, p. 6034.
[510]
See, for example,
Debates
, July 12, 1940, p. 1644; March 29, 1985, p. 3547; June 27, 1986, p. 14997.
[511]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 9, 1966, p. 2472; July 14, 1966, p. 7728; March 24, 1975, p. 4446; December 20, 1975, p. 10257; October 22, 1976, pp. 390-1; June 27, 1985, pp. 6331-2; December 19, 1986, pp. 2337-8.
[512]
For example, on December 14, 1990, Deputy Speaker Champagne adjourned the House at the normal hour of daily adjournment even though the House had already been informed that the Royal Assent ceremony would soon take place and that the Usher of the Black Rod was on his way to request the attendance of the House (
Debates
, pp. 16787, 16797-9).
[513]
On June 23, 1971, a recorded division and Royal Assent were both scheduled for the same time, 5:45 p.m. A member rose on a point of order, and it was decided to proceed with the vote first, and then go to the Royal Assent ceremony (
Debates
, June 23, 1971, p. 7265).
[514]
See, for example,
Debates
, March 28, 1996, p. 1386.
[515]
The origins of this practice go back to 1641 when the Gentleman Usher of Great Britain received a reprimand for entering the House before being expressly invited to do so (
The Table
, Vol. XLVI, 1978, p. 129).
[516]
Occasionally, the interruption of debate has prompted reaction from Members (
Debates
, December 16, 1953, pp. 1012-5; March 31, 1954, p. 3547).
[517]
Standing Order 29(5).
[518]
Debates
, February 19, 1981, pp. 7483-7; March 31, 1982, pp. 16029-32; November 3, 1982, pp. 20383-5. On occasion, Members have challenged the custom that the Usher be admitted to the House immediately (see
Debates
, February 16, 1972, pp. 10959-60).
[519]
It is the custom that the House should go to the Senate for Royal Assent only when it is invited to do so by the Usher of the Black Rod. However, the Commons has occasionally attended at the bar of the Senate without being accompanied by the Usher. One such incident occurred on June 12, 1925, when the office of the Black Rod was vacant (
Debates
, June 12, 1925, p. 438).
[520]
“Your Honour” is used to refer to the Deputy Governor.
[521]
The other date, which is fixed by the Governor in Council, is published in Part II of the
Canada Gazette
.
[522]
After the ceremony, the Clerk of the Senate, who is also the Clerk of the Parliaments, endorses on every Act, immediately after its title, the day, month and year when the Act was assented to in Her Majesty’s name, and the endorsement is a part of the Act, in accordance with Section 5(1) of the
Interpretation Act
, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21. When a bill has been initialled, it is sent to the residence of the Governor General to be signed on the back by the Governor General, after which it is sent to the Senate where it is kept in a vault. Because it is a single bilingual document, the new Act carries only one signature. The Clerk of the Senate then informs the
Canada Gazette
that bills have been given Royal Assent.
[523]
See, for example,
Journals
, August 9, 1977, pp. 1542-7; October 23, 1978, pp. 50-3.
[524]
R.S.C. 1985, Appendix II, No. 5, ss. 55-7.
[525]
R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21.
[526]
Interpretation Act
, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-21, s. 5(2).