House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 59 Wednesday, October 4, 2006 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| October 3, 2006 — The Minister of Finance — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and the Income Tax Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act”. |
| Recommendation |
| (Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2)) |
| Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to amend the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act and the Income Tax Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act”. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| October 3, 2006 — Mr. Martin (Sault Ste. Marie) — Bill entitled “An Act to change the name of the electoral district of Sault Ste. Marie”. |
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-952 — October 3, 2006 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With regard to the $5 million funding cuts to Status of Women Canada (SWC) over the next two years, announced in September 2006: (a) from specifically where within SWC does the government plan on cutting this funding; (b) when will these cuts take place; and (c) will the government provide a detailed timeline for these cuts? |
| Q-962 — October 3, 2006 — Mrs. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With regard to the $45 million funding cuts over the next two years to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), announced in September 2006: (a) from specifically where within CMHC does the government plan on cutting this funding; (b) when will these cuts take place; and (c) will the government provide a detailed timeline for these cuts? |
| Q-972 — October 3, 2006 — Mr. Paquette (Joliette) — What studies, analyses and reports relating to the fiscal imbalance have the Department of Finance or Queen’s Privy Council produced or commissioned since January 24, 2006? |
| Q-982 — October 3, 2006 — Mr. Paquette (Joliette) — What long-term estimates (two years or longer) have been carried out or requested since January 24, 2006 by the Department of Finance or by the Queen’s Privy Council with regard to Canada's financial situation? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Opposition Motion |
| October 3, 2006 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That the House reiterate to the government the importance of implementing a real income support program for older workers that would apply to all older workers in all economic sectors, in all regions. |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-226 — October 3, 2006 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) adopt a regulatory class which provides permanent residence to persons from moratoria countries to which Canada does not remove and who have been in Canada for three or more years; (b) until the time the regulatory class is adopted, immediately implement strengthened guidelines in the IP5 Manual “Immigrant Applications in Canada made on Humanitarian or Compassionate Grounds”, to create a “favourable presumption” in the case of persons under moratoria, who have been in Canada for three years or more and which recognizes that being in a prolonged state of legal limbo is a form of unusual hardship; and (c) review the decision making by and training for Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) officers deciding such cases to identify and correct concerns relating to PRRA and Humanitarian and Compassionate responsibilities. |
Private Members' Business |
| M-161 — June 12, 2006 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Stanton (Simcoe North), seconded by Mr. Shipley (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should consider the advisability of evaluating the future of the historic Trent-Severn Waterway, one of Parks Canada’s National Historic Sites, and its potential to become: (a) a premier recreational asset; (b) a world-class destination for recreational boaters; (c) a greater source of clean, renewable electrical power; (d) a facilitator of economic opportunity and renewal in the communities along its 386 km length; and (e) a model of environmental sustainability. |
| Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
| Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|