;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Bilingual view PDF


Tuesday, October 17, 2006 (No. 63)

Questions

The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.

Q-4 — April 4, 2006 — — With regard to the report “Empowering Canadian Farmers in the Marketplace”: (a) what have been the specific responses prepared by the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food to any or all of its recommendations; and (b) what have been the specific responses prepared by any other federal department or agency to any or all of the recommendations?

Q-5 — April 4, 2006 — — With regard to correspondence between the Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food and the Canadian Wheat Board: (a) did the Department correspond either in writing or by e-mail with the Canadian Wheat Board between November 1, 2005 and February 13, 2006 and, if so, on which dates; and (b) in any correspondence were specific questions or requests for information submitted to the Canadian Wheat Board and, if so, which questions or requests for information were submitted and on which dates were the responses due?

Q-64 — June 12, 2006 — — With regard to the ongoing projects that have been approved and are being funded under the Canada Strategic Infrastructure Fund (CSIF), the Municipal-Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF) and the Border Infrastructure Fund (BIF): (a) are any projects experiencing cost overruns as a result of unpredicted increases in the cost of building materials, labour, fuel and, if so, which ones and what is the value of these cost overruns; and (b) has the government developed any strategy for providing financial assistance to the recipients of CSIF, MRIF and BIF grants who are facing cost overruns caused by unprojected increases in the cost of fuel, labour or building materials?

Q-70 — June 15, 2006 — — With regard to contracts let to Morrison Hershfield by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation and the National Research Council: (a) name the contract; (b) the title of any research paper if a paper was prepared; and (c) the dollar value of the contract for each fiscal year beginning in 1980?

Q-88² — September 14, 2006 — — What percentage of unemployed people in Quebec have exhausted their weeks of regular employment insurance benefits, by employment insurance economic region and by fiscal year, from 2001-2002 to 2004-2005?

Q-89² — September 19, 2006 — — With regard to the Canadian Heritage program announced in December 2002 that allocated $172.5 million in funding to establish and operate a new Aboriginal Languages and Cultures Centre: (a) what were the year-by-year funding totals to this program; (b) what was the status of this program when the current government came to power; (c) what funding changes have taken place since January 2006; (d) what, if any, future plans are there for this program; and (e) what initiatives is the governement currently undertaking to help preserve Aboriginal languages?

Q-90² — September 19, 2006 — — With regard to the Canadian presence in Afghanistan: (a) what is the goal of the Canadian presence in Afghanistan; (b) what is the strategy employed by the government; (c) what are the tactics that are being used; (d) who is the enemy; (e) what is the operational centre of gravity of the enemy; (f) does the government have a political strategy to attain its goal; (g) is terrorism the greatest security threat that Canada faces; (h) does the government consider that Canada is at war; (i) what is the condition that the government would consider to be “civil war”; (j) what does the government deem to be the nature of counter-insurgency warfare and does this condition exist in Afghanistan; (k) what Canadian Forces (CF) manuals deal with counter-insurgency; (l) what is the number of CF members wounded since the first deployment to Afghanistan in 2002; (m) what is the number of CF members permanently wounded; (n) what are the current rules of engagement for the CF in Afghanistan; (o) what has been the change in rules of engagement since Canada left Operation Enduring Freedom; (p) is the government aware of the presence of foreign fighters in Afghanistan who help the Taliban; (q) if there are foreign fighters where do they come from on the whole; (r) what is the opinion of the government regarding the security of the Afghan border with Pakistan; (s) what is the opinion of the government regarding Pakistani cooperation in achieving the objectives of the mission; (t) does the government have an opinion as to when the goals of the Canadian presence will be achieved; (u) when was the decision to deploy a combat mission to Kandahar made by the government; (v) what is the allotment of money set aside in the fiscal framework for the remainder of the mission; (w) how does the mission effect the fiscal framework; (x) what new weapons systems have been purchased, or will be purchased for the remainder of the mission; (y) was there a M777 howitzer purchased for the mission in Kandahar and, if so, what was the cost of the system; (z) does the CF use the Excalibur ordinance system developed by Raytheon and, if so, what is the unit cost per shell of the Excalibur ordinance system; (aa) how well are CF capabilities matched to the conditions in the southern region of Afghanistan and to counter insurgency; (bb) what is the size and configuration of task forces available for use in Afghanistan through to February 2009; (cc) what has been the effect of increased training throughout the forces on the capability of these task forces; (dd) what is the added cost associated with the deployment of a leopard tank squadron; (ee) how has the training of new recruits been effected by the extension of the mission until 2009; (ff) when was the decision made to not bring the flag to half mast after the death of a soldier; (gg) does the CF use dogs in combat missions; (hh) do allied forces use dogs in combat missions; (ii) what are the protocols used in relation to dogs and civilians and detainees respectively; (jj) would Canadian lawyers be allowed to contact and represent detainees while they are held by CF and, if not, what legal authority or doctrine would justify this refusal; (kk) what are the project names and budgets, itemized by project, for each foreign aid project that Canada is financing in Afghanistan, whether financed through government agencies or through multilateral organizations; (ll) is the arrangement concerning detainees of December 18, 2005 still the current policy of the Department of National Defence following the handover of command to NATO; (mm) what reconstruction projects are underway in Kandahar province under the supervision of the CF; (nn) what non-governmental organizations funded or directed reconstruction projects are underway in Kandahar province; (oo) are there any plans to increase the size of the Provincial Reconstruction Team before 2009; (pp) what is the government position with regard to support by the government of Pakistan, particularly the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence for the Taliban; (qq) what is the process for making next of kin aware of casualties in the CF; (rr) what operational reasons would there be for any delay in making next of kin aware of casualties; (ss) what is the length and nature of extra training that is provided for CF personnel going to Afghanistan; (tt) what is the number of enemy captured since the CF arrived in Kandahar; and (uu) has the CF engaged Al Qaeda fighters since moving to Kandahar?

Q-92² — September 27, 2006 — — With regards to band council elections: (a) for each calendar year since the Corbière Decision came into effect, how many bands have had an election and what were the costs of those elections; (b) what plans does the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development have to request an extension of the financial authority from the Treasury Board to continue funding these additional costs for band elections; (c) what is the average cost of a band council election relative to the overall Band Support Funding for First Nations; (d) how many elections have been disputed since 1999 and what were the costs for each of those elections; (e) for those disputed elections, what was the percentage cost of the election as a portion of Band Support Funding and as a portion of own source revenue for the First Nation involved; (f) what studies or audits have been conducted to see how much of the annual two percent funding cap on Indian and Northern Affairs Canada program spending since 1995 has gone to pay for the increased costs of band council elections; (g) how much would Band Support Funding need to increase to cover the increased costs of the Corbière Decision without impacting other program spending; (h) how will the government live up to its fiduciary responsibility for First Nations if the two percent spending cap remains in place; and (i) how will the Honour of the Crown be protected in this matter?

Q-93² — September 28, 2006 — — With respect to the current and future status of Canada’s missions abroad: (a) how many embassies, high commissions, consulates and permanent missions does Canada currently have worldwide, by country, and what is the current staffing level at each of these missions; (b) how many and in what countries and cities are embassies, high commissions, consulates and permanent missions scheduled for expansion during the period 2006 – 2010; (c) how many and in what countries and cities are new embassies, high commissions, consulates and permanent missions scheduled for opening during the period 2006 – 2010; (d) with respect to the announcement of consolidation of foreign missions as part of the program spending cuts identified on September 25, 2006, which embassies, high commissions, consulates and permanent missions, by country and city, are targeted for closure or for reduction of staffing levels and what is the total number of personnel cuts in each of the affected missions; and (e) at the conclusion of these consolidations, what will the overseas to Canada staffing ratio be at Foreign Affairs Canada?

Q-94 — September 28, 2006 — — With respect to programs and spending administered by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) within the riding of Surrey North: (a) what is the total annual budget of CMHC spending in 2006; (b) what is the projected budget for 2007; (c) how many CMHC-funded housing units for singles and families currently exist; and (d) how many CMHC-funded housing units for singles and families are planned for the remainder of 2006 and 2007?

Q-95² — October 3, 2006 — — With regard to the $5 million funding cuts to Status of Women Canada (SWC) over the next two years, announced in September 2006: (a) from specifically where within SWC does the government plan on cutting this funding; (b) when will these cuts take place; and (c) will the government provide a detailed timeline for these cuts?

Q-96² — October 3, 2006 — — With regard to the $45 million funding cuts over the next two years to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), announced in September 2006: (a) from specifically where within CMHC does the government plan on cutting this funding; (b) when will these cuts take place; and (c) will the government provide a detailed timeline for these cuts?

Q-97² — October 3, 2006 — — What studies, analyses and reports relating to the fiscal imbalance have the Department of Finance or Queen’s Privy Council produced or commissioned since January 24, 2006?

Q-98² — October 3, 2006 — — What long-term estimates (two years or longer) have been carried out or requested since January 24, 2006 by the Department of Finance or by the Queen’s Privy Council with regard to Canada's financial situation?

Q-99² — October 5, 2006 — — With regard to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) spending: (a) how much was spent on low income housing for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006; (b) what is the projected spending on low income housing for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007; and (c) what is the detailed breakdown of CMHC spending for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 and the projected fiscal year ending March 31, 2007?

Q-100² — October 12, 2006 — — With regard to the government's plans for child care: (a) how many spaces will be created by the end of March 2007 from the $650 million that was transfered to the provinces and territories to create child care spaces; (b) what kind of phase-out plan will be implemented to deal with the loss of those funds on April 1, 2007; (c) what is the timeline for launching the $250 million Child Care Spaces Initiative; and (d) how many child care spaces will be created from the $1.6 billion Universal Child Care Benefit?

Q-101² — October 12, 2006 — — With regard to the government's $55 million cut to the Summer Career Placement Program, as announced on September 25, 2006: (a) how many jobs will be lost in the not-for-profit sector; and (b) how many jobs will be lost among small businesses due to the loss of such funds?

Q-102² — October 12, 2006 — — With regard to the Toronto Port Authority: (a) what safety standards are being violated should the Q400 operated by Porter Airlines land at the Toronto City Centre Airport without the installation of an Instrument Landing System (ILS); (b) what directives have been given to NAV Canada to speed up the installation of an ILS system at the Toronto City Centre Airport; and (c) were any government funds used to support the purchase and installation of such a system at the Toronto City Centre Airport?

Q-103² — October 12, 2006 — — With respect to the Income Tax Act and the research and development incentives of the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SRED) Tax Incentive Program: (a) can the government tell us the estimated dollar value it places on unused SRED Tax Incentive Program tax credits; and (b) is the government planning to expand access to these tax credits and to amend refund provisions and, if so, which ones?


² Response requested within 45 days