Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Thursday, December 10, 2009 (No. 128)

Questions

The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.
Q-322 — June 9, 2009 — Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — With regard to the May 2009 reactor shutdown of the National Research Universal (NRU) reactor at Chalk River: (a) when was Atomic Energy of Canada Limited headquarters first made aware of leaks at the reactor; (b) when was the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission first made aware of the reactor shutdown; (c) what levels of tritium and other nuclear products were discovered in ground and water samples following the leak; (d) what levels of ambient radiation were detected in air samples; (e) what is the future expected lifespan of the NRU reactor; (f) what major improvements and safety enhancements have been made over the last five years to the NRU reactor; and (g) what is the expected restart date of the reactor?
Q-5592 — October 26, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to the disappearance of nine million sockeye salmon in British Columbia this year: (a) has the government taken into account the warning by the West Coast Regional Department before cutting the funding for the stock assessments by 50 percent over the last few years; and (b) does the government have plans to immediately strike an independent blue-ribbon scientific panel with a short mandate and, if so, speedily commit to implementing the panel’s recommendations?
Q-5602 — October 26, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to the proposed changes to Employment Insurance premiums, what is the full breakdown in cost to businesses, including small and medium enterprises, in British Columbia, for both employers and employees as a result of the new Employment Insurance premiums, broken down into cost to employees alone on a wage sliding scale, as well as the cost to employers alone?
Q-5612 — October 26, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to promises made in Budgets 2006 and 2007 concerning the mountain pine beetle infestation in British Columbia, after consultations between the government and communities affected by the mountain pine beetle, what is the detailed account of how much of the $200 million promised in Budget 2006, and the added $200 million in Budget 2007 has been disbursed, broken down by (i) department, (ii) community, including aboriginal groups?
Q-5622 — October 26, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — In detail, what are the transportation and hospitality expenses for the Chief Government Whip and Minister of State, the honourable Gordon O’Connor, and his entire exempt staff for the past 18 months, including a detailed account of the locations where Mr. O’Connor was picked up and dropped off by the driver?
Q-5642 — October 26, 2009 — Mr. Holland (Ajax—Pickering) — With regard to Correctional Services Canada (CSC): (a) what cost has been associated with the implementation of bills C-2, (passed in 39th Parliament, second Session), C-14, C-15, C-36, C-25, C-42, C-43, C-52 and C-53 (from the current session); (b) what is the inflow of inmates anticipated, broken down annually, over the next 15 years; (c) what are the budgeted annual costs for CSC, broken down by subject, over the next 15 years; (d) are there any additional costs anticipated in the next 15 years that CSC has not accounted for in their annual budget projections and, if so, what are they and how much will they cost; (e) what plans does CSC have to alter existing facilities to meet the needs of inmates and staff over the next 15 years, what is the timeline and what costs are associated with these projects; (f) are there any plans within the next 15 year to close down any of existing federal institutions; (g) what plans does CSC have regarding building new super prisons (multi-level facilities), and what is the timeline and anticipated cost; (h) what plans does CSC have to convert existing facilities into super prisons, what is the timeline and anticipated cost; (i) does CSC plan to enter into agreement with the province of Newfoundland and Labrador to build a joint provincial – federal correctional institution and, if so, what is the timeline and how much will the federal government contribute and, if not, on what grounds is the government making such a decision; (j) what is the annual breakdown over the past 15 years of CSC staff, by professional category and cost; (k) what is the projected annual breakdown for CSC staff over the next 15 years, including new hiring, broken down annually, by professional category and cost; (l) what is the annual breakdown of federal inmates over the past 15 years, including federal inmates housed in provincial and territorial institutions, broken down by sex, institution, and security level (super max, max, medium, minimum); (m) what is the projected annual breakdown of federal inmates over the next 15 years, including federal inmates housed in provincial and territorial institutions, broken down by sex, security level and institution; (n) what are the annual costs per federal inmate in the past 15 years, broken down by sex, security level, and intuition; and (o) what are the anticipated annual costs per federal inmate over the next 15 years, broken down by sex, security level, and institution?
Q-5652 — October 26, 2009 — Mr. Holland (Ajax—Pickering) — With regard to Correctional Services Canada's (CSC) prison farm program: (a) what is the plan for the prison farm lands over the next 15 years, broken down annually, and what is the anticipated cost to CSC to manage the lands, and is any profit anticipated and, if so, what is it; (b) is CSC planning on renting out these lands and, if so, what sort of process will be put into place to decide who the tenants will be, and how much is CSC anticipating it will make annually on the rental of these lands; (c) how many inmates have participated in the prison farm program over the past 15 years, broken down annually and by institution, and how many of these participants have gone on to work in agricultural or related sectors; (d) what, if any, studies, documentation or advice did CSC rely on in their decision to terminate the prison farms program, when was it received and who provided it; (e) what, if any, studies, documentation or advice did CSC receive showing the psychological, social, financial, environmental and health benefits of the prison farm program, when was it received and who provided it; and (f) what is CSC doing to replace the food that was provided through the prison farm program, and what is the annual cost to CSC of outsourcing this food, as compared to the food derived through the prison farm program over the next five years?
Q-5662 — October 26, 2009 — Mr. Holland (Ajax—Pickering) — With regard to GRK Fasteners: (a) on what grounds are duties, under the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), applied; (b) on what grounds was their petition to the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) for a SIMA exempt status denied; (c) given that GRK’s request for exemption is based on the fact that all of their products are patented, is the CITT no longer recognizing that patents make a product unique; (d) was the fact that there are no domestic manufacturers able to provide GRK with the type of product they require taken into account when the CITT made their decision and, if so, why is the SIMA duty still imposed on them and, if not, why not; and (e) does the Canada Border Services Agency or any other department or agency have reason to believe that GRK Fasteners has ever engaged in product dumping and, if so, what evidence do they possess and, if not, how then can an anti-dumping duty be applied to GRK?
Q-5682 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Goodale (Wascana) — With regard to government magazine advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in Saskatchewan; and (b) when was each advertisement published, and in which magazine?
Q-5692 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Goodale (Wascana) — With regard to government radio advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in Saskatchewan; and (b) when was each advertisement aired, and on which radio station?
Q-5712 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Goodale (Wascana) — With regard to government television advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in Saskatchewan; and (b) when was each advertisement aired, and on which station?
Q-5722 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Dhaliwal (Newton—North Delta) — With respect to the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games, what discussions regarding the reservation of tickets for purchase by Members of Parliament have occurred (i) within the department of Canadian Heritage, (ii) between the department of Canadian Heritage and the Privy Council Office?
Q-5732 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Dhaliwal (Newton—North Delta) — With respect to contracts under $10,000 granted by the Department of Citizenship and Immigration between January 1 and October 21, 2009, what are the: (a) vendors names; (b) contracts' reference numbers; (c) dates of the contracts; (d) descriptions of the services provided; (e) delivery dates; (f) original contracts' values; and (g) final contracts' values if different from the original contracts' values?
Q-5742 — October 27, 2009 — Mr. Dhaliwal (Newton—North Delta) — With respect to contracts under $10,000 granted by Sport Canada between January 1 and October 21, 2009, what are the: (a) vendors names; (b) contracts' reference numbers; (c) dates of the contracts; (d) descriptions of the services provided; (e) delivery dates; (f) original contracts' values; and (g) final contracts' values if different from the original contracts' values?
Q-5762 — October 29, 2009 — Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — With regard to fisheries and in light of the Supreme Court of British Columbia’s ruling that fish farms are a fishery and therefore must be regulated by the federal government: (a) when will the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans introduce legislation to regulate the fish farm fishery; (b) what is Canada’s commitment to sustainable aquaculture development; (c) what action is the Minister taking to protect wild fisheries like the Fraser River sockeye salmon; (d) what plans are there to transition from open net pen salmon farms to closed containment; (e) what sustainability improvements for salmon aquaculture are being contemplated; and (f) when will the Minister convene an emergency summit with all key stakeholder groups to discuss low returns on the Fraser River?
Q-5802 — October 29, 2009 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — With respect to the Listeriosis Investigative Review: (a) what is the status of each of the 75 recommendations made by Ms. Weatherill; (b) who did Ms. Weatherill interview; (c) were any of those interviewed provided with any or all of the report prior to its completion by the investigator; (d) what are the names of all consultants as well as all seconded staff from any other federal department or agency who assisted the investigator; and (e) what was the total cost of the investigation including the cost of staff, contracts, travel and rents?
Q-5812 — October 29, 2009 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — With respect to the recommendations of the Trans Fat Task Force final report, TRANSforming the Food Supply, and the government’s ensuing two year voluntary trans fat reduction period, that ended in June 2009: (a) what is the status of the release of the final round of trans fat monitoring data which was due in June 2009; (b) what is the government’s official response to the two year voluntary reduction period; and (c) what does the government plan to do regarding its stated commitment, from June 2007, to develop trans fat regulations?
Q-5832 — October 30, 2009 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With respect to the Enabling Accessibility Fund, since March 2009 to present: (a) how many applications were successful and received funding under this program, and how many were rejected; (b) with respect to successful applications, what was the location and value of each project, broken down by province and federal electoral district; (c) what is the total cost of administering the program thus far; (d) how much funding is left; (e) how many major projects under this program will or went to expand existing centres; (f) what is the value of the successful major projects' applications that went towards (i) the construction of new centres, (ii) the expanding of existing centres; (g) how many of the successful Small Projects Enabling Accessibility Funding applications went towards (i) renovating buildings, (ii) modifying vehicles, (iii) making information and communications more accessible; and (h) what is the value of the successful Small Projects Enabling Accessibility Funding applications that went towards (i) renovating buildings, (ii) modifying vehicles, (iii) making information and communication more accessible?
Q-5862 — November 4, 2009 — Mr. Dryden (York Centre) — With regard to government magazine advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in Newfoundland and Labrador; and (b) when was each advertisement published, and in which magazine?
Q-5872 — November 4, 2009 — Mr. Dryden (York Centre) — With regard to government magazine advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in New Brunswick; and (b) when was each advertisement published, and in which magazine?
Q-5882 — November 4, 2009 — Mr. Dryden (York Centre) — With regard to government magazine advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through advertising in Manitoba; and (b) when was each advertisement published, and in which magazine?
Q-5892 — November 4, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — With regard to temporary resident visa applications for both the applicant and the applicant’s Canadian host, what is the breakdown of the following admissibility criteria: (a) minimum salary range; (b) minimum income; and (c) property value in order to be granted a temporary visitor visa in the following visa office (i) Accra, (ii) Beijing, (iii) Chandigarh, (iv) Colombo, (v) Damascus, (vi) Harare, (vii) Havana, (viii) Hong Kong, (ix) Islamabad, (x) Lagos, (xi) Manila, (xii) New Delhi, (xiii) Port-au-Prince, (xiv) Shanghai, (xv) Tehran?
Q-5902 — November 5, 2009 — Mr. LeBlanc (Beauséjour) — Regarding the press conference held by the honourable Minister of Justice on October 20, 2009, at 11:00 a.m., at the Lord Elgin Hotel, what was the total cost breakdown?
Q-5912 — November 5, 2009 — Mr. LeBlanc (Beauséjour) — With regard to inmates who served at least one day of a term of imprisonment at Dorchester Penitentiary since 1990, what is the recidivism rate, broken down by year, for those who: (a) participated in the prison farm program; (b) did not participate in the prison farm program but in a different vocational program offered by CORCAN; and (c) did not participate in any program offered by CORCAN?
Q-5922 — November 5, 2009 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — With regard to the Treasury Board and the Department of Finance: (a) what process is in place for gender based analysis on departmental policies in each department; (b) what measures are put in place to ensure gender based analysis is done on legislation in each department; (c) if a policy or legislation does not achieve gender parity through a gender based analysis what measures, if any, are taken to ensure the policy or legislation is gender appropriate in each department; (d) what measures are taken to ensure gender parity in policies or legislation in each department; (e) are gender based analysis on any policy or legislation conducted in each department and, if so, what is the content of those analysis; (f) how many staff are dedicated to do gender based analysis in each department; (g) to whom do staff in (f) report to in each department; and (h) what direction does each department give to staff on gender based analysis?
Q-5932 — November 12, 2009 — Ms. Minna (Beaches—East York) — With regard to the Labour Mobility Chapter of the Agreement on Internal Trade: (a) what actions has the government taken to ease the mobility of workers across provinces; (b) which occupations are specified in the Agreement for mobility of workers; (c) are the changes that came into effect April 1, 2009 permanent or temporary; (d) how many occupations will still require additional testing in order to move between provinces, and what are those occupations; (e) who was consulted regarding the changes that came into effect on April 1, 2009; and (f) has any province been found in violation of this Agreement between January 1, 2009 and November 5, 2009 and, if so, have any fines or penalties been imposed?
Q-5942 — November 12, 2009 — Ms. Minna (Beaches—East York) — With regard to the Employment Insurance (EI) program: (a) how many individuals applied for EI between September 1, 2008 and November 5, 2009; (b) what percentage of those were women, and what percentage of those women were denied EI; (c) what percentage of (a) were part-time workers and what percentage were full-time workers; (d) what percentage of (a) were the result of (i) job loss, (ii) parental leave, (iii) compassionate leave, (iv) maternity leave; and (e) how many individuals in (b) will receive extended benefits under the legislative changes proposed in Bill C-50, An Act to Amend the Employment Insurance Act?
Q-5952 — November 12, 2009 — Ms. Minna (Beaches—East York) — With regard to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program: (a) how many applications were approved for each year from 2005 to 2009; (b) how many violations were made in each of the years in (a) by (i) employers, (ii) workers; (c) what penalties were imposed for those violations; (d) what actions has the government taken to allow organized unions to employ a temporary foreign worker if the employer for which they came to Canada to work was found in violation or fired the worker; (e) what mechanism is in place for the government to protect the workers' rights once they have arrived in Canada; and (f) will employers that have been found in violation in the past be included on the black-list the government proposed on October 9, 2009?
Q-5962 — November 16, 2009 — Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to funding for aid in the Horn of Africa Countries (Eritrea, Djibouti, Ethiopia and Somalia): (a) what is the government spending on development aid in each of the Horn of Africa countries, broken down by state, province, district and urban area; (b) what role is Canada taking in the training of security forces in each of the Horn of Africa countries, broken down by state, province, district and urban area; (c) what support, logistical or otherwise, is Canada providing to African Union forces; (d) what institutional and capacity building projects funded by Canada, directly or indirectly, are underway or under consideration in each of the Horn of Africa countries, broken down by state, province, district and urban area; (e) what are the overall Canadian aid levels or aid flows for each of the Horn of Africa countries, broken down by state, province, district and urban area; and (f) exhaustively, what bilateral and multilateral aid is provided by Canada in either the United Nations or any United Nations agencies or regional development banks such as the African Development Bank, including trust funds, for each of the Horn of Africa countries, broken down by state, province, district and urban area?
Q-5972 — November 16, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With respect to deaths related to actions by members of the RCMP: (a) for each of the last 20 years, how many deaths were in relation to (i) individuals being held in RCMP custody, (ii) inadvertent actions against bystanders, (iii) individuals being arrested by the RCMP, (iv) individuals fleeing RCMP custody; (b) in relation to these deaths, broken down by year and within each category, how many resulted in charges being laid against RCMP officers or officials; and (c) of these charges laid, broken down by year and within each category, how many charges (i) were dropped before prosecution, (ii) were prosecuted but did not result in a conviction, (iii) were prosecuted and did result in a conviction?
Q-5982 — November 17, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — With regard to the Toronto Port Authority (TPA), on a yearly basis and since its inception: (a) what amounts were incurred by the TPA on (i) public relations, (ii) lobbying; and (b) what is the breakdown of legal fees incurred by the TPA for (i) the TPA, (ii) senior executives, (iii) employees, with the justification for each legal fee amount spent?
Q-5992 — November 17, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — How much has the Toronto Port Authority spent, on a yearly basis, at the Harbour Sixty Steakhouse, broken down by (i) board members, staff and chief executive officer, (ii) meal, (iii) purpose or function, (iv) names of individuals or group representatives?
Q-6002 — November 18, 2009 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to the protection of intellectual property rights: (a) what measures is the government planning to implement in order to comply with the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement; and (b) when will these measures be presented?
Q-6012 — November 18, 2009 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to research and development (R&D): (a) what specific obligations, if any, did the government establish for General Motors and Chrysler to perform R&D activity in Canada when it agreed to provide each company with a financial rescue package in the spring of 2009; (b) what undertaking did each company provide to perform R&D in Canada; and (c) what percentage does their Canadian R&D activity represent with respect to their total R&D activity?
Q-6022 — November 18, 2009 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With respect to the Strategic Aerospace and Defense Initiative (SADI): (a) what funds have been provided by Industry Canada annually from SADI since the inception of the program; and (b) what funds have been announced but not yet allocated at this time?
Q-6032 — November 18, 2009 — Mr. Reid (Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington) — With regard to the public reports which are issued by or on behalf of the RCMP, in which information is made public as to what took place each time a taser is fired or otherwise used to control a member of the public, both in the case of the incident of Adam Dormer, who was tasered on July 21 2007, and in all other cases since January 1, 2001: (a) what changes have been made, from time to time, with regard to the types of information being released, both in terms of types of information being withheld, which had previously been made public, and types of information being made public, which had previously been withheld; (b) what instructions were given to the individuals who prepared these reports, regarding the types of information which ought to be withheld or made public; (c) who issued any such instructions, and with whom did the instructions originate; and (d) has additional information been collected, which is not being released, on any of the following topics, (i) related injuries which took place during the tasering incident, (ii) the duration of the shocks, (iii) whether the individual who was tasered had been armed, (iv) whether the individual who was tasered was violent, combative or posed a risk of death or grievous bodily harm, (v) what alternative measures the police tried before resorting to a taser, (vi) whether the individual who was tasered was first given a verbal warning, (vii) whether the individual who was tasered had already been handcuffed or otherwise restrained?
Q-6042 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — Within the constituency of Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to (i) the date the money was received in the riding, (ii) the dollar amount of the expenditure, (iii) the program from which the funding came, (iv) the ministry responsible, (v) the designated recipient?
Q-6052 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — With respect to contracts under $10,000 granted by the Economic Development Agency for the Regions of Quebec since January 1, 2008, what are: (a) the names of the contractors; (b) the amounts of the contracts; (c) the dates of the contracts; (d) the dates of completion; and (e) the descriptions of the services provided?
Q-6062 — November 19, 2009 — Mr. D'Amours (Madawaska—Restigouche) — With regard to Service Canada offices in the riding of Madawaska—Restigouche, specifically Edmunston, Saint-Quentin, Campbellton and Dalhousie: (a) how many positions were there in each of these offices in 2006; (b) how many people held these positions; (c) how many positions were there in these offices as of November 18, 2009; and (d) how many people held these positions as of November 18, 2009?
Q-6082 — November 19, 2009 — Mr. D'Amours (Madawaska—Restigouche) — With regard to the Community Adjustment Fund of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, up until November 18, 2009: (a) what amount has been allocated to each Atlantic province; (b) which projects have benefited from this funding, by province; (c) how much have these projects received, by province; and (d) in which city and constituency are these projects being carried out?
Q-6092 — November 19, 2009 — Mr. D'Amours (Madawaska—Restigouche) — With regard to the transitional measures for Employment Insurance economic regions: (a) will the economic regions change after April 10, 2010; and (b) will the transitional measures for the economic regions be completely eliminated after April 10, 2010?
Q-6102 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the government's Economic Action Plan, for each announcement in the constituency of Scarborough Southwest: (a) what was (i) the date of announcement, (ii) the amount of stimulus spending announced, (iii) the department which announced it; and (b) was there a public event associated with the announcement and, if so, what was the cost of that event and which elected officials, if any, were invited to appear?
Q-6112 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With respect to Canadian citizenship, from August 2007 to present: (a) what is the total number of permanent residents that became Canadian citizens each month; and (b) what were the dates of each citizenship ceremony, (i) what city did the ceremonies take place in, (ii) how many people were sworn in at each ceremony?
Q-6122 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the Report of the administration of the Firearms Act for the year 2008: (a) what date was the report received by Public Safety Canada; (b) what date was the report received by the Minister’s office; (c) what date did the Minister of Public Safety receive the report; (d) who made the decision on which day the report was to be tabled in the House of Commons; (e) how many days was the report in the hands of the government before it was tabled; (f) did any other departments receive the report before it was table and, if so, what date was it received; and (g) was the report, or a briefing note on the report, given to any Members of Parliament before it was tabled and, if so, to whom and on what date?
Q-6132 — November 19, 2009 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to applications for permanent residence processed by the Canadian High Commission in Nairobi: (a) how many spousal sponsorships, parental sponsorships and independent applicant cases have been received since the 2007-2008 fiscal year up to and including the current; (b) how many of the spousal sponsorships, parental sponsorships and independent applicants since the 2007-2009 fiscal year cases (i) were accepted, (ii) are still in process, (iii) have been refused, and for what reason; (c) what is the current length of time required to process the applications for (i) spousal sponsorships, (ii) parental sponsorships, (iii) independent applicants; (d) how many cases are in backlog and are or were the subject of enhanced security background checks; (e) how many staff are employed to process applications; and (f) what additional resources have been allocated to process the case backlog?
Q-6142 — November 19, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With regard to the report entitled “Violence against organized unionized workers and teachers in Colombia 2000-2008”, produced by the Conflict Analysis Resource Centre and funded by the Global Fund for Peace and Security of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade: (a) what are the statistical findings, conclusions and recommendations of the report on (i) the torture, threats, killings of workers and citizens, including the chronological breakdown, (ii) the types of crimes and violence; (b) what were the judicial procedures enacted in each case; (c) who were those responsible for the reported crimes, violence and threats identified; (d) what were the convictions that resulted from related judicial procedures; and (e) why was the report not released by the government?
Q-6152 — November 19, 2009 — Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — With regard to the March 2008 agreement between the government and the Federation of Newfoundland Indians to establish a non-reserve Mi'kmaq band in the province: (a) how many Mi'kmaq have submitted their applications through the Qalipu First Nations Enrolment Committee; (b) how many Mi'kmaq have had their applications reviewed through the Qalipu First Nations Enrolment Committee; (c) have the Mi’kmaq requested and been granted an extension to the November 30th deadline; (d) how many enrolment offices are open in Newfoundland and Labrador; and (e) has the Minister requested additional branch offices to be open to enable those who wish to register to do so?
Q-6162 — November 23, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — With regard to Canada’s transfer of detainees to Afghan authorities, what are the names and positions of individuals who received the original or copies of the following documents: KANDH-0029; KANDH-0032; IDR-0512; correspondence between Richard Colvin and CEFCOM-J9 and CEFCOM-J3 from August 21 to September 19, 2006; KBGR-0118; KBGR-0121; KBGR-0160; KBGR-0258; "Detainee Diplomatic Contingency Plan", approved by Margaret Bloodworth, National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister, April 2007; KBGR-0261; KBGR-0263; KBGR-0265; KBGR-0267; KBGR-0269; KBGR-0271; May 3, 2007 unnumbered detainee report; May 4, 2007 additional unnumbered detainee report; KBGR-0274; KBGR-0275; KBGR-0291; KBGR-0292; June 21, 2007, KBGR on detainees; KBGR-0302; and KBGR-0321?
Q-6172 — November 23, 2009 — Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — With regard to search and rescue (SAR) operations: (a) how many SAR operation reports have been produced since 1980 by the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre in Halifax in accordance with chapter nine of the National Search and Rescue Manual; (b) since 1980, what incidents warranted a SAR operation report; (c) what have been the lessons learned, conclusions and recommendations from each report and what recommendations were adopted from each report; (d) what have been the details of the SAR operation from each report, including summary of significant decisions and timelines; (e) what is the criteria for warranting a SAR operation report; (f) what are the other methods of documenting SAR operations in the Atlantic region that have been used since 1980; and (g) what are the names of the comprehensive studies conducted by the Canadian Forces in 2003 and 2005 on the location of search and rescue assets, as referred to by the Parliamentary Secretary for the Minister of Defence on October 21, 2009, during Adjournment Proceedings in the House of Commons?
Q-6182 — November 23, 2009 — Mr. Scarpaleggia (Lac-Saint-Louis) — With respect to Ste. Anne's Hospital and veterans: (a) what is the hospital’s capacity in 2009 in terms of the total number of veterans who can be cared for on a full-time basis at any one time; (b) what was this capacity in each of the last 10 years; (c) what general and specialized care is offered to veterans at the hospital; (d) can the hospital accommodate patients suffering from every stage of Alzheimer's disease; (e) what are the eligibility criteria for admission to the hospital; (f) are veterans of Allied Forces who are now Canadian citizens eligible for admission to Ste-Anne's Hospital and, if so, do Canadian Forces veterans have priority over them; (g) how many Canadian and Allied Forces veterans, respectively, are currently under full-time care at the hospital; (h) how many Canadian and Allied Forces veterans, respectively, have been under full-time care at the hospital in each of the last 10 years; (i) is there currently a waiting list for admission to the hospital; and (j) how many Canadian and Allied Forces veterans, respectively, live in southwestern Quebec?
Q-6192 — November 24, 2009 — Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With regard to the Airport Soundscape Consultative Committee for Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, of which Transport Canada is a member, and as a follow-up to the October 5, 2009 letter from the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities to the honourable Member from Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine: (a) what have been the exact measures implemented over the last 15 years by this Committee designed to minimize aircraft noise around Montreal’s airports; and (b) what impact have these measures had on minimizing aircraft noise around Montreal’s airports?
Q-6202 — November 24, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to the provision of consular affairs, for the fiscal years 2005-2006 to 2008-2009: (a) what are all foreign missions operated by the government; and (b) what is the number of staff members tasked with the provision of consular services in each mission?
Q-6212 — November 24, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With respect to the use of the government owned fleet of Challenger jets since February 2006 and for each use of the aircraft: (a) what are the names and titles of the passengers present on the flight manifest; (b) what were all the departure and arrival points of the aircraft; (c) who requested access to the fleet; and (d) who authorized the flight?
Q-6222 — November 25, 2009 — Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to consular services for Canadians abroad: (a) how many Canadians travel abroad every year without international health coverage; (b) is the government considering forcing Canadians to have health care coverage when they travel abroad; (c) how many consular assistance cases in the past 10 years are health-care related, broken down by country, detailing the total number of cases on any subject and indicating how many were health or medical issues; (d) how many of these cases as broken down in question (c) involved medical evacuations; (e) what were the specific costs of those medical evacuations, broken down by country; (f) what coverage is provided for Canadian government officials and their families when they are working abroad, and what exactly does that coverage entail (medical evacuations, hospitalization, etc.), broken down by country; (g) what is the cost of the coverage that is provided for these Canadian government officials and their families, broken down by country of service; (h) what company or companies are providing that coverage, by country; and (i) what criteria are considered in the selection of these providers, by country?
Q-6232 — November 25, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to French-language training, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 through 2008-2009: (a) how much was spent by the government on language training for new immigrants in each province and territory; and (b) what are the names of the third parties who received money for language training for new immigrants in each province and territory, and how much did each one receive?
Q-6242 — November 25, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to English-language training, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 through 2008-2009: (a) how much was spent by the government on language training for new immigrants in each province and territory; and (b) what are the names of the third parties who received money for language training for new immigrants in each province and territory, and how much did each one receive?
Q-6252 — November 25, 2009 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to the proposed new Arctic Research Station: (a) what has been done to date in the creation of this research station; (b) where will it be located; (c) what is the cost for this new facility; (d) who is doing the design, architectural and construction work; (e) what will be the annual operating and research budget for the facility; (f) how many people will staff the facility with regard to (i) operating, (ii) research; (g) when will the facility open; and (h) who will head up the facility?
Q-6262 — November 26, 2009 — Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With respect to the second year of the Treasury Board’s four-year cycle to review program spending and performance across the government and ensure value for money: (a) which 21 departments and agencies participated in the exercise and how much did each department or agency contribute towards the (i) $349 million identified for 2009-2010, (ii) $449 million identified for 2010–2011, (iii) $586 million identified for 2011–2012; and (b) for each of the participating departments and agencies, among what programs or services were the savings identified and in what amounts?
Q-6272 — November 26, 2009 — Mr. D'Amours (Madawaska—Restigouche) — With regard to the Community Development Trust Fund, up until November 18, 2009: (a) what amount has been allocated to each Atlantic province; (b) which projects have benefited from this funding, by province; (c) how much have these projects received, by province; (d) in which city and constituency are these projects being carried out?
Q-6282 — November 26, 2009 — Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With regard to the vaccine for influenza A (H1N1): (a) what contractual agreements exist between the government and GlaxoSmithKline for the production of this vaccine; and (b) what contractual agreements exist between the federal government and any provincial government for the distribution of the vaccine?
Q-6292 — November 26, 2009 — Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With regard to canola and canola-related products manufactured in Canada: (a) do these products contain any genetic use restriction technologies (GURT), also known as “terminator technologies”; and (b) have these products ever in the past contained any genetic use restriction technologies?
Q-6302 — November 26, 2009 — Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With respect to the allegations of torture of Afghan detainees: (a) what briefing materials have been prepared on this issue, since January 2006, by (i) the Department of Foreign Affairs, (ii) the Department of National Defence; and (b) what briefing materials have been prepared on this issue for members of the Conservative caucus, since January 2006, in preparation for meetings of (i) the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, (ii) the Standing Committee on National Defence?
Q-6312 — November 27, 2009 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to Canada's supply of fossil fuels: (a) what are Natural Resources Canada's estimates of Canada's total fossil fuel supplies recoverable under present economic conditions; (b) what are the government's estimates of international supplies of recoverable fossil fuels; (c) what are the government's estimates for the peaking of Canadian fossil fuel production; and (d) what are the government's estimates for the peaking of international fossil fuel production?
Q-6322 — November 30, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to the transfer of Canadian offenders from abroad to Canada, what is, for the calendar years 2005 to 2008: (a) the total number of transfer applications carried over from the previous year; (b) the total number of new applications made; (c) the number of applications that were approved; (d) the total number of applications rejected; (e) the total number of applications withdrawn by the offender; (f) the total number of cases that remained open at the end of the year; and (g) the average time that the Minister took to make a decision regarding any decided cases?
Q-6332 — December 2, 2009 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — With respect to the Expert Review Panel on Medical Isotope Production: (a) what were the criteria and rationale to choose the four members of the panel; (b) who declined to sit on the panel; (c) how many times did the panel meet; (d) who did the panel consult; (e) what was the formal mandate of the panel; (f) did the panel have the technical expertise alone to be able to understand the proposals and make recommendations; (g) what is the relation of Dr. Alexander MacEwan, the Special Advisor on Medical Isotopes to the Minister of Health, to the panel; (h) did the panel recommend to the Minister that she implement the four recommendations of the Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine mentioned at the November 23rd meeting of the Standing Committee on Health; (i) what was the process for the panel to consult with provinces and territories; (j) did the panel consult and meet with each public and private consortium that made a submission to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of their proposal; (k) will the government release the 22 submissions on ideas for isotope supply that were received and reviewed by the panel; (l) what was the role of the firm SECOR in the production of the expert panel report; (m) who, from SECOR, was assigned to this task; (n) what were the recommendations of the panel’s November 30th report to the government; (o) will the panel be dismantled or will it continue its advising role to the government following its November 30th report; and (p) what will be the outcome of the panel and the government’s next steps including but not limited to recommendations to proceed with projects, funding recommendations, or another phase of evaluations?
Q-6342 — December 2, 2009 — Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) — With regard to the government’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Counsellor created by Order in Council on March 26, 2009, what progress has the government made in providing the Counsellor with: (a) an official office space that is accessible to the public and space for the Counsellor’s staff; (b) if an office has been provided, where is it located and precisely which offices have been allocated at the given address; (c) if staff have been provided, how many staff does the Counsellor have and what are their functions; (d) what is the budget for the Counsellor’s office and staff; (e) has the Counsellor yet received any complaints in relation to Counsellor’s mandate; (f) why is there no clear and user-friendly information on the government’s Foreign Affairs and International Trade website to assist Canadians in contacting the CSR Counsellor; (g) what is the email address, fax number, phone number and address for the current Counsellor; (h) if an office and staff have not yet been provided, from where is the current Counsellor working and how is she undertaking her responsibilities as mandated by the Order in Council; and (i) if an office and staff have not yet been provided to the Counsellor, when does the Minister expect to provide them, and if they have been provided, on what date were they procured?
Q-6352 — December 3, 2009 — Mr. Dion (Saint-Laurent—Cartierville) — With regard to the Abousfian Abdelrazik case: (a) what are the names of any outside contractors hired by the government; (b) what is the value of any contracts awarded; (c) what services were rendered by the contractor; and (d) when was the contract awarded and what was the time period during which the services were carried out?
Q-6362 — December 3, 2009 — Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to lifting seniors out of poverty, what has the government done since being elected in January 2006, specifically: (a) what national and local programs have been created to specifically address poverty among seniors; (b) how much money has been spent on addressing poverty among seniors and from which government departments did this money come; (c) how much money has been given to each federal riding to address poverty among seniors; and (d) what initiatives have been undertaken to identify which ethnic groups of seniors have the greatest numbers of individuals living in poverty, and, if identified, what steps have been taken to address the needs of these ethnic groups?
Q-6372 — December 3, 2009 — Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to the latest ten appointments to the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB): (a) how many individuals were considered for these positions; (b) how many were interviewed; (c) what is the process for vetting potential candidates for IRB appointments; and (d) what criteria is used to determine the appropriate candidate for these positions?
Q-6382 — December 3, 2009 — Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to addressing youth violence: (a) what programs has the government created since being elected in January 2006 to specifically address youth violence; (b) how much money has been spent on addressing youth violence and from which government departments did this money come; and (c) how much money has been given to each federal riding to address youth violence?
Q-6392 — December 3, 2009 — Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to addressing child poverty in Canada: (a) what programs has the government created since being elected in January 2006 to specifically address child poverty; (b) how much money has been spent on addressing child poverty and from which government departments did this money come; and (c) how much money has been given to each federal riding to address child poverty?
Q-6402 — December 3, 2009 — Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With regard to the Canadian International Development Agency: (a) what percentage of Official Development Assistance (ODA) is allocated to maternal and child health; (b) which branches of ODA does the funding come from; (c) what are the programs that receive this funding; and (d) how are these programs’ performance evaluated?
Q-6412 — December 3, 2009 — Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With regard to the Development Assistance Accountability Act, requiring the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) to report annually to Parliament on its progress: (a) what reporting requirements has CIDA implemented in incorporating the Official Development Assistance Accountability Act; and (b) how are these reporting requirements evaluated?
Q-6422 — December 3, 2009 — Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With regard to KAIROS, which has lost their funding from the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), as of November 30, 2009, due to KAIROS no longer fitting CIDA priorities: (a) what are the CIDA priorities that did not fit well with the priorities of KAIROS; (b) what sort of criteria does CIDA examine to determine whether or not a non-governmental organization will receive funding; and (c) what specific criteria did KAIROS not meet to have their funding cut by CIDA?
Q-6432 — December 7, 2009 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to the report done by Natural Resources Canada "From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate 2007'', what are the estimated economic costs (2010-2050) of adaptation to the following significant impacts as identified regionally in the report: (a) rising sea levels triggering more frequent and higher storm surges, and subsequent flooding in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island; (b) rising sea levels in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island, especially in southeastern New Brunswick; (c) coastal erosion triggered by storm surges, flooding and rising sea levels, including the economic costs of infrastructure threatened by coastal erosion, in the Provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island; (d) river flooding from the increased participation and a variable winter climate in the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Prince Edward Island; (e) damage caused by the increased frequency of ice storms in the Province of Quebec; (f) infrastructure sensitivity in Nunavik due to thawing permafrost; (g) vulnerability of coastal zones to sea level rise, flood risks and saltwater intrusion into groundwater in the Province of Ontario; (h) infrastructure impacts of near shore lake warming; (i) infrastructure and transportation impacts of decreasing water levels in the Great Lakes, especially on the shipping industry; (j) impacts to the energy system from reduced hydroelectric output; (k) potential arrival of the mountain pine beetle, in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba; (l) diminished surface water resources; (m) impact of increased drought on the agricultural sector and water systems; (n) increased extreme rainfall events; (o) spread of mountain pine beetle infestation, in Canada's Northern Communities; (p) the impact on northern communities and businesses of the expected reduction in the availability of ice roads, especially in the mining industry; (q) the impact of melting permafrost on community and industrial infrastructure, including waste containment structures; (r) replacing food that has been secured through traditional and subsistence activities; (s) climate related changes in forest productivity in the Province of British Columbia (B.C.); (t) the impact of rising sea levels on coastal communities and infrastructure; (u) the impact of abrupt changes and/or distribution of pacific salmon, sardine, anchovy, and western red cedar; (v) the impact on B.C.'s hydroelectric system of water shortages; (w) the impact of drought and water shortages on agriculture in the B.C. interior, especially in the Okanagan region; (x) regarding these impacts, and others identified in the 2007 report, what is the government's climate change adaptation strategy; and (y) if the government does not have a climate change adaptation strategy, when will one be developed, and what is the mechanism for doing so?
Q-6442 — December 7, 2009 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With respect to the government's 2020 target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20% from 2006 levels: (a) what is the government assessment on how Canada will meet the 2020 target; (b) what is the government estimated emission levels for each year in the period 2010-2020, in megatonnes, specifically noting which year Canadian emissions will peak; (c) how many emission credits will need to be purchased to meet the 2020 target, and where does the government intend to purchase them from; (d) what does the government estimate the carbon price, under the carbon pricing scheme that the government plans on using, will be for each year in the period 2010-2020; and (e) in detail, following the statement of the Minister of Environment on October 29, 2009, how will the 2020 target be met with a carbon price that is $28 per tonne?
Q-6452 — December 7, 2009 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — In the matter of global warming, the thawing of the northern permafrost, and damage to infrastructure: (a) has the government conducted any studies to ascertain the level of potential damage to all government infrastructure in the Territories of Yukon, Northwest and Nunavut; (b) what is the cost associated with this damage to replace, reconstruct, or stabilize this infrastructure; (c) what is the time frame in regard to making these repairs or replacing damaged infrastructure; (d) have municipal and territorial partners been advised of the level of damage as a result of thawing permafrost; (e) have residents of the North been advised of potential hazards resulting from global warming; (f) what are the monetary costs associated with the said study; (g) when was the study conducted and by whom; (h) how is the government monitoring northern infrastructure deterioration from global warming; (i) how frequently is the infrastructure being inspected; (j) is any of the economic stimulus money earmarked for the three territories being directed to repairs or new construction of infrastructure damaged or weakened by thawing permafrost, and, if so how much; (k) what are the names of the projects, the associated costs, the location of the projects and the projected completion dates for all projects funded by earmarked money as specified in (j); and (l) given that the MacKenzie Valley pipeline is a major infrastructure project scheduled for the North, has the government applied its assessment of global warming and permafrost melting damage to this project as well, and, if so (i) what were the results, (ii) what are the government’s plans in this matter?
Q-6462 — December 8, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With respect to the upcoming climate summit in Copenhagen and climate change: (a) what criteria need to be met in order to be part of the Canadian delegation; (b) what are the name and position of each member of the Canadian delegation, what expertise and skills does each bring to the table, and for what time period will each be in Copenhagen; (c) what is the total budget for the delegation, from flights to accommodation and living expenses; (d) what, if any, offsets were purchased for the delegation; (e) what is the description, in detail, of the Canadian climate change plan, and when it will be revealed to Canadians; (f) who are all stakeholders consulted in the development of the plan, and how does each goal/target reflect or does not reflect each stakeholder's views; (g) did the government include the voice of Canadians who are on the 'front line of climate change', and were those who will be impacted by climate change meaningfully involved, and, if so, how; (h) what accountability measures, if any, are in place to ensure that the Canadian delegation will be responsible to those Canadians who will be particularly impacted (e.g. those living in low-lying areas and Aboriginal peoples); (i) what has been the stakeholder response to the plan, particularly from business, NGOs, scientists, and all stakeholders, and if available, what is the actual response of stakeholders' consulted; (j) what are the specific goals of the Canadian delegation, and how do they compare (in advance and afterward) with those of the G-20 or OECD in terms of baseline, absolute reductions, and target date; (k) will Canada back the Global Framework for Climate Services proposed by experts and policy-makers; (l) does the Canadian delegation support the notion that climate change is not just an environmental issue, but rather a human rights issue and a justice issue and, if so, what is the description, in detail, of Canada's position; (m) will the Canadian delegation listen to the world's 'frontline voice', such as Bangladesh's and the Maldives', and act upon scientific and humanitarian evidence; (n) what were the projected costs of mitigating acid precipitation and reducing chemicals that destroyed stratospheric ozone, the costs of inaction, and what were the actual costs required; (o) what are the projected costs of adapting to and mitigating climate change in Canada today, and what are the costs of inaction for each year, five years, and decade delayed; (p) will the government commit new research dollars to support global climate research and services; (q) provide a detailed accounting of what percentage of this year's stimulus was 'green', and how it was a 'triple win' for the economy, jobs, and the atmosphere, and going forward, what specific targets in Canada's climate change plan will be a 'triple win'; and (r) what are the costs the government is willing to pay to mitigate climate change, and how do these costs compare with the projected economic, environmental and social costs of climate change?
Q-6472 — December 8, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With respect to armed conflicts where Canada is both directly and indirectly involved: (a) what are the sites and in detail, Canada’s involvement; (b) how are civilians, and particularly, children, minorities, and women impacted for each identified site; (c) which identified areas have refugees and refugee camps, with the numbers of civilians, and particularly, children and minorities affected, and what are the living conditions in refugee camps if applicable; (d) what is the process for determining whether Canada becomes either directly or indirectly involved or not in a conflict, and how does Canada become involved; (e) how does the process ensure that good verifiable information is obtained from the field, particularly in areas where there is poor communication; (f) how does Canada obtain information from civilians who might be afraid to speak out, as well as NGOs, who need to have their work protected; (g) what is the process for ensuring that good information is acted upon, and what is the demonstration, if applicable, of where Canada has acted upon such evidence with regard to identified sites; (h) does Canada invest in development and reintegration in areas to ensure alternative lifestyles for civilians and, if so, in which areas specifically; and (i) what are the other sites, by countries, where Canada is aware of an armed conflict but is not involved?
Q-6482 — December 8, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With respect to humanitarian issues and crisis and Canada’s involvement: (a) how does Canada increase awareness around the world that abuse of children, minorities, women, etc. will be punished; (b) how often is humanitarian evidence examined in Canada, and by whom; (c) what accountability measures are in place to demonstrate Canada’s commitments with respect to human rights internationally; (d) what processes are in place to give Canadian family members information, and to give information on how to help; (e) what processes are in place or can be put in place to allow Canadians to sponsor family members more quickly if required; (f) what, if any, audit process follows Canada’s direct or indirect involvement during a humanitarian crisis; (g) what, if any, process follows the resolution of a humanitarian crisis, and how Canada performed with respect to it; (h) what opportunity, if any, is there for Canadians to have their input in such an audit process; and (i) with respect to Canada’s involvement during last year's crisis in Sri Lanka, (i) what, if any, audit will follow Canada’s involvement, (ii) what, if any, evidence is Canada receiving that might suggest violations against children, minorities, and women, (iii) what steps, if applicable, is Canada taking to address such evidence?
Q-6492 — December 8, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to the cuts to the budget of the Canada Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (CISTI), Canada’s national science library: (a) what is the total amount of the cuts; (b) how many people will lose their jobs because of these cuts; (c) what are the predicted impacts on CISTI’s ability to fulfill its mandate with these cuts; (d) will CISTI still be able to maintain a comprehensive and current collection of scientific, technical, and medical (STM) journals, and what processes will be put in place to decide what cuts, if any, need to be made; (e) what are the predicted impacts to stakeholders in the National Research Council of Canada (NRC), to universities across Canada and to the world, and in industry; (f) how might onsite library services to NRC researchers at its various laboratories across Canada be affected; (g) what will be the impact of these cuts on CISTI’s Information and Intelligence Services, its document delivery services, and the NRC Research Press; (h) what is the predicted impact on Canadian research; (i) will NRC Research press publications still be available by way of the Depository Services Program, and if not, will this restrict access to these important publications; and (j) what will be the impact of these cuts on researchers at Canada’s small and medium-sized enterprises, and what, if any, stakeholders have been consulted about these cuts?
Q-6502 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Cannis (Scarborough Centre) — With regard to the Building Canada Fund: (a) what projects are being funded; (b) what federal electoral district is each project located in; (c) who applied for the funding for each project; and (d) what is the exact amount of money allocated to each project?
Q-6512 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Cannis (Scarborough Centre) — With regard to the Recreational Infrastructure Canada Fund: (a) what projects are being funded; (b) in what federal electoral district is each project located; (c) who applied for the funding for each project; and (d) what is the exact amount of money allocated to each project?
Q-6522 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Cannis (Scarborough Centre) — With regard to the Knowledge Infrastructure Program: (a) what projects are being funded; (b) in what federal electoral district is each project located; (c) who applied for the funding for each project; and (d) what is the exact amount of money allocated to each project?
Q-6532 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Cannis (Scarborough Centre) — With regard to the Community Adjustment Fund: (a) what projects are being funded; (b) in what federal electoral district is each project located; (c) who applied for the funding for each project; and (d) what is the exact amount of money allocated to each project?
Q-6542 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore) — With regard to the redaction of memos released to the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan: (a) what specific department or office was responsible for this process; and (b) what input did the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Department of National Defence, the Privy Council Office or any other ministry have in this process?
Q-6552 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore) — With regard to the Public Appointments Commission: (a) how much money has been spent on this office to date; (b) in detail, what was this money spent on; and (c) how many employees or contractors have been hired under the money allocated to this office?
Q-6562 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore) — With regard to the Status of Women Canada: (a) how many funding applications or requests has this office received since 2006; (b) how many funding requests were granted since 2006; and (c) what is the name of each organization or individual who received funding from Status of Women Canada since 2006?
Q-6572 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — With regard to the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan: (a) what legal opinion or opinions did the government receive regarding the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel’s opinion dated October 23, 2009 on the disclosure of information to the committee; (b) who provided that legal opinion or opinions and on what date; (c) what arguments were used to form that opinion or opinions; and (d) was there any disagreement or difference of opinion among those providing that advice and, if so, what was the nature of the disagreement or difference of opinion?
Q-6582 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — With respect to the Department of Defence for all contracts under $10,000 signed between December 1, 2008 and December 8, 2009, what is the: (a) vendor name; (b) contract reference number; (c) contract date; (d) description of work; (e) delivery date; (f) original contract value; and (g) final contract value if different from the original?
Q-6592 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — With regard to Canada’s mission in Afghanistan: (a) how many times has the government notified the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission (AIHRC) of allegations of abuse, mistreatment, or torture of Canadian-transferred detainees; (b) on which dates were those notifications sent (please list all); (c) did the government follow-up on these or any other investigation with regards to allegations or evidence of abuse, mistreatment, or torture of Canadian-transferred detainees to ensure that each of the allegations had been investigated; (d) what were the results of these investigations, in detail and for each instance; (e) what did the government do to assure itself that the allegations had been sufficiently investigated by the AIHRC or any other entity; (f) were any records or files kept on these investigations; and (g) were any of these investigations deemed to be insufficient and, if so, what was done to remedy this?
Q-6602 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — With regard to Canada’s mission in Afghanistan: (a) did the government ever request legal opinions regarding Canada’s domestic and international legal responsibility for detainees captured by the Canadian military or military police in Afghanistan and transferred to Afghan authorities; (b) if so, who was it requested by and who was it provided by; (c) what actions, policies, or standard operating procedures were developed within each entity as a result of this advice; and (d) did this legal advice contribute to the formulation of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada's diplomatic contingency plan related to detainees?
Q-6612 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With regard to fisheries: (a) what specific measures has the Department of Fisheries and Oceans taken to enforce inland fisheries regulations in the vicinity of Phase II and III of the Trans-Labrador Highway; and (b) what specific measures will the Department take to enforce inland fisheries regulations in the vicinity of Phase II and III of the Trans-Labrador Highway?
Q-6622 — December 8, 2009 — Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With regard to government television advertising: (a) how much has the government spent on promoting Canada's National Anti-Drug Strategy; (b) which department commissioned the recent or current television spot; (c) how much did it cost to produce this ad; (d) which firm produced the ad; and (e) how many such spots have aired, or planned to air, per week, on each television station, network, or channel?

2 Response requested within 45 days