House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Order PaperNo. 126 Tuesday, February 8, 2011 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Order of Business |
Daily Routine of Business — at 10:00 a.m. |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
| No. 1 |
| June 16, 2010 — The Minister of Labour — Bill entitled “An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of air service operations”. |
| Recommendation |
| (Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2)) |
| Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of air service operations”. |
Statements by Ministers |
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| No. 1 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act (programming provided by the Corporation)”. |
| No. 3 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to prevent the use of the Internet to distribute pornographic material involving children”. |
| No. 4 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to promote the teaching of aboriginal history and culture in Canada's schools”. |
| No. 5 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (interest rates on debts owed) and to make a consequential amendment to the Income Tax Regulations”. |
| No. 6 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act (marriage after the age of sixty years)”. |
| No. 7 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the labelling of bottled water”. |
| No. 8 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda)”. |
| No. 9 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deductibility of expense of tools provided as a requirement of employment)”. |
| No. 10 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Volpe (Eglinton—Lawrence) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (electronic stability control)”. |
| No. 11 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (no interest on repayments)”. |
| No. 12 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sports betting)”. |
| No. 13 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (benefits for illness, injury or quarantine)”. |
| No. 14 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Access to Information Act (improved access)”. |
| No. 15 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief against educational or other institution)”. |
| No. 16 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deduction for medical doctors in underserviced areas)”. |
| No. 18 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consent)”. |
| No. 19 |
| March 3, 2010 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to limit the use of phosphorus in dishwasher detergent”. |
| No. 20 |
| March 3, 2010 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (use of hand-held cellular telephone while operating a motor vehicle)”. |
| No. 21 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a day to honour Canada’s marine industry”. |
| No. 22 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (minimum wage)”. |
| No. 23 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish National Ovarian Cancer Month”. |
| No. 24 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Pierre Elliott Trudeau Day”. |
| No. 25 |
| March 3, 2010 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (amphetamines)”. |
| No. 26 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (equity investments)”. |
| No. 27 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 and the Income Tax Act (pension contribution holidays)”. |
| No. 28 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (employer-sponsored pension plans)”. |
| No. 29 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding the inclusion of the Queen Charlotte Islands as a prescribed northern zone under the Income Tax Act”. |
| No. 30 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Food Day”. |
| No. 31 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act (annual report)”. |
| No. 32 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the review of the National Building Code of Canada, 2005, to provide the greatest degree of protection to firefighters”. |
| No. 33 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Library and Archives of Canada Act (establishment of the National Portrait Gallery)”. |
| No. 34 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — Bill entitled “An Act to bring the Food and Drug Regulations in line with the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality”. |
| No. 36 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards”. |
| No. 37 |
| March 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (special benefits)”. |
| No. 38 |
| March 4, 2010 — Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (body armour)”. |
| No. 39 |
| March 4, 2010 — Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (leaving province to avoid warrant of arrest or committal)”. |
| No. 40 |
| March 4, 2010 — Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (tax credit for voters)”. |
| No. 41 |
| March 31, 2010 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the National Anthem Act (gender neutral)”. |
| No. 42 |
| April 12, 2010 — Ms. Cadman (Surrey North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (possession of prohibited or restricted firearm with ammunition)”. |
| No. 43 |
| April 14, 2010 — Ms. Lalonde (La Pointe-de-l'Île) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada-Israel Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (goods originating from settlements)”. |
| No. 44 |
| May 26, 2010 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Hazardous Products Act (noise limit for children's products)”. |
| No. 45 |
| May 26, 2010 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Bank Act (automated banking machine charges)”. |
| No. 46 |
| June 14, 2010 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Oil and Gas Operations Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act (moratorium)”. |
| No. 47 |
| June 15, 2010 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Records Act (pardon)”. |
| No. 48 |
| September 23, 2010 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (universal child care benefit)”. |
| No. 49 |
| October 5, 2010 — Ms. Ratansi (Don Valley East) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Dystonia Awareness Week”. |
| No. 50 |
| November 3, 2010 — Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — Bill entitled “An Act to change the name of the electoral district of Victoria”. |
| No. 51 |
| November 15, 2010 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Hazardous Products Act and the Textile Labelling Act (animal fur or skin)”. |
| No. 52 |
| December 8, 2010 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Currency Act (levy on financial transactions)”. |
| No. 53 |
| December 14, 2010 — Mr. Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (deductions for non-attendance)”. |
| No. 54 |
| January 31, 2011 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a national strategy to reduce the incidence of serious injury in amateur sport”. |
| No. 55 |
| February 3, 2011 — Mr. Armstrong (Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the Marine Mammals Regulations (seal fishery observation licence)”. |
| No. 56 |
| February 4, 2011 — Mr. Calandra (Oak Ridges—Markham) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the establishment of a National Strategy for the Purchase and Sale of Second-hand Precious Metal Articles”. |
First Reading of Senate Public Bills |
|
| S-7 — November 16, 2010 — The Minister of Public Safety — An Act to deter terrorism and to amend the State Immunity Act. |
Motions |
|
| No. 1 |
| March 11, 2010 — Ms. Demers (Laval) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, March 10, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 2 |
| March 18, 2010 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 3 |
| March 18, 2010 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 4 |
| March 18, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 5 |
| March 18, 2010 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 6 |
| March 18, 2010 — Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 7 |
| March 18, 2010 — Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 8 |
| March 30, 2010 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, March 30, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 9 |
| March 30, 2010 — Mr. Lee (Scarborough—Rouge River) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, March 29, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 10 |
| March 30, 2010 — Mr. Dion (Saint-Laurent—Cartierville) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, March 29, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 11 |
| March 31, 2010 — Mr. Calandra (Oak Ridges—Markham) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, March 30, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 12 |
| March 31, 2010 — Mrs. Block (Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 13 |
| March 31, 2010 — Mrs. Block (Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 14 |
| April 16, 2010 — Ms. Faille (Vaudreuil-Soulanges) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, March 29, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 15 |
| May 3, 2010 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Monday, May 3, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 16 |
| May 11, 2010 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 17 |
| May 11, 2010 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 18 |
| June 9, 2010 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 19 |
| June 16, 2010 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 16, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 20 |
| September 22, 2010 — Mr. Braid (Kitchener—Waterloo) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Wednesday, March 31, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 21 |
| September 22, 2010 — Mr. Hoback (Prince Albert) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 22 |
| September 22, 2010 — Mr. Payne (Medicine Hat) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Wednesday, March 31, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 23 |
| October 18, 2010 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, October 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 24 |
| November 3, 2010 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, November 3, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, March 3, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 25 |
| November 15, 2010 — Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 26 |
| November 22, 2010 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that it have the power, during its consideration of Bill C-501, An Act to amend the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and other Acts (pension protection), to amend section 136 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. |
| No. 27 |
| November 25, 2010 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, November 24, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 28 |
| November 25, 2010 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Wednesday, November 24, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 29 |
| November 26, 2010 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 30 |
| November 26, 2010 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 31 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, November 24, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 32 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, October 21, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, February 18, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 33 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Dosanjh (Vancouver South) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 34 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, October 18, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 35 |
| November 26, 2010 — Ms. Coady (St. John's South—Mount Pearl) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Wednesday, November 24, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 36 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 37 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Friday, November 19, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 38 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 39 |
| November 26, 2010 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Friday, November 19, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Saturday, March 19, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 40 |
| December 3, 2010 — Mr. Lunney (Nanaimo—Alberni) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, November 3, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, March 3, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 41 |
| December 9, 2010 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, December 9, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 8, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 42 |
| December 9, 2010 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented on Thursday, December 9, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 8, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 43 |
| December 13, 2010 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, December 8, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 44 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented on Thursday, December 9, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 8, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 45 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Clarke (Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented on Thursday, December 9, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 8, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 46 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Rickford (Parliamentary Secretary for Official Languages) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Monday, November 29, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Tuesday, March 29, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 47 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mrs. O'Neill-Gordon (Miramichi) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Monday, November 29, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Tuesday, March 29, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 48 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Van Kesteren (Chatham-Kent—Essex) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, December 15, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 49 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, December 15, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 50 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, December 9, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, April 8, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 51 |
| December 15, 2010 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, December 15, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 52 |
| January 27, 2011 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, December 15, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 53 |
| January 27, 2011 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, December 14, 2010, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, April 13, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 54 |
| February 2, 2011 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 55 |
| February 3, 2011 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Monday, January 31, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 56 |
| February 3, 2011 — Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — That the 26th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Monday, May 2, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 57 |
| February 3, 2011 — Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — That the 25th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Monday, May 2, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 58 |
| February 3, 2011 — Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — That the 24th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Monday, May 2, 2011, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 59 |
| February 3, 2011 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 60 |
| February 3, 2011 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — That the 13th Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 61 |
| February 3, 2011 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
|
The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.
|
|
Government Orders |
Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m. |
Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. |
Government Orders |
Private Members' Business — from 5:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. |