No. 2 |
— May 6, 2010 — — Consideration at report stage of Bill , , as reported by the with an amendment. |
Statements by Speaker regarding Royal Recommendation — June 2, November 16, 2009 and March 5, 2010 (See Debates). |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— June 8, 2009 |
Committee Report — presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-50. |
Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
No. 6 |
— March 3, 2010 — — Consideration at report stage of Bill , , as reported by the without amendment. |
Statements by Speaker regarding Royal Recommendation — February 25, June 3, 2009 and March 5, 2010 (See Debates). |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— March 9, 2009 |
Committee Report — presented on Thursday, November 5, 2009, Sessional Paper No. 8510-402-150. |
Statement by Speaker — see Journals of Thursday, November 19, 2009. |
Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
No. 8 |
— May 6, 2010 — — Consideration at report stage of Bill , , as reported by the without amendment. |
Statements by Speaker regarding Royal Recommendation — June 2, October 29, 2009 and March 5, 2010 (See Debates). |
Committee Report — presented on Thursday, May 6, 2010, Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-51. |
Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
No. 11 |
† — March 24, 2010 — — Consideration at report stage of Bill , , as reported by the with amendments. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— March 2, 2009 |
— March 9, 2009 |
— March 10, 2009 |
Committee Report — presented on Wednesday, March 24, 2010, Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-15. |
Statement by Speaker — see Journals of Thursday, April 29, 2010. |
Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
No. 14 |
M-513 — May 13, 2010 — On or after Monday, June 7, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should encourage and assist provincial and territorial governments, the medical community and other groups to lessen the burden on Canada's health care system through: (a) an increased adoption of technological developments; (b) a better recognition of the changing roles of health care professionals and the needs of Canadians; and (c) a greater focus on strategies for healthy living and injury prevention. |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 16 |
— May 25, 2010 — On or after Wednesday, June 9, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— November 3, 2009 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 17 |
— May 26, 2010 — On or after Thursday, June 10, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— March 5, 2010 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 18 |
M-517 — May 27, 2010 — On or after Friday, June 11, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs be instructed to recommend changes to the Standing Orders and other conventions governing Oral Questions, and to consider, among other things, (i) elevating decorum and fortifying the use of discipline by the Speaker, to strengthen the dignity and authority of the House, (ii) lengthening the amount of time given for each question and each answer, (iii) examining the convention that the Minister questioned need not respond, (iv) allocating half the questions each day for Members, whose names and order of recognition would be randomly selected, (v) dedicating Wednesday exclusively for questions to the Prime Minister, (vi) dedicating Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday for questions to Ministers other than the Prime Minister in a way that would require Ministers be present two of the four days to answer questions concerning their portfolio, based on a published schedule that would rotate and that would ensure an equitable distribution of Ministers across the four days; and that the Committee report its findings to the House, with proposed changes to the Standing Orders and other conventions, within six months of the adoption of this order; |
And of the amendment of , seconded by , — That the motion be amended by replacing the words “recommend changes to” with the word “study” and by replacing all the words after “(iii)” with “allocating half the questions each day for Members, whose names and order of recognition would be randomly selected, (iv) whether the practices of the Westminster Parliament in the United Kingdom, such as dedicating Wednesday exclusively for questions to the Prime Minister, and dedicating Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday for questions to Ministers other than the Prime Minister in a way that would require Ministers be present two of the four days to answer questions concerning their portfolio, based on a published schedule that would rotate and that would ensure an equitable distribution of Ministers across the four days, are appropriate and useful in a Canadian context, (v) whether there are other practices of other parliaments based on the Westminster model that may be adopted and adapted to a Canadian context; and that the Committee report its findings to the House within six months of the adoption of this order.”. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , and — April 16, 2010 |
, , , , , , , , , and — April 22, 2010 |
, and — April 29, 2010 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 19 |
— May 28, 2010 — On or after Monday, June 14, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— May 26, 2010 |
— May 27, 2010 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 20 |
M-518 — May 31, 2010 — On or after Tuesday, June 15, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) recognize that improved competitiveness will continue to stimulate economic growth and create jobs for Canadians; and (b) continue to diversify and expand markets for Canadian goods and services by encouraging investment in Canada through lower corporate tax rates, maintaining a stable economy and the signing of free trade agreements. |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 21 |
— June 1, 2010 — On or after Wednesday, June 16, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— November 3, 2009 |
— November 4, 2009 |
and — November 5, 2009 |
— November 12, 2009 |
— May 4, 2010 |
— May 5, 2010 |
— May 6, 2010 |
— May 7, 2010 |
— May 13, 2010 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 22 |
M-519 — June 2, 2010 — On or after Thursday, June 17, 2010 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, in order to ensure the long-term ecological and economic vitality of the Lake of the Woods and Rainy River Basin, the governments of Canada and the United States should continue to foster trans-jurisdictional coordination and collaboration on science and management activities to enhance and restore water quality in the Lake of the Woods and Rainy River Basin, by referring the matter of Lake of the Woods water quality to the International Joint Commission for examination, reporting, and recommendations regarding the binational management of the international waters of the Lake of the Woods and Rainy River system and the International Joint Commission's potential role in this watershed, in line with the International Watersheds Initiative. |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |