Skip to main content
;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 182

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

2:00 p.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

November 20, 2012 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 20, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

November 20, 2012 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Thursday, November 8, 2012, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Friday, March 8, 2013, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

November 20, 2012 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, June 8, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

Questions

Q-10622 — November 20, 2012 — Mr. Regan (Halifax West) — With respect to the Department of National Defence: (a) how many complaints of racial discrimination were filed each year between 2000 and 2011; (b) how many complaints originated in each province or territory; (c) what was the location where the alleged racial discrimination took place; (d) how many complaints involved (i) military personnel, (ii) civilian personnel; (e) how many complaints were (i) investigated, (ii) found to be valid, (iii) resulted in discipline; and (f) what is the file number and date of each complaint?
Q-10632 — November 20, 2012 — Mr. Casey (Charlottetown) — With respect to funding announcements regarding veterans: (a) how much of the $300,000 announced on August 7, 2006 for renovations to the Robert L. Knowles Veterans’ Unit at the Villa Chaleur Nursing Home in Bathurst, New Brunswick was spent, and what was the breakdown of that amount; (b) how much of the $10,000,000 in funding announced in Budget 2007 to establish five new Operational Stress Injury (OSI) Clinics across Canada has been spent, broken down by OSI Clinic; (c) how much of the $1.5 million announced on June 25, 2007 to establish a new OSI Clinic in Fredericton was spent, and what was the breakdown of that amount; (d) since the announcement of $850,000 in increased funding for the Calgary Carewest OSI Clinic in 2007, what has been the Clinic’s annual budget for each fiscal year to present date; (e) how much of the possible $18,500,000 payable to Right Management over four years under its national contract for the Job Placement Program announced on October 25, 2007, has been spent, broken down by amount spent annually; (f) since the announcement of $1,400,000 in increased funding for the Quebec OSI Clinic on November 16, 2007, what has been the Clinic’s annual budget for each fiscal year to present date; (g) how much of the possible $20,000,000 payable to CanVet VR Services over three years to provide the vocational components of Veterans Affairs Canada’s broader Rehabilitation Program announced on May 21, 2009, has been spent, broken down by amount spent annually; (h) how much of the $114,500,000 earmarked to compensate Agent Orange victims has been spent, broken down by amount spent annually; and (i) how much of the $2,000,000,000 announced on September 19, 2010, “to ensure that veterans who have been seriously injured in the service of Canada have access to the support they deserve” has been spent, broken down by both the amount spent annually and the project/initiative under which the money was spent?
Q-10642 — November 20, 2012 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the Competition Bureau: (a) how many investigations have been launched since 2006, sorted by (i) year, (ii) economic sector of the companies under investigation; (b) how many indictments have been brought since 2006, sorted by year; (c) how many investigations have not resulted in indictments since 2006, sorted by year; (d) how many Bureau staff have been assigned to investigations since 2006, sorted by year; (e) how many interim injunctions have been issued since 2006, sorted by year; (f) how many convictions have resulted from Bureau investigations since 2006, sorted by year; (g) how many fines have been collected since 2006, sorted by year; (h) what measures have been implemented as part of the Anti-Bid-Rigging Program since 2006; (i) what has been the total number of Bureau employees since 2006, sorted by year; (j) how many employees have been assigned to the Anti-Bid-Rigging Program since 2006, sorted by year; and (k) when are the Bureau’s 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 annual reports expected to be published?
Q-10652 — November 20, 2012 — Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry) — With regard to Environment Canada’s Habitat Stewardship Program: (a) what are the names and places and provinces of origin of the organizations that received funding in each year since the 2006–2007 fiscal year; (b) what were the funding amounts for this program in each year since the 2006–2007 fiscal year; and (c) what were the (i) expired, (ii) transferred, (iii) unused funding amounts in each year since 2006–2007?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

Private Members' Business

C-398 — October 16, 2012 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Ms. Laverdière (Laurier-Sainte-Marie), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-398, An Act to amend the Patent Act (drugs for international humanitarian purposes), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — March 1, 2012
Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — September 13, 2012
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — September 20, 2012
Mrs. Sellah (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert), Ms. Ashton (Churchill), Mr. Larose (Repentigny), Mr. Ravignat (Pontiac), Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), Ms. LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard), Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) and Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — October 5, 2012
Mr. Nantel (Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher) and Ms. Leslie (Halifax) — October 16, 2012
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).

2 Response requested within 45 days