Skip to main content
;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
Status of House Business
PDF

Notice Paper

No. 241

Friday, April 26, 2013

10:00 a.m.

Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Sullivan (York South—Weston) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Navigable Waters Protection Act (Humber River)”.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Navigable Waters Protection Act (Goldstream River)”.

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Thursday, December 6, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Thursday, November 8, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Monday, May 28, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, March 6, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Tuesday, March 13, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Monday, March 12, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Monday, May 7, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Co-operatives, presented on Monday, September 17, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Nineth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, June 8, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 20, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Monday, September 24, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, October 24, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 8, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Monday, May 14, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Nineth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, December 12, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Thursday, June 21, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, March 28, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Thursday, March 1, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Nineth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Thursday, June 7, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Wednesday, December 14, 2011, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Thursday, March 1, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, November 7, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, June 20, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, June 20, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, April 25, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Nineth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 21, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, April 4, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, April 2, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, March 28, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Tuesday, November 27, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, May 2, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, September 25, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Monday, April 23, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Wednesday, February 15, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, October 15, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Tuesday, May 1, 2012, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
April 25, 2013 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, December 12, 2011, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

Questions
Q-13262 — April 25, 2013 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to homicides and attempted homicides among Somali-Canadian males in Canada since 2006: (a) what are the dates of each death, listed chronologically, and for each death, indicate (i) the location where the death occurred, (ii) the Canadian home location if not the location of the death, (iii) the cause of death, (iv) whether the homicide was solved or not, and if unsolved, for how many years the death has remained unsolved, and how the time period compares with the average time to resolve homicides for the Canadian population as a whole, (v) whether a reward to solve the homicide was offered or not, and if a reward was offered, how much was offered, if the reward was ever claimed, (vi) whether in any given homicide case there is any on-going investigation, (vii) if this information cannot be provided, why not; (b) what are the dates of each attempted, listed homicide chronologically, and for each, indicate (i) the location where the attempt occurred, (ii) the Canadian place of origin if not the location of the attempt, (iii) whether the attempted homicide was solved or not, and if unsolved, for how many years the attempt has remained unsolved, and how the time period compares with the average time to resolve homicides for the Canadian population as a whole, (iv) whether a reward was offered or not, and if a reward was offered, how much was offered, and if the reward was ever claimed, (v) whether in any given case there is any on-going investigation, (vi) if this information cannot be provided, why not; (c) for each year, what is the number of Somali-Canadian homicides that occurred by Canadian city, (i) what percentage did Somali-Canadian homicides comprise of the total homicides in the identified city by year, (ii) what percentage of Somali-Canadian homicides by city by year went unsolved compared with that of the general Canadian population, (iii) what percentage does the Somali-Canadian population comprise for each identified city, and how does this percentage compare with the percentage of Somali-Canadian homicides for the city for each year, (iv) if this information cannot be provided, why not; (d) for each year, list the number of Somali-Canadian attempted homicides that occurred by Canadian city, (i) what percentage did Somali-Canadian attempted homicides comprise of the total attempted homicides in the identified city by year, (ii) what percentage of Somali-Canadian attempted homicides by city went unsolved compared with that of the general Canadian population in the identified city by year, (iii) what percentage does the Somali-Canadian population comprise for each identified city, and how does this percentage compare with the percentage of Somali-Canadian attempted homicides for the city, (iv) if this information cannot be provided, why not; (e) what research and investment has the government undertaken to explore these homicides and attempted homicides, and if any, what are the studies, dates, and monetary investment, and specifically (i) the total actual number of deaths and whether or not the violence is increasing, (ii) from what Canadian cities are the victims, (iii) what are the causes of the violence, and can they be reduced, (iv) what are solutions to stem the violence; (f) what, if any, research or investment has been given to consider whether (i) a federal judicial task force should investigate why so many Somali-Canadians are killed in Canada, many without corresponding charges or arrests, (ii) the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security or a special committee should investigate these deaths, and make recommendations to reduce the violence; (g) what research or investment has been given to consider whether a provincial-federal employment and opportunity program supporting Somali-Canadians might help reduce the violence, and if any, list the studies, dates, and actual investment; (h) what research or investment has been given to support Somali-Canadians in accessing employment opportunities with the RCMP and the Ontario Provincial Police, and if any, list the studies, dates, and actual investment; (i) what research or investment has been given to strengthening the witness protection program to encourage more witnesses to come forward, and if any, list the studies, dates, and actual investment; (j) what research or investment has been given to reducing homicides and attempted homicides among the Somali-Canadian population and, if any, what are the studies, dates, and actual investment, and any recommendations to reduce the violence; and (k) what, if any, research or investment has been given to estimating (i) the direct and indirect health care costs of each attempted homicide, (ii) the costs to the mental health care and social care system to support the victim and family, (iii) how these costs compare with any federal inquiry or study by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security or a special committee to study the issue and provide preventive recommendations, and list any studies, dates, and actual investment?
Q-13272 — April 25, 2013 — Mr. Casey (Charlottetown) — With respect to the Community Volunteer Income Tax Program (CVITP) in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island: (a) what is the level of support the CVITP has received from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) over the past five years, broken down by fiscal year, including (i) the nature of the support offered each year, (ii) the cost to CRA to provide this support; and (b) does CRA have plans to reduce, eliminate, increase, or restore support to the CVITP in Charlottetown?
Q-13282 — April 25, 2013 — Mr. Casey (Charlottetown) — With respect to correspondence from Parliamentarians addressed to the Minister of National Revenue, for the period September 1, 2010 to the present: (a) what is the amount of correspondence, initiated by Parliamentarians (MPs and Senators), that has gone unanswered (i) after three months, (ii) after six months; (b) what percentage of correspondence not answered after three months was from (i) Conservative MPs and Senators, (ii) Liberal MPs and Senators, (iii) NDP MPs, (iv) other MPs and Senators; (c) what percentage of correspondence not answered after six months was from (i) Conservative MPs and Senators, (ii) Liberal MPs and Senators, (iii) NDP MPs, (iv) other MPs and senators; and (d) what is the average response time for correspondence received from (i) Conservative MPs or Senators, (ii) Liberal MPs or Senators, (iii) NDP MPs, (iv) other MPs or Senators?
Q-13292 — April 25, 2013 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — With regard to government funding specifically dedicated to ending violence against women, what was the total amount of funding, broken down by fiscal year, from fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including fiscal year 2011-2012, broken down by (i) the department or agency responsible for the funding, (ii) the program or initiative from which the funding came, (iii) the project name, (iv) the total value of the project, (v) description of the project, (vi) entity responsible for delivering the project, (vii) length of the project, (viii) geographic target of the project, if applicable, by province and federal riding?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions

Private Members' Business
C-480 — February 27, 2013 — Mr. Pilon (Laval—Les Îles) — Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities of Bill C-480, An Act to amend the Old Age Security Act (funeral arrangements).
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie), Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) and Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — April 25, 2013
2 Response requested within 45 days
Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page