House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 258 Wednesday, May 29, 2013 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-13822 — May 28, 2013 — Mr. Regan (Halifax West) — With regard to the Canadian Radio-Television Telecommunications Commission (CRTC): (a) what is the position of the government on the matter of overturning decisions of the CRTC; (b) what criteria or policies are used by the Cabinet to overturn decisions of the CRTC; (c) how many times since 2006 has the Cabinet overturned decisions of the CRTC, (i) what were those decisions; and (d) who are the current members of the CRTC and what are each member’s date of appointment or reappointment? |
| Q-13832 — May 28, 2013 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to funds, grants, loans and loan guarantees the government issued through its various departments and agencies in the areas with postal codes beginning in V6B, V6E, V6G, V6J, V5Y, V5Z, V6A, V7Y, V6H, V6Z, V6C, V7X and V5T for the period of January 24, 2006, to May 27, 2013, inclusive, what funds, grants, loans and loan guarantees has the government issued and, in each case, where applicable, (i) what was the program under which the payment was made, (ii) what were the names of the recipients, (iii) what was the monetary value of the payment made, (iv) what was the percentage of program funding covered by the payment received? |
| Q-13842 — May 28, 2013 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to Marchese Hospital Solutions’ communications with Health Canada from January 1, 2010 to May 15, 2013: (a) on what dates did Health Canada receive any form of communication from Marchese Hospital Solutions; (b) what was the subject matter of each form of communication; (c) did Health Canada respond to each form of communication received; and (d) did Marchese Hospital Solutions request to be regulated by Health Canada? |
| Q-13852 — May 28, 2013 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to the Northern Dimension Partnership in Public Health and Social Well-Being (NDPHS): (a) on what date did the government commit to participate in the partnership; (b) what was Canada’s committed annual financial contribution; (c) has Canada ever made a financial contribution to the NDPHS and, if so, how much; (d) what groups and organizations did the government consult in its decision to withdraw from the NDPHS; (e) has the government received any form of communication from other members of the NDPHS regarding Canada’s withdrawal from the partnership; and (f) was the Minister of Health ever advised on withdrawing from the NDPHS by her department and, if so, what was the department’s recommendation? |
| Q-13862 — May 28, 2013 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — With regard to the Federal Framework on Suicide Prevention: (a) what actions has the government taken to implement this framework; (b) what groups and organizations have made submissions to Health Canada or the Public Health Agency of Canada; (c) has Health Canada or the Public Health Agency of Canada invited any groups, individuals or organizations to make submissions; (d) what is the department’s timeline to implement the framework; (e) will there be public consultations on the framework and, if so, when will they be held; and (f) what are the federal departments or agencies involved in the development of the framework? |
| Q-13872 — May 28, 2013 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — With regard to government spending in the constituency of Outremont, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, broken down by (i) the date the money was received in the riding, (ii) the dollar amount of the expenditure; (iii) the program from which the funding came, (iv) the dollar amount of the expenditure, (v) the designated recipient? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-447 — May 28, 2013 — Mr. Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca) — That the Standing Committee on Finance be instructed to study and make recommendations regarding the implementation of an insurance hedging mechanism, or mechanisms, to protect Canadians from a rapid escalation of mortgage interest rates, and to consider, among other things, (i) current levels of mortgage debt in Canada, (ii) the potential effect of a rapid escalation of mortgage rates on the Canadian economy taking into account current national mortgage debt levels, (iii) historical information and evidence from previous worldwide and Canadian recessions regarding rapid rate escalation, (iv) the introduction of a mandatory or voluntary requirement for financial institutions offering mortgages or mortgage services to consumers, to also offer mortgage rate insurance to new and existing mortgage-holders which would insure against dramatically increased mortgage payments resulting from significantly escalating mortgage rates, and would be equal to the difference between the actual mortgage rate and the insured rate, (v) a suite of insurance products which would allow consumers to choose between various levels of risk and various term-lengths, (vi) options for commercial mortgage rate insurance products to offset potential losses by corporations as a result of significantly escalating mortgage rates, (vii) consequential positive and/or negative benefits to mortgage-holders, (viii) consequential positive and/or negative benefits to the Canadian economy, (ix) how such a mechanism or mechanisms could be applied to all mortgage types, (x) how to best move forward in implementing such a mechanism or mechanisms; and that the Committee report its findings and recommendations to this House within one year of the adoption of this Order. |
Private Members' Business |
| C-419 — May 1, 2013 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Benskin (Jeanne-Le Ber), — That Bill C-419, An Act respecting language skills, be now read a third time and do pass. |
| Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
| Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — May 1, 2012 |
| Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — December 7, 2012 |
| Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|