House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
Friday, May 31, 2013 (No. 260) |
|
|
Report Stage of Bills |
Bill C-60 |
An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures |
Notices of Motions |
Motion No. 1 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 2 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 12. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) and Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 3 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 15. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) and Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 4 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 15, be amended |
(a) by replacing line 11 on page 8 with the following: |
“March 21, 2015 is of the number of days” |
(b) by replacing line 15 on page 8 with the following: |
“March 20, 2015 and before 2016 is of the” |
(c) by replacing line 19 on page 8 with the following: |
“2016 is of the number of days in the year,” |
(d) by replacing line 21 on page 8 with the following: |
“number of days in the year in 2017 is of” |
(e) by replacing line 24 on page 8 with the following: |
“number of days in the year in 2018 is of” |
(f) by replacing line 27 on page 8 with the following: |
“after 2019, 0%.” |
Motion No. 5 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 15, be amended |
(a) by replacing line 13 on page 8 with the following: |
“(b) the proportion of 95% that the” |
(b) by replacing line 17 on page 8 with the following: |
“(c) the proportion of 90% that the” |
(c) by replacing line 20 on page 8 with the following: |
“(d) the proportion of 85% that the” |
(d) by replacing line 23 on page 8 with the following: |
“(e) the proportion of 80% that the” |
(e) by replacing line 27 on page 8 with the following: |
“after 2016, 75%.” |
Motion No. 6 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 104. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 7 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 105. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 8 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 106. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 9 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 107. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 10 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 108. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 11 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 109. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 12 — May 29, 2013 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 112. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 13 — May 29, 2013 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 113. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 14 — May 29, 2013 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 114. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 15 — May 29, 2013 — Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 115. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 16 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 125. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 17 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 133. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) and Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 18 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 134. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) and Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 19 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 135. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska) and Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 20 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 136. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 21 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 136, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 67 with the following: |
“of such a government, that is pursuing political or economic objectives that are potentially injurious to Canada’s national security;” |
Motion No. 22 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 136, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 67 the following: |
“(3) Section 3 of the Act is amended by renumbering it as subsection 3(1) and adding the following: |
(2) The Minister shall issue guidelines under section 38 defining the terms “control”, “control in fact”, “influence” and “direction” and include in those guidelines specific examples of situations where a foreign government would be considered to have sufficient influence or direction over an entity to make it a state-owned enterprise.” |
Motion No. 23 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 136, be amended by adding after line 27 on page 67 the following: |
“(3) Section 3 of the Act is amended by renumbering it as subsection 3(1) and adding the following after that subsection: |
(2) The following definitions apply in the definition “state-owned enterprise” in subsection (1). |
“influence” means influence exerted by a non-Canadian government or agency thereof in order to further its geopolitical goals in Canada, as determined in accordance with prescribed criteria. |
“direction” means direction given by a non-Canadian government or agency thereof in order to further its geopolitical goals in Canada, as determined in accordance with prescribed criteria.” |
Motion No. 24 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 137. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) and Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 25 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 141, be amended by adding after line 18 on page 72 the following: |
“(8) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (6), the factors to be taken into account by the Minister in making a determination whether an investment could be injurious to national security include |
(a) whether the non-Canadian making the investment is a state-owned enterprise; |
(b) the domestic production needed for projected national defence requirements; |
(c) the capability and capacity of domestic industries to meet national defence requirements, including the availability of human resources, products, technology, materials and other supplies and services; |
(d) the potential effects of foreign control of domestic industries and commercial activity on the capability and capacity of Canada to meet the requirements of national security; |
(e) the potential effects of the proposed or pending transaction on sales of military goods, equipment or technology to a country that supports terrorism, a country of concern regarding the proliferation of missiles or of chemical and biological weapons, a country that poses a potential regional military threat to the interests of Canada or a country that is listed on the nuclear non-proliferation special country list; |
(f) the potential effects of the transaction on Canadian international technological leadership in areas affecting national security; |
(g) the potential effects related to national security on critical national infrastructure, including major energy assets; |
(h) the potential effects related to national security on Canadian critical technologies; |
(i) whether the investment is the result of a transaction controlled by a foreign government; |
(j) in the case where the non-Canadian making the investment is a government or agency thereof, the adherence of the non-Canadian to non-proliferation control regimes, the cooperation of the non-Canadian with Canada, specifically in counterterrorism efforts, and the potential for transshipment or diversion of technologies with military applications; |
(k) the long-term projection of Canadian requirements for sources of energy and other critical resources and material; and |
(l) such other factors as the Minister may determine to be appropriate, generally or in connection with a specific review or investigation.” |
Motion No. 26 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 143. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 27 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 144. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 28 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 145, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 76 with the following: |
“does not apply, and the Minister shall provide” |
Motion No. 29 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 147. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 30 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 148. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 31 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 149. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 32 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 150. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 33 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 151. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 34 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 152. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 35 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 153. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 36 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 154. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 37 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 162. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 38 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 167. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 39 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 168. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 40 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 169. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 41 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 170. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 42 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 171. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 43 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 172. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 44 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 174, be amended |
(a) by replacing line 36 on page 88 with the following: |
“nomic relations, ensuring that all economic relationships are founded on the principles of democracy, human rights and the rule of law;” |
(b) by replacing line 38 on page 88 with the following: |
“tional trade and commerce and ensure that Canadian enterprises operating internationally do so in a manner that is socially and ecologically responsible;” |
(c) by replacing line 41 on page 88 with the following: |
“countries, provide development assistance for the mitigation of, and adaptation to, the disproportionate effects of climate change on developing countries and provide humanitarian assis-” |
(d) by replacing line 9 on page 89 with the following: |
“relations, provide material support for international organizations mandated to support this objective, including the United Nations and the International Criminal Court;” |
(e) by replacing line 10 on page 89 with the following: |
“(k) pursue non-violent resolutions to international and civil conflicts, supporting military intervention during peacekeeping and peacemaking operations authorized by the United Nations only when all such non-violent means of conflict resolution have been exhausted; and |
(l) carry out any other duties and functions” |
Motion No. 45 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 174, be amended |
(a) by replacing line 13 on page 90 with the following: |
“moting Canadian export sales while respecting the democratic preferences of countries whose domestic policies, including those related to climate change mitigation, limit their imports of Canadian exports;” |
(b) by replacing line 16 on page 90 with the following: |
“markets through trade negotiations and the pursuit of trade agreements containing robust protections for social, ecological, and labour-related policies;” |
(c) by replacing line 18 on page 90 with the following: |
“tries founded on the principles of democracy, human rights and the rule of law;” |
(d) by replacing line 20 on page 90 with the following: |
“trading conditions; and |
(e) ensuring that Canadian enterprises operating internationally do so in a manner that is socially and ecologically responsible.” |
Motion No. 46 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 174, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 90 with the following: |
“priorities, namely a commitment to equality, democracy, social justice, ecological integrity, multilateralism, human rights and the rule of law.” |
Motion No. 47 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 200. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 48 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 201. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 49 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 202. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 50 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 203. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 51 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 204. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 52 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 205. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 53 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 206. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 54 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 207. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 55 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 208. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 56 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 209. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 57 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 210. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 58 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 211. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 59 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 212. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 60 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 213. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 61 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 214. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 62 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 215. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 63 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 216. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 64 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 217. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 65 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 218. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 66 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 219. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 67 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 220. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 68 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 221. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 69 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 222. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 70 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 223. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 71 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 224. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 72 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 225. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 73 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 228. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) and Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 74 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 229. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic), Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) and Mr. Patry (Jonquière—Alma) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 75 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 229, be amended by replacing lines 20 and 21 on page 109 with the following: |
“89.8 (1) In instances where a Crown corporation’s failure to successfully negotiate a collective agreement poses specific and immediate risks to the health and well-being of Canadians, the Governor in Council may, by order, direct the Crown corporation to have its” |
Motion No. 76 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 229, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 109 with the following: |
“order, direct a Crown corporation, other than the Canada Council for the Arts, the Canada Post Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, the International Development Research Centre or VIA Rail Canada Inc., to have its” |
Motion No. 77 — May 30, 2013 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — That Bill C-60, in Clause 229, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 109 with the following: |
“order, direct a Crown corporation, other than one whose independence from intervention by the Governor in Council is provided for in subsections 2(3), 35(2) and 46(5) and in section 52 of the Broadcasting Act, to have its” |
Motion No. 78 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 230. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 79 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 231. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |
Motion No. 80 — May 29, 2013 — Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park) — That Bill C-60 be amended by deleting Clause 232. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from: |
Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), Mr. Rankin (Victoria) and Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou) — May 29, 2013 |