House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 262 Tuesday, June 4, 2013 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
|
|
| June 3, 2013 — Mr. Jean (Fort McMurray—Athabasca) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sentencing)”. |
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-13892 — June 3, 2013 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to ministerial offices outside of the National Capital Region: (a) what is the rationale for operating these offices; (b) what criteria are used to determine the location of the offices; (c) what branches or programs are operated out of the offices; (d) what are each office, broken down by region and province; (e) what is the address and location of each office; (f) what are the annual costs of operating each office for each of the past five years; and (g) what is the number of full-time and temporary staff in each office? |
| Q-13902 — June 3, 2013 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — With regard to copyrighted material held by the government: (a) what copyrighted material does the government own, broken down by (i) department, (ii) creation date, (iii) publication date, (iv) author, (v) fee charged for use, (vi) total fees collected to date in the lifetime of the material, (vii) format or media type, (viii) cost of production, (ix) future plans, (x) for any material not available to the public, what are the reasons for the secrecy and the name and title of the person responsible for the decision to keep the material from the public; and (b) what enforcement action has the government taken to protect its copyright on any material since January, 2006, broken down by (i) department, (ii) creation date, (iii) publication date, (iv) author, (v) fee charged for use, (vi) total fees collected to date in the lifetime of the material, (vii) alleged infraction, (viii) damages sought, (ix) case status, (x) case outcome or settlement? |
| Q-13912 — June 3, 2013 — Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal) — With regard to aboriginal justice, broken down by year from 2006 to the present: (a) how much money was dedicated to the Aboriginal Justice Strategy (AJS); (b) how much money was devoted to other aboriginal justice programs; (c) with respect to (a) and (b), by program, how much money was spent; (d) by whom were monies in (a) and (b) spent, on what dates, and for what purpose; (e) broken down by province and territory, on what dates were provinces and territories consulted with respect to funding of the AJS for the upcoming year; (f) broken down by province and territory, on what dates were the provinces and territories consulted with respect to other aboriginal justice programs; (g) broken down by province and territory, how much did each request of the government with respect to the AJS; (h) broken down by province and territory, with which First Nations did the government consult with respect to the AJS; (i) with which First Nations groups and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) did the government consult with respect to the AJS; (j) with which other stakeholders did the government consult with respect to the AJS; (k) which stakeholders were informed of budget decisions relative to the AJS, by what means and on what dates; (l) broken down by province and territory, how much did each request of the government with respect to other aboriginal justice programs; (m) broken down by province and territory, with which First Nations did the government consult with respect to other aboriginal justice programs; (n) with which First Nations groups and NGOs did the government consult with respect to other aboriginal justice programs; (o) with which other stakeholders did the government consult with respect to the other aboriginal justice programs; (p) how does the government determine stakeholders regarding aboriginal justice concerns; (q) by whom, with what criteria, and when was AJS the budget determined; (r) in what ways, by whom, and when is AJS evaluated; (s) in which Federal-Provincial-Territorial Minister’s meetings was the AJS raised; (t) what commitments were made by the government; (u) were those commitments met; (v) which stakeholders were informed of budget decisions relative to other aboriginal justice programs, by what means and on what dates; (v) by whom, with what criteria, and when were these budgets determined; (w) in what ways, by whom, and when are these programs evaluated; (x) in which Federal-Provincial-Territorial Minister’s meetings were these programs raised; (y) what commitments were made by the government; (z) were those commitments met; (aa) in what ways do these programs work to implement the Gladue principles; (bb) in what other ways are the Gladue principles being implemented; (cc) by what means, how often, with which criteria, and by whom does the government evaluate its implementation of the Gladue principles; (dd) what programs and strategies are in place to ensure both respect for and compliance with the Gladue principles; (ee) how many Gladue courts operate in Canada; (ff) in what ways is the government engaged with Gladue courts; (gg) in what ways does the government support Gladue courts; (hh) in what ways does the government ensure training for judges on the Gladue principles; (ii) in what ways does the government ensure training for prosecutors on the Gladue principles; (jj) in what ways does the government ensure the consideration of Gladue principles in its filings and submissions before the courts; (kk) in what ways is the government addressing the over-representation of aboriginals in prisons; (ll) what are the principles of the government’s aboriginal justice approach; (mm) how does the government evaluate whether its approach to aboriginal justice is working; (nn) by what specific standards, by whom and how often do such evaluations occur; (oo) in what ways does the government undertake predictions or forecasts with respect to the incarceration of aboriginal offenders; (pp) how are these forecasts taken into account in criminal justice policy development; (qq) in what ways are proposed justice laws evaluated for their impact on aboriginal persons; (rr) in what ways is the government incorporating aboriginal justice into its overall justice strategy; (ss) what policies exist to ensure aboriginal justice concerns are taken into account at every stage of policy and legislative development; (tt) who is responsible for keeping statistics on aboriginal justice; (uu) with respect to (tt), what statistics are available and from which departments; and (vv) with respect to (uu) what are the figures for each of the last three years? |
| Q-13922 — June 3, 2013 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — With regard to fisheries enforcement by the government: (a) what fines have been issued since 2006, broken down by (i) infraction, (ii) date, (iii) trial outcome where applicable, (iv) fine amount paid, v) the recipient of the funds from the fine; (b) for each trial in (a)(iii), what is (i) the name of the prosecutor, ii) the name of the Judge, (iii) the initial fine, (iv) the penalty assessed by the Court, and (c) what conservation groups or other organisations that are not the Receiver General have received any proceeds from any such enforcement actions and what justification exists for their receipt of these proceeds? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Opposition Motion |
| June 3, 2013 — Mr. Ravignat (Pontiac) — That all funding should cease to be provided to the Senate beginning on July 1, 2013. |
| Main Estimates |
| OPPOSED VOTES |
| No. 1 — June 3, 2013 — The President of the Treasury Board — That Vote 1, in the amount of $58,169,816, under PARLIAMENT — The Senate — Program expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, be concurred in. |
| June 3, 2013 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Notice of opposition to Vote 1, in the amount of $58,169,816, under PARLIAMENT — The Senate — Program expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014. |
| Voting — not later than 10:00 p.m. on the last allotted day, pursuant to Standing Order 81(18). |
| UNOPPOSED VOTES |
| June 3, 2013 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, except any vote disposed of earlier today and less the amounts voted in Interim Supply, be concurred in. |
| Voting — not later than 10:00 p.m. on the last allotted day, pursuant to Standing Order 81(18). |
| Supplementary Estimates (A) |
| UNOPPOSED VOTES |
| June 3, 2013 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Supplementary Estimates (A) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Voting — not later than 10:00 p.m. on the last allotted day, pursuant to Standing Order 81(18). |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
Private Members' Business |
| C-478 — April 25, 2013 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake), seconded by Mr. Rajotte (Edmonton—Leduc), — That Bill C-478, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (increasing parole ineligibility), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. |
| Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
| Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|