House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 117 Friday, September 26, 2014 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
| September 25, 2014 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, April 10, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
|
|
| September 25, 2014 — Mr. Jacob (Brome—Missisquoi) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Tuesday, April 29, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
|
|
| September 25, 2014 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Tuesday, June 3, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, October 1st, 2014, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
|
|
| September 25, 2014 — Mr. Chicoine (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Tuesday, June 3, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, October 1st, 2014, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
|
|
| September 25, 2014 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Tuesday, June 3, 2014, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, October 1st, 2014, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
Questions |
|
| Q-7202 — September 25, 2014 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans’ monitoring of ocean acidification: (a) what are the details of the government’s monitoring, including (i) total budgetary resources allocated to this issue to date, (ii) projected budgetary resources allocated through 2016-2017, (iii) the number of full-time employees who are involved in researching, monitoring, or studying ocean acidification, (iv) locations of any and all researching or monitoring sites; (b) what are all reports, documents, briefing materials, and communications on this subject, broken down by (i) title, (ii) internal tracking number, (iii) recipient, (iv) date of production or distribution; (c) has there been an economic impact analysis of the effects of ocean acidification and, if so, (i) what are its findings, and, if not, (ii) why not, (iii) does the government have any plans to do such an economic impact analysis; and (d) does the government have a plan to deal with the long-term risks associated with ocean acidification and, if so, what are the details of any such plan? |
| Q-7212 — September 25, 2014 — Mr. Hsu (Kingston and the Islands) — With regard to Correctional Service Canada's (CSC) terminated Prison Farm Program: (a) has CSC studied the possibility of re-opening a Prison Farm Program; (b) what studies, reports or assessments have been prepared by CSC regarding the re-opening of a Prison Farm Program, broken down by (i) date of studies, reports or assessments, (ii) title of studies, reports or assessments, (iii) internal tracking number of studies, reports or assessments; (c) what briefing documents have been prepared for ministers and their staff regarding the re-opening of a Prison Farm Program, broken down by (i) date of request for briefing note, (ii) title of requested briefing note, (iii) internal tracking number of briefing note; (d) what is the anticipated cost, broken down annually for the next ten years, of re-opening a Prison Farm Program; (e) how much money has currently been budgeted to re-open a Prison Farm Program; (f) how much money has currently been budgeted to study the re-opening of a Prison Farm Program; (g) has the government’s policy changed regarding a Prison Farm Program changed since 2010; and (h) what records exist regarding meetings at which CSC was asked to re-open a prison farm, broken down by (i) date of meeting, (ii) attendees, (iii) any internal tracking numbers assigned to the meeting’s documentation? |
| Q-7222 — September 25, 2014 — Mr. Hsu (Kingston and the Islands) — With regard to Service Canada, specifically to the 2008 document, "Moving Forward, Growing Service Canada in the Ontario Region": (a) what are the dates, titles, and file numbers of any file, memorandum, instruction, directive or any other record which document (i) the decision which resulted in removing Kingston from the list of physical processing areas of hubs for the Employment Insurance business line of Service Canada since the issuance of the 2008 document, (ii) the rationale which resulted in removing Kingston from the list of physical processing areas of hubs for the Employment Insurance business line of Service Canada since the issuance of the 2008 document; and (b) what are the dates, titles, and file numbers of any file, memorandum, instruction, directive or any other record which documents (i) the decision which resulted in adding North Bay to the list of physical processing areas of hubs for the Employment Insurance business line of Service Canada since the issuance of the 2008 document, (ii) the rationale which resulted in adding North Bay to the list of physical processing areas of hubs for the Employment Insurance business line of Service Canada since the issuance of the 2008 document? |
| Q-7232 — September 25, 2014 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — With respect to boat operator licenses issued in the Atlantic provinces by Transport Canada: (a) for each license issued since 2009, (i) on what date was each license issued, (ii) who were the owners or operators, (iii) under what conditions, if any, for the use, retention, or renewal of the license was it issued; (b) for each vessel whose license was suspended, rejected, or for which a renewal was denied, (i) on what date was the license suspended, rejected, or the renewal denied, (ii) for what reason(s), (iii) on whose authority, (iv) what are the file numbers of all relevant ministerial briefings or departmental correspondence between the government and all entities, departments, companies, contractors, or individuals, broken down by minister or department, relevant file number, correspondence or file type, date, purpose, origin, intended destination, other officials copied or involved; (c) what are the specific rules for the retention or renewal of any such license; (d) what are all rules, files, and correspondence related to observer and dockside monitoring of these license-holders and users, broken down by all relevant file numbers, entities, departments, companies, contractors, or individuals, and by (i) minister or department, (ii) relevant file number, (iii) correspondence or file type, (iv) date, (v) purpose, (vi) origin, (vii) intended destination, (viii) other officials copied or involved, (ix) military base, asset, or facility, (x) type of activity or contract; (e) what differences exist in the conditions for licenses between different regions, zones, or provinces; and (f) what are the rules specific to keeping as opposed to releasing fish caught on boats used for recreational or touristic purposes, broken down by province and number of applicable licensees? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Opposition Motion |
| September 25, 2014 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That Standing Order 11(2) be replaced with the following: The Speaker or the Chair of Committees of the Whole, after having called the attention of the House, or of the Committee, to the conduct of a Member who persists in irrelevance, or repetition, including during responses to oral questions, may direct the Member to discontinue his or her intervention, and if then the Member still continues to speak, the Speaker shall name the Member or, if in Committee of the Whole, the Chair shall report the Member to the House. |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-538 — September 25, 2014 — Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) work with the provinces, territories and First Nations to support workforce training for the clean energy sector; (b) provide more support for the development and commercialization of clean technologies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; and (c) promote the use of clean technologies in Canada’s industrial sectors. |
Private Members' Business |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|