House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 12 Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| October 30, 2013 — Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Navigable Waters Protection Act (Fox Lake and other lakes and rivers)”. |
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-1352 — October 30, 2013 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With regard to the Respect for Communities Act: (a) how many of the following were consulted in the development of the legislation, (i) health care providers, (ii) front-line service providers, (iii) medical research professionals specializing in addictions treatment, (iv) medical research professionals specializing in concurrent mental health and addictions treatment, (v) police departments, (vi) police officers; (b) of the organizations mentioned in the answer to (a), who from each organization was involved; (c) over what time period did the consultations take place; (d) which ministries were involved in the development of the legislation; and (e) from those ministries listed in the answer to (d), who from each ministry was consulted? |
| Q-1362 — October 30, 2013 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — On what date and in what manner did the government receive a payment from Mike Duffy or his associates for expense claims? |
| Q-1372 — October 30, 2013 — Mr. Lapointe (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup) — With regard to the Port of Gros Cacouna (QC) breakwater repair: (a) what is the government funding provided, by department or agency, initiative and amount concerning the Port of Gros Cacouna breakwater repair; (b) was there a public tender; (c) what is the project start date; (d) what is the expected project completion date; (e) what is the total project value; (f) what are the specifications for the production of the stone required for the project; (g) who are the bidders for the production of stone; (h) what is the outcome of the tender for the production of stone; (i) what is the complete list of names of all individuals who were at the time of the tender directors of the winning bidder; (j) what is the complete list of names of all individuals who are currently directors of the winning bidder; (k) what are the technical explanations for the decision regarding the lack of stone density in the Cacouna region; (l) further to these investments, will the project to transfer the Port of Gros Cacouna be abandoned; and (m) will Transport Canada give a public presentation on the short-term planning regarding the Gros Cacouna port facilities? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-471 — October 30, 2013 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should agree with provincial and territorial finance ministers to move forward with an increase to basic public pension benefits under the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans, and implement a plan to begin phasing in such an increase without delay. |
| M-472 — October 30, 2013 — Ms. Boivin (Gatineau) — That the House concur in the motion adopted by the National Assembly of Québec on October 29, 2013, and therefore: (a) recognizes that the Supreme Court Act stipulates that three of the Supreme Court judges shall be from Québec and that they shall be appointed from among the judges of the Court of Appeal or of the Superior Court of Québec or from among practicing lawyers who are members of the Québec Bar; (b) recognizes that this guarantee preserves Québec’s distinctiveness and civil law tradition and cannot be altered or otherwise modified without the consent of the National Assembly of Québec; (c) supports Québec’s historic position that the three Québec judges on the Supreme Court should be selected from among the candidates recommended by the Attorney General of Québec to the federal government; and (d) affirms that three judges from Québec must be on the Supreme Court when cases that are of major importance to Québec are heard. |
Private Members' Business |
| C-201 — October 16, 2013 — Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Finance of Bill C-201, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons). |
| Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
| Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — June 3, 2013 |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|