No. 1 |
M-537† — December 4, 2014 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) apologize to the people of Hamilton for approving the 2007 foreign takeover of Stelco by U.S. Steel, on the grounds that it has failed to provide a net benefit to Hamilton and Canada; (b) make public the commitments U.S. Steel agreed to under the Investment Canada Act in respect of the acquisition of Stelco Inc. in 2007, and the 2011 out-of-court settlement, concerning employment and production guarantees and maintenance of the employee pension system; and (c) take immediate action to ensure pension benefits for the 15,000 employees and pensioners remain fully funded and protected, including amending the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act to protect worker pensions in the event of bankruptcy. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— October 1, 2014 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 2 |
— December 4, 2014 — — Second reading and reference of Bill , . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and — December 4, 2014 |
No. 7 |
— February 25, 2015 — On or after Thursday, March 26, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
— February 6, 2015 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 8 |
M-533 — November 21, 2014 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the federal government, in exercising its jurisdiction, should submit natural resource development projects to a broader consultation with First Nations and citizens in communities and urban areas affected by the establishment of such activities, and that public willingness should be a criterion in obtaining a development permit to the same degree as impacts on human health, ecosystem maintenance, employment and economic development. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , and — November 20, 2014 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 9 |
— December 2, 2014 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
and — September 23, 2014 |
, and — September 24, 2014 |
and — September 25, 2014 |
and — September 26, 2014 |
— October 1, 2014 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 10 |
M-550 — February 2, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should take steps to provide an increased level of rail service throughout Canada by: (a) recognizing that an increase in rail service and capacity is essential to the livelihood of Canadian agriculture; (b) recognizing that the ongoing review of the Canada Transportation Act provides an opportunity to rebalance the system and improve capacity and service; (c) making sure that all sections of the industry convene, with their own operational ideas, to increase effectiveness and efficiency of our transportation system, such as increased labour, capacity, or train-cars; (d) recognizing that changes to legislation are needed to address the imbalance of power along the logistics chain; and (e) making sure that all stakeholders work together to build a world class transportation system, including effective legislation and regulations. |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 13 |
— February 17, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and — November 25, 2014 |
|
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 15 |
— February 19, 2015 — On or after Friday, March 13, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and — June 16, 2014 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 16 |
— February 20, 2015 — On or after Monday, March 23, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and — December 4, 2014 |
Statement by Speaker regarding Royal Recommendation — January 29, 2015 (See Debates) |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 18 |
† — April 9, 2014 — — Second reading and reference of Bill , . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and — April 9, 2014 |
No. 19 |
— February 26, 2015 — On or after Friday, March 27, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , , , , , , , , and — December 1, 2014 |
— February 25, 2015 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 20 |
M-553 — March 9, 2015 — On or after Tuesday, March 31, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of , seconded by , — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should present, as soon as possible, a mechanism that would allow non-designated airports, that is, airports that are not on the 2004 list of airports designated under the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority Act (CATSA), to provide, at their expense, CATSA-recognized security screening in a manner that would not compromise the health and safety of passengers, and would uphold existing CATSA standards; |
And of the amendment of , seconded by , — That the motion be amended by: (a) deleting the word “2004”; and (b) replacing the words “CATSA-recognized” with the word “CATSA”. |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
No. 21 |
— March 10, 2015 — On or after Wednesday, April 1, 2015 — Resuming consideration of the motion of
, seconded by , — That Bill , , be now read a second time and referred . |
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
, , and — November 27, 2014 |
, and — November 28, 2014 |
— December 2, 2014 |
— December 3, 2014 |
Debate — 1 hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |