Skip to main content
;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 131

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

2:00 p.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

Questions

Q-8222 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the budgets of Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada and Health Canada’s First Nations and Inuit Health Branch (FNIHB), broken down by each program and sub-program for the 2016-2017 fiscal year: (a) what amount of money has been reallocated to each program and sub-program area; (b) what amount of money has been reallocated from each program and sub-program area; (c) what are the reasons for each reallocation in (a) and (b); (d) what is the impact, actual or anticipated, of each reallocation in (a) and (b); (e) what are the identified shortfalls within each program and sub-program; (f) how much money was allocated for child welfare, broken down by where it was allocated from (i.e. Main Estimates, Budget 2016, etc.); (g) what amount of money was allocated and spent on Jordan’s Principle as of January 26, 2016; (h) what is the government’s definition of Jordan’s Principle; (i) are there any group cases for Jordan’s Principle that exist in Saskatchewan and Manitoba and, if so, which ones; (j) what process has the government used to assess that the need for implementing Jordan’s principle is 127 million dollars per year; (k) what is the amount allocated to the First Nations Mental Wellness Continuum; (l) what amount of money has been identified as needed for the full implementation of the First Nations Mental Wellness Continuum; and (m) how many mental wellness teams have been identified as needed to reach every First Nations community in Canada?
Q-8232 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With respect to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's 94 calls to action: (a) what is the itemized list of each of the 45 calls to action which the government believes fall under federal jurisdiction; (b) what is the itemized list of all actions the government has taken to implement each call to action under federal jurisdiction; (c) what is the itemized list of explanations for delays by the government in implementing each call to action under federal jurisdiction; (d) what is the itemized list of projected timelines for the government to fully implement each call to action; and (e) what concerns does the government have with respect to the full implementation of the calls to action within federal jurisdiction, broken down by call to action?
Q-8242 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil) — With regard to Canada’s Innovation Agenda as published by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and “innovation leaders” titled “Innovation for a Better Canada: What We Heard”: (a) what was the total cost incurred by the government for the production of this document; (b) what are the details of the compensation for each of the ten innovation leaders; and (c) what are the costs of the consultation process with the innovation leaders broken down by (i) travel, (ii) hospitality, (iii) meals and incidentals, (iv) lodging, (v) per diems, (vi) rental space for stake holder consultations?
Q-8252 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil) — With regard to the Prime Minister and Conflict of Interest screens: (a) what are the names of the businesses and organizations which are managed or run by friends or relatives of the Prime Minister, as described in Section 4 of the Conflict of interest act; (b) what are the names of businesses and organizations for which a screen involving the Prime Minister recusing himself from any related decisions have been established; (c) broken down by business or organization, when was any such screen established; and (d) who in the Prime Minister’s Office or the Privy Council Office is responsible for enforcing or implementing any such screens?
Q-8262 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — With regard to the management fees for blind trusts set up for Public Office Holders, during the 2016 calendar year and broken down by department or agency: (a) what is the total amount of expenditures on such management fees; (b) how many Public Office Holders have set up blind trusts; and (c) how many Public Office Holders had their management fees paid for, or were reimbursed for such payments, by the government?
Q-8272 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — With regard to the Prime Minister’s trip to China in August and September of 2016: (a) what was the total cost to taxpayers of the trip; (b) how much was spent on accommodation; (c) how much was spent on food; and (d) how much was spent on other expenses, including a description of each expense?
Q-8282 — January 31, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — With regard to Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) payments to provinces: (a) as of February 1, 2017, which provinces owe money to the federal government as a result of HST overpayments; and (b) what is the amount owed, broken down by province?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Opposition Motions
January 31, 2017 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That, given the average middle class Canadian is already overburdened with taxes, the House call on the government to abandon any plans it may have to in any way tax health and dental care plans.

January 31, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That, given the escalating crisis across Canada from the illicit use of opioids such as fentanyl and carfentanil, the House call on the government to declare the opioid overdose crisis a national public health emergency and immediately undertake the following actions: (a) enhance border security measures to stop the flow of fentanyl and carfentanil into Canada; (b) undertake a national fentanyl and carfentanil education awareness campaign; (c) support detox and treatment facilities and mental health in our communities and provinces; and (d) create a national strategy for tracking opioid overdoses.

January 31, 2017 — Mr. Calkins (Red Deer—Lacombe) — That, in the opinion of the House, given the Prime Minister has placed the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner in a direct conflict by only appointing her on an interim basis for a term of six months, an independent third party, other than the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, should undertake the investigation of the Prime Minister in relation to “cash-for-access” events and his use of a private commercial airliner, in an apparent contravention of Sections 11 and 12 of the Conflict of Interest Act, for his trip to a private island.

January 31, 2017 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — That, given the average middle class Canadian is already overburdened with taxes, the House call on the government to abandon any plans it may have to in any way tax health and dental care plans.

January 31, 2017 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — That, given the escalating crisis across Canada from the illicit use of opioids such as fentanyl and carfentanil, the House call on the government to declare the opioid overdose crisis a national public health emergency and immediately undertake the following actions: (a) enhance border security measures to stop the flow of fentanyl and carfentanil into Canada; (b) undertake a national fentanyl and carfentanil education awareness campaign; (c) support detox and treatment facilities and mental health in our communities and provinces; and (d) create a national strategy for tracking opioid overdoses.

January 31, 2017 — Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) — That, in the opinion of the House, given the Prime Minister has placed the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner in a direct conflict by only appointing her on an interim basis for a term of six months, an independent third party, other than the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, should undertake the investigation of the Prime Minister in relation to “cash-for-access” events and his use of a private commercial airliner, in an apparent contravention of Sections 11 and 12 of the Conflict of Interest Act, for his trip to a private island.

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions


2 Response requested within 45 days