Skip to main content
;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
Status of House Business
PDF

Order Paper

No. 163

Monday, April 10, 2017

11:00 a.m.

Order of Business

Private Members' Business — from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon

Government Orders

Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m.

Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m.

Daily Routine of Business — at 3:00 p.m.

Tabling of Documents

Introduction of Government Bills
No. 1
April 7, 2017 — The Minister of Finance — Bill entitled “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures”.
Recommendation
(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
His Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2017 and other measures”.

Statements by Ministers

Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations

Presenting Reports from Committees

Introduction of Private Members' Bills
No. 1
January 26, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons)”.
No. 2
February 4, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Holidays Act (National Flag of Canada Day)”.
No. 3
September 15, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (small business deduction rate)”.
No. 4
September 21, 2016 — Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (psychotherapeutic services)”.
No. 5
September 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and the Canada Marine Act”.
No. 6
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Tabbara (Kitchener South—Hespeler) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (locked mobile device)”.
No. 7
September 29, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Department of Employment and Social Development Act (registry of compromised Social Insurance Numbers)”.
No. 8
November 17, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Region of Northern Ontario and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.
No. 9
November 28, 2016 — Mr. Choquette (Drummond) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Judges Act (bilingualism)”.
No. 10
December 5, 2016 — Mrs. Wong (Richmond Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (birthright citizenship)”.
No. 11
February 13, 2017 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Navigation Protection Act (North Thames River, Middle Thames River and Thames River)”.
No. 12
April 5, 2017 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Old Age Security Act (Canada Pension Plan payments)”.
No. 13
April 5, 2017 — Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap) — Bill entitled “An Act providing for the award of a Canadian Search and Rescue Voluntary Service Medal”.
No. 14
April 6, 2017 — Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Department of Employment and Social Development Act (persons with disabilities)”.
No. 15
April 6, 2017 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act (use of wood)”.
No. 16
April 6, 2017 — Mr. Barlow (Foothills) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Importation of Intoxicating Liquors Act and the Excise Act, 2001 (importation)”.
No. 17
April 6, 2017 — Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (trafficking and transplanting human organs and other body parts)”.
No. 18
April 7, 2017 — Mr. Fortin (Rivière-du-Nord) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and to make consequential amendments to other acts (criminal organization)”.

First Reading of Senate Public Bills
S-205 — October 25, 2016 — Ms. Dabrusin (Toronto—Danforth) — An Act to amend the Canada Border Services Agency Act (Inspector General of the Canada Border Services Agency) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.
S-215 — January 30, 2017 — An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sentencing for violent offences against Aboriginal women).
S-225 — June 16, 2016 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (substances used in the production of fentanyl).

Motions
No. 1
March 7, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 2
March 7, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 3
March 7, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 4
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 5
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 6
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 7
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 8
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 9
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 10
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 11
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 12
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 13
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers.
No. 14
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 15
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 16
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers.
No. 17
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 18
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 19
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 20
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 21
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 22
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 23
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation.
No. 24
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 25
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 26
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation.
No. 27
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 28
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 29
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 30
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 31
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 32
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 33
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation.
No. 34
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation.
No. 35
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee.
No. 36
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation.
No. 37
May 11, 2016 — Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that it have the power during its consideration of Bill C-15, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2016 and other measures, to divide this bill into two bills: the first consisting of provisions regarding the Canadian Forces Members and Veterans Re-establishment and Compensation Act, provisions stipulating that the Minister of Veterans Affairs must pay to a person who received a disability award or a death benefit under that Act before April 1, 2017, an amount that represents the increase in the amount of the disability award or the death benefit, as the case may be, and consequential amendments to the Children of Deceased Veterans Education Assistance Act, the Pension Act and the Income Tax Act; and the second bill consisting of all the other provisions of Bill C-15.
No. 38
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 39
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 40
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 41
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 42
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 43
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 44
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 45
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 46
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 47
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 48
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 49
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 50
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 51
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 52
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 53
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 54
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 55
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 56
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 57
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 58
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 59
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 60
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 61
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 62
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 63
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 64
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 65
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 66
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 67
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 68
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 69
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 70
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 71
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 72
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 73
June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 74
June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 75
June 6, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 76
June 6, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 77
June 10, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 78
June 10, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 79
September 15, 2016 — Mr. Virani (Parkdale—High Park) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 80
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 81
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 82
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 83
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 84
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 85
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 86
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 87
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 88
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 89
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 90
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 91
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 92
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 93
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 94
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 95
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 96
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 97
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 98
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 99
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 100
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 101
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 102
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 103
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 104
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 105
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 106
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 107
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 108
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 109
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 110
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 111
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 112
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 113
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 114
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 115
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 116
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 117
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 118
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 119
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 120
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 121
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 122
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 123
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 124
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ramsey (Essex) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 125
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 126
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 127
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 128
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 129
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 130
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 131
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 132
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 133
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 134
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 135
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 136
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 137
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 138
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 139
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 140
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Laverdière (Laurier—Sainte-Marie) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 141
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 142
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 143
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 144
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 145
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 146
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 147
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 148
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 149
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 150
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 151
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 152
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 153
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 154
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 155
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 156
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 157
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 158
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 159
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 160
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 161
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 162
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 163
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 164
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 165
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 166
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 167
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 168
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 169
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 170
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 171
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 172
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Choquette (Drummond) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 173
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 174
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 175
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 176
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 177
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 178
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 179
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 180
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 181
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 182
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 183
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 184
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 185
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Saroya (Markham—Unionville) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 186
October 3, 2016 — Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 187
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 188
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Calkins (Red Deer—Lacombe) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 189
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 190
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 191
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Fast (Abbotsford) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 192
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 193
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 194
October 3, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 13th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 195
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 196
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 197
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 198
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 199
October 4, 2016 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 200
October 4, 2016 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 201
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Shields (Bow River) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 202
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 203
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 204
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 205
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 206
October 4, 2016 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 207
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 208
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 209
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 210
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 211
October 4, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 212
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 213
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Donnelly (Port Moody—Coquitlam) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 214
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 215
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 216
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 217
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 218
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 219
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 220
October 4, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 221
October 5, 2016 — Mrs. Boucher (Beauport—Côte-de-Beaupré—Île d'Orléans—Charlevoix) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 222
October 5, 2016 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 223
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 224
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 225
October 5, 2016 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 226
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 227
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Barlow (Foothills) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 228
October 5, 2016 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 229
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 230
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 231
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 232
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 233
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Hoback (Prince Albert) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 234
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Yurdiga (Fort McMurray—Cold Lake) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 235
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Viersen (Peace River—Westlock) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 236
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Ritz (Battlefords—Lloydminster) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 237
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 238
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 239
October 5, 2016 — Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 240
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 241
October 5, 2016 — Mr. Van Kesteren (Chatham-Kent—Leamington) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 242
October 5, 2016 — Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 243
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 244
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 13th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, September 28, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 245
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 246
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 247
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 248
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 249
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 250
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 251
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 252
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 253
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 254
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 255
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 256
October 6, 2016 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 257
October 6, 2016 — Ms. Watts (South Surrey—White Rock) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 258
October 21, 2016 — Mr. Saroya (Markham—Unionville) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 259
October 24, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 260
October 24, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 15th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 261
October 24, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 16th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 262
October 24, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 17th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 263
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, October 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 264
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, October 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 265
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, October 6, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 266
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 17th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 267
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 16th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 268
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 15th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 269
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 270
October 25, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 271
October 25, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 15th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 272
October 25, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 16th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 273
October 25, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 17th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 274
October 25, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 14th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, October 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 275
October 25, 2016 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 276
October 31, 2016 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 277
October 31, 2016 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 278
October 31, 2016 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 279
October 31, 2016 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 280
October 31, 2016 — Ms. Watts (South Surrey—White Rock) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 281
October 31, 2016 — Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 282
October 31, 2016 — Mr. Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 283
October 31, 2016 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 284
October 31, 2016 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 285
November 14, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 18th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 2, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 286
November 14, 2016 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, November 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 287
November 14, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 18th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 2, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 288
November 14, 2016 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, November 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 289
November 14, 2016 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, November 3, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 290
November 14, 2016 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the 18th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, November 2, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 291
November 24, 2016 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, November 18, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 292
November 24, 2016 — Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 293
November 24, 2016 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, November 18, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 294
November 24, 2016 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 295
November 28, 2016 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform, presented on Monday, November 28, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 296
December 6, 2016 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 297
December 6, 2016 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 298
December 8, 2016 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 299
February 1, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill C-37, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and to make related amendments to other Acts, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two pieces of legislation, one containing the provisions relating to supervised consumption sites and one containing the remaining provisions of the Bill.
No. 300
February 6, 2017 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — That the Third Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 301
February 6, 2017 — Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie) — That the Third Report of the Special Committee on Electoral Reform, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 302
February 23, 2017 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the 13th Report of the Standing Committee on Finance (recommendation not to proceed further with Bill C-240, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (tax credit — first aid)), presented on Thursday, February 23, 2017, be concurred in.
To be added to the business of the House, at the expiry of the time provided for Private Members' Business, on a day fixed by the Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 97.1(2).
No. 303
March 7, 2017 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, February 21, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 304
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, February 21, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 305
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 306
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 307
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, February 21, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 308
March 7, 2017 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 19th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 309
March 7, 2017 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 20th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 310
March 7, 2017 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the 21st Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 311
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 15, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 16, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 312
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 15, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 16, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 313
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, February 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 25, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 314
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, February 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 25, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 315
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 316
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — That the 19th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 317
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — That the 20th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 318
March 7, 2017 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — That the 21st Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 319
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 19th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 320
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 20th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, February 13, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 14, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 321
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the 21st Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, February 22, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 322
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Allison (Niagara West) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Wednesday, February 15, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 16, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 323
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 6, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 324
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 7, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 325
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, February 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or June 25, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 326
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Shipley (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, March 8, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 7, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 327
March 23, 2017 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 6, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 328
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Barlow (Foothills) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Tuesday, March 7, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 6, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 329
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie) — That the 23rd Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 6, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 5, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 330
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Reid (Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston) — That the 23rd Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 6, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 5, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 331
March 23, 2017 — Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock) — That the 23rd Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 6, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 5, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 332
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 333
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 334
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 335
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 336
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 337
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 338
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 339
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 340
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 341
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 342
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 343
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 344
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 345
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 346
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 347
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 348
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 349
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 350
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 351
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 352
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 353
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 354
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 355
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 356
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 357
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 358
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 359
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 360
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 361
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 362
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 363
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 364
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 365
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 366
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 367
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 368
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 369
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 370
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 371
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 372
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 373
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 374
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 375
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 376
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 377
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 378
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 379
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 380
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 381
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 382
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 383
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 384
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 385
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 386
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 387
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 388
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 389
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 390
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 391
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 392
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 393
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 394
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 395
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 396
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 397
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 398
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 399
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 400
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 401
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 402
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 403
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 404
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 405
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 406
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 407
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 408
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 409
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 410
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 411
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 412
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 413
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 414
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 415
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 416
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 417
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 418
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 419
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 420
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 421
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 422
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 423
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 424
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 425
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 426
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 427
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 428
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days .
No. 429
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 430
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 431
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 432
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 433
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 434
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 435
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 436
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 437
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 438
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 439
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 440
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 441
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 442
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 443
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 444
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 445
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 446
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 447
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 448
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 449
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 450
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 451
March 30, 2017 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 452
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, March 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 453
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 454
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, March 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 455
April 3, 2017 — Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 456
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie) — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 457
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock) — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 458
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Van Loan (York—Simcoe) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, December 8, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 459
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Shields (Bow River) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, March 24, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 23, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 460
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Reid (Lanark—Frontenac—Kingston) — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 461
April 3, 2017 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 462
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 463
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 464
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Saroya (Markham—Unionville) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, November 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 465
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Saroya (Markham—Unionville) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, March 9, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 8, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 466
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Saroya (Markham—Unionville) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 467
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Wednesday, October 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 468
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Wednesday, December 7, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 469
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 470
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Tuesday, November 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 471
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, March 9, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 8, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 472
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Tilson (Dufferin—Caledon) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 473
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Wednesday, October 26, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 474
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Wednesday, December 7, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 475
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Thursday, December 1, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 476
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, December 8, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 477
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, January 30, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or May 30, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 478
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 479
April 3, 2017 — Mr. McCauley (Edmonton West) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented on Tuesday, December 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 13, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 480
April 3, 2017 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 481
April 3, 2017 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 482
April 3, 2017 — Ms. Harder (Lethbridge) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 483
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Tuesday, December 13, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 484
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — That the Second Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 485
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — That the Third Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 486
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — That the Second Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 487
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach) — That the Third Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 488
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 489
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, January 30, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or May 30, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 490
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 491
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, January 30, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or May 30, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 492
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, March 20, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 19, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 493
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga) — That the Second Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 494
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga) — That the Third Report of the Standing Joint Committee for the Scrutiny of Regulations, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 495
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, March 23, 2017, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or July 22, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 496
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 497
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 498
April 4, 2017 — Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 499
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or April 12, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.
No. 500
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Monday, December 12, 2016, be concurred in.
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.
No. 501
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 502
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 503
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 504
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 505
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 506
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 507
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 508
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 509
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 510
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 511
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 512
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 513
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 514
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 515
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 516
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 517
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 518
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 519
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development that, during its consideration of Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (rehabilitation of historic property), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 520
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 521
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 522
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 523
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 524
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 525
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 526
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 527
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 528
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 529
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 530
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 531
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 532
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 533
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 534
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 535
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 536
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 537
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 538
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 539
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Health that, during its consideration of Bill S-211, An Act respecting National Sickle Cell Awareness Day, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 540
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 541
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 542
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 543
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 544
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 545
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 546
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 547
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 548
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 549
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Falk (Provencher) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 550
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 551
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 552
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 553
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 554
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 555
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 556
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 557
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 558
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 559
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights that, during its consideration of Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 560
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 561
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 562
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 563
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 564
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 565
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 566
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 567
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 568
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 569
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Warawa (Langley—Aldergrove) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-243, An Act respecting the development of a national maternity assistance program strategy and amending the Employment Insurance Act (maternity benefits), the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 570
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 571
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 572
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 573
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 574
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 575
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 576
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 577
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 578
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 579
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Clement (Parry Sound—Muskoka) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security that, during its consideration of Bill C-23, An Act respecting the preclearance of persons and goods in Canada and the United States, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 580
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 581
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 582
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 583
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 584
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 585
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 586
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 587
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 588
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 589
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 590
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five sitting days.
No. 591
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten sitting days.
No. 592
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 sitting days.
No. 593
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 sitting days.
No. 594
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 sitting days.
No. 595
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed five calendar days.
No. 596
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed ten calendar days.
No. 597
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 15 calendar days.
No. 598
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 20 calendar days.
No. 599
April 3, 2017 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology that, during its consideration of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Statistics Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee, provided that the travel does not exceed 25 calendar days.
No. 600
April 5, 2017 — The Leader of the Government in the House of Commons — That, in accordance with subsection 4(5) of the Public Service Employment Act, S.C. 2003, c. 22, and pursuant to Standing Order 111.1, this House approve the appointment of Patrick Borbey as President of the Public Service Commission, for a term of seven years.
Motion — to be decided without debate or amendment, pursuant to Standing Order 111.1(2).

Presenting Petitions

Questions on the Order Paper
The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.

Government Orders
Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page