House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Publication Selector by Date
Dates with dots provide a link to available publications.
To access Debates and Journals from 1867 to 1993, please visit the Canadian Parliamentary Historical Resources portal.
To access Debates and Journals from 1867 to 1993, please visit the Canadian Parliamentary Historical Resources portal.
42nd Parliament ,1st Session
(December 3, 2015 - September 11, 2019)
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Retrieving Calendars...
Status of House Business
Cumulative information on the status of business before the House, updated after each sitting.
|
|
|
|
Thursday, November 29, 2018 (No. 361) |
|
|
|
Motions Respecting Senate Amendments to Bills |
| C-51 |
| An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act |
| November 15, 2018 — The Minister of Justice — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that the House respectfully disagrees with amendments 1 and 2 made by the Senate to Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Department of Justice Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, as they are inconsistent with the Bill’s objective of codifying Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence on a narrow aspect of the law on sexual assault and instead seek to legislate a different, much more complex legal issue, without the benefit of consistent guidance from appellate courts or a broad range of stakeholder perspectives. |