House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Order PaperNo. 66 Monday, June 6, 2016 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
|
Order of Business |
Private Members' Business — from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon |
Government Orders |
Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m. |
Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. |
Daily Routine of Business — at 3:00 p.m. |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Statements by Ministers |
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
| No. 1 |
| December 7, 2015 — Mr. Stewart (Burnaby South) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Navigation Protection Act (Burnaby Lake, Deer Lake and Brunette River)”. |
| No. 2 |
| January 26, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons)”. |
| No. 3 |
| January 26, 2016 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a Government Awareness Day”. |
| No. 4 |
| February 4, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Holidays Act (National Flag of Canada Day)”. |
| No. 5 |
| May 9, 2016 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (residence of electors)”. |
| No. 6 |
| May 16, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (cessation of refugee protection)”. |
| No. 7 |
| May 30, 2016 — Mr. Donnelly (Port Moody—Coquitlam) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (special benefits)”. |
| No. 8 |
| June 1, 2016 — Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (machine-readable code)”. |
| No. 9 |
| June 1, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (nanotechnology)”. |
| No. 11 |
| June 3, 2016 — Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Canadian Optimist Movement Awareness Day”. |
First Reading of Senate Public Bills |
|
Motions |
|
| No. 1 |
| March 7, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 2 |
| March 7, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 3 |
| March 7, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 4 |
| March 10, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 5 |
| March 10, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 6 |
| March 10, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 7 |
| March 11, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 8 |
| March 21, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 9 |
| March 21, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 10 |
| March 21, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 11 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 12 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 13 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 14 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 15 |
| March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 16 |
| March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 17 |
| March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers. |
| No. 18 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 19 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 20 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers. |
| No. 21 |
| March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 22 |
| March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 23 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 24 |
| March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 25 |
| April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 26 |
| April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 27 |
| April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation. |
| No. 28 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 29 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 30 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation. |
| No. 31 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 32 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 33 |
| April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 34 |
| April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 35 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 36 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 37 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation. |
| No. 38 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
| No. 39 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
| No. 40 |
| April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation. |
| No. 41 |
| May 11, 2016 — Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that it have the power during its consideration of Bill C-15, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2016 and other measures, to divide this bill into two bills: the first consisting of provisions regarding the Canadian Forces Members and Veterans Re-establishment and Compensation Act, provisions stipulating that the Minister of Veterans Affairs must pay to a person who received a disability award or a death benefit under that Act before April 1, 2017, an amount that represents the increase in the amount of the disability award or the death benefit, as the case may be, and consequential amendments to the Children of Deceased Veterans Education Assistance Act, the Pension Act and the Income Tax Act; and the second bill consisting of all the other provisions of Bill C-15. |
| No. 42 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 43 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 44 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 45 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 46 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 47 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 48 |
| May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 49 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 50 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 51 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 52 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 53 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 54 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 55 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 56 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 57 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 58 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 59 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 60 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 61 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 62 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 63 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 64 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 65 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 66 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 67 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 68 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 69 |
| May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 70 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 71 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 72 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 73 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 74 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 75 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 76 |
| May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 77 |
| May 18, 2016 — Mrs. Lockhart (Fundy Royal) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 78 |
| May 18, 2016 — Mr. Longfield (Guelph) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 79 |
| May 18, 2016 — Mr. Breton (Shefford) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 80 |
| May 19, 2016 — Mr. Warkentin (Grande Prairie—Mackenzie) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 81 |
| May 26, 2016 — Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Tuesday, May 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 82 |
| June 1, 2016 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 83 |
| June 1, 2016 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
| No. 84 |
| June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Nineth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 85 |
| June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or September 19, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
| No. 86 |
| June 3, 2016 — Ms. Watts (South Surrey—White Rock) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Tuesday, May 31, 2016, be concurred in. |
| Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
| Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
|
The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.
|
|
Government Orders |