House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
Order PaperNo. 86 Monday, October 3, 2016 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
Order of Business |
Private Members' Business — from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon |
Government Orders |
Statements by Members — at 2:00 p.m. |
Oral Questions — not later than 2:15 p.m. until 3:00 p.m. |
Daily Routine of Business — at 3:00 p.m. |
Tabling of Documents |
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
No. 1 |
June 16, 2016 — The Minister of Justice — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (victim surcharge)”. |
Statements by Ministers |
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
No. 1 |
January 26, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons)”. |
No. 2 |
February 4, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Holidays Act (National Flag of Canada Day)”. |
No. 3 |
June 9, 2016 — Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Parks Canada Agency Act (Conservation of National Historic Sites Account)”. |
No. 4 |
June 10, 2016 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Revenue Agency Act (organ donors)”. |
No. 5 |
September 15, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — Bill entitled “An Act concerning the development of a national strategy respecting advertising to children and amending the Broadcasting Act (regulations)”. |
No. 6 |
September 15, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (small business deduction rate)”. |
No. 7 |
September 19, 2016 — Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a national cycling strategy”. |
No. 8 |
September 21, 2016 — Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (psychotherapeutic services)”. |
No. 9 |
September 22, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (prohibition of asbestos)”. |
No. 10 |
September 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and the Canada Marine Act”. |
No. 11 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Tabbara (Kitchener South—Hespeler) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (locked mobile device)”. |
No. 12 |
September 29, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Department of Employment and Social Development Act (registry of compromised Social Insurance Numbers)”. |
First Reading of Senate Public Bills |
|
S-225 — June 16, 2016 — An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (substances used in the production of fentanyl). |
Motions |
|
No. 1 |
March 7, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 2 |
March 7, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 3 |
March 7, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 4 |
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 5 |
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 6 |
March 10, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, February 26, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 7 |
March 11, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 8 |
March 21, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 9 |
March 21, 2016 — Mr. Liepert (Calgary Signal Hill) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 10 |
March 21, 2016 — Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 11 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 12 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 13 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 14 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 15 |
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 16 |
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 17 |
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers. |
No. 18 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 19 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 20 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to expand the scope of the Bill in order to ensure the restoration of good faith bargaining with Canada’s public service workers. |
No. 21 |
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 22 |
March 23, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 23 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 24 |
March 23, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 25 |
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 26 |
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 27 |
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation. |
No. 28 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 29 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 30 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation. |
No. 31 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 32 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 33 |
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 34 |
April 12, 2016 — Ms. Raitt (Milton) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that, during its consideration of Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 35 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 36 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 37 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities that, during its consideration of Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all the provisions relating to the certification and decertification of a union as a bargaining agent, be in a separate piece of legislation. |
No. 38 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill into two or more pieces of legislation. |
No. 39 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to travel throughout Canada to hear testimony from interested parties and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
No. 40 |
April 12, 2016 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration that, during its consideration of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, the Committee be granted the power to divide the Bill in order that all provisions to remove the grounds for the revocation of Canadian citizenship that relate to national security be in a separate piece of legislation. |
No. 41 |
May 11, 2016 — Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou) — That it be an instruction to the Standing Committee on Finance that it have the power during its consideration of Bill C-15, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 22, 2016 and other measures, to divide this bill into two bills: the first consisting of provisions regarding the Canadian Forces Members and Veterans Re-establishment and Compensation Act, provisions stipulating that the Minister of Veterans Affairs must pay to a person who received a disability award or a death benefit under that Act before April 1, 2017, an amount that represents the increase in the amount of the disability award or the death benefit, as the case may be, and consequential amendments to the Children of Deceased Veterans Education Assistance Act, the Pension Act and the Income Tax Act; and the second bill consisting of all the other provisions of Bill C-15. |
No. 42 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 43 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 44 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 45 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 46 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 47 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 48 |
May 16, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 49 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 50 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 51 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 52 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 53 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 54 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 55 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 56 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 57 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 58 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 59 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 60 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 61 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 62 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Vandal (Saint Boniface—Saint Vital) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 63 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 64 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 65 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 66 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 67 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 68 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 69 |
May 17, 2016 — Ms. Khera (Brampton West) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 70 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 71 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 72 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 73 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 74 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 75 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 76 |
May 17, 2016 — Mr. Peterson (Newmarket—Aurora) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 77 |
June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 78 |
June 3, 2016 — Mr. Poilievre (Carleton) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 79 |
June 6, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 80 |
June 6, 2016 — Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 81 |
June 10, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 82 |
June 10, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 83 |
June 15, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 84 |
June 15, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 85 |
September 15, 2016 — Mr. Virani (Parkdale—High Park) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 86 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 87 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Finance, presented on Friday, March 11, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 88 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 89 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 90 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 91 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 92 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 93 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 94 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 95 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 96 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 97 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 98 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 99 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 100 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 101 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 102 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 103 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 104 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 105 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 106 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 107 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 108 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 109 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 110 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 111 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 112 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 113 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, May 12, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 114 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 115 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 116 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 117 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 118 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 119 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 120 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 121 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Wednesday, June 1, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 122 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 12, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 123 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 12, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 124 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 12, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 125 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Monday, June 13, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 12, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 126 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 127 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 128 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 129 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 130 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 131 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Monday, May 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 132 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ramsey (Essex) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 133 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 134 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 135 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 136 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 137 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 138 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 139 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 140 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 141 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 142 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 8, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 143 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 8, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 144 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 8, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 145 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Special Committee on Pay Equity, presented on Thursday, June 9, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 8, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 146 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 147 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 148 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Laverdière (Laurier—Sainte-Marie) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 149 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Friday, June 17, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 16, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 150 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 151 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 152 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 153 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Special Joint Committee on Physician-Assisted Dying, presented on Thursday, February 25, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 154 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 155 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Malcolmson (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 156 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 157 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 158 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 159 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 160 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Friday, May 6, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 161 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 162 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 163 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 164 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 165 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 166 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 167 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 168 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 169 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 170 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 171 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 172 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 173 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 174 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 175 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 176 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 177 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Thursday, May 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2). |
Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate. |
No. 178 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 179 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 180 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 181 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Choquette (Drummond) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 182 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 183 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Wednesday, June 15, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 14, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 184 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 185 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 186 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Monday, September 19, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 18, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 187 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 20, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 188 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 20, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 189 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or January 20, 2017, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 190 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 191 |
September 28, 2016 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 192 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
No. 193 |
September 28, 2016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented on Thursday, June 16, 2016, be concurred in. |
Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or October 15, 2016, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
The complete list of questions on the Order Paper is available for consultation at the Table in the Chamber and on the Internet. Those questions not appearing in the list have been answered, withdrawn or made into orders for return.
|
|
Government Orders |