Skip to main content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Notice Paper

No. 376

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

10:00 a.m.


Introduction of Government Bills

November 25, 2024 — The Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance — Bill entitled “An Act respecting temporary cost of living relief (affordability)”.

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

November 25, 2024 — Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a national food cooperative strategy”.

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)

November 25, 2024 — Mr. Shields (Bow River) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented earlier today, be concurred in.

November 25, 2024 — Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — That the 15th report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, be concurred in.

November 25, 2024 — Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented earlier today, be concurred in.

Questions

Q-32082 — November 25, 2024 — Mr. Majumdar (Calgary Heritage) — With regard to government programs focused on research, broken down by department, agency, or Crown corporation: (a) what are the names of all such programs; and (b) for each program in (a), (i) how much funding is allocated for the current fiscal year, (ii) how much funding is projected to be allocated in subsequent fiscal years, as far as current projections allow, (iii) what is the program’s purpose and objective, (iv) is it guided by a diversity, equity, and inclusion mandate?
Q-32092 — November 25, 2024 — Mr. Majumdar (Calgary Heritage) — With regard to government funding for foreign aid and international development during the 2023-24 fiscal year: what was the amount of money provided, in total and broken down by recipient country?
Q-32102 — November 25, 2024 — Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon) — With regard to the National Supply Chain Office (NSCO): (a) where are the physical locations of its main offices and additional hubs located in Canada; (b) how much of the $27.2 million investment from budget 2023 has been spent to date; (c) what are the details of each briefing the NSCO has sent to the minister responsible, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) title, (iii) topic, (iv) author, (v) file number; (d) what are the details of all external outreach activities the NSCO has had with any stakeholders, provinces or territories since its establishment on December 1, 2023, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) participants of the outreach, (iii) format of outreach, (iv) topic, (v) description or summary; and (e) what are the details of each contract over $1,000 related to the NSCO, including the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of the goods or services provided?
Q-32112 — November 25, 2024 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — With regard to the sale of federal properties since March 1, 2023: (a) what are the details of each property sold, including the (i) province or territory, (ii) city, (iii) street address, (iv) type of listing (residential, office, etc.), (v) description of the property, (vi) sale price, if different than the asking price, (vii) buyer, (viii) future use of the property, if known, (ix) date of the sale; (b) for each sale in (a), what were the costs incurred by the government related to the sale, broken down by type of expense; and (c) for each sale in (a), how did the government reinvest the net profits?
Q-32122 — November 25, 2024 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to a sport meeting held on or around January 22, 1997, in Ottawa, to discuss the sexual harassment and abuse of Canadian athletes during which Canadian sport leaders rejected an inquiry into sexual abuse: (a) what was the specific date of the meeting; (b) who convened the meeting, and at whose request; (c) did Sport Canada host the meeting; (d) was the meeting open to the public or closed; (e) were members of the media present (i) before, (ii) during, (iii) after, the meeting; (f) was the meeting intended as a “take stock” meeting to determine what organizations were presently doing; (g) was the meeting intended to “let the public know harassment in sport is a serious problem”; (h) was an “athlete-friendly ombudsman’s office” suggested as the “most effective approach to hear and deal with complaints”, and, if so, what actions followed this suggestion and in what years did they occur; (i) who were all those invited to the meeting, and who were all those who attended the meeting; (j) was there an agenda for the meeting, and, if so, what was the agenda; (k) did the Minister of Canadian Heritage attend the meeting or provide any greeting, and, if so, what was the greeting; (l) how many people were in attendance at the meeting, and which organizations did they come from; (m) who chaired the meeting, and which organization did the Chair come from; (n) which 14 Canadian sport organizations were in attendance, and for each of these identified organizations, who were their representatives; (o) did any athletes attend the meeting, and if so, (i) how many athletes attended the meeting, (ii) what institutions or organizations did they come from, (iii) who were they; (p) did any ethicists attend the meeting, and if so, (i) how many ethicists attended the meeting, (ii) what institutions or organizations did they come from, (iii) who were they; (q) was the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport in attendance, and, if so, who were its representatives; (r) were any representatives from the health and medical community in attendance to discuss abuse, its forms, and impacts, and, if so, who were they, and what institutions or organizations did they come from; (s) were any representatives from the legal community in attendance to discuss legal responsibility with respect to sexual harassment and abuse, and if so, who were they, and what institutions or organizations did they come from; (t) was there a formal vote for “sport leaders reject inquiry into sex abuse”, and (i) if yes, what were the results of the vote, (ii) if yes, which organizations supported an inquiry, (iii) if yes, which individuals supported an inquiry, (iv) if yes, which organizations rejected an inquiry, (v) if yes, which individuals rejected an inquiry, (iv) if not, why not; (u) what reasons were given for rejecting an inquiry, including, but not limited to, (i) “it would be damaging to victims of abuse”, (ii) “much of the fact finding [...] has already been done”, (iii) “there’s enough anecdotal evidence”, (iv) it would be a diversion of time and money, (v) “inquiries create an environment where people run for cover”; (v) were there minutes or a report following the meeting, and, if so, (i) what is the name of the minutes or report, (ii) where can the document be accessed; and (w) what specific deliverables, if any, came out of the meeting?
Q-32132 — November 25, 2024 — Ms. Zarrillo (Port Moody—Coquitlam) — With regard to the Public Service Pension Investment Board (PSP Investments): what are the details of all residential real estate properties that are part of PSP Investments’ investment portfolio, including the (i) location, (ii) date on which investment was made, (iii) value of the asset, (iii) names of any asset managers or co-owners of the property?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Supplementary Estimates (B)
UNOPPOSED VOTES
November 22, 2024 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, be concurred in.

Government Business

No. 43 — November 25, 2024 — The Leader of the Government in the House of Commons — That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House, the bill in the name of the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, entitled An Act respecting temporary cost of living relief (affordability), be disposed of as follows:
(a) the bill be ordered for consideration at the second reading stage immediately after the adoption of this order;
(b) when the House begins debate at the second reading stage of the bill, one member of each recognized party and a member of the Green Party may each speak at the said stage for not more than 10 minutes, followed by five minutes for questions and comments;
(c) at the conclusion of the time provided for the debate or when no member wishes to speak, whichever is earlier, all questions necessary to dispose of the second reading stage of the bill be deemed put, a recorded division be deemed requested and the vote shall not be deferred;
(d) if the bill is adopted at the second reading stage, it shall be deemed referred to a committee of the whole, deemed considered in committee of the whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage, and deemed read a third time and passed;
(e) during consideration of the bill, the House shall not adjourn, except pursuant to a motion moved by a minister of the Crown; and
(f) no motion to adjourn the debate may be moved except by a minister of the Crown.

Private Members' Notices of Motions

Private Members' Business

C-380 — April 18, 2024 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Tochor (Saskatoon—University), seconded by Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), — That Bill C-380, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (plastic manufactured items), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.
Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:
Mr. Leslie (Portage—Lisgar) — February 16, 2024
Ms. Rood (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex) and Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — March 21, 2024
Debate — one hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).
Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1).

2 Response requested within 45 days