House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 377 Wednesday, November 27, 2024 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
| November 26, 2024 — Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Monday, November 25, 2024, be concurred in. |
Questions |
|
| Q-32142 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. Mazier (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — With regard to the government’s Net Zero Accelerator (NZA) Initiative: (a) what are the details of the funding under the “decarbonization of large emitters” investment pillar, including the total (i) funding allocated, (ii) funding committed, (iii) funding disbursed, (iv) funding uncommitted, (v) number of applicants, (vi) commitments for emission reductions in tonnes; (b) what are the details of the funding under the “industrial transformation” investment pillar including the total (i) funding allocated, (ii) funding committed, (iii) funding disbursed, (iv) funding uncommitted, (v) number of applicants, (vi) commitments for emission reductions in tonnes; (c) what are the details of the funding under the “clean technology and battery ecosystem development” investment pillar including the total (i) funding allocated, (ii) funding committed, (iii) funding disbursed, (iv) funding uncommitted, (v) number of applicants, (vi) commitments for emission reductions in tonnes; (d) for large emitters, what is the (i) total number of applications received, (ii) total number of contributions signed, (iii) dollar value of the contribution agreements signed, (iv) total disbursements, (v) commitments in the contribution agreement to reduce emissions in tonnes, (vi) actual results achieved in terms of carbon reductions in tonnes; (e) for medium emitters, what is the (i) total number of applications received, (ii) total number of contributions signed, (iii) dollar value of the contribution agreements signed, (iv) total disbursements, (v) commitments in the contribution agreement to reduce emissions in tonnes, (vi) actual results achieved in terms of carbon reductions in tonnes; (f) for small emitters, what is the (i) total number of applications received, (ii) total number of contributions signed, (iii) dollar value of the contribution agreements signed, (iv) total disbursements, (v) commitments in the contribution agreement to reduce emissions in tonnes, (vi) actual results achieved in terms of carbon reductions in tonnes; (g) what was the emission reduction target at the program level when the NZA Initiative was created; (h) what is the amount of actual emission reductions achieved to date; (i) what are the details of the contribution agreements that have been signed under the initiative including for each (i) the company name, (ii) the amount of funding, (iii) whether the applicant was seeking funding of $50 million or more, (iv) the date when the application was received, (v) the date the contribution agreement was signed, (vi) cost of emissions reduction per tonne; (j) what is the total number of employees or full time equivalents working on delivering the NZA; and (k) what are the details of all contracts signed to date related to the initiative, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount or value, (iii) vendor, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) manner in which contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid)? |
| Q-32152 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to the Living Cost Differential for federal employees working in Bella Coola, British Columbia, which was removed in 2020 following the results of a 2018 cost of living survey of employees: (a) how many employees in the Bella Coola area were contacted for the 2018 survey; (b) how many surveys were completed and returned; (c) what was the method by which employees were contacted about the survey (in-person, email, etc.); (d) what are the line-by-line results of the survey, for both Bella Coola and Vancouver; and (e) what is the Treasury Board Secretariat’s detailed reasoning for removing the Living Cost Differential? |
| Q-32162 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to government enforcement of the Accessible Transportation for Persons with Disabilities Regulations: how much has the government fined airlines for violating these regulations, since they came into effect, broken down by (i) year, (ii) airline company, (iii) value of the fine for each violation, (iv) reason for the fine? |
| Q-32172 — November 26, 2024 — Ms. Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) — With regard to Canada’s obligations under the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations (IHRs): (a) since 2016, what work has the government undertaken to create National Focal Points (NFPs) in order to implement the IHRs within Canada; (b) what are the details of all NFPs within Canada, including, for each, their (i) location, (ii) mandate, (iii) number of employees or full-time equivalents, (iv) operational budget, (v) date of establishment; (c) for NFPs within Canada, what is the breakdown of employees by nationality; (d) what plans does the government have to establish additional NFPs, including, for each, their (i) location, (ii) mandate, (iii) allocated resources (personnel, funding, assets); (e) what is the frequency of communication between the NFPs and the (i) WHO, (ii) Pan American Health Organization (PAHO); (f) what Act, including clause and section, enabled (i) the designation of NFPs, (ii) the relationship between the NFPs and the PAHO, (iii) the relationship between the NFPs and the WHO; (g) does Canada have a regional office or NFP located at the PAHO headquarters in Washington, and, if so, what is the work of that office or NFP; (h) as per Article 4 of the IHRs, what measures is Canada taking, or will take, to implement the IHR’s NFP regulations, including any adjustments to domestic legislative and administrative arrangements; (i) what is the role of the PAHO in Canada and what are the programs and initiatives Canada and the PAHO are working on; (j) what are the roles of other government agencies and departments in working with the WHO or PAHO; (k) what is the reporting hierarchy in relation to the WHO, NFPs, PAHO, the Government of Canada’s Minister of Health, Privy Council Office, Office of the Prime Minister, and the Chief Medical Officers of Health in the provinces and territories; and (l) has the government analyzed the measures contained in Bill C-293, An Act respecting pandemic prevention and preparedness, and if so, what did the analysis show would be the impact of the measures on Canada’s pandemic preparedness plan? |
| Q-32182 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to Sustainable Development Technology Canada’s (SDTC) Independent Ethics Advisor (advisor) position: (a) is the hired advisor a public servant, and, if so, what are the details of this hire, including (i) the salary range, (ii) the hiring date, (iii) the start and end dates, (iv) who at SDTC hired the advisor and what their position is, (v) the mandate of the advisor, (vi) the title of the individual to whom the advisor reports at SDTC; (b) what are the details of all hospitality expenses incurred by the advisor to date, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) location, (iv) vendor, (v) event description; (c) what are the details of all travel claim expenses incurred by the advisor to date, including, for each, the (i) start date, (ii) end date, (iii) total amount, (iv) origin, (v) destination, (vi) amount spent on air fare, (vii) amount spent on meals, (viii) amount spent on other forms of transportation, (ix) amount spent on accommodations; (d) how many full-time equivalents are assigned to support the position; (e) what were the costs to set up this position; and (f) if the answer to (a) is no, is the advisor a hired consultant, and, if so, (i) what were the costs to hire the advisor, (ii) what company is the advisor from, (iii) what was the hiring date, (iv) what are the contract’s start and end dates, (v) who at SDTC hired the advisor and what is their position, (vi) what is the mandate of the advisor, (vii) to whom does the advisor report? |
| Q-32192 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. Kitchen (Souris—Moose Mountain) — With regard to the government's economic policy: what specific actions, if any, does the government have planned to increase the value of the Canadian dollar? |
| Q-32202 — November 26, 2024 — Mr. McLean (Calgary Centre) — With regard to the family-based permanent residence pathway for people affected by the current conflict in Sudan, since the program opened in February 2024: (a) how many applications have been received; and (b) of the applications received in (a), how many (i) were accepted, (ii) were denied, (iii) are still being processed? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
| Supplementary Estimates (B) |
| UNOPPOSED VOTES |
| November 22, 2024 — The President of the Treasury Board — That the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025, be concurred in. |
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
Private Members' Business |
| C-380 — April 18, 2024 — Resuming consideration of the motion of Mr. Tochor (Saskatoon—University), seconded by Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), — That Bill C-380, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (plastic manufactured items), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. |
| Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
| Mr. Leslie (Portage—Lisgar) — February 16, 2024 |
| Ms. Rood (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex) and Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan) — March 21, 2024 |
| Debate — one hour remaining, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
| Voting — at the expiry of the time provided for debate, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1). |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|