House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Publication Selector by Date
Dates with dots provide a link to available publications.
To access Debates and Journals from 1867 to 1993, please visit the Canadian Parliamentary Historical Resources portal.
To access Debates and Journals from 1867 to 1993, please visit the Canadian Parliamentary Historical Resources portal.
39th Parliament ,2nd Session
(October 16, 2007 - September 7, 2008)
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Retrieving Calendars...
Status of House Business
Cumulative information on the status of business before the House, updated after each sitting.
|
|
|
|
Monday, February 4, 2008 (No. 43) |
|
|
|
Motions Respecting Senate Amendments to Bills |
| C-13 |
| An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal procedure, language of the accused, sentencing and other amendments) |
| February 1, 2008 — The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada — That a message be sent to the Senate to acquaint their Honours that this House: |
| agrees with amendments numbered 2, 4, 5 and 6 made by the Senate to Bill C-13, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal procedure, language of the accused, sentencing and other amendments); but |
| disagrees with amendment numbered 1 because it would place an undue burden on judges and does not take into consideration provincial and territorial practices that are currently in place to ensure that accused persons are informed of their language rights; and |
| disagrees with amendment numbered 3 because the Minister of Justice would be unable to comply with the statutory duty imposed by the amendment as provinces and territories do not keep statistics to report on the operation of the language of trial provisions. |