House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
40th PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 22 Tuesday, March 3, 2009 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Copy of a letter from the Office of the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel regarding a clerical error during the drafting of Bill C-301, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Firearms Act (registration of firearms), and a copy of the corrected Bill. — Sessional Paper No. 8527-402-5.
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), Bill C-333, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mass transit operators), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, at the conclusion of debate on the report stage of Bill C-10, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures, all questions necessary to dispose of report stage of this Bill be deemed put, and recorded divisions be deemed requested and deferred to 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 3, 2009, provided that the Bill may be taken up at third reading in the same sitting. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Bevington (Western Arctic), one concerning navigable waters (No. 402-0135);
|
— by Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South), one concerning human rights in India (No. 402-0136) and one concerning the income tax system (No. 402-0137).
|
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-10, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment; |
And of the motions in Group No. 2 (Motions Nos. 7 to 31). |
Group No. 2 |
Motion No. 7 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 317. |
Motion No. 8 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 318. |
Motion No. 9 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 319. |
Motion No. 10 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 320. |
Motion No. 11 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 321. |
Motion No. 12 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 322. |
Motion No. 13 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 323. |
Motion No. 14 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 324. |
Motion No. 15 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 325. |
Motion No. 16 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 326. |
Motion No. 17 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 327. |
Motion No. 18 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 328. |
Motion No. 19 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 329. |
Motion No. 20 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 330. |
Motion No. 21 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 331. |
Motion No. 22 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 332. |
Motion No. 23 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 333. |
Motion No. 24 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 334. |
Motion No. 25 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 335. |
Motion No. 26 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 336. |
Motion No. 27 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 337. |
Motion No. 28 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 338. |
Motion No. 29 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 339. |
Motion No. 30 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 340. |
Motion No. 31 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 341. |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 2. |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on Motion No. 7 and the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 8 to 31, was deemed requested and deferred until later today at 3:00 p.m. |
Group No. 3 |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 358. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 359. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 360. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 361. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 362. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 363. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 364. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 39, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 365. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 366. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 367. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 368. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 43, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 383. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 384. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 385. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 46, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 386. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 387. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 388. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 389. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 50, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 390. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 391. |
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 392. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 394. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 395. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 55, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 396. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 56, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 397. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 57, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 398. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 58, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 399. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 59, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 400. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 60, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 401. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 61, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 402. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 62, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 403. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 63, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 404. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 405. |
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), moved Motion No. 65, — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 406. |
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 3. |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on Motion No. 32 and the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 33 to 42, was deemed requested and deferred until later today at 3:00 p.m. |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on Motion No. 43 and the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 44 to 52, was deemed requested and deferred until later today at 3:00 p.m. |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on Motion No. 53 and the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 54 to 65, was deemed requested and deferred until later today at 3:00 p.m. |
|
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food of Bill C-13, An Act to amend the Canada Grain Act, chapter 22 of the Statutes of Canada, 1998 and chapter 25 of the Statutes of Canada, 2004. |
Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development) for Mr. Ritz (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), seconded by Mr. Goodyear (Minister of State (Science and Technology)), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Business of Supply |
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, February 26, 2009, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), — That, in the opinion of this House, and as experience has demonstrated, the most efficient, expeditious and stimulative method of transferring federal funding for municipal infrastructure projects is by means of mechanisms similar to those put in place, beginning in 2005, to share with municipalities on a per capita basis a significant and growing portion of the federal excise tax on gasoline; and the House calls upon the government to transfer at least half of its proposed new infrastructure funding in this manner over the next two years, with no requirement that these additional federal funds be matched by the municipalities with which they are shared. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 14 -- Vote no 14) | |
YEAS: 154, NAYS: 136 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cullen Julian Paillé Total: -- 154 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Cummins Komarnicki Reid Total: -- 136 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-10, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment. |
Group No. 1 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 6. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 15 -- Vote no 15) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 209 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 209 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 295. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 209 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 209 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3 to 6 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 66 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 445. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 66 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 17 -- Vote no 17) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 208 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 208 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 67 to 86 were also negatived on the same division. |
Group No. 2 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 7 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 317. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 7 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 18 -- Vote no 18) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 208 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 208 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 8 to 31 were also negatived on the same division. |
Group No. 3 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 32 of Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 358. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 32 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 19 -- Vote no 19) | |
YEAS: 36, NAYS: 253 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Comartin Hughes Masse Total: -- 36 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Cuzner Kenney (Calgary Southeast) Poilievre Total: -- 253 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 33 to 42 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 43 of Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain), seconded by Mr. Vincent (Shefford), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 383. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 43 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 20 -- Vote no 20) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 208 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 208 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 44 to 52 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 53 of Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), seconded by Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 394. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 53 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 21 -- Vote no 21) | |
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 208 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 208 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 54 to 65 were also negatived on the same division. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 22 -- Vote no 22) | |
YEAS: 208, NAYS: 81 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Abbott Day Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rathgeber Total: -- 208 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Allen (Welland) Chow Gravelle Masse Total: -- 81 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Cannon (Pontiac) Guay Mourani Ritz |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and pursuant to Order made earlier today, ordered for a third reading later today. |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the Order was read for the third reading of Bill C-10, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures. |
Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville), seconded by Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South), moved, — That this question be now put. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Private Members' Business |
At 6:49 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development of Bill C-300, An Act respecting Corporate Accountability for the Activities of Mining, Oil or Gas in Developing Countries. |
Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), seconded by Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. |
Messages from the Senate |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Pursuant to the User Fees Act, S.C. 2004, c. 6, sbs. 6(2), a report recommending that the Department of Natural Resources User Fees Proposal relating to Explosives Regulatory Division activities (Sessional Paper No. 8564-402-3-01) be approved was deemed presented by the Standing Committee on Natural Resources. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mr. Day (Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway) — Summary of the Corporate Plan for 2009-2013 of Export Development Canada, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-402-851-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade)
|
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:49 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:58 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |