Skip to main content
;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION

Journals

No. 138

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

10:00 a.m.



Prayers
Daily Routine Of Business

Motions

Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), moved, — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented on Friday, May 30, 2014, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 23)

Debate arose thereon.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on division.


Presenting Petitions

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

— by Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), one concerning environmental pollution (No. 412-4436);
— by Mr. Warawa (Langley), one concerning sex selection (No. 412-4437) and one concerning the Criminal Code of Canada (No. 412-4438);
— by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 412-4439);
— by Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury), one concerning loans (No. 412-4440);
— by Mr. Stewart (Burnaby—Douglas), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 412-4441);
— by Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), one concerning lighthouses (No. 412-4442);
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the electoral system (No. 412-4443).
Government Orders

The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security of Bill C-44, An Act to amend the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act and other Acts.

Mr. Blaney (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of Veterans Affairs), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.

Debate arose thereon.

Statements By Members

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Oral Questions

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Ways and Means

The Order was read for consideration of a Ways and Means motion to amend the Income Tax Act (Sessional Paper No. 8570-412-17), notice of which was laid upon the Table on Thursday, October 30, 2014. (Ways and Means No. 16)

Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Minister of State (Finance)), moved, — That the motion be concurred in.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

(Division No. 269 -- Vote no 269)
YEAS: 152, NAYS: 123

YEAS -- POUR

Ablonczy
Adams
Adler
Aglukkaq
Albas
Albrecht
Alexander
Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac)
Allison
Ambler
Ambrose
Anders
Anderson
Armstrong
Aspin
Baird
Barlow
Bateman
Benoit
Bezan
Blaney
Block
Boughen
Braid
Breitkreuz
Brown (Leeds—Grenville)
Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)
Brown (Barrie)
Bruinooge
Butt
Calandra
Calkins
Cannan
Carmichael
Carrie
Chisu
Chong
Clarke

Clement
Crockatt
Daniel
Davidson
Dechert
Devolin
Dreeshen
Duncan (Vancouver Island North)
Dykstra
Falk
Fantino
Fast
Findlay (Delta—Richmond East)
Finley (Haldimand—Norfolk)
Fletcher
Galipeau
Gallant
Gill
Glover
Goguen
Goldring
Goodyear
Gosal
Gourde
Grewal
Harper
Harris (Cariboo—Prince George)
Hawn
Hayes
Hiebert
Hillyer
Hoback
Holder
James
Kamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)
Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)
Kenney (Calgary Southeast)
Kent

Kerr
Komarnicki
Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)
Lake
Lauzon
Lebel
Leef
Leitch
Lemieux
Leung
Lizon
Lobb
Lukiwski
Lunney
MacKay (Central Nova)
MacKenzie
Maguire
Mayes
McColeman
McLeod
Menegakis
Miller
Moore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)
Moore (Fundy Royal)
Nicholson
Norlock
Obhrai
O'Connor
Oliver
O'Neill Gordon
Opitz
O'Toole
Paradis
Payne
Poilievre
Preston
Rajotte
Reid

Rempel
Richards
Saxton
Schellenberger
Seeback
Shea
Shipley
Shory
Smith
Sopuck
Sorenson
Stanton
Storseth
Strahl
Sweet
Tilson
Toet
Trost
Truppe
Uppal
Valcourt
Van Kesteren
Van Loan
Vellacott
Wallace
Warawa
Warkentin
Watson
Weston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)
Weston (Saint John)
Wilks
Williamson
Wong
Woodworth
Yelich
Young (Oakville)
Young (Vancouver South)
Yurdiga

Total: -- 152

NAYS -- CONTRE

Allen (Welland)
Andrews
Angus
Ashton
Atamanenko
Aubin
Ayala
Bélanger
Bellavance
Bennett
Benskin
Blanchette
Blanchette-Lamothe
Boivin
Borg
Boulerice
Brahmi
Brison
Brosseau
Byrne
Caron
Casey
Cash
Chan
Charlton
Chicoine
Chisholm
Choquette
Christopherson
Cleary
Comartin

Côté
Crowder
Cullen
Cuzner
Davies (Vancouver Kingsway)
Davies (Vancouver East)
Day
Dewar
Dion
Dionne Labelle
Doré Lefebvre
Dubé
Dubourg
Duncan (Etobicoke North)
Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)
Dusseault
Easter
Eyking
Foote
Freeland
Freeman
Fry
Garneau
Garrison
Genest
Genest-Jourdain
Giguère
Goodale
Harris (Scarborough Southwest)
Harris (St. John's East)
Hsu

Hyer
Jones
Julian
Kellway
Lamoureux
Lapointe
Larose
Latendresse
Laverdière
LeBlanc (Beauséjour)
LeBlanc (LaSalle—Émard)
Leslie
Liu
MacAulay
Mai
Marston
Martin
Masse
Mathyssen
May
McCallum
McGuinty
McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)
Morin (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)
Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine)
Morin (Laurentides—Labelle)
Morin (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot)
Mulcair
Murray
Nantel
Nash

Nicholls
Nunez-Melo
Pacetti
Péclet
Perreault
Pilon
Plamondon
Quach
Rafferty
Rankin
Ravignat
Raynault
Regan
Saganash
Sandhu
Scarpaleggia
Scott
Sellah
Sgro
Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor)
St-Denis
Stewart
Stoffer
Sullivan
Thibeault
Toone
Tremblay
Trudeau
Turmel
Valeriote

Total: -- 123

PAIRED -- PAIRÉS

Nil--Aucun

Question of Privilege

A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;

Whereupon, Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved, — That, with regard to the guilty verdict of October 31, 2014, against the Member for Peterborough on four counts of violating the Canada Elections Act, (a) the House immediately suspend the Member of (i) the right to sit or vote in this place, (ii) the right to sit on any committee of this place, (iii) the right to collect his sessional allowance as a Member of Parliament; and (b) this matter be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs for further study of appropriate measures concerning the Member for Peterborough’s membership in the House of Commons.

Debate arose thereon.

Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by adding the following:

“, including:
(i) an expulsion of the Member, should a conviction under section 443 of the Canada Elections Act not be set aside by a competent authority and no further rights of appeal remain available to the Member, together with the appropriate Order, in those circumstances, for the Speaker to issue his warrant to the Chief Electoral Officer for the issue of a writ for the election of a Member to serve in the present Parliament for the electoral district of Peterborough;
(ii) the appropriate approach respecting the Member's pensions, travel status expense account, insurance and other benefits;
(iii) the appropriate approach respecting the employment of the staff, and management of the offices, of the Member; and
(iv) any other questions that arise as a result of this matter and its disposition.”.

Debate arose thereon.

Ms. Jones (Labrador), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved the following subamendment, — That the amendment be amended by deleting the words:

“, should a conviction under section 443 of the Canada Elections Act not be set aside by a competent authority and no further rights of appeal remain available to the Member, together with the appropriate Order, in those circumstances, for the Speaker to issue his warrant to the Chief Electoral Officer for the issue of a writ for the election of a Member to serve in the present Parliament for the electoral district of Peterborough”.

Debate arose thereon.

Notice of Motion

Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of intention to move at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 57, that, in relation to the consideration of the privilege motion, the debate not be further adjourned.

Question of Privilege

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), — That, with regard to the guilty verdict of October 31, 2014, against the Member for Peterborough on four counts of violating the Canada Elections Act, (a) the House immediately suspend the Member of (i) the right to sit or vote in this place, (ii) the right to sit on any committee of this place, (iii) the right to collect his sessional allowance as a Member of Parliament; and (b) this matter be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs for further study of appropriate measures concerning the Member for Peterborough’s membership in the House of Commons;

And of the amendment of Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Mr. Mai (Brossard—La Prairie), — That the motion be amended by adding the following:
“, including:
(i) an expulsion of the Member, should a conviction under section 443 of the Canada Elections Act not be set aside by a competent authority and no further rights of appeal remain available to the Member, together with the appropriate Order, in those circumstances, for the Speaker to issue his warrant to the Chief Electoral Officer for the issue of a writ for the election of a Member to serve in the present Parliament for the electoral district of Peterborough;
(ii) the appropriate approach respecting the Member's pensions, travel status expense account, insurance and other benefits;
(iii) the appropriate approach respecting the employment of the staff, and management of the offices, of the Member; and
(iv) any other questions that arise as a result of this matter and its disposition.”;
And of the subamendment of Ms. Jones (Labrador), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), — That the amendment be amended by deleting the words:
“, should a conviction under section 443 of the Canada Elections Act not be set aside by a competent authority and no further rights of appeal remain available to the Member, together with the appropriate Order, in those circumstances, for the Speaker to issue his warrant to the Chief Electoral Officer for the issue of a writ for the election of a Member to serve in the present Parliament for the electoral district of Peterborough”.

The debate continued.

Messages from the Senate

A message was received from the Senate as follows:

— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House that the Senate has passed Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Criminal Code in response to the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Attorney General of Canada v. Bedford and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, without amendment.
Adjournment Proceedings

At 6:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 6:48 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).