House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
| 41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION | |
|
|
|
JournalsNo. 198 Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
| Prayers |
| National Anthem |
| Statements By Members |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
| Oral Questions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
| Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Blaney (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) laid upon the Table, — Copy of the Agreement on Land, Rail, Marine, and Air Transport Preclearance between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America, and Explanatory Memorandum, dated March 16, 2015. — Sessional Paper No. 8532-412-50.
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 412-5079 concerning housing policy. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-93-09;
|
— Nos. 412-5088 and 412-5160 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-2-34;
|
— No. 412-5113 concerning working conditions. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-87-14;
|
— No. 412-5163 concerning immigration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-15-23;
|
— Nos. 412-5173 and 412-5180 to 412-5182 concerning the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-6-16;
|
— Nos. 412-5221 and 412-5246 to 412-5249 concerning foreign aid. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-34-19.
|
Presenting Reports from Interparliamentary Delegations |
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association respecting its Bilateral Mission to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Republic of Djibouti, Amman, Jordan and Djibouti, Djibouti, from October 13 to 17, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-76-04.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association respecting its Bilateral Mission to the Kingdom of Lesotho and the Republic of Malawi, Maseru, Lesotho and Lilongwe, Malawi, from January 19 to 22, 2015. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-76-05.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group respecting its participation at U.S. Congressional Meetings, held in Washington, D.C., from February 24 to 26, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-59-17.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group respecting its participation at the Canadian/American Border Trade Alliance (BTA) Conference, held in Ottawa, Ontario, from May 4 to 6, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-59-18.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group respecting its participation at the 2014 Annual Summer Meeting of the National Governors Association (NGA), held in Nashville, Tennessee, from July 10 to 13, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-59-19.
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), Mr. Brown (Leeds—Grenville) presented the report of the Canadian delegation of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group respecting its participation at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Council of State Governments Midwestern Legislative Conference, held in Omaha, Nebraska, from July 12 to 16, 2014. — Sessional Paper No. 8565-412-59-20.
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
|
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 36th Report of the Committee (items to remain votable). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-211. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 91.1(2), the report was deemed concurred in. |
|
|
|
Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), from the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented the Sixth Report of the Committee (Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, without amendment). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-212. |
|
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 33 to 40) was tabled. |
Motions |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, in relation to Motion M-587 on genocide recognition, standing on the Order Paper in the name of the Member for Mississauga—Streetsville, the House may continue to sit beyond the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on Friday, April 24, 2015, to consider the motion and that after 60 minutes of debate, or when no Member rises to speak, whichever is the earlier, the Speaker put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the motion. |
Presenting Petitions |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), one concerning security information (No. 412-5363);
|
— by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), one concerning immigration (No. 412-5364);
|
— by Ms. Leslie (Halifax), one concerning crimes of violence (No. 412-5365);
|
— by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), two concerning waste management (Nos. 412-5366 and 412-5367) and five concerning transportation (Nos. 412-5368 to 412-5372);
|
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning navigable waters (No. 412-5373), one concerning genetic engineering (No. 412-5374) and one concerning security information (No. 412-5375);
|
— by Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), one concerning security information (No. 412-5376) and one concerning a national child care program (No. 412-5377);
|
— by Mr. Kellway (Beaches—East York), three concerning genetic engineering (Nos. 412-5378 to 412-5380).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
|
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-1093, Q-1096 and Q-1099 on the Order Paper. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: |
Q-1086 — Mr. Vaughan (Trinity—Spadina) — With respect to citizenship ceremonies held outside of government facilities since January 1, 2006: (a) where did the ceremonies take place; (b) did a third party, such as a corporation, not-for-profit, or charity, partner with the government for the ceremonies; (c) in the cases where there were partners involved, what were the names of these third parties; (d) were any gifts provided to the new citizens, their families, or others in attendance; and (e) if gifts were provided, what are the details regarding these gifts? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1086.
|
|
|
Q-1087 — Mr. Vaughan (Trinity—Spadina) — With respect to the expiration of federal housing operating agreements: (a) how many agreements expired, broken down by year, since 2014; (b) what are the details of the agreements identified in (a), including (i) name or title of the agreement, (ii) how many units were affected, (iii) what was the date of expiry, (iv) in which municipality, province, territory, Aboriginal community, or other jurisdiction were they located; (c) how many agreements are set to expire by December 31, 2015; and (d) what are the details of the agreements identified in (c), including (i) name or title of the agreement, (ii) how many units will be affected, (iii) in which municipality, province, territory, Aboriginal community, or other jurisdiction are they located? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1087.
|
|
|
Q-1088 — Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's) — With regard to the implementation of the government’s deficit reduction action plan: (a) what are the total number of federal government positions that have been eliminated pursuant to the plan, broken down by year since 2012; (b) what proportion of the job reductions since 2012 have been within the National Capital Region (NCR) compared with those outside the NCR, broken down by year; (c) excluding positions in the NCR, what are the details of all positions eliminated as part of the deficit reduction action plan since 2012, broken down by (i) province, (ii) year; (d) what percentage of the total federal public service workforce was situated in the NCR at (i) year-end in 2012, (ii) year-end in 2014; (e) what percentage of the total federal public service workforce was located in each province, excluding the NCR positions for Ontario and Quebec, at (i) year-end in 2012, (ii) year-end in 2013, (iii) year-end in 2014; (f) what were the total government expenditures on outside consultants to review corporate services, including human resources, finance and administration, communications, and information technology, broken down by year since 2012; (g) what is the current demographic breakdown, including position level, gender, employment equity group, tenure and average years of service in the public service, for all human resources positions that fall within federal public service occupational group (i) Personnel Administration (PE), (ii) Administrative Services (AS), (iii) Clerical and Regulatory (CR); (h) how many PE positions have been eliminated by the government since 2012, broken down by year; (i) how many PE positions does the government plan to eliminate in 2015-2016; (j) how many PE category employees in the government have been promoted since 2012, broken down by year, and what percentage of employees in that category do those promotions represent; (k) how many PE positions have been downgraded as a result of the implementation of PE Generic Work Descriptions; (l) how many Executive (EX) positions within departmental human resources divisions or branches of the federal public service have been created, eliminated or reclassified to a higher level within the EX category since 2012, broken down by year; (m) when was the classification standard for the PE group last updated; (n) what are the details concerning the most recent PE group classification standard; (o) why was the PE group classification standard not updated prior to implementing PE Generic Work descriptions; (p) what percentage of sick days taken by employees in the public service in 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 were to attend non-routine or ongoing medical appointments as opposed to illness or injury, excluding those related to pregnancy; and (q) what are the details of any documents or memoranda that have been produced since 2010 by any department or agency regarding any current or previous plans to centralize or amalgamate human resources positions within the federal public service under Shared Services Canada or any other shared services agency including, for each document, (i) the date, (ii) the authoring department or agency, (iii) the title of the document? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1088.
|
|
|
Q-1089 — Mr. Chan (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to the government’s Email Transformation Initiative: (a) how many and which departments have migrated to the one email platform, including the date of the migration; (b) what is the date for the expected migration of the remaining departments, agencies or boards; (c) what was the original date planned for the migration of each government body; (d) how much does the government expect to forgo in savings because of any delays; (e) what are the projected savings arising from the move to one email platform, broken down by (i) department, (ii) total government savings; (f) for departments that have already migrated to the one email platform, (i) what are the recorded Treasury Board transfers for the department to Shared Services Canada, (ii) what are the recorded Treasury Board savings for each department, (iii) what is the amount of reduction to the departments’ estimates for 2015-2016; (g) what penalties were charged to Bell Canada and CGI Information Systems for not being able to meet their targets; (h) what is the cost of the contract to both Bell Canada and CGI Information Systems, including (i) how much has currently been paid, (ii) how much is expected to be paid at the completion of the project, (iii) the maximum amount that is allowed under the contract, (iv) the original maximum amount allowed at the signing of the contract; (i) how much has been budgeted for the migration to one email platform; (j) how much was budgeted at the start of the program; (k) what will be the ongoing operational cost to operate the one email platform; (l) what is the static operational cost of operating all email platforms before the migration; (m) for departments that have migrated to the one email platform, what are the issues logged by the IT help desk, including (i) the type of issue, (ii) the length of time on the IT help line, (iii) the cost of any outside contractors hired to address excess volumes; and (n) what are all the contracts associated with the migration and the implementation of the one email platform, including (i) the name of the company, (ii) the amount of the contract, (iii) the amount that has already been paid under the contract, (iv) if the contract is tendered, (v) the length of the contract? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1089.
|
|
|
Q-1090 — Mr. Chan (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to PPP Canada: since its creation, (a) what are the date and the details of the agenda of each Board of Directors' meeting; (b) for each meeting, which members of the board attended; (c) which board members declared conflicts of interest during any meeting, specifying the issue on the agenda with respect to which the conflict was declared; (d) what projects have been announced by PPP Canada; (e) which of the projects in (d) had board approval; (f) how much funding was announced for each project; (g) when was the project announced; (h) how much has been paid for the project and to whom; (i) for each project in (d), was a cost-benefit analysis and an analysis of the advantage of using P3 done for the project and, if so, what were the projected savings; (j) where are PPP Canada's unspent funds currently held, including (i) amounts, (ii) terms, (iii) the details of the contracts of all investments; (k) what travel has the board of directors done, including the location and the cost, broken down by (i) travel, (ii) hotel, (iii) per diem, (iv) any other expenses; (l) what were the costs for any announcements made by PPP Canada, including (i) cost of staff travel, (ii) cost of room rentals, (iii) cost of staging equipment or contract, (iv) cost for any writing services paid for by PPP Canada (such as for speeches, press releases, media advisories, backgrounders, and websites), (v) cost of press release distribution, (vi) date of the event, (vii) cost of any food, (viii) any additional costs; and (m) how much has PPP Canada spent on hospitality, including, for each event (i) amount spent, (ii) nature of the event, (iii) date, (iv) authorizing authority, (v) location, (vi) vendor? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1090.
|
|
|
Q-1091 — Mr. Chan (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to the government’s use and receipt of credit cards since 2005-2006: (a) how much has the government paid in credit-card merchant fees, broken down by (i) year, (ii) company, (iii) amounts withheld, forgone, or otherwise held by either credit card companies or service providers; (b) how many credit cards does the government currently have in use for staff, and which companies provide them; (c) for cards provided by the government to staff, what is the annual fee paid by the government per card; (d) does the government provide any cards to staff that include redeemable rewards and, if so, what are these rewards and who collects them; and (e) how much has the government paid in late or overdue balances, broken down by year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1091.
|
|
|
Q-1092 — Mr. Chan (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to the government’s non-tax revenue for each year since 2005-2006: (a) how much has each department, agency, board, or other body collected for each year, including (i) the dollar amount and the number of people and businesses that paid the amount, (ii) the programs, fines, services, or product the amount was received for; (b) how much was the public charged for programs, services, products and documents, broken down by year since 2005-2006, including (i) the cost of each product, (ii) the cost of each product where express service or premium service was offered; and (c) how much does it cost the government to provide each program, service, product or document, including (i) the total amount annually for the service as well as the cost per transaction, (ii) the number of transactions per year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1092.
|
|
|
Q-1094 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — With respect to the processing of Status Cards and of Secure Certificates of Indian Status by Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, broken down by year from 2004 to 2014, and further broken down by (i) regular application, (ii) application under Bill C-3, Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act, (iii) number of Qalipu band members applying: (a) what is the number of applications; (b) how many are being processed; (c) how many employees are assigned to the processing of applications; (d) what is the amount budgeted for the processing of applications; (e) what is the average wait time for the processing of applications; (f) how many years behind is the processing of applications; and (g) what are the shortest and longest turnaround times on record for the processing of one application? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1094.
|
|
|
Q-1095 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — With regard to the Makwa Sahgaiehcan First Nation: (a) how much funding has been allocated for fire safety between 2011 and 2015, broken down by year; (b) what are the details of the budgeting and spending of $39 999 of funding for fire safety in 2014-2015; (c) how much funding has been allocated for training volunteer or professional firefighters from 2011 to 2015, broken down by year; (d) how much funding has been allocated for building inspections and regulations from 2011 to 2015, broken down by year; and (e) how much funding has been allocated for equipment maintenance and upkeep from 2011 to 2015, broken down by year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1095.
|
|
|
Q-1097 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — With regard to Canadian diplomatic operations in Haiti over the past five years: (a) what were the total budgeted government expenditures, broken down by (i) overall total, (ii) year; (b) what were the total actual government expenditures, broken down by (i) overall total, (ii) year; (c) what were the budgeted government expenditures on security, broken down by (i) overall total, (ii) year; (d) what were the actual government expenditures on security, broken down by (i) overall total, (ii) year; (e) how many Canadian diplomatic personnel were employed in Haiti, broken down by year; and (f) for all personnel identified in (e), what were the titles and terms of their positions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1097.
|
|
|
Q-1098 — Ms. Sims (Newton—North Delta) — With regard to Employment and Social Development Canada and to the unit responsible for reviewing backlogged social security appeals: (a) where is the unit located within the Department’s structure; (b) to whom is the unit reporting; (c) how many people are in the unit; (d) how many of the people working in the unit have a medical degree; (e) how many of the people working in the unit are lawyers; (f) how many of the people working in the unit are Canada Pension Plan Disability medical adjudicators; (g) what is the budget of the unit; (h) what are the terms of reference for the unit; (i) what is the unit’s expected length of existence; (j) how many appeal case files have been reviewed to date; (k) how many settlements have been offered; (l) how many settlements have been accepted; (m) are settlements retroactive; (n) what are the criteria for deciding to review a file or to allow it to pass on to the Social Security Tribunal; (o) when was the unit created; and (p) when did the unit begin operations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1098.
|
|
|
Q-1100 — Mr. Ravignat (Pontiac) — With regard to the redevelopment of the industrial park in the Regional County Municipality of Pontiac, specifically the purchase of the former Smurfit-Stone mill in Portage-du-Fort, in the Outaouais region, by Sustainable Site Planning and Management Pontiac, a subsidiary of Green Investment Group Incorporated: (a) were Industry Canada or Canada Economic Development financially involved in this project; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, what proportion of the contributions, in dollar and percentage terms, were (i) refundable, (ii) non-refundable; (c) were the contributions referred to in (b) loans or grants; and (d) what were the names and titles of the official and the entrepreneur who signed this agreement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1100.
|
| Ways and Means |
|
The House resumed the adjourned debate on the motion of Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Minister of State (Finance)), — That this House approve in general the budgetary policy of the government. (Ways and Means No. 18) |
|
The debate continued. |
|
Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: |
“this House not approve the budgetary policy of the government as it:
|
(a) gives billions of dollars in handouts to the wealthy few through income splitting, doubling Tax-Free Savings Accounts, and tax loopholes for CEOs;
|
(b) fails to help middle class families by creating affordable, quality childcare spaces;
|
(c) contains no plan to make life more affordable by tackling unfair ATM fees or high credit card rates;
|
(d) fails to restore the age of retirement to 65 by reversing cuts to Old Age Security;
|
(e) does nothing to help workers by reinstating the federal minimum wage and raising it to $15 an hour;
|
(f) fails to fight climate change or grow the economy while protecting the environment; and
|
(g) relies on one time asset sales and accounting sleight-of-hand to achieve a balance.”.
|
|
Debate arose thereon. |
|
Mr. Trudeau (Papineau), seconded by Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), moved the following subamendment, — That the amendment be amended by adding the following: |
“(h) unfairly benefits the rich instead of helping the middle class and those working hard to join it; and
|
(i) contains no plan for jobs and growth.”.
|
|
Debate arose thereon. |
| Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Private Members' Business |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Liu (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), — That Bill C-636, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (unpaid training), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities. |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 377 -- Vote no 377) | |
| YEAS: 125, NAYS: 136 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Adams Cleary Groguhé Nantel Total: -- 125 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Saxton Total: -- 136 |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria), seconded by Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should take steps to provide an increased level of rail service throughout Canada by: (a) recognizing that an increase in rail service and capacity is essential to the livelihood of Canadian agriculture; (b) recognizing that the ongoing review of the Canada Transportation Act provides an opportunity to rebalance the system and improve capacity and service; (c) making sure that all sections of the industry convene, with their own operational ideas, to increase effectiveness and efficiency of our transportation system, such as increased labour, capacity, or train-cars; (d) recognizing that changes to legislation are needed to address the imbalance of power along the logistics chain; and (e) making sure that all stakeholders work together to build a world class transportation system, including effective legislation and regulations. (Private Members' Business M-550) |
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
| (Division No. 378 -- Vote no 378) | |
| YEAS: 260, NAYS: 0 |
|
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Clement Julian Perkins Total: -- 260 |
|
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
| Private Members' Business |
|
At 6:23 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
|
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill S-219, An Act respecting a national day of commemoration of the exodus of Vietnamese refugees and their acceptance in Canada after the fall of Saigon and the end of the Vietnam War, as reported by the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage without amendment. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected for debate Motion No. 3. |
|
Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill S-219 be amended by deleting Clause 2. |
|
Debate arose thereon. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Adler (York Centre), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to. |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(2), Mr. Adler (York Centre), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to. |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
| Messages from the Senate |
|
A message was received from the Senate as follows: |
— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House that the Senate has passed Bill C-32, An Act to enact the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights and to amend certain Acts, without amendment.
|
| Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mrs. Glover (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan for 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 and of the Operating and Capital Budgets for 2014-2015 of the Canada Science and Technology Museums Corporation, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-412-857-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage)
|
— by Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Report of operations under the Export and Import Permits Act for the year 2013, pursuant to the Export and Import Permits Act, R.S. 1985, c. E-19, s. 27. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-137-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development)
|
— by Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) — Interim Order No. 3 Respecting Flights Deck Occupants (81100-3-38-2), dated April 22, 2015, pursuant to the Aeronautics Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-2, sbs. 6.41(5) and (6). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-926-05. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
|
| Adjournment Proceedings |
|
At 7:17 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
|
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
|
Accordingly, at 7:44 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |