House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 29 Tuesday, December 3, 2013 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner entitled "The Paradis Report", dated December 3, 2013, pursuant to section 28 of the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons — Appendix to the Standing Orders. — Sessional Paper No. 8527-412-6.
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— Nos. 412-0058, 412-0194 and 412-0344 concerning landmines. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-29-02;
|
— Nos. 412-0094, 412-0095, 412-0205 and 412-0240 to 412-0242 concerning VIA Rail. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-60-01;
|
— Nos. 412-0101 to 412-0145 concerning chemical products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-56-02.
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Stewart (Burnaby—Douglas), seconded by Ms. Liu (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), Bill C-558, An Act to establish the position of Parliamentary Science Officer, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Chong (Wellington—Halton Hills), seconded by Mr. Rajotte (Edmonton—Leduc), Bill C-559, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and the Parliament of Canada Act (reforms), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul), one concerning prostitution (No. 412-0560);
|
— by Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), one concerning science policy (No. 412-0561) and one concerning the fishing industry (No. 412-0562);
|
— by Mr. Regan (Halifax West), two concerning lighthouses (Nos. 412-0563 and 412-0564);
|
— by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), one concerning the mining industry (No. 412-0565);
|
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning certain diseases (No. 412-0566) and one concerning the electoral system (No. 412-0567);
|
— by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), one concerning international agreements (No. 412-0568).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-51, Q-53, Q-55, Q-56, Q-58 and Q-59 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: |
Q-50 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to the Canadian Coast Guard: (a) what is the complete list of all Canadian Coast Guard ships in service each year since 2000, including (i) the name of each ship, (ii) the location of the home port for each ship, (iii) the number of months per year each ship is operational, (iv) the annual operating budget of each ship, (v) the number of full time and part time employees on each ship, (vi) a list of each operation undertaken by each ship, including a detailed summary of the operation, date, and location(s); (b) what are the ships that are currently slated to be taken out of service or have annual operational service times decreased; and (c) what are the ships that are currently in production and the proposed location for their home port? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-50.
|
|
Q-54 — Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces, since January 1, 2006: (a) what are the file numbers of each set of Minutes of Proceedings for a Board of Inquiry convened to investigate the death, attempted suicide, serious injury, or injury likely to cause permanent disability of a Canadian Armed Forces member; (b) what was the date on which the Chief of Defence Staff, or a person acting on behalf of the Chief of Defence Staff, approved those minutes; (c) if the minutes have not been approved, the date by which such approval is anticipated; and (d) has a copy of the minutes of the Board of Inquiry been released to the victim or next of kin of each victim? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-54.
|
Government Orders |
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and |
That, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at report stage and on the day allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the stage of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 18 -- Vote no 18) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 113 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Clarke Lake Schellenberger Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Andrews Cullen Jones Pacetti Total: -- 113 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 284). |
Group No. 1 |
Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
Motion No. 2 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 2. |
Motion No. 3 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 14. |
Motion No. 4 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 59. |
Motion No. 5 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 73. |
Motion No. 6 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 80. |
Motion No. 7 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 81. |
Motion No. 8 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 113. |
Motion No. 9 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 126. |
Motion No. 10 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 127. |
Motion No. 11 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 128. |
Motion No. 12 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 129. |
Motion No. 13 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 130. |
Motion No. 14 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 131. |
Motion No. 15 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 132. |
Motion No. 16 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 133. |
Motion No. 17 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 134. |
Motion No. 18 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 137. |
Motion No. 19 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 159. |
Motion No. 20 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 160. |
Motion No. 21 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 161. |
Motion No. 22 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 162. |
Motion No. 23 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 163. |
Motion No. 24 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 164. |
Motion No. 25 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 165. |
Motion No. 26 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 166. |
Motion No. 27 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 176. |
Motion No. 28 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 177. |
Motion No. 29 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 178. |
Motion No. 30 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 179. |
Motion No. 31 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 180. |
Motion No. 32 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 181. |
Motion No. 33 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 182. |
Motion No. 34 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 183. |
Motion No. 35 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 184. |
Motion No. 36 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 185. |
Motion No. 37 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 186. |
Motion No. 38 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 187. |
Motion No. 39 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 188. |
Motion No. 40 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 189. |
Motion No. 41 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 190. |
Motion No. 42 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 191. |
Motion No. 43 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 192. |
Motion No. 44 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 193. |
Motion No. 45 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 194. |
Motion No. 46 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 195. |
Motion No. 47 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 196. |
Motion No. 48 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 197. |
Motion No. 49 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 198. |
Motion No. 50 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 199. |
Motion No. 51 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 200. |
Motion No. 52 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 201. |
Motion No. 53 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 202. |
Motion No. 54 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 203. |
Motion No. 55 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 204. |
Motion No. 56 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 205. |
Motion No. 57 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 206. |
Motion No. 58 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 207. |
Motion No. 59 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 208. |
Motion No. 60 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 209. |
Motion No. 61 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 210. |
Motion No. 62 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 215. |
Motion No. 63 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 216. |
Motion No. 64 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 217. |
Motion No. 65 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 219. |
Motion No. 66 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 220. |
Motion No. 67 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 221. |
Motion No. 68 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 222. |
Motion No. 69 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 223. |
Motion No. 70 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 224. |
Motion No. 71 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 225. |
Motion No. 72 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 226. |
Motion No. 73 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 227. |
Motion No. 74 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 228. |
Motion No. 75 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 229. |
Motion No. 76 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 230. |
Motion No. 77 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 231. |
Motion No. 78 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 232. |
Motion No. 79 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 233. |
Motion No. 80 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 234. |
Motion No. 81 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 235. |
Motion No. 82 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 236. |
Motion No. 83 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 237. |
Motion No. 84 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 238. |
Motion No. 85 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 239. |
Motion No. 86 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 240. |
Motion No. 87 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 241. |
Motion No. 88 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 242. |
Motion No. 89 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 243. |
Motion No. 90 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 244. |
Motion No. 91 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 245. |
Motion No. 92 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 246. |
Motion No. 93 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 247. |
Motion No. 94 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 248. |
Motion No. 95 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 256. |
Motion No. 96 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 272. |
Motion No. 97 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 276. |
Motion No. 98 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 282. |
Motion No. 99 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 283. |
Motion No. 100 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 284. |
Motion No. 101 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 285. |
Motion No. 102 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 286. |
Motion No. 103 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 287. |
Motion No. 104 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 288. |
Motion No. 105 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 289. |
Motion No. 106 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 294. |
Motion No. 107 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 295. |
Motion No. 108 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 296. |
Motion No. 109 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 297. |
Motion No. 110 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 298. |
Motion No. 111 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 299. |
Motion No. 112 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 300. |
Motion No. 113 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 301. |
Motion No. 114 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 302. |
Motion No. 115 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 303. |
Motion No. 116 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 304. |
Motion No. 117 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 305. |
Motion No. 118 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 306. |
Motion No. 119 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 307. |
Motion No. 120 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 308. |
Motion No. 121 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 309. |
Motion No. 122 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 310. |
Motion No. 123 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 311. |
Motion No. 124 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 312. |
Motion No. 125 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 313. |
Motion No. 126 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 314. |
Motion No. 127 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 315. |
Motion No. 128 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 316. |
Motion No. 129 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 317. |
Motion No. 130 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 318. |
Motion No. 131 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 319. |
Motion No. 132 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 320. |
Motion No. 133 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 321. |
Motion No. 134 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 322. |
Motion No. 135 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 323. |
Motion No. 136 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 324. |
Motion No. 137 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 325. |
Motion No. 138 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 326. |
Motion No. 139 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 327. |
Motion No. 140 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 328. |
Motion No. 141 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 329. |
Motion No. 142 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 330. |
Motion No. 143 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 331. |
Motion No. 144 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 332. |
Motion No. 145 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 333. |
Motion No. 146 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 334. |
Motion No. 147 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 335. |
Motion No. 148 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 336. |
Motion No. 149 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 337. |
Motion No. 150 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 338. |
Motion No. 151 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 339. |
Motion No. 152 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 340. |
Motion No. 153 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 341. |
Motion No. 154 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 342. |
Motion No. 155 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 343. |
Motion No. 156 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 344. |
Motion No. 157 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 345. |
Motion No. 158 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 346. |
Motion No. 159 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 347. |
Motion No. 160 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 348. |
Motion No. 161 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 349. |
Motion No. 162 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 350. |
Motion No. 163 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 351. |
Motion No. 164 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 352. |
Motion No. 165 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 353. |
Motion No. 166 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 354. |
Motion No. 167 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 355. |
Motion No. 168 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 356. |
Motion No. 169 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 357. |
Motion No. 170 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 358. |
Motion No. 171 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 359. |
Motion No. 172 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 360. |
Motion No. 173 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 361. |
Motion No. 174 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 362. |
Motion No. 175 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 363. |
Motion No. 176 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 364. |
Motion No. 177 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 365. |
Motion No. 178 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 366. |
Motion No. 179 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 367. |
Motion No. 180 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 368. |
Motion No. 181 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 369. |
Motion No. 182 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 370. |
Motion No. 183 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 371. |
Motion No. 184 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 372. |
Motion No. 185 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 373. |
Motion No. 186 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 374. |
Motion No. 187 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 375. |
Motion No. 188 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 376. |
Motion No. 189 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 377. |
Motion No. 190 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 378. |
Motion No. 191 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 379. |
Motion No. 192 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 380. |
Motion No. 193 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 381. |
Motion No. 194 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 382. |
Motion No. 195 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 383. |
Motion No. 196 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 384. |
Motion No. 197 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 385. |
Motion No. 198 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 386. |
Motion No. 199 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 387. |
Motion No. 200 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 388. |
Motion No. 201 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 389. |
Motion No. 202 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 390. |
Motion No. 203 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 391. |
Motion No. 204 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 392. |
Motion No. 205 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 393. |
Motion No. 206 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 394. |
Motion No. 207 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 395. |
Motion No. 208 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 396. |
Motion No. 209 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 397. |
Motion No. 210 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 398. |
Motion No. 211 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 399. |
Motion No. 212 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 400. |
Motion No. 213 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 401. |
Motion No. 214 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 402. |
Motion No. 215 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 403. |
Motion No. 216 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 404. |
Motion No. 217 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 405. |
Motion No. 218 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 406. |
Motion No. 219 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 407. |
Motion No. 220 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 408. |
Motion No. 221 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 409. |
Motion No. 222 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 410. |
Motion No. 223 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 411. |
Motion No. 224 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 412. |
Motion No. 225 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 413. |
Motion No. 226 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 414. |
Motion No. 227 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 415. |
Motion No. 228 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 416. |
Motion No. 229 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 417. |
Motion No. 230 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 418. |
Motion No. 231 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 419. |
Motion No. 232 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 420. |
Motion No. 233 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 421. |
Motion No. 234 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 422. |
Motion No. 235 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 423. |
Motion No. 236 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 424. |
Motion No. 237 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 425. |
Motion No. 238 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 426. |
Motion No. 239 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 427. |
Motion No. 240 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 428. |
Motion No. 241 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 429. |
Motion No. 242 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 430. |
Motion No. 243 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 431. |
Motion No. 244 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 432. |
Motion No. 245 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 433. |
Motion No. 246 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 434. |
Motion No. 247 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 435. |
Motion No. 248 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 436. |
Motion No. 249 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 437. |
Motion No. 250 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 438. |
Motion No. 251 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 439. |
Motion No. 252 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 440. |
Motion No. 253 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 441. |
Motion No. 254 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 442. |
Motion No. 255 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 443. |
Motion No. 256 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 444. |
Motion No. 257 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 445. |
Motion No. 258 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 446. |
Motion No. 259 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 447. |
Motion No. 260 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 448. |
Motion No. 261 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 449. |
Motion No. 262 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 450. |
Motion No. 263 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 451. |
Motion No. 264 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 452. |
Motion No. 265 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 453. |
Motion No. 266 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 454. |
Motion No. 267 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 455. |
Motion No. 268 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 456. |
Motion No. 269 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 457. |
Motion No. 270 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 458. |
Motion No. 271 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 459. |
Motion No. 272 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 460. |
Motion No. 273 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 461. |
Motion No. 274 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 462. |
Motion No. 275 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 463. |
Motion No. 276 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 464. |
Motion No. 277 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 465. |
Motion No. 278 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 466. |
Motion No. 279 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 467. |
Motion No. 280 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 468. |
Motion No. 281 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 469. |
Motion No. 282 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 470. |
Motion No. 283 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 471. |
Motion No. 284 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 472. |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
By unanimous consent, Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the Fourth Report of the Committee (Amendments to the Standing Orders). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-23. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 11) was tabled. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented earlier today, be concurred in. |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 284). |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
At 5:45 p.m., pursuant to Order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on Motion No. 1, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 3 to 8, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived. |
The question was put on Motion No. 9, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 10 to 13 and 15 to 17, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 14, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 18, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 19, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 20 to 26, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 27, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 28 to 54, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 55, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 56 to 84, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 85, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 86 to 94, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 95, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 96, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 97, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 98, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 99 to 103, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 104, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 105, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 106, and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 107 to 176, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 177 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions No. 178 to 282, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 283 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 284, was deferred. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-4, A second act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment. |
Group No. 1 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 19 -- Vote no 19) | |
YEAS: 123, NAYS: 141 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Karygiannis Patry Total: -- 123 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clement Komarnicki Richards Total: -- 141 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3 to 8 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 9 of Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 126. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 9 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 20 -- Vote no 20) | |
YEAS: 35, NAYS: 229 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Foote Lamoureux Plamondon Total: -- 35 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clement Kent Preston Total: -- 229 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 10 to 13 and 15 to 17 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 14 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 131. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 14 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 21 -- Vote no 21) | |
YEAS: 92, NAYS: 172 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Angus Comartin Julian Patry Total: -- 92 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Daniel Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Richards Total: -- 172 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motion No. 18 was also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 19 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 159. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 19 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 22 -- Vote no 22) | |
YEAS: 94, NAYS: 171 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Angus Côté Kellway Péclet Total: -- 94 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Daniel Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rickford Total: -- 171 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 20 to 26 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 27 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 176. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 27 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 23 -- Vote no 23) | |
YEAS: 123, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Karygiannis Patry Total: -- 123 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 28 to 54 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 55 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 204. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 55 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 24 -- Vote no 24) | |
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Karygiannis Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 56 to 84 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 85 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 239. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 85 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 25 -- Vote no 25) | |
YEAS: 93, NAYS: 171 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Angus Côté Julian Papillon Total: -- 93 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Daniel Lake Rickford Total: -- 171 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 86 to 94 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 95 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 256. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 95 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 26 -- Vote no 26) | |
YEAS: 6, NAYS: 257 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Bellavance Hyer Patry Total: -- 6 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Cullen Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rajotte Total: -- 257 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 96 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 272. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 96 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 27 -- Vote no 27) | |
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 97 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 276. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 97 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 28 -- Vote no 28) | |
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 98 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 282. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 98 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 29 -- Vote no 29) | |
YEAS: 92, NAYS: 172 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Angus Cullen Kellway Patry Total: -- 92 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Daniel Lake Richards Total: -- 172 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 99 to 103 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 104 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 288. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 104 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 30 -- Vote no 30) | |
YEAS: 120, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Patry Total: -- 120 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motion No. 105 was also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 106 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 294. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 106 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 31 -- Vote no 31) | |
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Lake Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 107 to 176 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 177 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 365. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 177 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 32 -- Vote no 32) | |
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 144 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rickford Total: -- 144 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 178 to 282 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 283 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-4 be amended by deleting Clause 471. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 283 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 33 -- Vote no 33) | |
YEAS: 122, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Davies (Vancouver East) Lapointe Perreault Total: -- 122 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Crockatt Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Saxton Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motion No. 284 was also negatived on the same division. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Sorenson (Minister of State (Finance)) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 34 -- Vote no 34) | |
YEAS: 144, NAYS: 121 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Crockatt Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rickford Total: -- 144 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Andrews Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Kellway Papillon Total: -- 121 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance) — Actuarial Report of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions on the Canada Pension Plan dated December 31, 2012, pursuant to the Canada Pension Plan Act, R.S., 1985, c. C-8, s. 115. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-83-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance)
|
Petitions Filed with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were filed as follows: |
— by Mrs. Hassainia (Verchères—Les Patriotes), one concerning transportation (No. 412-0569);
|
— by Mr. Richards (Wild Rose), one concerning Canadian heritage (No. 412-0570).
|
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 8:05 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 8:25 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |