House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
|
|
|
Notice PaperNo. 77 Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
|
Introduction of Government Bills |
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
|
Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings) |
|
Questions |
|
| Q-4852 — April 29, 2014 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to access to information requests to government departments, institutions and agencies for each year from 2003 to 2013: (a) how many requests were made in total, broken down by department, institution, or agency, (i) what was the average number of days taken to process these requests, (ii) what was the method by which a delay to a request was determined, (iii) is there a formula by which the number of days of delay is quantitatively determined, (iv) what was the number of requests signed by the Minister before being sent out, (v) what was the number of days delayed per request waiting for the Minister’s signature, (vi) what was the number of requests that ministerial staff questioned, requested or demanded modifications to to the Access to Information and Privacy Directorate (ATIP), (vii) what was the number of requests modified after questions, requests, or demands by staff in the Minister’s office, (viii) what was the average delay per request due to questions, requests, or demands by staff in the Minister's office; (b) of those requests identified in (v) and (vi), how many have been reported to the Office of the Information Commissioner, broken down by department, institution or agency; (c) do policies exist to minimize delays, broken down by (i) department, institution, or agency, (ii) are they formal or informal policies, (iii) were there cases where these policies could not be applied and, if so, how many, (iv) of those times in (iii), what was the reason, (v) of those in (iii), what was the length of delay; and (d) did weekly meetings occur, organized by the ATIP directorate broken down by (i) department, institution, or agency, (ii) do staff from the Minister’s office attend, (iii) do staff from the Minister’s office play an active role, (iv) do staff from the Minister’s office flag files in any capacity and, if so, on what basis, (v) do staff from the Minister’s office ask questions, make requests or demands to the ATIP Directorate? |
| Q-4862 — April 29, 2014 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to on-reserve educational facilities for First Nations in Canada: (a) what requests for capital building expenditure funding for the purposes of acquiring, building, expanding, improving or replacing educational facilities have been made from 2008 to the present; (b) which of these requests have been granted by the government and why; (c) which of these requests were denied and why; (d) which of these requests were delayed, by whom (i.e. government or band council), by how long, and why; (e) what funds have been committed by the government for capital building expenditure for the purposes of acquiring, building, expanding, improving or replacing educational facilities on-reserve in each fiscal year from 2008-2009 to 2013-2014; (f) what on-reserve educational facilities projects are currently under way; (g) in each year since 2008, what projects have been delayed or postponed, and, if any, what were the justifications for and lengths of these delays; (h) what projects are slated to begin work in the 2014-2015 fiscal year; (i) what portion of the total cost of these projects is being funded by Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) through capital building infrastructure; (j) how many projects included additional money from a First Nation to complete the construction or for the equipping of an educational facility; (k) what on-reserve educational facilities projects are slated to begin work beyond the 2014-2015 fiscal year; (l) how many communities with projects identified by INAC as priority capital projects have had letters of approval issued to them; (m) since 2008, what amounts from the "Community Infrastructure" line item have been reallocated either within INAC or to other government departments; (n) with regard to capital building expenditure funding for the purposes of acquiring, building, expanding, improving or replacing educational facilities built on First Nations Reserves for each year from 2008 to the present, broken down by (i) year and (ii) community, how much money was planned but not spent on schools and why? |
Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers |
|
Business of Supply |
|
Government Business |
|
Private Members' Notices of Motions |
|
| M-506 — April 29, 2014 — Mr. Rankin (Victoria) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should work with the scientific community and other key stakeholders to develop an overarching structure or body to provide a forum for leadership and strategic direction for the entire ocean science community in Canada that would: (a) engage in the establishment of a body to coordinate ocean science activities and data archiving, provide periodic assessments of the state of ocean science, and lead the development of a national vision for the future development of ocean science in Canada; (b) manage access to shiptime, through scientific consortia, using standardized access procedures and a central information hub for available capacity and use, to improve transparency and efficiency of research vessel management; and (c) facilitate international sharing of research infrastructure, information and scientific collaboration to address common problems and build international partnerships and an essential channel for mobilizing science to inform international collaboration and governance. |
Private Members' Business |
| C-479 — March 5, 2014 — Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale) — Consideration at report stage of Bill C-479, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (fairness for victims), as reported by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security with amendments. |
| Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by: |
| Ms. Adams (Mississauga—Brampton South) — May 8, 2013 |
| Committee Report — presented on Wednesday, March 5, 2014, Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-50. |
| Report and third reading stages — limited to 2 sitting days, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
| Motion for third reading — may be made in the same sitting, pursuant to Standing Order 98(2). |
| Report stage motions — see “Report Stage of Bills” in today's Notice Paper. |
|
|
|
| 2 Response requested within 45 days |
|