Mr. Kerr (West Nova), from the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented the Third Report of the Committee, "The New Veterans Charter: Moving Forward". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-102.

Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.

A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 5 to 10 and 14 to 27) was tabled.

Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan), seconded by Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), Bill C-608, An Act respecting a National Day of the Midwife, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.

Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca), seconded by Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan), Bill C-609, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (critical infrastructure), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights of Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (law enforcement animals, military animals and service animals).

Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

Debate arose thereon.

Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.

The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), — That Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (law enforcement animals, military animals and service animals), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

The debate continued.

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

By unanimous consent, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows:

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 27, 2014, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Fantino (Minister of Veterans Affairs), seconded by Ms. Finley (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), — That Bill C-27, An Act to amend the Public Service Employment Act (enhancing hiring opportunities for certain serving and former members of the Canadian Forces), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-20, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, the Agreement on Environmental Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras and the Agreement on Labour Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and five hours shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and

that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and the five hours provided for the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the said stages of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-20, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, the Agreement on Environmental Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras and the Agreement on Labour Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, as reported by the Standing Committee on International Trade without amendment;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 53).

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 1.

Motion No. 2 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 2.

Motion No. 3 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 3.

Motion No. 4 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

Motion No. 5 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

Motion No. 6 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 6.

Motion No. 7 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Motion No. 8 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 8.

Motion No. 9 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 9.

Motion No. 10 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 10.

Motion No. 11 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

Motion No. 12 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 12.

Motion No. 13 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 13.

Motion No. 14 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 14.

Motion No. 15 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 15.

Motion No. 16 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

Motion No. 17 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 17.

Motion No. 18 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 18.

Motion No. 19 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 19.

Motion No. 20 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 20.

Motion No. 21 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 21.

Motion No. 22 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 22.

Motion No. 23 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 23.

Motion No. 24 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Motion No. 25 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 25.

Motion No. 26 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 26.

Motion No. 27 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 27.

Motion No. 28 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 28.

Motion No. 29 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 29.

Motion No. 30 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 30.

Motion No. 31 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 31.

Motion No. 32 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 32.

Motion No. 33 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 33.

Motion No. 34 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 34.

Motion No. 35 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 35.

Motion No. 36 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 36.

Motion No. 37 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 37.

Motion No. 38 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 38.

Motion No. 39 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 39.

Motion No. 40 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 40.

Motion No. 41 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 41.

Motion No. 42 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 42.

Motion No. 43 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 43.

Motion No. 44 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 44.

Motion No. 45 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 45.

Motion No. 46 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 46.

Motion No. 47 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 47.

Motion No. 48 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 48.

Motion No. 49 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 49.

Motion No. 50 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 50.

Motion No. 51 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 51.

Motion No. 52 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 52.

Motion No. 53 of Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That Bill C-20 be amended by deleting Clause 53.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 5:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development of Bill C-584, An Act respecting the Corporate Social Responsibility Inherent in the Activities of Canadian Extractive Corporations in Developing Countries.

Ms. Péclet (La Pointe-de-l'Île), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development.

Debate arose thereon.

Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper.

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-20, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, the Agreement on Environmental Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras and the Agreement on Labour Cooperation between Canada and the Republic of Honduras, as reported by the Standing Committee on International Trade without amendment;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 53).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 10:32 p.m., pursuant to Order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 27, 2014, the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2 to 53, was deferred until Wednesday, June 4, 2014, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-32, An Act to enact the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights and to amend certain Acts, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

The debate continued.

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows:

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were filed as follows:

At midnight, pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 12:18 a.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until later today at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).