Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Longfield (Guelph), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the Orders of the Day.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Duclos (Minister of Families, Children and Social Development), seconded by Mr. Garneau (Minister of Transport), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and five hours shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and

That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and the five hours provided for the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the said stages of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 409).

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting the short title.

Motion No. 2 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 2.

Motion No. 3 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 3.

Motion No. 4 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

Motion No. 5 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

Motion No. 6 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 6.

Motion No. 7 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Motion No. 8 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 8.

Motion No. 9 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 9.

Motion No. 10 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 10.

Motion No. 11 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

Motion No. 12 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 12.

Motion No. 13 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 13.

Motion No. 14 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 14.

Motion No. 15 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 15.

Motion No. 16 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

Motion No. 17 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 17.

Motion No. 18 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 18.

Motion No. 19 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 19.

Motion No. 20 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 20.

Motion No. 21 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 21.

Motion No. 22 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 22.

Motion No. 23 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 23.

Motion No. 24 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 24.

Motion No. 25 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 25.

Motion No. 26 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 26.

Motion No. 27 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 27.

Motion No. 28 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 28.

Motion No. 29 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 29.

Motion No. 30 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 30.

Motion No. 31 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 31.

Motion No. 32 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 32.

Motion No. 33 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 33.

Motion No. 34 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 34.

Motion No. 35 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 35.

Motion No. 36 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 36.

Motion No. 37 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 37.

Motion No. 38 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 38.

Motion No. 39 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 39.

Motion No. 40 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 40.

Motion No. 41 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 41.

Motion No. 42 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 42.

Motion No. 43 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 43.

Motion No. 44 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 44.

Motion No. 45 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 45.

Motion No. 46 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 46.

Motion No. 47 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 47.

Motion No. 48 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 48.

Motion No. 49 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 49.

Motion No. 50 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 50.

Motion No. 51 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 51.

Motion No. 52 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 52.

Motion No. 53 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 53.

Motion No. 54 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 54.

Motion No. 55 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 55.

Motion No. 56 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 56.

Motion No. 57 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 57.

Motion No. 58 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 58.

Motion No. 59 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 59.

Motion No. 60 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 60.

Motion No. 61 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 61.

Motion No. 62 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 62.

Motion No. 63 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 63.

Motion No. 64 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 64.

Motion No. 65 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 65.

Motion No. 66 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 66.

Motion No. 67 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 67.

Motion No. 68 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 68.

Motion No. 69 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 69.

Motion No. 70 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 70.

Motion No. 71 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 71.

Motion No. 72 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 72.

Motion No. 73 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 73.

Motion No. 74 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 74.

Motion No. 75 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 75.

Motion No. 76 of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 76.

Motion No. 77 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 77.

Motion No. 78 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 78.

Motion No. 79 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 79.

Motion No. 80 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 80.

Motion No. 81 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 81.

Motion No. 82 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 82.

Motion No. 83 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 83.

Motion No. 84 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 84.

Motion No. 85 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 85.

Motion No. 86 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 86.

Motion No. 87 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 87.

Motion No. 88 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 88.

Motion No. 89 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 89.

Motion No. 90 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 90.

Motion No. 91 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 91.

Motion No. 92 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 92.

Motion No. 93 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 93.

Motion No. 94 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 94.

Motion No. 95 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 95.

Motion No. 96 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 96.

Motion No. 97 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 97.

Motion No. 98 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 98.

Motion No. 99 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 99.

Motion No. 100 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 100.

Motion No. 101 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 101.

Motion No. 102 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 102.

Motion No. 103 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 103.

Motion No. 104 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 104.

Motion No. 105 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 105.

Motion No. 106 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 106.

Motion No. 107 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 107.

Motion No. 108 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 108.

Motion No. 109 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 109.

Motion No. 110 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 110.

Motion No. 111 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 111.

Motion No. 112 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 112.

Motion No. 113 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 113.

Motion No. 114 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 114.

Motion No. 115 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 115.

Motion No. 116 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 116.

Motion No. 117 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 117.

Motion No. 118 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 118.

Motion No. 119 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 119.

Motion No. 120 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 120.

Motion No. 121 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 121.

Motion No. 122 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 122.

Motion No. 123 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 123.

Motion No. 124 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 124.

Motion No. 125 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 125.

Motion No. 126 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 126.

Motion No. 127 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 127.

Motion No. 128 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 128.

Motion No. 129 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 129.

Motion No. 130 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 130.

Motion No. 131 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 131.

Motion No. 132 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 132.

Motion No. 133 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 133.

Motion No. 134 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 134.

Motion No. 135 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 135.

Motion No. 136 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 136.

Motion No. 137 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 137.

Motion No. 138 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 138.

Motion No. 139 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 139.

Motion No. 140 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 140.

Motion No. 141 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 141.

Motion No. 142 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 142.

Motion No. 143 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 143.

Motion No. 144 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 144.

Motion No. 145 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 145.

Motion No. 146 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 146.

Motion No. 147 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 147.

Motion No. 148 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 148.

Motion No. 149 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 149.

Motion No. 150 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 150.

Motion No. 151 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 151.

Motion No. 152 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 152.

Motion No. 153 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 153.

Motion No. 154 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 154.

Motion No. 155 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 155.

Motion No. 156 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 156.

Motion No. 157 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 157.

Motion No. 158 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 158.

Motion No. 159 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 159.

Motion No. 160 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 160.

Motion No. 161 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 161.

Motion No. 162 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 162.

Motion No. 163 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 163.

Motion No. 164 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 164.

Motion No. 165 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 165.

Motion No. 166 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 166.

Motion No. 167 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 167.

Motion No. 168 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 168.

Motion No. 169 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 169.

Motion No. 170 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 170.

Motion No. 171 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 171.

Motion No. 172 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 172.

Motion No. 173 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 173.

Motion No. 174 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 174.

Motion No. 175 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 175.

Motion No. 176 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 176.

Motion No. 177 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 177.

Motion No. 178 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 178.

Motion No. 179 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 179.

Motion No. 180 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 180.

Motion No. 181 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 181.

Motion No. 182 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 182.

Motion No. 183 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 183.

Motion No. 184 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 184.

Motion No. 185 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 185.

Motion No. 186 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 186.

Motion No. 187 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 187.

Motion No. 188 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 188.

Motion No. 189 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 189.

Motion No. 190 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 190.

Motion No. 191 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 191.

Motion No. 192 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 192.

Motion No. 193 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 193.

Motion No. 194 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 194.

Motion No. 195 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 195.

Motion No. 196 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 196.

Motion No. 197 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 197.

Motion No. 198 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 198.

Motion No. 199 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 199.

Motion No. 200 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 200.

Motion No. 201 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 201.

Motion No. 202 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 202.

Motion No. 203 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 203.

Motion No. 204 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 204.

Motion No. 205 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 205.

Motion No. 206 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 206.

Motion No. 207 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 207.

Motion No. 208 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 208.

Motion No. 209 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 209.

Motion No. 210 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 210.

Motion No. 211 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 211.

Motion No. 212 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 212.

Motion No. 213 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 213.

Motion No. 214 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 214.

Motion No. 215 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 215.

Motion No. 216 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 216.

Motion No. 217 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 217.

Motion No. 218 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 218.

Motion No. 219 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 219.

Motion No. 220 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 220.

Motion No. 221 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 221.

Motion No. 222 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 222.

Motion No. 223 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 223.

Motion No. 224 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 224.

Motion No. 225 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 225.

Motion No. 226 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 226.

Motion No. 227 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 227.

Motion No. 228 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 228.

Motion No. 229 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 229.

Motion No. 230 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 230.

Motion No. 231 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 231.

Motion No. 232 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 232.

Motion No. 233 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 233.

Motion No. 234 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 234.

Motion No. 235 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 235.

Motion No. 236 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 236.

Motion No. 237 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 237.

Motion No. 238 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 238.

Motion No. 239 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 239.

Motion No. 240 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 240.

Motion No. 241 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 241.

Motion No. 242 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 242.

Motion No. 243 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 243.

Motion No. 244 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 244.

Motion No. 245 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 245.

Motion No. 246 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 246.

Motion No. 247 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 247.

Motion No. 248 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 248.

Motion No. 249 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 249.

Motion No. 250 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 250.

Motion No. 251 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 251.

Motion No. 252 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 252.

Motion No. 253 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 253.

Motion No. 254 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 254.

Motion No. 255 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 255.

Motion No. 256 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 256.

Motion No. 257 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 257.

Motion No. 258 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 258.

Motion No. 259 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 259.

Motion No. 260 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 260.

Motion No. 261 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 261.

Motion No. 262 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 262.

Motion No. 263 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 263.

Motion No. 264 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 264.

Motion No. 265 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 265.

Motion No. 266 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 266.

Motion No. 267 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 267.

Motion No. 268 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 268.

Motion No. 269 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 269.

Motion No. 270 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 270.

Motion No. 271 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 271.

Motion No. 272 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 272.

Motion No. 273 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 273.

Motion No. 274 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 274.

Motion No. 275 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 275.

Motion No. 276 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 276.

Motion No. 277 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 277.

Motion No. 278 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 278.

Motion No. 279 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 279.

Motion No. 280 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 280.

Motion No. 281 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 281.

Motion No. 282 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 282.

Motion No. 283 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 283.

Motion No. 284 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 284.

Motion No. 285 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 285.

Motion No. 286 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 286.

Motion No. 287 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 287.

Motion No. 288 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 288.

Motion No. 289 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 289.

Motion No. 290 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 290.

Motion No. 291 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 291.

Motion No. 292 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 292.

Motion No. 293 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 293.

Motion No. 294 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 294.

Motion No. 295 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 295.

Motion No. 296 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 296.

Motion No. 297 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 297.

Motion No. 298 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 298.

Motion No. 299 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 299.

Motion No. 300 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 300.

Motion No. 301 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 301.

Motion No. 302 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 302.

Motion No. 303 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 303.

Motion No. 304 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 304.

Motion No. 305 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 305.

Motion No. 306 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 306.

Motion No. 307 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 307.

Motion No. 308 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 308.

Motion No. 309 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 309.

Motion No. 310 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 310.

Motion No. 311 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 311.

Motion No. 312 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Motion No. 313 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 313.

Motion No. 314 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 314.

Motion No. 315 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 315.

Motion No. 316 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 316.

Motion No. 317 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 317.

Motion No. 318 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 318.

Motion No. 319 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Beauport—Limoilou), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 319.

Motion No. 320 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 320.

Motion No. 321 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 321.

Motion No. 322 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 322.

Motion No. 323 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 323.

Motion No. 324 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 324.

Motion No. 325 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 325.

Motion No. 326 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 326.

Motion No. 327 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 327.

Motion No. 328 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 328.

Motion No. 329 of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 329.

Motion No. 330 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 330.

Motion No. 331 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 331.

Motion No. 332 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 332.

Motion No. 333 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 333.

Motion No. 334 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 334.

Motion No. 335 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 335.

Motion No. 336 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 336.

Motion No. 337 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 337.

Motion No. 338 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 338.

Motion No. 339 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 339.

Motion No. 340 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 340.

Motion No. 341 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 341.

Motion No. 342 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 342.

Motion No. 343 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 343.

Motion No. 344 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 344.

Motion No. 345 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 345.

Motion No. 346 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 346.

Motion No. 347 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 347.

Motion No. 348 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 348.

Motion No. 349 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 349.

Motion No. 350 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 350.

Motion No. 351 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 351.

Motion No. 352 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 352.

Motion No. 353 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 353.

Motion No. 354 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 354.

Motion No. 355 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 355.

Motion No. 356 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 356.

Motion No. 357 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 357.

Motion No. 358 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 358.

Motion No. 359 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 359.

Motion No. 360 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 360.

Motion No. 361 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 361.

Motion No. 362 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 362.

Motion No. 363 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 363.

Motion No. 364 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 364.

Motion No. 365 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 365.

Motion No. 366 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 366.

Motion No. 367 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 367.

Motion No. 368 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 368.

Motion No. 369 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 369.

Motion No. 370 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 370.

Motion No. 371 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 371.

Motion No. 372 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 372.

Motion No. 373 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 373.

Motion No. 374 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 374.

Motion No. 375 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 375.

Motion No. 376 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 376.

Motion No. 377 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 377.

Motion No. 378 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 378.

Motion No. 379 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 379.

Motion No. 380 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 380.

Motion No. 381 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 381.

Motion No. 382 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 382.

Motion No. 383 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 383.

Motion No. 384 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 384.

Motion No. 385 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 385.

Motion No. 386 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 386.

Motion No. 387 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 387.

Motion No. 388 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 388.

Motion No. 389 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 389.

Motion No. 390 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 390.

Motion No. 391 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 391.

Motion No. 392 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 392.

Motion No. 393 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 393.

Motion No. 394 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 394.

Motion No. 395 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 395.

Motion No. 396 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 396.

Motion No. 397 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 397.

Motion No. 398 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 398.

Motion No. 399 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 399.

Motion No. 400 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 400.

Motion No. 401 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 401.

Motion No. 402 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 402.

Motion No. 403 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 403.

Motion No. 404 of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 404.

Motion No. 405 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 405.

Motion No. 406 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 406.

Motion No. 407 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 407.

Motion No. 408 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 408.

Motion No. 409 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-74 be amended by deleting Clause 409.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements.

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House: (a) stand with steel and aluminum workers in Saguenay, Hamilton, Sault Ste. Marie, Regina, Kitimat and all across Canada; (b) agree that U.S. action today on steel and aluminum is unacceptable, even more so because it is being done on national security grounds; and (c) is of the view that Canada should retaliate.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division at report stage of Bill C-57, An Act to amend the Federal Sustainable Development Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development with amendments.

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Fast (Abbotsford), seconded by Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope), — That Bill C-57 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 409).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 5:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Shipley (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex), — That Bill C-395, An Act to amend the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.

The debate continued.

The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 6, 2018, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 409).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 7:33 p.m., pursuant to Order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2 to 46, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 47 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 48 to 67, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 68 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 70 to 72, 74 to 94, 96 and 98 to 119, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 69 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 73, 95 and 97, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 120 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 121 to 185, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 186 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 187 to 198, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 199 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 200 and 201, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 202 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 203 to 213, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 214 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 215 to 219, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 220 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 221, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 222 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 223 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 224, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 225 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 226 to 230, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 231 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 232 to 244, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 245 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 246, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 247 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 248 and 249, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 250 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 251 to 256, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 257 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 258 to 264, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 265 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 266 and 267, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 268 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 269 to 283, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 284 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 285 to 296, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 297 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 298 to 309, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 310 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 316, 317, 324 and 329, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 311 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 312 to 315, 318 to 323, 325 to 328 and 330 to 358, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 359 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 360 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 361 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 362 to 402, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 403 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 404 to 409, was deferred.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the recorded divisions were further deferred until Monday, June 4, 2018, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-47, An Act to amend the Export and Import Permits Act and the Criminal Code (amendments permitting the accession to the Arms Trade Treaty and other amendments), as reported by the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 and 2).

Motion No. 1 of Ms. Laverdière (Laurier—Sainte-Marie), seconded by Ms. Brosseau (Berthier—Maskinongé), — That Bill C-47, in Clause 8, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 5 the following:

Motion No. 2 of Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), — That Bill C-47 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 2 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the recorded divisions were further deferred until Monday, June 4, 2018, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

A message was received from the Senate as follows:

— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House:

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows:

Pursuant to Standing Order 36, a petition certified by the Clerk of Petitions was filed as follows:

At 9:57 p.m., by unanimous consent, the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 10:07 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).