House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 262 Tuesday, December 5, 2023 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
The acting clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Speaker. |
Whereupon, Mr. d'Entremont (West Nova), Deputy Speaker and Chair of Committees of the Whole, took the chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the Parliament of Canada Act. |
Prayer |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 441-01896 concerning animals. |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Mr. Arseneault (Madawaska—Restigouche), from the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented the third report of the committee, "Adaptation of CBC/Radio-Canada’s Audiovisual Content for the International Market". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-355. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 70) was tabled. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Calkins (Red Deer—Lacombe), seconded by Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon), Bill C-368, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (natural health products), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), seconded by Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), Bill C-369, An Act respecting Christian Heritage Month, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
Mr. Desilets (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), seconded by Ms. Chabot (Thérèse-De Blainville), moved, — That the 13th report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Thursday, November 9, 2023, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 47) |
Debate arose thereon. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mrs. Vignola (Beauport—Limoilou), one concerning government services and administration (No. 441-01967); |
— by Mr. Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands), one concerning the environment (No. 441-01968) and one concerning social affairs and equality (No. 441-01969). |
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-1803, Q-1808, Q-1814 to Q-1820, Q-1823, Q-1828, Q-1829, Q-1832 to Q-1835 and Q-1842 to Q-1845 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-1804 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — With regard to the Fighting and Managing Wildfires in a Changing Climate Program's training fund, since October 1, 2021: (a) how many community-based firefighters have been successfully trained by the federal government, broken down by (i) province or territory, (ii) year; and (b) in what jurisdictions have the trained community-based firefighters in (a) been used to fight and manage wildfires, broken down by (i) province or territory, (ii) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1804.
|
|
Q-1805 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — With regard to the Rental Construction Financing Initiative: (a) how much funding has been provided under the initiative since the creation of the program; (b) what are the details of all projects approved to date, including, for each, the (i) location, (ii) number of units, (iii) value of the project, (iv) amount of financing, (v) type of financing, (vi) financing recipient, if known, (vii) date of application, (viii) date of approval, (ix) date the financing was provided; and (c) of the projects in (b), how many units have been completed as of October 2023? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1805.
|
|
Q-1806 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — With regard to the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA): (a) what is the current backlog of air traffic complaints, including the number of complaints and the length of time before new complaints are adjudicated; (b) what is the government’s plan to reduce the backlog; (c) does the government have a target date for when the backlog will be reduced to less than six months, and, if so, what is the target; (d) if the government does not have a target in (c), why not; and (e) what measures, if any, are in place to reduce the number of cases requiring a CTA ruling? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1806.
|
|
Q-1807 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — With regard to government expenditures related to the Prime Minister’s trip to New York in September 2023, to attend the United Nations General Assembly: (a) what are the expenditures incurred to date, in total and broken down by type of expense; (b) how many members were part of the Canadian delegation; (c) what are the names and titles of the delegation members; (d) what was the total amount spent on hotels in the New York City area during that visit; and (e) what are the details of the spending at each hotel, including the (i) total amount spent, (ii) name of the hotel, (iii) number of rooms rented each night, (iv) rate paid and the number of rooms at each rate? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1807.
|
|
Q-1809 — Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester) — With regard to the government's Substance Use and Addictions Program, broken down annually for each of the last five years: (a) how much funding has been provided through the program; (b) how was the funding spent, broken down by type of expenditure; (c) what are the details of the funding recipients, including (i) which entities received funding through the program, including the name and location of each entity, (ii) how much funding each entity receive, (iii) what the funding was intended for; (d) what was the breakdown of the funding by province or territory and by municipal area, if known; and (e) what was the breakdown of the funding by type of substance? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1809.
|
|
Q-1810 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — With regard to Veterans Affairs Canada, to date: (a) how many purpose-built accessible and affordable housing units have been built or procured since November 1, 2019, to specifically address homelessness of former members of the Canadian Armed Forces and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, broken down by year and by province or territory; (b) what are the median rents for the purpose built-housing units in (a), broken down by year and by municipality; (c) how many formerly homeless veterans received access to homes through the procurement of the purpose-built housing units in (a), broken down by year and by province or territory; (d) how were federal funds allocated to construct purpose-built affordable housing for veterans experiencing homelessness across Canada; and (e) is the government aware of how many veterans are currently experiencing homelessness in Canada, and, if so, what is the most recent count? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1810.
|
|
Q-1811 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — With regard to the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation's (CMHC) mortgage insurance loans for non-profit housing providers, to date: (a) how many non-profit housing projects with mortgage guarantees from CMHC defaulted, broken down by year and by province or territory; (b) for each project that defaulted in (a), what was the reason for the default; (c) how many and what percentage of non-profit projects that defaulted were eventually foreclosed; (d) how many and what percentage of projects in default were also guaranteed by provincial or territorial governments; (e) what is the amount of administrative fees the CMHC charges to non-profits seeking to have CMHC mortgage insurance for their housing project, on average; and (f) what is the total amount of administrative fees the CMHC has collected from non-profits broken down by year and by province or territory? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1811.
|
|
Q-1812 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — With regard to the government's Rapid Housing Initiative (RHI), to date: (a) how many applications through the Projects Stream has the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) (i) received, broken down by municipality and by year, (ii) rejected, broken down by municipality, by year, and by number of units per application, (iii) approved, broken down by municipality and by year, (iv) accepted and delivered all funding for, broken down by municipality, by year, and by number of units; (b) how many applications through the Cities Stream has the CMHC (i) received, broken down by municipality and by year, (ii) rejected, broken down by municipality, by year, and by number of units per application, (iii) approved, broken down by municipality and by year, (iv) accepted and delivered all funding for, broken down by municipality, by year, and by number of units; (c) of the projects rejected, how many had either municipal, provincial, or territorial resources attached to the project (i) for the Projects Stream, (ii) for the Cities stream; (d) how much federal funding has been paid out by the program; (e) what are the median processing times for RHI applications, broken down by municipality and by year; and (f) what are the median rents for completed RHI-funded units, broken down by municipality and by year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1812.
|
|
Q-1813 — Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East) — With regard to compliance inspections undertaken by Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) related to the Temporary Foreign Worker program and the findings of those inspections: (a) of the more than 2,100 inspections undertaken by ESDC in the last fiscal year, how many and what percentage were conducted (i) in-person, (ii) remotely, broken down by year and by province; (b) of those inspections conducted in-person in (a), (i) how many provided formal or informal notice to employers prior to the date of inspection, (ii) how many and what percentage were found to be in violation of compliance standards, (iii) what were the reasons cited for the violation of compliance (ranked in order of the most frequent) and the percentage for each distinct reason in relation to all found violations, (iv) within what timeframe did the employer address the violations; (c) of those inspections conducted remotely in (a), (i) how many and what percentage were found to be in violation of compliance standards, (ii) what were the reasons cited for the violation of compliance (ranked in order of the most frequent) and the percentage for each distinct reason in relation to all found violations; (d) were any of the employers found to be repeat offenders and, if so, how many employers were found to be in violation of compliance standards more than once and how often did these employers violate compliance standards; (e) how many and what percentage of employers found to be in violation of compliance standards received a follow-up inspection following the original finding of violations, and how many and what percentage of follow-up inspections found the employer to be in (i) compliance, (ii) violation; (f) among employers who were found to be in violation of compliance standards of the Temporary Foreign Workers Program, how many and what percentage (i) were required to provide adequate living accommodations for migrant workers, (ii) failed to meet the requirements to provide adequate living accommodations, (iii) employed foreign nationals holding closed work permits and (g) in those cases whereby it was decided that employers failed to provide foreign nationals with appropriate and agreed-upon wages, failed to provide foreign nationals with health insurance, charged foreign nationals excessive fees, failed to provide adequate living accommodations, failed to maintain a workplace free of abuse or reprisal, failed to meet expectations listed in the offer of employment, or failed to provide information on the foreign national’s rights in Canada, what measures, if any, were taken to compensate affected foreign nationals? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1813.
|
|
Q-1821 — Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock) — With regard to all memorandums, briefing notes, and other documents sent from or received by the Privy Council Office related to, or which mention in any way, the United States President Joe Biden’s visit to Parliament on March 24, 2023: what are the details of each, including the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) type of document, (v) title, (vi) summary of the contents, (vii) file number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1821.
|
|
Q-1822 — Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock) — With regard to all memorandums, briefing notes, and other documents sent from or received by Global Affairs Canada related to, or which mention in any way, United States President Joe Biden’s visit to Parliament on March 24, 2023: what are the details of each, including the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) type of document, (v) title, (vi) summary of the contents, (vii) file number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1822.
|
|
Q-1824 — Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester) — With regard to expenditures incurred by the government related to icebreaking services on the St. Lawrence Seaway: what were the total expenditures, broken down by year and month, for each of the last five years? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1824.
|
|
Q-1825 — Mr. Warkentin (Grande Prairie—Mackenzie) — With regard to the carbon tax or price on carbon, during the 2022-23 fiscal year: (a) what were the annual costs to administer the (i) collection of the carbon tax, (ii) rebate program; and (b) how many employees or full-time equivalents were assigned to work on the (i) collection of the carbon tax, (ii) rebate program? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1825.
|
|
Q-1826 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to Service Canada’s national in-person service delivery network, broken down by each Service Canada Centre: (a) how many full-time employees (FTEs) were there on January 1, 2020; (b) how many FTEs were there on October 17, 2023; (c) which offices have changed their hours of service since January 1, 2020; and (d) for each office that has changed its hours of service, what (i) were the previous hours, (ii) are the new hours? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1826.
|
|
Q-1827 — Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford) — With regard to the food affordability crisis: (a) on what date will the government implement its proposed National School Food Policy; (b) what programs will be put in place by the government to implement its proposed commitment of $1 billion over five years; (c) what are the government’s plans to integrate Canada's Food Guide as a guiding principle for the Healthy Eating Strategy; and (d) what communications, via in-person meeting, virtual meetings, e-mails, or letters, have been received from provincial governments confirming their interest in partnering with the federal government on the establishment of a National School Food Program, broken down by (i) province, (ii) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1827.
|
|
Q-1830 — Ms. Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha) — With regard to expenditures by any department, agency, Crown corporation, or other government entity involving ONWARD or Maryam Monsef, since January 1, 2022: what are the details of all expenditures, including, for each, (i) the date, (ii) the amount, (iii) a description of the goods or services provided, (iv) whether the contract was sole-sourced or competitively bid? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1830.
|
|
Q-1831 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — With regard to events held at Rideau Hall since January 1, 2018: what are the details of each event, including the (i) date, (ii) purpose and description of the event, (iii) number of attendees, (iv) total costs or expenditures, (v) breakdown of the costs or expenditures? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1831.
|
|
Q-1836 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — With regard to services provided on bases of the Canadian Armed Forces since December 1, 2015: (a) how many positions for civilian employees of the Department of National Defence have been eliminated, broken down by (i) province or territory, (ii) year; (b) how many positions for civilian employees of the Department of National Defence remain unfilled, broken down by (i) province or territory, (ii) year; and (c) how many contracts using federal funds, including renewed contracts, were issued to private companies without using an open tender process, broken down by (i) province or territory, (ii) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1836.
|
|
Q-1837 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — With regard to the government’s 2023 Housing Accelerator Fund that closed on August 18, 2023: what are the details of the $4 billion dollar fund, including (i) which ridings received funding, (ii) what amount of funding each riding received? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1837.
|
|
Q-1839 — Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton) — With regard to Canada’s international land border crossings: what was the average wait time at Canada’s land border crossing bridges for 2019 and 2023, broken down by (i) bridge, (ii) week? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1839.
|
|
Q-1841 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the Canada Dental Benefit, broken down by year, for each of the next five years: (a) what are the funding allocations and projections for the program, broken down by department or agency receiving funding to administer the program; (b) how much funding is expected to be required to administer the program, whereas how much funding is provided in benefits; and (c) what are the projected rates of coverage under the program? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1841.
|
|
Q-1846 — Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil) — With regard to international conferences attended by the government, broken down by department, agency, Crown corporation, or other government entity, since January 1, 2019: what are the details of all conferences attended by the government, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) location, (iii) name of the conference, (iv) number of government attendees, (v) amount spent on conference fees or tickets, (vi) amount spent on travel related to the conference? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1846.
|
|
Q-1847 — Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil) — With regard to international conferences sponsored by the government, broken down by department, agency, Crown corporation, or other government entity, since January 1, 2019: what are the details of all conferences sponsored by the government, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) location, (iii) name of the conference, (iv) financial amount of the sponsorship? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-1847.
|
Government Orders |
The order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-56, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions: |
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 3. |
Group No. 1 |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-56 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-56, in Clause 3, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing lines 26 and 27 on page 3 with the following: |
|
|
|
(b) by replacing line 30 on page 3 to line 6 on page 4 with the following: |
|
|
Ms. Gould (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Champagne (Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry), seconded by Mr. Rodriguez (Minister of Transport), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-56 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 8 the following: |
|||
|
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Ms. Gould (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Certificate of Nomination and biographical notes of Eric Janse, Clerk of the House of Commons, pursuant to Standing Order 111.1(1) — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-5-08. (Pursuant to Standing Order 111.1(1), referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs) |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Concurrence in Committee Reports |
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Desilets (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), seconded by Ms. Chabot (Thérèse-De Blainville), — That the 13th report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, presented on Thursday, November 9, 2023, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 47) |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 470 -- Vote no 470) | |
YEAS: 167, NAYS: 149 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Desilets Larouche Rood Total: -- 167 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Drouin Kusmierczyk Robillard Total: -- 149 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Champagne Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Guilbeault Qualtrough Total: -- 14 |
Question of Privilege |
A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), the Deputy Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege; |
Whereupon, Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved, — That the Speaker's public participation at an Ontario Liberal Party convention, as Speaker of the House of Commons, constitute a breach of the tradition and expectation of impartiality required for that high office, constituting a serious error of judgment which undermines the trust required to discharge his duties and responsibilities and, therefore, the House refer the matter to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs with instruction that it recommend an appropriate remedy. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), seconded by Mr. Tochor (Saskatoon—University), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by adding the following: |
“, provided that the committee: (a) meet within 24 hours after receiving this order of reference to consider the matter; (b) ensure this matter take priority over all other business; (c) shall have the first priority for the use of House resources for the committee meetings, subject to the special orders adopted on Monday, May 16, 2023, and Monday, December 4, 2023; and (d) be instructed to report back to the House not later than on Thursday, December 14, 2023”.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, December 6, 2023, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-56, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 3). |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
At 5:30 p.m., pursuant to order made Thursday, November 23, 2023, the Deputy Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-56, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments. |
Group No. 1 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington), — That Bill C-56 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 471 -- Vote no 471) | |
YEAS: 139, NAYS: 172 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Ellis Lewis (Essex) Shields Total: -- 139 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Dhaliwal Kelloway O'Regan Total: -- 172 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Champagne Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Guilbeault Qualtrough Total: -- 14 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington), — That Bill C-56, in Clause 3, be amended |
||
(a) by replacing lines 26 and 27 on page 3 with the following:
|
||
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||
(Division No. 472 -- Vote no 472) | ||
YEAS: 137, NAYS: 171 |
||
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dreeshen Lemire Schmale Total: -- 137 |
||
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Dhaliwal Kelloway Petitpas Taylor Total: -- 171 |
||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Champagne Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Guilbeault Qualtrough Total: -- 14 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 3 of Mr. Champagne (Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry), seconded by Mr. Rodriguez (Minister of Transport), — That Bill C-56 be amended by adding after line 16 on page 8 the following:
|
|||
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|||
(Division No. 473 -- Vote no 473) | |||
YEAS: 309, NAYS: 0 |
|||
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Diab Lake Rodriguez Total: -- 309 |
|||
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Champagne Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Guilbeault Qualtrough Total: -- 14 |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Ms. Martinez Ferrada (Minister of Tourism and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec) for Ms. Freeland (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Ng (Minister of Export Promotion, International Trade and Economic Development), moved, — That the bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage with a further amendment. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 474 -- Vote no 474) | |
YEAS: 309, NAYS: 0 (See list under Division No. 473) |
|
Accordingly, the bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage with a further amendment and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Royal Assent |
A message was received informing the Commons that on December 5, 2023, at 5:11 p.m., Her Excellency the Governor General signified royal assent by written declaration to the following bill: |
Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bail reform) — Chapter No. 30.
|
Private Members' Business |
At 6:28 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay), seconded by Ms. Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), — That Bill C-219, An Act to enact the Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights and to make related amendments to other Acts, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. |
The debate continued. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, December 6, 2023, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:29 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:59 p.m., the Deputy Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |