House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 290 Monday, March 18, 2024 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Private Members' Business |
At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development of Bill C-375, An Act to amend the Impact Assessment Act (federal-provincial agreements). |
Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Soroka (Yellowhead), moved, — That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order or usual practice of the House, in relation to the second reading stage of Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, all questions necessary to dispose of the said stage of the bill be deemed put, any recorded divisions be deemed requested and take place immediately following the disposal of the motion related to the business of supply later this day, after which the House shall adjourn to the next sitting day, and that the debate pursuant to standing order 38 not take place. |
Business of Supply |
The order was read for the consideration of the business of supply. |
Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), seconded by Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre), moved, — That, given that, |
(i) the situation in the Middle East is devastating to many Canadians, particularly those with friends and family members in the region,
|
(ii) the death toll in Gaza has surpassed 30,000, with 70% of the victims women and children,
|
(iii) the Hamas terrorist attacks on October 7, 2023, killed nearly 1,200 people and over 100 hostages remain in Hamas captivity,
|
(iv) millions of residents of Gaza are displaced and at risk of starvation, death, and disease, and Gaza is currently the most dangerous place in the world to be a child,
|
(v) the United Nations reports over 70 per cent of civilian infrastructure in Gaza, including homes, hospitals, schools, water and sanitation facilities, have been destroyed or severely damaged by Israeli military attacks,
|
(vi) on January 26, 2024, the International Court of Justice ordered six provisional measures, including for Israel to refrain from acts under the Genocide convention, prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to genocide, and take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza,
|
(vii) Israelis are still at risk of attacks by Iran-backed terrorist groups including Hamas and Hezbollah,
|
(viii) the forcible transfer and violent attacks on Palestinians in the West Bank have significantly increased in recent months,
|
(ix) the casualties of the war on Gaza and the Hamas terrorist attack include Canadian citizens,
|
(x) Canadian citizens remain trapped in Gaza, blocked from leaving,
|
(xi) Jewish, Muslim, Arab, and Palestinian Canadians have reported an increase in hate-motivated attacks and racism since October,
|
(xii) Palestinians and Israelis both deserve to live in peace, with full enjoyment of their human rights and democratic freedoms,
|
the House call on the government to: |
(a) demand an immediate ceasefire and the release of all hostages;
|
(b) suspend all trade in military goods and technology with Israel and increase efforts to stop the illegal trade of arms, including to Hamas;
|
(c) immediately reinstate funding and ensure long-term continued funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), and support the independent investigation;
|
(d) support the prosecution of all crimes and violations of international law committed in the region, and support the work of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court;
|
(e) demand unimpeded humanitarian access to Gaza;
|
(f) ensure Canadians trapped in Gaza can reach safety in Canada and lift the arbitrary cap of 1,000 temporary resident visa applications;
|
(g) ban extremist settlers from Canada, impose sanctions on Israeli officials who incite genocide, and maintain sanctions on Hamas leaders;
|
(h) advocate for an end to the decades-long occupation of Palestinian territories and work toward a two-state solution; and
|
(i) officially recognize the State of Palestine and maintain Canada’s recognition of Israel’s right to exist and to live in peace with its neighbours.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— Nos. 441-02013, 441-02040, 441-02044, 441-02062, 441-02066 and 441-02068 concerning taxation; |
— Nos. 441-02016, 441-02022, 441-02033, 441-02041, 441-02048 and 441-02065 concerning health; |
— Nos. 441-02017, 441-02027, 441-02036 and 441-02059 concerning the democratic process; |
— No. 441-02019 concerning government services and administration; |
— Nos. 441-02020, 441-02035, 441-02042, 441-02055 and 441-02058 concerning the environment; |
— No. 441-02021 concerning natural resources and energy; |
— No. 441-02024 concerning media and telecommunications; |
— Nos. 441-02026, 441-02034, 441-02043, 441-02047, 441-02050 and 441-02064 concerning justice; |
— Nos. 441-02028, 441-02032, 441-02045, 441-02051 and 441-02057 concerning social affairs and equality; |
— Nos. 441-02029 and 441-02054 concerning civil and human rights; |
— Nos. 441-02030, 441-02031, 441-02046 and 441-02060 concerning foreign affairs; |
— Nos. 441-02037, 441-02053, 441-02056 and 441-02063 concerning business and trade; |
— Nos. 441-02038 and 441-02039 concerning employment and labour; |
— No. 441-02049 concerning the correctional system; |
— No. 441-02052 concerning culture and heritage; |
— No. 441-02061 concerning food and drink; |
— No. 441-02067 concerning citizenship and immigration. |
Statements by Ministers |
Pursuant to Standing Order 33(1), Mr. Trudeau (Prime Minister) made a statement. |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Mr. McCauley (Edmonton West), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 15th report of the committee, "Request for Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada to Investigate". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-396. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 105) was tabled. |
|
Mr. McCauley (Edmonton West), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 16th report of the committee, "Supplementary Estimates (C), 2023-24: Votes 1c and 5c under Department of Public Works and Government Services, Vote 1c under Privy Council Office, Vote 1c under Shared Services Canada and Votes 1c, 15c, 20c and 30c under Treasury Board Secretariat". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-397. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 110) was tabled. |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Masse (Windsor West), seconded by Mr. Sorbara (Vaughan—Woodbridge), Bill C-384, An Act to establish Turkish Heritage Month, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, in relation to its study of Canadian businesses in supply chains and global markets, seven members of the Standing Committee on International Trade be authorized to travel to Prince Rupert, British Columbia; Winnipeg, Manitoba; Windsor, Ontario; Montréal, Quebec; and Halifax, Nova Scotia, in the spring of 2024, during an adjournment period, and that the necessary staff accompany the committee. |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, in relation to its study of the opioid epidemic and toxic drug crisis in Canada, seven members of the Standing Committee on Health be authorized to travel to Montréal, Quebec; Vancouver, British Columbia; Calgary, Alberta; and Red Deer, Alberta, in the spring of 2024, during an adjournment period, and that the necessary staff accompany the committee. |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, in relation to its study of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII), seven members of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs be authorized to travel to New York, New York, United States of America, in the spring of 2024, during an adjournment period, and that the necessary staff accompany the committee. |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, in relation to its study of the growing problem of car thefts in Canada, seven members of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security be authorized to travel to Montréal, Quebec, in the spring of 2024, during an adjournment period, and that the necessary staff accompany the committee. |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That a take-note debate on the Canada-Ukraine relationship and the newly signed strategic security partnership be held on Wednesday, March 20, 2024, pursuant to Standing Order 53.1, and that, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House: (a) members wishing to speak during the debate may indicate to the Chair that they will be dividing their time with another member; (b) the time provided for the debate be extended beyond four hours, as needed, to include a minimum of 12 periods of 20 minutes each; and (c) no quorum calls, dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent shall be received by the Chair. |
|
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That a take-note debate to pay tribute to the late Right Honourable Brian Mulroney be held on Tuesday, March 19, 2024, pursuant to Standing Order 53.1, and that, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House: (a) no member may speak for more than 10 minutes and the speeches not be subject to a question and comment period, provided that members wishing to speak may indicate to the Chair that they will be dividing their time with another member; and (b) no quorum calls, dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent shall be received by the Chair. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands), one concerning the environment (No. 441-02230), one concerning social affairs and equality (No. 441-02231) and one concerning food and drink (No. 441-02232); |
— by Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon), one concerning parliament and politics (No. 441-02233) and one concerning health (No. 441-02234); |
— by Ms. Sahota (Brampton North), one concerning citizenship and immigration (No. 441-02235); |
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning fisheries (No. 441-02236); |
— by Mr. Morrice (Kitchener Centre), one concerning foreign affairs (No. 441-02237). |
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-2202, Q-2203, Q-2205, Q-2217, Q-2218, Q-2220, Q-2223, Q-2230, Q-2236, Q-2237, Q-2243, Q-2245, Q-2247 and Q-2250 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-2204 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With regard to the federal tobacco control strategy for fiscal year 2022-23: (a) what was the budget for the strategy; (b) how much of that budget was spent within each fiscal year; (c) how much was spent on each component of the strategy, specifically (i) mass media, (ii) policy and regulatory development, (iii) research, (iv) surveillance, (v) enforcement, (vi) grants and contributions, (vii) programs for Indigenous Canadians; (d) were any other activities not listed in (c) funded by the strategy, and, if so, how much was spent on each of these activities; and (e) was part of the budget reallocated for purposes other than tobacco control, and, if so, how much was reallocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2204.
|
|
Q-2206 — Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George) — With regard to Statistics Canada's phone surveys on mental health service accessibility and effectiveness: (a) how many people have been contacted across the country from 2016 to 2023, broken down by year and by province or territory; (b) does Statistics Canada explain the nature of the survey before participants are asked to continue; (c) does Statistics Canada obtain informed consent from participants to participate in the survey before questions are asked; (d) does Statistics Canada provide a list of services available if questions traumatize participants; (e) do those administering the survey, including those who make the phone calls, have any mental health awareness training, and, if so, what training is provided; (f) what follow-up measures, if any, are taken when a survey participant exhibits signs of distress; and (g) if no follow-up measures are taken in (f), why not? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2206.
|
|
Q-2207 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to athlete abuse, discrimination, and harassment in sport in Canada: (a) what are all the groups of athletes under federal jurisdiction; (b) are athletes who are carded under the Athlete Assistance Program considered protected under federal jurisdiction; (c) how many athletes are currently carded, broken down by sport; (d) how many athletes have been carded, broken down by sport since any form of carding began; (e) has the government ever undertaken a large-scale survey of athletes under its jurisdiction or protection, while protecting their privacy, on athlete abuse, discrimination, and harassment; (f) has the government ever taken such a survey of current carded athletes, while protecting their privacy; (g) has the government ever undertaken such a survey of past carded athletes, while protecting their privacy; (h) if the answer to (e), (f) or (g) is affirmative, what are the details of the survey, including (i) the dates, (ii) the questions, (iii) the results, (iv) any changes to protecting athlete health, safety, and wellbeing as a result; (i) does each national sport organization (NSO) have a formal policy to address (i) abuse, (ii) discrimination, (iii) harassment; (j) which NSOs do not have a policy; (k) how often does Sport Canada review such policies as in (i)(i) to (i)(iii), and has any policy ever been required to be strengthened, and, if so, how and when; (l) does each NSO have an independent third party to address abuse, discrimination, and harassment; (m) which NSOs do not have an independent third party; (n) what are the minimum requirements for a third party; (o) what oversight, if any, does Sport Canada provide; (p) broken down by NSO, for each one, is annual mandatory training on (i) abuse, (ii) discrimination, (iii) harassment, taking place; (q) broken down by NSO, for each one, how does Sport Canada track what annual training is taking place; (r) broken down by NSO, for each one, how many athletes, coaches, trainers, medical personnel, judges or referees, parents, and volunteers have gone through such training, broken down by year since April 2020; (s) how many incidents of abuse, discrimination, and harassment, broken down by sport, have been reported to Sport Canada, broken down by year since June 2018; (t) of the incidents in (s), how many of them (i) involved a team, (ii) involved a coach or trainer, (iii) involved medical personnel, (iv) involved a judge or referee, (v) involved another athlete, (vi) involved anyone else in a position of power, (vii) were considered sufficiently serious to withhold funding; (u) in the context of withholding funding, how is “sufficiently serious” defined; (v) how many cases were transferred to the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner (OSIC); (w) what is the current backlog of cases broken down by sport at the OSIC; (x) how many cases at the OSIC have been effectively resolved; (y) what is, in detail, the current reporting mechanism for reporting an incident of abuse, discrimination or harassment to the appropriate channels at the federal level, and what are all the appropriate channels; (z) since June 2018, broken down by sport, how many coaches, trainers, medical personnel, judges or referees, or any other person in a position of power have been (i) suspended, (ii) removed from the sport system, (iii) referred to the police; (aa) what mechanisms have been put in place to ensure that anyone (i) suspended, (ii) removed, (iii) criminally convicted, cannot work, volunteer or cross jurisdictions to work or volunteer with athletes or children in Canada and internationally; (bb) what work, if any, has been undertaken on any form of registry of offenders to protect athletes and children, and what were the steps taken; (cc) since 2018, how much funding has the government invested in safe sport, and, for each, what were the dates and investments; (dd) how much funding has each NSO invested in safe sport, and what areas of safe sport has each NSO invested in; (ee) are U Sports athletes protected under federal jurisdiction; (ff) what governments have jurisdiction over U Sports; (gg) who has jurisdiction if an athlete is both a university athlete and a carded athlete; (hh) are Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association athletes protected under federal jurisdiction; (ii) what governments have jurisdiction over Canadian Collegiate Athletic Association; and (jj) who has jurisdiction if an athlete is both a college athlete and a carded athlete? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2207.
|
|
Q-2208 — Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls) — With regard to the Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA), which is administered by Export Development Canada: (a) what is the total number of loans and total capital (i) issued from the CEBA program since it was first launched on April 9, 2020, (ii) that was paid back in full by December 31, 2023, (iii) issued that the government expects or forecasts to be refinanced before March 28, 2024, (iv) that the government expects or forecasts will be repaid in full by March 28, 2024; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by province and territory; and (c) for each province and territory in (b), what is the breakdown by each sector of the tourism industry, including (i) accommodation, (ii) transportation, (iii) food and beverage services, (iv) recreation and entertainment, (v) travel services? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2208.
|
|
Q-2209 — Mr. Lake (Edmonton—Wetaskiwin) — With regard to the government’s response to the Emergency Alert issued at 6:44 p.m. on January 13, 2024, by the Alberta Emergency Management Agency asking Albertans to immediately limit their electricity use to essential needs only: what specific actions, if any, were taken by the government to limit the amount of electricity it was using at federal buildings and facilities in Alberta during this crisis, including, for each building, (i) the name and location of the building, (ii) what action was taken, if any, (iii) what time and date was the action taken? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2209.
|
|
Q-2210 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to the Canadian sport helpline and the abuse-free sport helpline: (a) in what month and year was the service first launched; (b) what are the details of the program’s financing, including (i) the cost to administer the program annually, (ii) whether there have been any changes to the finances since its inception, (iii) the dates of any such changes; (c) what is the size of the current team that leads the program, and what are the details of the team that leads the program including the name of all positions of the current team; (d) how many days a week is the service available, and (i) what are the specific times when the service is available for each day, (ii) how many operators are available during these times, (iii) what training do each of the operators have; (e) how is the existence of the service communicated to athletes, and who is responsible for doing so; (f) broken down annually and by sport, while protecting privacy of all callers, how many calls have been logged yearly since 2019; (g) broken down annually and by sport, while protecting the privacy of all callers, how many calls provided advice on (i) a complaints process, (ii) how to seek help from the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner, (iii) how to seek help from a national sport organization, (iv) how to seek help from a provincial or territorial sport organization, (v) how to seek help from a lawyer, (vi) how to seek help from the police, (vii) on any other matter, including the full range of issues that athletes, parents, witnesses, and any callers were concerned about; and (h) who has oversight of data from the helpline, and, while protecting privacy of all callers, what analysis, if any, has been undertaken on the data and (i) on what timescales, (ii) have any such analyses been used to inform further action to protect athletes and young people, and, if so, what are the details of each instance? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2210.
|
|
Q-2211 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to the Red Deer Declaration signed in 2019: (a) how many federal, provincial and territorial sport ministerial meetings have been held, and, for each meeting, what were the details, including (i) the date, (ii) the agenda, (iii) whether safety and integrity in sport were on the agenda, (iv) what specifically was discussed regarding safety in sport; (b) how many federal, provincial and territorial sport ministerial conference calls have been held, and, for each, what were the details, including (i) the date, (ii) the agenda, (iii) whether safety and integrity in sport were on the agenda, (iv) what specifically was discussed regarding safety in sport in each of the conference calls; (c) what intergovernmental goals have been developed to address abuse, discrimination and harassment in sport in the areas of (i) awareness, (ii) policy, (iii) prevention, (iv) reporting, (v) management, (vi) monitoring; (d) what intergovernmental actions have been taken in the areas of (i) awareness, (ii) policy, (iii) prevention, (iv) reporting, (v) management, (vi) monitoring; (e) what progress has been made on mechanisms to report and monitor incidents of abuse, discrimination, and harassment (i) federally, (ii) by each province and territory; and (f) what outcomes have been achieved as a result of signing the declaration? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2211.
|
|
Q-2212 — Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris) — With regard to refugee claims made at points of entries at Canadian airports, broken down by year for each of the last five years: (a) what was the number of refugee claims made in total and broken down by airport; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by country of persecution; (c) what is the breakdown of (a) by country of citizenship; and (d) of the claims in (a) through (c), how many (i) were granted, (ii) were denied, (iii) are still awaiting a decision? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2212.
|
|
Q-2213 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — With regard to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, broken down by year since 2020: (a) how many newcomers came to Canada; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by status (i.e. permanent or temporary); (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by industry and occupation; and (d) what is the breakdown of (c) by how many newcomers are currently working in that industry and occupation versus how many are currently working in a different industry or occupation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2213.
|
|
Q-2214 — Mr. Redekopp (Saskatoon West) — With regard to the Home Child Care Provider Pilot, Home Support Worker Pilot, and Live-in Caregiver Program, broken down by province or territory and by each program: (a) how many work permits have been processed by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) during each calendar year between 2019 and 2023 inclusively; (b) how many work permits are projected to be processed for 2024; (c) of the permits in (a), how many migrants arrived in Canada to fill jobs; (d) what is the expected duration of the work permit for these migrants in each category; (e) what was the average processing time for each of the in years in (a); (f) what was the average wait time between application processing and arrival time in Canada to begin their employment for each program stream; (g) what is the number of migrants to stay in Canada under a renewed visa in that program; (h) what is the number of migrants to stay in Canada under a different type of visa after their initial visa, and what is the (i) breakdown of those various visas by type, (ii) average length of those various visas; (i) how many and what percentage of migrants who arrived under these programs stayed past the expiry of their initial visa; (j) of those migrants in (i), how many migrants remain in Canada, and of those, how many has IRCC or the Canada Border Services Agency lost track of; and (k) of the migrants who arrived under these programs for each year, how many have gained permanent residency? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2214.
|
|
Q-2215 — Mr. Redekopp (Saskatoon West) — With regard to the Caring for Children Program, Caring for People with High Medical Needs Program, and Interim Pathway for Caregivers, broken down by province or territory, and by program: (a) how many work permits have been processed by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) during each of the calendar years between 2015 and 2020 inclusively; (b) of those permits, how many of those migrants have actually come to Canada to fill jobs; (c) what was the expected duration of the work permit for these migrants in each category; (d) what was the average processing time for each of the years in (a); (e) what was the average wait time between application processing and arrival time in Canada to begin their employment for each program stream; (f) what was the number of migrants to stay in Canada under a renewed visa in that program; (g) of the migrants in (a), what number subsequently stayed in Canada under a different type of visa, in total and broken down by type of visa, and what is the average length of those various visas; (h) how many migrants stayed past the expiry of their initial visa; (i) of the migrants in (h), how many remain in Canada, and of those, how many has IRCC or the Canada Border Services Agency lost track of; and (j) of the migrants who arrived under these programs between 2015 and 2020, how many have gained permanent residency? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2215.
|
|
Q-2216 — Mr. Soroka (Yellowhead) — With regard to government advertising promoting or about the climate crisis, since 2016, and broken down by year: (a) what are the total amounts spent on such advertising; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by type of advertising, or media outlet; and (c) what are the details of all contracts awarded related to the advertising, or the associated advertising campaigns, including any contracts associated with developing the content of any government websites or advertisements, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount or value, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) duration, if applicable? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2216.
|
|
Q-2219 — Mr. Melillo (Kenora) — With regard to the Northern Ontario section of the Community Futures Program: (a) what were the service standards for the program in Northern Ontario in fiscal Year 2020-21, broken down by (i) standard name, (ii) target, (iii) performance, (iv) results, (v) total business volume, (vi) volume meeting target; and (b) if data in (a) is not available, what is the reason for it not being available? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2219.
|
|
Q-2221 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency and the Canada Child Benefit (CCB), broken down by year for each of the last five years: (a) what was the total number of overpayments that were (i) assessed, (ii) collected from taxpayers who received overpayments following or due to death of a child; and (b) what is the amount of money represented by the overpayments in (a)(i) and (a)(ii)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2221.
|
|
Q-2222 — Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard) — With regard to the acceptance of government assisted refugees from United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) refugee camps in Uganda: (a) what is the total number of refugees accepted from Uganda since January 1, 2017, broken down by year; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by ethnicity; (c) what is the breakdown of (a) by country of origin; and (d) what is the breakdown of (a) through (c) by UNHCR camp for (i) Kyaka I, (ii) Kyaka II, (iii) Kyangwali, (iv) Nakivale, (v) Kampala Capital City, (vi) Kiryandongo, (vii) Nyumanzi, (viii) Rhino, (ix) Rwamwanja? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2222.
|
|
Q-2224 — Mr. Soroka (Yellowhead) — With regard to Parks Canada and the Sidney Island Deer Cull: (a) what are the total expenditures to date related to the cull, broken down by type of expense; (b) what are the details of all contracts awarded to date related to the cull, including, for each, the (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) value or amount, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (i.e. sole-sourced versus competitive bid); (c) how many deer have been culled to date, in total and broken down by date; (d) what are the future planned dates of the cull; (e) how many more deer will be hunted as part of the cull; (f) what types and models of (i) firearms, (ii) ammunition, were used in the cull; (g) were the firearms and ammunition used obtained domestically or imported, and, if so, from what country; (h) were any of the firearms used classified as restricted or prohibited, and, if so, which ones; (i) did the RCMP or the Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs give an exemption to the hunters to use restricted or prohibited firearms, and, if so, what are the details; (j) did all hunters who participated in the cull possess a valid Possession and Acquisition License, and, if so, what are the details of how these licenses were checked, including who checked them and on what dates; (k) why were Canadian hunters not offered the opportunity to cull the deer; (l) was a financial benefit analysis done regarding how much income would have been generated if Canadian hunters participated in the cull, and, if not, why not; and (m) were any of these deer shot from helicopters, and, if so, was permission received from Transport Canada prior to this occurring? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2224.
|
|
Q-2225 — Mr. Mazier (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — With regard to the Government of Canada’s delegation to COP28 in Dubai: what were the total expenses incurred by the Government of Canada, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, and Canada's Climate Change Ambassador, for each, broken down by expense, including (i) transportation, (ii) accommodation, (iii) hospitality, (iv) gifts, (v) miscellaneous, (vi) registration and event costs? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2225.
|
|
Q-2226 — Mr. Mazier (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — With regard to the government’s advertisements of the website canada.ca/climate-crisis: (a) how much has the government (i) spent, (ii) budgeted to spend, on advertisements for the canada.ca/climate-crisis website; (b) what is the breakdown of the advertisement expenses in (a) on (i) social media, further broken down by platform, (ii) television, (iii) print, (iv) radio, (v) online, (vi) all other types of advertising; (c) who did the government pay to produce the advertisements in (a); (d) how much did the government pay each entity in (c) to produce the advertisements; (e) did the government purchase television advertisements for the canada.ca/climate-crisis website during the broadcast of Superbowl LVII; (f) what were the cost of the advertisements in (e), if any; and (g) how many Canadians visited the canada.ca/climate-crisis website broken down by month? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2226.
|
|
Q-2227 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to international charters, conferences, consensus statements, declarations, policy, and national reports regarding sport and abuse, discrimination, and harassment: (a) following the UNESCO International Charter of Physical Education and Sport in 1978, and with respect to the statement that “sport practiced by all must be protected against any abuse”, what, if any, (i) actions were taken against abuse in sport, (ii) new requirements were adopted as a result of the Charter with respect to “appropriate qualifications”, “training”, and “further training” for each of those in administration, coaching, teaching, and volunteering, and on which dates between 1978 and 1988; (b) following the UNESCO International Charter of Physical Education and Sport in 1978, and with respect to the statement that “it is crucial that the fight against doping should win the support of national and international authorities”, what, if any, actions did Canada take, and on which dates between 1978 and 1988; (c) following the 1990 release of the Commission of Inquiry into the Use of Drugs and Banned Practices Intended to Increase Athletic Performance and with respect to the recommendation “that individuals and organizations in receipt of government funding meet the ethical standards as well as the performance standards required for funding”, what actions, if any, did Canada take in response to the recommendation for individuals and organizations, and on which dates; (d) following the 1990 release of the Commission of Inquiry into the Use of Drugs and Banned Practices Intended to Increase Athletic Performance, and with respect to the recommendation “that those involved in the health, care, and training of athletes are qualified to be so ethically as well as technically”, what actions, if any, did Canada take regarding ethical qualifications for all those involved in the health, care, and training of athletes, and on which dates; (e) following the 1990 release of the Commission of Inquiry into the Use of Drugs and Banned Practices Intended to Increase Athletic Performance, and with respect to the recommendation that “the measure of success of government funding be linked not to medal count, but to the degree to which it has met the social, educational, and national goals of government for sport”, what actions, if any, did Canada take to (i) disentangle medal count from funding, (ii) tie medal count to funding, and on which dates; (f) following the International Olympic Committee’s adoption of a Consensus Statement on Sexual Harassment and Abuse in Sport in 2007, what actions, if any, has Canada undertaken with respect to (i) developing “policies and procedures for the prevention of sexual harassment and abuse”, (ii) monitoring “the implementation of these policies and procedures”, (iii) evaluating “the impact of these policies in identifying and reducing sexual harassment and abuse”, (iv) developing “an education and training program on sexual harassment and abuse in their sport(s)”, (v) fostering “strong partnerships with parents in the prevention of sexual harassment and abuse”, (vi) promoting and supporting scientific research on these issues, and on which dates; (g) did any representatives of Canada attend the 5th International Conference of Ministers and Senior Officials Responsible for Physical Education and Sport in 2013, and, if so, what were the names of positions of all those who attended; (h) following the 2013 Declaration of Berlin, what actions, if any, has Canada taken with respect to Article 1.4 of the Declaration “recognizing that an inclusive environment free of violence, sexual harassment, racism and other forms of discrimination is fundamental to quality physical education and sport”, and on which dates; (i) following the revised International Charter of Physical Education, Physical Activity and Sport in 2015, what actions, if any, has Canada taken with respect to (i) “safety and management of risk”, (ii) Article 10.1 which states that, “All forms of physical education, physical activity and sport must be protected from abuse”, (iii) any identified harms, (iv) “bullying”, (v) “deprivation of education”, (vi) “discrimination”, (vii) “excessive training of children”, (viii) “homophobia”, (ix) “racism”, (x) “sexual exploitation”, (xi) “violence”, (xii) “potential risks, especially for children, of dangerous or inappropriate training methods and competition, and psychological pressures of any kind”, and on which dates were these actions taken; (j) following the issue of the Policy on Non-Accidental Violence and Abuse in Sport of the International Paralympic Committee in 2016, what actions, if any, were taken by Canada with respect to violations of human rights, including, but not limited to, (i) “bullying and emotional abuse”, (ii) “child exploitation”, (iii) “hazing”, (iv) “neglect”, (v) “physical abuse”, (vi) “sexual abuse and assault”, and on which dates; (k) did Canada attend the Sixth International Conference of Ministers and Senior Officials Responsible for Physical Education and Sport in 2017, and, if so, what were the positions of all those who attended; and (l) following the Kazan Action Plan, what actions, if any, did Canada undertake with respect to (i) “protecting the integrity of sport”, (ii) “III.1 Safeguard athletes, spectators, workers and other groups involved”, (iii) “III.2 Protect children, youth and other vulnerable groups”, and on which dates? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2227.
|
|
Q-2228 — Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester) — With regard to the federal carbon tax: (a) how much did the (i) Canadian Army, (ii) Royal Canadian Navy, (iii) Royal Canadian Air Force, (iv) Canadian Coast Guard, pay in carbon tax on the fuel which they purchased in each of the last five years; and (b) what are the projections for how much the (i) Canadian Army, (ii) Royal Canadian Navy, (iii) Royal Canadian Air Force, (iv) Canadian Coast Guard, will pay in carbon tax on the fuel which they will purchase in each of the next five years? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2228.
|
|
Q-2229 — Mrs. Gray (Kelowna—Lake Country) — With regard to the Benefits Delivery Modernization Programme: (a) what was the projected scope, full technology requirements and projected procurement needs presented in the initial budget for the programme in 2017; (b) what is the breakdown of costs for each aspect of (a); (c) what is the projected scope, full technology requirements and projected procurement needs presented in the most recent budget for the programme in 2024; and (d) what is the breakdown of costs for each aspect of (c)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2229.
|
|
Q-2231 — Mrs. Gray (Kelowna—Lake Country) — With regard to the Canada Digital Adoption Program: (a) how many and which vendors applied to administer the (i) "Grow Your Business", (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology", stream; (b) what metrics and criteria were used by the government when determining which applicants in (a) would become administrators, broken down by stream; (c) what is the dollar value of the contracts provided to Magnet to administer the "Boost Your Business Technology" stream; (d) which vendors were awarded the contracts to administer the "Grow Your Business" stream; (e) what is the dollar value of the contracts provided to each of the vendors in (d); (f) what is the number of students hired, as of January 1, 2024, via the (i) "Grow Your Business", (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology", stream; and (g) what is the number of businesses which have applied, as of January 1, 2024, to the (i) "Grow Your Business", (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology", stream? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2231.
|
|
Q-2232 — Mr. Redekopp (Saskatoon West) — With regard to the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA): (a) how many migrants does the CBSA currently believe are in Canada without a valid visa; (b) how many of those individuals in (a) are pending adjudication by the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB); (c) how many of those individuals in (a) have had their case resolved by the IRB but are awaiting judicial review; (d) how many of those individuals in (a) have exhausted all legal avenues including the IRB and judicial review, and of those what is the number of those individuals that (i) are currently detained, (ii) are currently awaiting deportation, (iii) the CBSA lost track of; and (e) of those individuals in (d), how many (i) have been convicted in Canada of a criminal code offence, (ii) have been convicted in their country of origin of an equivalent charge to a criminal code offence, (iii) of those convicted are currently being detained, (iv) are set to be deported in 2024, (v) has the CBSA lost track of? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2232.
|
|
Q-2233 — Mr. Redekopp (Saskatoon West) — With regard to the electoral district of Saskatoon West: what are the details of all the grants, contributions, loans and any other payments from Government of Canada departments, agencies, and Crown corporations, but excluding the Canada Revenue Agency, to all other levels of government within and outside of Canada, First Nations, corporations, non-governmental organizations, and charities for the fiscal years 2015-16 to the current fiscal year inclusively? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2233.
|
|
Q-2234 — Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon) — With regard to the Climate Action Incentive Fund SME Project Stream: (a) of the $218 million of 2019-20 carbon pollution proceeds allocated to the stream, (i) how many businesses applied for funding, (ii) how many businesses were approved, (iii) how much money was awarded to the approved businesses for the duration of the program; (b) how much of the $218 million allocated was not spent; and (c) did the amount in (b) return to general revenue or was returned to businesses, and, if so, how? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2234.
|
|
Q-2235 — Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon) — With regard to the Canada Digital Adoption Program: (a) what is the number of businesses which have applied, as of January 25, 2024, to the (i) Grow Your Business Online stream, (ii) Boost Your Business Technology stream; (b) what is the total number of businesses which have received funding or assistance through the (i) Grow Your Business Online stream, (ii) Boost Your Business Technology stream; (c) what is the number of students hired, from October 5, 2022, to January 25, 2024, via the (i) Grow Your Business Online stream, (ii) Boost Your Business Technology stream, broken down by week since October 5, 2022; and (d) since the start date of March 3, 2022, how much has been paid to Magnet to administer the Boost Your Business Technology stream, in total and broken down by payment? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2235.
|
|
Q-2238 — Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets) — With regard to private stakeholders consultations held by the Department of Industry, prior to June 1, 2022, that helped inform the drafting of the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act: what are the details of all such meetings, including, for each, the (i) date of occurrence, (ii) name of any meeting attendees, (iii) names of organizations or stakeholder groups in attendance, (iv) topic of discussion? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2238.
|
|
Q-2239 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — With regard to expenditures incurred by the government related to the Prime Minister’s trip to Jamaica which began on or around December 26, 2023: (a) what are the expenditures to date, including those incurred by the Privy Council Office, the RCMP, and any other department or agency that was involved in the trip, including any advance work done to prepare for the trip, in total and broken down by type of expense (e.g. accommodation, fuel, per diems, etc.); (b) what was the total amount of expenditures incurred for accommodations at (i) Prospect Estate and Villas, (ii) other hotels or properties, broken down by vendor; (c) for each expenditure in (b), what was the (i) number of rooms rented at each resort, (ii) number of nights stayed, (iii) nightly rate; (d) what are the details of the legs of each challenger flight that travelled between Canada and Jamaica in relation to the trip, including, for each leg, the (i) date, (ii) origin, (iii) destination, (iv) names and titles of passengers, excluding security personnel, (v) amount of fuel used, (vi) fuel cost, (vii) catering cost, (viii) other costs, broken down by type; (e) what are the details of the problem or malfunction that occurred with the initial Challenger jet that causes a second Challenger jet to be flown to Jamaica; and (f) how much did it cost to fix the problem or malfunction in (e)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2239.
|
|
Q-2240 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — With regard to the government's participation in the UN Climate Change Conference, the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) in Dubai: (a) how many and which individuals were part of the Canadian delegation that travelled to Dubai; (b) what were the titles of all individuals in (a); (c) were there any delegation members in (a) for which the government did not pay the expenses of, and, if so, which members; (d) what are the names and titles of all other individuals who attended the COP28 for whom the government paid expenses; (e) what are the total expenditures incurred by the government to date related to the conference, broken down by type; (f) what is the government's estimate of the carbon footprint resulting from the Canadian delegation's travel to and from the conference; and (g) for the delegations accommodations in Dubai, (i) what hotels were used, (ii) how much was spent at each hotel, (iii) how many rooms were rented at each hotel and for how many nights, (iv) what was the room rate, or range of room rates, paid at each hotel? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2240.
|
|
Q-2241 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — With regard to government subsidies to Qualified Canadian Journalism Organizations (QCJO): (a) what is the total amount of subsidies paid to QCJOs in total, broken down by year for each of the last five years; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by type of tax credit or subsidy; (c) how many organizations have applied for the QCJO designation; (d) of the applications in (c), how many were (i) approved, (ii) rejected; (e) how many QCJOs received subsidies, broken down by year for each of the last five years; and (f) without identifying the organization, what is the breakdown of (e) by subsidy range for each type of subsidy (i.e. under $100,000, $100,001-$500,000, etc.)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2241.
|
|
Q-2242 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — With regard to the ArriveCAN application, broken down by each department or agency that worked on the application: (a) how many employees worked on the application; and (b) how many man-hours and working days were spent working on the application? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2242.
|
|
Q-2244 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — With regards to the Indigenous Community Infrastructure Fund (ICIF), and broken down by province or territory and fiscal year since 2020-21: (a) what is the total number of applications received by Indigenous Services Canada; (b) for the applications in (a), what is the (i) median amount of funding requested, (ii) average amount of funding requested; (c) how many projects in (a) were approved; and (d) what is the total amount of funding allocated by the ICIF, reflected as a dollar amount and a percentage of program funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2244.
|
|
Q-2246 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — With regard to on-reserve housing funding provided by Indigenous Services Canada (ISC), broken down by province or territory and fiscal year since 2015-16: (a) what measures and resources have ISC allocated to streamline and expedite the application and approval process for building new housing; (b) what indicators do ISC use to ensure consistency in processing times across regions, considering the varying nature of projects and community-specific needs; (c) broken down by A-base stream funding and targeted funding, what is the average number of days for ISC to (i) acknowledge receipt of an application for funding, (ii) review an application, (iii) approve an application, (iv) deliver funding, (v) begin construction; and (d) in cases where multi-year plans or annual applications are submitted, what strategies are in place to minimize delays and ensure timely processing of funding applications? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2246.
|
|
Q-2248 — Ms. Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) — With regard to the Canada-Wide Early Learning & Child Care System: (a) how many kids are currently enrolled in a $10 a day spot, in total and broken down by province or territory; (b) what is the average income of the parents who have the $10 a day spot; (c) how many of the $10 a day spots are for flexible childcare outside of the hours between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.; (d) what is the average wage of a childcare worker who provides $10 a day daycare; (e) how many additional childcare workers are needed to achieve the amount of spots that the government promised would be created; (f) how many of the $10 a day spots are located in urban areas versus rural areas; and (g) for each statistic in (a) through (f) that the government doesn’t have the answer for, why does the government not track such information? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2248.
|
|
Q-2249 — Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning) — With regard to the government contracts involving FTI Professional Grade and Baylis Medical since January 1, 2020: what are the details of each contract, including (i) when was the contract signed, (ii) what is the monetary value of the awarded contract, (iii) what is the description of the good or service contracted, (iv) what is the quantity of the good or service agreed to be supplied, (v) how many ventilators have been delivered to fulfill the conditions of the contract, (vi) what quantity of the good or service has been received by the addressee, (vii) what are the last known locations of each ventilator, (viii) whether the terms of the contract have been fulfilled and, if not, what penal actions have been taken to ensure compliance for each contract? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2249.
|
|
Q-2251 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to the Underused Housing Tax (UHT) that came into effect on January 1, 2022, broken down by year: (a) how many UHT returns have been filed (i) in total, (ii) broken down by census metropolitan area (CMA); (b) how many UHT returns had no amounts owing (i) in total, (ii) broken down by CMA; (c) what is the total amount of the UHT assessed; (d) what is the amount of the UHT assessed that has been collected; (e) what are the costs to (i) implement, (ii) annually administer, the UHT by government departments or agencies; (f) how many employees or full-time equivalents are or were assigned to work on the UHT by government departments or agencies; and (g) how much has been spent to date by government departments or agencies on public consultations, advertisements, promotion, publications, stakeholder meetings or engagements, public opinion research, or other communications, public relations, and information efforts related to the UHT, in total and broken down by type of expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2251.
|
|
Q-2252 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to the Select Luxury Items Tax (luxury tax) that came into effect on September 1, 2022: (a) what is the amount of luxury tax assessed by asset class (i.e. aircraft, vehicles, vessels); (b) what is the amount of luxury tax assessed that has been collected by asset class and separated by relative size of the payments received, including how many transactions involved a luxury tax between (i) $1 and $24,999, (ii) between $25,000 and $74,999, (iii) between $75,000 and $174,999, (iv) greater than $175,000; (c) what are the costs to (i) implement, (ii) annually administer, the luxury tax by government departments or agencies; (d) how many employees or full-time equivalents are or were assigned to work on the luxury tax by government departments or agencies; and (e) how much has been spent to date by government departments or agencies on public consultations, advertisements, promotion, publications, stakeholder meetings or engagements, public opinion research, or other communications, public relations, and information efforts related to the luxury tax, in total and broken down by type of expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2252.
|
|
Q-2253 — Mr. Morantz (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley) — With regard to government funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA): (a) what is the amount of funding that the government provided to UNRWA in total and broken down by year since November 4, 2015; (b) what is the breakdown of funding by individual project, including the name, timeframe and description of each project; (c) how much funding has been paused since the government’s announcement that it was pausing funding due to allegations that UNRWA employees were involved in the October 7, 2023 terror attacks by Hamas; (d) of the projects in (b), which ones have had their funding halted since the pause of funding; and (e) what information does the government have regarding the extent of UNRWA’s employees involvement in the terror attacks, including the estimated number of employees who participated in the attacks and the number of employees who may have assisted Hamas in the taking or holding of hostages? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2253.
|
Business of Supply |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), seconded by Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre), in relation to the business of supply. |
The debate continued. |
Mr. MacKinnon (Gatineau), seconded by Mr. Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended as follows: |
(a) in paragraph (ii), by adding the word “being” after the word “victims”;
|
(b) by replacing paragraph (iii) with the following: “Hamas is a listed terrorist organization in Canada whose attacks on October 7, 2023, killed nearly 1,200 Israelis and that over 100 hostages remain in Hamas captivity”;
|
(c) in paragraph (iv), by replacing the words “millions of” with the words “1.7 million”;
|
(d) by adding, after paragraph (vi), the following new paragraph: “all states, including Israel have a right to defend themselves and in defending itself, Israel must respect international humanitarian law and the price of defeating Hamas cannot be the continuous suffering of all Palestinian civilians”;
|
(e) by replacing paragraph (viii) with the following: “the increase in extremist settler violence against Palestinians and reports of Palestinian communities being forcibly removed from their lands in the West Bank”;
|
(f) by replacing paragraph (a) with the following: “demand an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, and Hamas must lay down its arms”;
|
(g) by replacing paragraph (b) with the following: “cease the further authorization and transfer of arms exports to Israel to ensure compliance with Canada’s arms export regime and increase efforts to stop the illegal trade of arms, including to Hamas”;
|
(h) by replacing paragraph (c) with the following: “ensure continued funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to meet the dire humanitarian need, engage with the United Nations internal investigation and independent review process, and ensure implementation of necessary long-term governance reforms and accountability measures”;
|
(i) in paragraph (d) by deleting the words “, and support the work of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court”;
|
(j) by adding, after paragraph (d), the following new paragraph: “support the work of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court”;
|
(k) by replacing paragraph (f) with the following: “ensure Canadians trapped in Gaza can reach safety in Canada and expand access to the temporary resident visa program”;
|
(l) by replacing paragraph (g) with the following: “sanction extremist settlers and maintain sanctions on Hamas leaders”;
|
(m) by replacing paragraph (h) with the following: “reaffirm that settlements are illegal under international law and that settlements and settler violence are serious obstacles to a negotiated two-state solution, and advocate for an end to the decades long occupation of Palestinian territories”; and
|
(n) by replacing paragraph (i) with the following: “work with international partners to actively pursue the goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, including towards the establishment of the State of Palestine as part of a negotiated two-state solution, and maintain Canada’s position that Israel has a right to exist in peace and security with its neighbours”.
|
At 7:29 p.m., the sitting was suspended. |
At 8:10 p.m., the sitting resumed. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), seconded by Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre), in relation to the business of supply; |
And of the amendment of Mr. MacKinnon (Gatineau), seconded by Mr. Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands). |
At 8:28 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 81(16), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
Pursuant to order made Friday, March 1, 2024, the question was put on the amendment and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 657 -- Vote no 657) | |
YEAS: 204, NAYS: 118 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Desjarlais Khera Plamondon Total: -- 204 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aitchison Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Lewis (Essex) Scheer Total: -- 118 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(16), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the main motion, as amended, of Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), seconded by Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre), — That, given that, |
|
(i) the situation in the Middle East is devastating to many Canadians, particularly those with friends and family members in the region,
|
|
(ii) the death toll in Gaza has surpassed 30,000, with 70% of the victims being women and children,
|
|
(iii) Hamas is a listed terrorist organization in Canada whose attacks on October 7, 2023, killed nearly 1,200 Israelis and that over 100 hostages remain in Hamas captivity,
|
|
(iv) 1.7 million of residents of Gaza are displaced and at risk of starvation, death, and disease, and Gaza is currently the most dangerous place in the world to be a child,
|
|
(v) the United Nations reports over 70 per cent of civilian infrastructure in Gaza, including homes, hospitals, schools, water and sanitation facilities, have been destroyed or severely damaged by Israeli military attacks,
|
|
(vi) on January 26, 2024, the International Court of Justice ordered six provisional measures, including for Israel to refrain from acts under the Genocide convention, prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to genocide, and take immediate and effective measures to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza,
|
|
(vii) all states, including Israel have a right to defend themselves and in defending itself, Israel must respect international humanitarian law and the price of defeating Hamas cannot be the continuous suffering of all Palestinian civilians,
|
|
(viii) Israelis are still at risk of attacks by Iran-backed terrorist groups including Hamas and Hezbollah,
|
|
(ix) the increase in extremist settler violence against Palestinians and reports of Palestinian communities being forcibly removed from their lands in the West Bank,
|
|
(x) the casualties of the war on Gaza and the Hamas terrorist attack include Canadian citizens,
|
|
(xi) Canadian citizens remain trapped in Gaza, blocked from leaving,
|
|
(xii) Jewish, Muslim, Arab, and Palestinian Canadians have reported an increase in hate-motivated attacks and racism since October,
|
|
(xiii) Palestinians and Israelis both deserve to live in peace, with full enjoyment of their human rights and democratic freedoms,
|
|
the House call on the government to: |
|
(a) demand an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, and Hamas must lay down its arms;
|
|
(b) cease the further authorization and transfer of arms exports to Israel to ensure compliance with Canada’s arms export regime and increase efforts to stop the illegal trade of arms, including to Hamas;
|
|
(c) ensure continued funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) to meet the dire humanitarian need, engage with the United Nations internal investigation and independent review process, and ensure implementation of necessary long-term governance reforms and accountability measures;
|
|
(d) support the prosecution of all crimes and violations of international law committed in the region;
|
|
(e) support the work of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court;
|
|
(f) demand unimpeded humanitarian access to Gaza;
|
|
(g) ensure Canadians trapped in Gaza can reach safety in Canada and expand access to the temporary resident visa program;
|
|
(h) sanction extremist settlers and maintain sanctions on Hamas leaders;
|
|
(i) reaffirm that settlements are illegal under international law and that settlements and settler violence are serious obstacles to a negotiated two-state solution, and advocate for an end to the decades long occupation of Palestinian territories; and
|
|
(j) work with international partners to actively pursue the goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, including towards the establishment of the State of Palestine as part of a negotiated two-state solution, and maintain Canada’s position that Israel has a right to exist in peace and security with its neighbours.
|
|
The question was put on the main motion, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following division:
|
|
(Division No. 658 -- Vote no 658) | |
YEAS: 204, NAYS: 117 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Desjarlais Khera Plamondon Total: -- 204 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aitchison Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Leslie Rood Total: -- 117 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to order made earlier today, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Freeland (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance), seconded by Mrs. St-Onge (Minister of Canadian Heritage), — That Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance. |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mrs. Goodridge (Fort McMurray—Cold Lake), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: |
|
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, since the bill fails to repeal the carbon tax on farmers, First Nations and families.”.
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 659 -- Vote no 659) | |
YEAS: 118, NAYS: 206 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Epp Lewis (Essex) Schmale Total: -- 118 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Desilets Koutrakis Qualtrough Total: -- 206 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 1 to 136, 138 to 143, 168 to 196, 209 to 216 and 278 to 317, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 660 -- Vote no 660) | |
YEAS: 172, NAYS: 148 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Dhaliwal Khalid O'Regan Total: -- 172 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dreeshen Leslie Scheer Total: -- 148 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 137, 144 and 231 to 272, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 661 -- Vote no 661) | |
YEAS: 320, NAYS: 1 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Diab Kwan Reid Total: -- 320 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Schmale Total: -- 1 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 197 to 208 and 342 to 365, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 662 -- Vote no 662) | |
YEAS: 323, NAYS: 2 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dhillon Kwan Rempel Garner Total: -- 323 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) Schmale Total: -- 2 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 145 to 167, 217 and 218, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 663 -- Vote no 663) | |
YEAS: 323, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Diab Lake Richards Total: -- 323 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 219 to 230, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 664 -- Vote no 664) | |
YEAS: 321, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dhaliwal Kusmierczyk Redekopp Total: -- 321 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 273 to 277, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 665 -- Vote no 665) | |
YEAS: 206, NAYS: 117 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Desilets Koutrakis Powlowski Total: -- 206 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Ellis Leslie Ruff Total: -- 117 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 318 and 319, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 666 -- Vote no 666) | |
YEAS: 322, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dhillon Lake Richards Total: -- 322 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 320 to 322, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 667 -- Vote no 667) | |
YEAS: 323, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dhillon Kwan Richards Total: -- 323 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Clauses 323 to 341, and they were adopted on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 668 -- Vote no 668) | |
YEAS: 175, NAYS: 149 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Dhaliwal Kelloway Oliphant Total: -- 175 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dowdall Lemire Savard-Tremblay Total: -- 149 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Gill Wilkinson Total: -- 2 |
|
Accordingly, Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid before the House as follows: |
— by the Speaker — Report of the Parliamentary Budget Officer entitled "Economic and Fiscal Outlook – March 2024", pursuant to the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S. 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 79.2(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1119-106. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) |
— by the Speaker — Report of the Parliamentary Budget Officer entitled "The Government’s Expenditure Plan and Main Estimates for 2024-25", pursuant to the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S. 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 79.2(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1119-107. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates) |
— by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Science and Research, "The Role and Contribution of Citizen Scientists" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-338), presented to the House on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-338. |
— by Mr. Fraser (Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the 31st report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, "Chronic Homelessness" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-337), presented to the House on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-337. |
— by Mr. Hussen (Minister of International Development) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the 33rd report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, "International Assistance in Support of Gender Equality" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-340), presented to the House on Thursday, November 9, 2023. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-340. |
— by Ms. Joly (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Copies of the Regulations Amending the Special Economic Measures (Russia) Regulations (P.C. 2024-159, P.C. 2024-168 and P.C. 2024-169) and of the Regulations Amending the Special Economic Measures (Iran) Regulations (P.C. 2024-200), pursuant to the Special Economic Measures Act, S.C. 1992, c. 17, sbs. 7(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-495-63. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development) |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the 30th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, "Systemic Barriers—Correctional Service Canada" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-336), presented to the House on Tuesday, November 7, 2023. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-336. |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Document from the government concerning the ArriveCAN application, in response to the motion adopted by the House on Wednesday, February 28, 2024. — Sessional Paper No. 8530-441-36. |
Adjournment |
At 11:44 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today, the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |