Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

— Nos. 441-02214, 441-02215, 441-02222 and 441-02225 concerning health;

— No. 441-02216 concerning citizenship and immigration;

— No. 441-02217 concerning foreign affairs;

— No. 441-02218 concerning justice;

— No. 441-02219 concerning food and drink;

— No. 441-02220 concerning civil and human rights;

— No. 441-02221 concerning employment and labour;

— No. 441-02223 concerning the correctional system;

— No. 441-02224 concerning Indigenous affairs;

— Nos. 441-02226, 441-02227, 441-02228 and 441-02229 concerning the democratic process.

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Ms. Hepfner (Hamilton Mountain), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the orders of the day.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

The order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, as reported by the Standing Committee on Natural Resources with amendments.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting the preamble.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 2 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 2 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 14 and 15 on page 2 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 2 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 43 and 44 on page 2 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended

(a) by replacing line 48 on page 2 with the following:

(b) by replacing lines 2 to 7 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 3 to 7 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 7 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 12, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by deleting lines 29 to 31 on page 3.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 39 and 40 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 39 and 40 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 3 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 48 on page 3 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by deleting lines 49 to 51 on page 3.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting the short title.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 2.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 3 to 10 on page 5.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 3 to 10 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 27, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 5 to 10 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 28, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 7 to 10 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 29, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 11 to 16 on page 5.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 30, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 16 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 31, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 24 to 32 on page 5.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 24 to 32 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 27 to 29 on page 5 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 27 and 28 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 31 and 32 on page 5 with the following:

Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-50 be amended by restoring Clause 3 as follows:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 4.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 39, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 5.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 6.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 10 to 14 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 14 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 7.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 6 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by deleting lines 3 to 7 on page 7.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 6 on page 7 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 5 and 6 on page 7 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 56, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10 on page 7 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 57, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 9 and 10 on page 7 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 58, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 8.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 59, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 15 and 16 on page 7 with the following:

(b) by deleting lines 19 to 28 on page 7.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 60, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 28 on page 7.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 61, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended

(a) by replacing line 19 on page 7 with the following:

(b) by replacing lines 22 to 24 on page 7 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 7 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 69, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 7 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 71, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 28 on page 7 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 74, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 7 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 75, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 8, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 8 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 76, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 9.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 77, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 10.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 78, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 11.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 79, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 11, be amended by replacing lines 6 to 9 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 80, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 11, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 90, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 12.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 91, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 12, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 95, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 13.

Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved Motion No. 96, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 13, be amended by replacing lines 21 and 22 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 97, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 13, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 101, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 14.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 102, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 14, be amended by replacing lines 27 to 29 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 106, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 15.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 108, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 15, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 9 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 112, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 16.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 113, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended

(a) by replacing line 3 on page 10 with the following:

(b) by replacing line 10 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved Motion No. 117, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by

Mr. Morrice (Kitchener Centre), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), moved Motion No. 118, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended

(a) by replacing lines 3 and 4 on page 10 with the following:

(b) by replacing, in the French version, line 6 on page 10 with the following:

(c) by replacing line 10 on page 10 with the following:

(d) by replacing line 12 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 119, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended

(a) by replacing line 4 on page 10 with the following:

(b) by replacing line 12 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 123, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 19 to 23 on page 10 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 24 and 25 on page 10.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 10 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 10 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 131, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 132, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 31 on page 10 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 134, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 29 and 30 on page 10 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 136, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 10 to line 6 on page 11 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 137, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 6 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 138, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 4 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 140, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 7 to 11 on page 11.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 141, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 11 on page 11 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 142, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 143, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 12 to 16 on page 11.

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 144, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 16 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 145, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 17 to 20 on page 11.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 146, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 21 to 25 on page 11.

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 147, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 148, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 24 and 25 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 149, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by deleting lines 26 to 31 on page 11.

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 151, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 152, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 153, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 11 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 154, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 17.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 155, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 17, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 159, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 18.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 160, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 11 on page 12 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 161, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 162, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 12 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 163, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 164, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by deleting lines 12 to 15 on page 12.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 165, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 20 on page 12.

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 166, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 12 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 169, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 171, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 19.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 172, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved Motion No. 176, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by

Mr. Morrice (Kitchener Centre), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), moved Motion No. 177, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 178, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 33 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 180, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 33 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 181, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 12 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 182, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 20.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 183, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 10 to 16 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 184, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 13 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 185, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 187, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 24 on page 13 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 188, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 22 to 24 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 189, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 190, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Falk (Provencher), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 191, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by deleting lines 25 to 28 on page 13.

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 192, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 13 with the following:

Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 193, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 13 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 194, — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting Clause 21.

Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved Motion No. 199, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 21, be amended by

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 200, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 21, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 14 with the following:

Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved Motion No. 204, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 21, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 14 with the following:

Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1.

By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, on divisions Nos. 683 and 684, the votes of the members for York—Simcoe and Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies in favour of the motion be struck from the record.

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, as reported by the Standing Committee on Natural Resources with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 12, 14 to 42, 44, 45, 47 to 49, 51 to 54, 56 to 61, 64, 69, 71, 74 to 80, 90, 91, 95 to 97, 101, 102, 106, 108, 112, 113, 117 to 119, 123, 127 to 132, 134, 136 to 138, 140 to 149, 151 to 155, 159 to 166, 169, 171, 172, 176 to 178, 180 to 185, 187 to 194, 199, 200 and 204).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements.

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, as reported by the Standing Committee on Natural Resources with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 12, 14 to 42, 44, 45, 47 to 49, 51 to 54, 56 to 61, 64, 69, 71, 74 to 80, 90, 91, 95 to 97, 101, 102, 106, 108, 112, 113, 117 to 119, 123, 127 to 132, 134, 136 to 138, 140 to 149, 151 to 155, 159 to 166, 169, 171, 172, 176 to 178, 180 to 185, 187 to 194, 199, 200 and 204).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 5:15 p.m., pursuant to order made Monday, December 4, 2023, the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 23, 24, 38 to 40, 47, 58, 76 to 78, 90, 95, 101, 106, 112, 154, 159, 171, 182 and 194, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 2 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 6, 7, 12, 15, 18 and 22, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 5 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 48, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 25 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 29 and 31, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 37 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 41 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 45, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 52 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 56, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 59 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 79 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 91 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 96 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 102 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 108 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 113 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 155 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 160 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 165, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 172 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 178 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 183 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 187 and 192, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 199 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order or usual practice of the House, the vote of the member for Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame on division No. 684 from Wednesday, April 10, 2024, be changed from Nay to Yea.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, as reported by the Standing Committee on Natural Resources with amendments.

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50 be amended by deleting the preamble.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 2 with the following:

The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division:

Motion No. 2 having been negatived, the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 3 of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 2 with the following:

The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived on the following division:

Motion No. 2 having been negatived, the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 4 of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 14 and 15 on page 2 with the following:

The question was put on Motion No. 4 and it was negatived on the following division:

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 5 of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 2 with the following:

The question was put on Motion No. 5 and it was negatived on the following division:

Motion No. 4 having been negatived, the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 10 of Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That Bill C-50, in the preamble, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 7 on page 3 with the following:

The question was put on Motion No. 10 and it was negatived on the following division: