House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 300 Tuesday, April 16, 2024 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government response, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petition: |
— No. 441-02240 concerning the correctional system. |
Motions |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bittle (St. Catharines), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the orders of the day. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 739 -- Vote no 739) | |
YEAS: 175, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Diab Khalid O'Regan Total: -- 175 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Lemire Scheer Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Anandasangaree Bergeron Schmale Sorbara Total: -- 4 |
Government Orders |
The order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Health of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare. |
Notice of the royal recommendation was given on Thursday, February 29, 2024, by the Minister of Health as follows:
|
Recommendation |
(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2)) |
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled "An Act respecting pharmacare".
|
Mr. Holland (Minister of Health), seconded by Mr. Fraser (Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities), moved, — That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Health. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, since the bill does nothing to address the health care crisis and will instead offer Canadians an inferior pharmacare plan that covers less, costs more, and builds up a massive new bureaucracy that Canadians can’t afford.”.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Naming of a member |
The Speaker named Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) for disregarding the authority of the Chair and, pursuant to Standing Order 11(1)(a), ordered the member to withdraw from the House for the remainder of today's sitting. |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Holland (Minister of Health), seconded by Mr. Fraser (Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities), — That Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Health; |
And of the amendment of Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, since the bill does nothing to address the health care crisis and will instead offer Canadians an inferior pharmacare plan that covers less, costs more, and builds up a massive new bureaucracy that Canadians can’t afford.”.
|
The debate continued. |
|
At 4:01 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 83(2), the House proceeded to the consideration of ways and means motion No. 20 for the budget presentation. |
Ms. Freeland (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Boissonnault (Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages), moved, — That this House approve in general the budgetary policy of the government. (Ways and Means No. 20) |
Debate arose thereon. |
|
Ms. Freeland (Minister of Finance) laid before the House, —
|
|
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Freeland (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Boissonnault (Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages). (Ways and Means No. 20) |
The debate continued. |
Mr. Poilievre (Carleton), seconded by Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), moved, — That the debate be now adjourned. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(2), the motion was deemed adopted. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid before the House as follows: |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Agreement for RCMP policing services made between Canada and the Town of Wolfville, Nova Scotia, pursuant to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, R.S. 1985, c. R-10, sbs. 20(5). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-475-20. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security) |
Adjournment |
At 4:56 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 83(2), the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |