House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 309 Monday, May 6, 2024 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Private Members' Business |
At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
Mr. Dhaliwal (Surrey—Newton), seconded by Mr. Bains (Steveston—Richmond East), moved, — That: |
(a) the House recognize that,
|
(i) Canada takes global security very seriously and has several cooperative agreements with various foreign states to share security intelligence, protect democratic institutions, maintain the rule of law, and prevent violence and terrorism,
|
(ii) recent events, including the credible allegations of a link between agents of the Government of India and the killing of a Canadian citizen, Hardeep Singh Nijjar, at a place of worship on Canadian soil, are examples of rising forms of intimidation, threats, and interference from countries such as India, China, Russia, Iran, and others; and
|
(b) in the opinion of the House, to ensure that diaspora communities are protected from acts of political interference, violence, or intimidation on Canadian soil, the government should immediately review its measures that hold to account any person or agents of a foreign state undermining democratic institutions, engaging in acts of violence, or violating human or international rights, in order to bar these persons from entering Canada, and report to the House on the progress of these actions. (Private Members' Business M-112)
|
Debate arose thereon. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, May 8, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Government Orders |
The order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Finance of Bill C-69, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 16, 2024. |
Ms. Hajdu (Minister of Indigenous Services and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario) for Ms. Freeland (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance), seconded by Mrs. Valdez (Minister of Small Business), moved, — That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mr. Allison (Niagara West), seconded by Mr. Lehoux (Beauce), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-69, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 16, 2024, since the bill fails to implement a commonsense budget that would:
|
(a) axe the carbon tax;
|
(b) build the homes, not bureaucracy, by requiring cities to permit 15% more home building each year as a condition for receiving federal infrastructure money; and
|
(c) cap the spending with a dollar-for-dollar rule to bring down interest rates and inflation, by requiring the government to find a dollar in savings for every new dollar of spending.”.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— Nos. 441-02249, 441-02250 and 441-02251 concerning the democratic process; |
— Nos. 441-02252, 441-02258, 441-02263 and 441-02273 concerning justice; |
— No. 441-02253 concerning public safety; |
— Nos. 441-02254, 441-02255 and 441-02271 concerning social affairs and equality; |
— Nos. 441-02256, 441-02266 and 441-02270 concerning the environment; |
— Nos. 441-02259, 441-02260 and 441-02261 concerning taxation; |
— Nos. 441-02265, 441-02274 and 441-02275 concerning health; |
— No. 441-02267 concerning citizenship and immigration; |
— No. 441-02268 concerning veterans' affairs. |
Introduction of Government Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs), seconded by Ms. Hajdu (Minister of Indigenous Services and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario), Bill C-70, An Act respecting countering foreign interference, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Mr. Casey (Charlottetown), from the Standing Committee on Health, presented the 17th report of the committee, "The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board: Ensuring the Effectiveness of the Reform Process". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-425. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 64, 65, 76, 90, 99, 100, 106 and 111) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Casey (Charlottetown), from the Standing Committee on Health, presented the 18th report of the committee, "Fostering Healthy Childhoods: A Foundation for Resilient Generations". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-426. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 24, 30 to 32, 41, 52 to 57, 61, 70 to 74, 77, 78, 89, 90 and 111) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Fonseca (Mississauga East—Cooksville), from the Standing Committee on Finance, presented the 17th report of the committee (Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the fall economic statement tabled in Parliament on November 21, 2023 and certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 28, 2023, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-427. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 132 to 140) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Fonseca (Mississauga East—Cooksville), from the Standing Committee on Finance, presented the 18th report of the committee, "Main Estimates 2024-25: Vote 1 and 5 under Canada Revenue Agency, Votes 1 and 5 under Department of Finance, Vote 1 under Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada and Vote 1 under Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-428. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 133 and 136) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Fonseca (Mississauga East—Cooksville), from the Standing Committee on Finance, presented the 19th report of the committee, "Excess Profit Tax on Large Grocery Companies". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-429. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 133) was tabled. |
|
Mr. McCauley (Edmonton West), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 18th report of the committee, "Request for a Privacy Commissioner investigation of the ArriveCAN Application". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-430. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 109) was tabled. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Mazier (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), one concerning justice (No. 441-02437); |
— by Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), one concerning foreign affairs (No. 441-02438); |
— by Mr. Shields (Bow River), one concerning government services and administration (No. 441-02439); |
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning transportation (No. 441-02440); |
— by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), one concerning public safety (No. 441-02441), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 441-02442) and one concerning social affairs and equality (No. 441-02443); |
— by Mr. Morrice (Kitchener Centre), one concerning the environment (No. 441-02444); |
— by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), one concerning health (No. 441-02445); |
— by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), two concerning health (Nos. 441-02446 and 441-02447); |
— by Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), one concerning health (No. 441-02448); |
— by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), one concerning health (No. 441-02449); |
— by Mr. Leslie (Portage—Lisgar), one concerning health (No. 441-02450). |
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-2456, Q-2457, Q-2458, Q-2460, Q-2461, Q-2471, Q-2473, Q-2477, Q-2482, Q-2484 and Q-2485 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-2459 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — With regard to costs related to the government's output-based pricing system (OBPS) for industrial facilities: (a) what have been the costs to implement and administer the OBPS broken down by year since 2018; (b) what have been the costs related to OBPS compliance verification; (c) how many employees or full-time equivalents are currently assigned to positions related to the OBPS; and (d) how many employees or full-time equivalents are assigned to OBPS compliance verification? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2459.
|
|
Q-2462 — Mrs. Wagantall (Yorkton—Melville) — With regard to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and its funding of the study titled “Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission”: (a) to what funding opportunity stream, and what application criteria, did Fisman et al. submit their grant application and receive funding approval; (b) when CIHR conducted a peer review of this application prior to funding, (i) which researchers were assigned to conduct this review, (ii) what were their qualifications, (iii) what were their conclusions, (iv) what were their conflicts of interest; (c) how much funding did CIHR grant this study project; (d) were there any other funding agencies or entities supporting this study; (e) if the answer to (d) is affirmative, who were the other funding agencies or entities; (f) what was the expected timeline for study completion at the time of funding; (g) what conflicts of interest were listed for the grant applicants at the time of funding; (h) was there any federal government involvement with, or communication regarding, any component of the application review process, research study, or media outreach; (i) if the answer to (h) is affirmative, which government bodies were involved; (j) what are the details of the media communications once the study was completed, broken down by (i) subject, (ii) type of communication, (iii) who directed the communication, (iv) date of communication; (k) after the study was published, did CIHR receive any negative feedback; (l) if the answer to (k) is affirmative, (i) what was that feedback, (ii) how was it addressed; (m) what is CIHR’s average timeline from the day a grant application is received to when the grant is approved; and (n) what was the timeline from the day the grant application was received to when the funding approval decision was made for the above-captioned study? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2462.
|
|
Q-2463 — Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle) — With regard to Farm Credit Canada (FCC): (a) what is the current number of employees or full-time equivalents (FTEs) at FCC; (b) of the current employees or FTEs, how many work out of (i) Regina, (ii) the National Capital Region, (iii) FCC offices in other cities, broken down by location, (iv) remotely; (c) on January 1, 2016, how many employees or FTEs worked out of (i) Regina, (ii) the National Capital Region, (iii) FCC offices in other cities, broken down by location, (vi) remotely; and (d) what is the breakdown of (b) and (c) by rank or classification level (executive, manager, assistant, etc.)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2463.
|
|
Q-2464 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to provisions of the Criminal Code concerning motor vehicle theft: (a) how many Government of Canada-owned vehicles were stolen between January 2016 and February 2024 inclusively; (b) how many of the vehicles in (a) have been recovered; (c) how many of the vehicles in (a) have been used in the commission of other crimes; (d) how many of the vehicles in (a) departed Canada; (e) how many of the vehicles in (a) have been stolen more than once; (f) what is the provincial and territorial breakdown for the location in which the vehicles in (a) were stolen for each year; (g) of the vehicles in (a) stolen in Ontario, how many were stolen in (i) Ottawa or the National Capital Region, (ii) the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, (iii) the rest of the province; (h) of the vehicles in (a) stolen in Quebec, how many were stolen in (i) Gatineau or the National Capital Region, (ii) Montréal, (iii) Quebec City, (iv) the rest of the province; and (i) how many times has the official vehicle of the Minister of Justice been stolen? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2464.
|
|
Q-2465 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to the Department of National Defence's (DND) "2022-2023 Annual Report to Parliament - Administration of the Privacy Act", in particular "Figure 7: Number of active requests (as of 31 March 2023)", regarding the age of outstanding access to information and privacy requests filed with the DND, between January 2016 and February 2024 inclusively: (a) how many privacy requests were filed in each year; (b) how many of those requests filed in 2018 or earlier remain open; (c) how many of those requests filed in 2019 remain open; and (d) how many of those requests in (b) were filed by (i) serving members, (ii) veterans, (iii) misconduct complainants? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2465.
|
|
Q-2466 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to personnel levels in the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces, for each year between January 2015 and January 2024, broken down by branch and occupation: (a) what were the target or desired personnel levels in each occupation; (b) what were the actual personnel levels in each occupation; (c) how many applicants expressed a desire to serve in each occupation; (d) how many applicants were admitted to serve in each occupation; and (e) how many civilian, full-time equivalents, were employed in the Department of National Defence? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2466.
|
|
Q-2467 — Mr. Waugh (Saskatoon—Grasswood) — With regard to the electoral district of Saskatoon–Grasswood: what are the details of all the grants, contributions, loans and any other payments from Government of Canada departments, agencies and Crown corporations, but excluding the Canada Revenue Agency, to all other levels of government within and outside of Canada, First Nations, corporations, non-governmental organizations and charities for the fiscal years 2015-16 to the current fiscal year, inclusively? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2467.
|
|
Q-2468 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to correspondence, written or electronic, received by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) from 2016 to 2024, broken down by year: (a) what was the total amount of correspondence received by the CRA; (b) what was the average length in days for a complete response, excluding the acknowledgement of receipt reply; (c) how many and what percentages of final responses took (i) over six months, (ii) over 12 months, (iii) over 18 months, (iv) over 24 months; (d) how many pieces of correspondence have yet to receive a final response and what is the oldest piece of correspondence that has yet to receive a final response; (e) what is the total yearly budget for all CRA correspondence operations; and (f) what is the total number of employees assigned to CRA correspondence operations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2468.
|
|
Q-2469 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and the objection process, broken down by fiscal year from 2015-16 to 2023-24: (a) what was, or is, the total budget for all CRA objection-related operations; (b) what was, or is, the total employee count for all CRA objection-related operations; (c) how many taxpayers filed objections; (d) what was the total of outstanding federal tax dollars in dispute; (e) how many days, on average, did the CRA take to assign objections from the time they were filed by the taxpayers for (i) low-complexity objections, (ii) medium-complexity objections, (iii) high-complexity objections, (iv) complexity not assigned; (f) how many days, on average, did the CRA take to resolve objections from the time they were filed by the taxpayers for (i) low-complexity objections, (ii) medium-complexity objections, (iii) high-complexity objections, (iv) complexity not assigned; (g) what was the CRA's inventory of outstanding income tax objections for (i) new objections, (ii) outstanding objections, (iii) resolved objections; (h) with respect to the data and figures included in "Appendix-Outcomes of objection decisions for the 2011-12 to 2015-16 fiscal years" in the 2016 Fall Reports of the Auditor General of Canada - Report 2-lncome Tax Objections-Canada Revenue Agency, what are the same data and figures for provide each of the fiscal years from 2015-16 to 2023-24; and (i) since the CRA began measuring and reporting service standards related to the objection process, how many and which service standards have not been met, broken down by fiscal year and specific service standard? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2469.
|
|
Q-2470 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to taxation, for the last tax year for which statistics are available: for each federal tax, (i) what is the name of the tax, (ii) how much did it cost to administer, (iii) how many employees or full-time equivalents were assigned to administer the tax, (iv) how much revenue was received from the tax? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2470.
|
|
Q-2472 — Ms. Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha) — With regard to the Canada Dental Benefit (CDB): (a) what is the government's estimate of the number of dentists currently operating in Canada; (b) of the dentists in (a), how many have received payments for services provided under the CDB; and (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by province or territory? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2472.
|
|
Q-2474 — Ms. Findlay (South Surrey—White Rock) — With regard to contracts entered into by the government relating to diversity, equity and inclusion services, since January 1, 2019, and broken down by department or agency: (a) what is the total value of such contracts, broken down by year and by type of service provided (policy development, training, guest speaker, fee, etc.); and (b) what are the details of each such contract, including, for each, the (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) amount or value, (iv) description of goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced versus competitive bid)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2474.
|
|
Q-2475 — Mrs. Goodridge (Fort McMurray—Cold Lake) — With regard to Global Affairs Canada's (GAC) reduced operating budgets from 2024 to 2027 as per the most recent Main Estimates: (a) what is the detailed breakdown of budget reductions per branch and office in GAC, broken down by (i) year, (ii) expected budget per year after reduction, (iii) reasons for why the budgets are being reduced, (iv) title of employee managing the branch or office; (b) what is the budget reduction for every embassy, consulate, and representative office from 2024 to 2027; and (c) which of the embassies, consulates, and offices in (b) are scheduled to be closed and by what date? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2475.
|
|
Q-2476 — Mr. Morantz (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley) — With regard to the federal government's commitment in budget 2022 to invest $76 million to strengthen Canada's capacity to implement sanctions: (a) how much of the $76 million has been invested to date; (b) of the funds spent to date, what is the breakdown by (i) department that was allocated funding, (ii) how the funds were spent, including what specific investments were made and how much spent on each item; (c) which directors general and assistant deputy ministers were tasked with overseeing the program implementation; and (d) what are the key progress indicators used to determine the success of the program, and what are the results of the indicators? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2476.
|
|
Q-2478 — Mr. Caputo (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo) — With regard to Correctional Service Canada (CSC), broken down by year since 2019: (a) how many assaults have taken place in CSC facilities, in total, and broken down by facility, year, and by type of incident (inmate assaulting inmate, inmate assaulting correctional officer, inmate assaulting staff and inmate assaulting contractor, etc.); (b) what is the breakdown of each part of (a) by the seriousness of the resulting incident (i.e. no injury, minor injury, serious injury, death etc.); (c) following the events in (a), how many times was (i) the inmate who committed the assault moved to a different CSC facility, (ii) the inmate who was assaulted moved to a different CSC facility, (iii) the inmate who committed the assault moved to a higher security; (d) what were the nature and types of espoused used in assaults contained in (a); and (e) of the incidents in (a), how many have resulted in punitive measures against the perpetrator in total and broken down by type of punitive measure? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2478.
|
|
Q-2479 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regard to the mandatory electronic filing requirements for the Goods and services tax (GST) and harmonized sales tax (HST): (a) did the government consult with any religious or cultural communities such as the Amish, Mennonite and Hutterite communities that do not have access or utilize the internet before making paper filing less accessible, and, if so, what are the details, including the (i) dates, (ii) locations, (iii) types of consultations that were conducted; (b) were seniors and Canadians without reliable internet access consulted on the recent changes to electronic filing, and, if so, what are the details, including the (i) dates, (ii) locations, (iii) types of consultations that were conducted; (c) what are the standards or criteria for attaining an exemption from the electronic filing requirement from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA); (d) what are the estimated number of exemption requests that CRA is anticipating receiving for this year; (e) how much are the financial penalties for a tax filer who is required to file their HST or GST returns online but continues to file it on paper; and (f) what is the projected revenue that CRA will receive as a result of the penalties in (e) and how will that money be allocated or spent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2479.
|
|
Q-2480 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regard to the federal government’s implementation of new bare trust filing requirements: (a) what is the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) formal definition of a bare trust; (b) what guidance regarding formal and informal arrangements that qualify as a bare trust that requires filing for tax purposes has the CRA provided; (c) how many complaints or requests for information or clarity has the minister and the CRA received to date broken down by (i) number of requests, (ii) medium of request – letter, phone call, webform, (iii) month of inquiry; (d) do parents or children co-signing a mortgage for property qualify as a bare trust requiring a return; (e) does joint ownership of a bank account, investment or security with a value of over $50,000 during the reporting year qualify as a bare trust requiring a return; (f) what are the the CRA’s plans to ensure new requirements regarding bare trusts are communicated clearly and available to all Canadians, including those without access to the internet; and (g) what conditions would exclude a trust from the T3 return requirement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2480.
|
|
Q-2481 — Mr. Mazier (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa) — With regard to the government's participation in the UN Climate Change Conference, the 28th Conference of the Parties (COP28) in Dubai: (a) what are the total expenditures incurred by the government to date related to the conference, broken down by type of expense; (b) what was the total number of delegates that the Government of Canada paid for, including the (i) official title and department or organization of each individual, (ii) total expenditures incurred for each entity in (b)(i), broken down by type of expense; (c) for the delegations accommodations in Dubai, (i) what hotels were used, (ii) how much was spent at each hotel, (iii) how many rooms were rented at each hotel and for how many nights, (iv) what were the room rates paid at each hotel and the number of rooms rented at each rate, (v) who stayed at each of the rooms in (c)(iv) broken down by room rate; (d) what were the details of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change’s accommodation expenditures, including the (i) daily rate, (ii) accommodation venue; (e) what are the details of the total hospitality expenditures broken down by (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) location, (iv) name of any commercial establishment or vendor involved in the hospitality activity, (v) number of attendees, (vi) description of event, (vii) description of goods and services; (f) what are the details of all ground transportation expenditures, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) vendor, (iv) origin, (v) destination, (vi) make and model of each vehicle used, (vii) type of vehicle (gas, electric, hybrid), (viii) whether a chauffeur or driver was included, (ix) names and titles of passengers or individuals who incurred the expense; and (g) what are the details of all expenditures on gifts related to the conference, including, for each, the (i) value, (ii) description, (iii) vendor from whom it was purchased, (iv) who was the recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2481.
|
|
Q-2483 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With regard to the Minister of Health’s mandate letter and the marketing of food and beverages to children: (a) what are the details of all consultations held since January 1, 2023, including the (i) name of organization consulted, (ii) date of consultation, (iii) format of consultation; and (b) is the government on schedule to submit draft regulations in the Canada Gazette before June 1, 2024? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2483.
|
|
Q-2486 — Mr. Small (Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame) — With regard to striped bass (Morone saxatilis) science at the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) : (a) what was the biomass of striped bass, broken down by year since 2010, with the upper and lower reference points, for the combined waters of the St. Lawrence River and all Atlantic Canadian waters; (b) what is the biomass in the St. Lawrence River and its tributaries; (c) what is the biomass in the Miramichi River; (d) what is the biomass in Area 4R and 2J; (e) what framework is in place to support a balance of the striped bass population and rest of the ecosystem; (f) what was the total catch of striped bass per area in Atlantic Canada and Quebec broken down by year since 2010 and what was the total allowable catch; (g) what is the biomass projected to be in each of the next five years and what are the upper and lower reference points, broken down by the St. Lawrence River and estuary, Miramichi River and all Atlantic Canadian waters; (h) what has the DFO's science budget amount been, that has been dedicated to striped bass since 2019 per year; (i) what is the known range of the migration of striped bass and can the DFO display where they are throughout the year on a map with their spawning zones and rivers; (j) why has the DFO not removed the maximum length restriction of 65 cm on striped bass per Recommendation 4 from the 2019 Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans’s report entitled “Striped bass in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence and Miramichi River: striking a delicate balance”; (k) have scientific studies been done in the Gulf of the St. Lawrence on striped bass since 2019, and, if so, what are the details, including results; (l) what ectotherm animals feed upon Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar); (m) what is the "at sea" diet of striped bass, broken down by (i) area, (ii) percentage of species consumed in overall diet; and (n) what is the "in river" diet of striped bass, broken down by (i) river studied, (ii) percentage of diet by species? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2486.
|
Government Orders |
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. MacKinnon (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Holland (Minister of Health), moved, — That in relation to Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at second reading stage of the bill; and |
That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for consideration at second reading stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 751 -- Vote no 751) | |
YEAS: 180, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Diab Kelloway Oliphant Total: -- 180 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dreeshen Lemire Savard-Tremblay Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Holland (Minister of Health), seconded by Mr. Fraser (Minister of Housing, Infrastructure and Communities), — That Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Health; |
And of the amendment of Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, since the bill does nothing to address the health care crisis and will instead offer Canadians an inferior pharmacare plan that covers less, costs more, and builds up a massive new bureaucracy that Canadians can’t afford.”.
|
The debate continued. |
At 9:49 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Tuesday, May 7, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Concurrence in Committee Reports |
By unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), seconded by Ms. Lantsman (Thornhill), — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, December 6, 2023, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 55) |
The debate continued. |
At 10:10 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, May 8, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid before the House as follows: |
— by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry) — Report of the Canadian Intellectual Property Office for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, pursuant to the Patent Act, R.S. 1985, c. P-4, s. 26. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-330-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology) |
— by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry) — Report on activities of the College of Patent Agents and Trademark Agents for the year 2023, pursuant to the College of Patent Agents and Trademark Agents Act, S.C. 2018, c. 27, s. 247 "25(2)". — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1287-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology) |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Agreement for RCMP policing services (First Nations Community Policing Service) for the province of Alberta, pursuant to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act, R.S. 1985, c. R-10, sbs. 20(5). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-475-21. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security) |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Report on the use of electronic surveillance for the year 2022, pursuant to the Criminal Code, R.S. 1985, c. C-46, sbs. 195(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-510-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security) |
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs) — Report of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service for the year 2023, pursuant to the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act, R.S. 1985, c. C-23, sbs. 20.2(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1235-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security) |
— by Ms. Martinez Ferrada (Minister of Tourism) — Report of Destination Canada, together with the Auditor General's Report, for the year ended December 31, 2023, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 150(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-87-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology) |
— by Ms. Ng (Minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development) — Report of Export Development Canada, together with the Auditor General's Report, for the year ended December 31, 2023, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 150(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-289-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade) |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 10:10 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 10:38 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |