;

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Bilingual view PDF

44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION

Journals No. 333 Monday, June 17, 2024 11:00 a.m.

Prayer

Private Members' Business

At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Ellis (Cumberland—Colchester), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (mental health services), be now read a third time and do pass;

And of the amendment of Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), seconded by Mr. Melillo (Kenora), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:

“Bill C-323, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (mental health services), be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Finance for the purpose of reconsidering Clause 1 with the view to amend the clause so as to include massage therapy among the health services to be exempted from the Goods and Services Tax, and the committee be invited to consider reporting the bill back to the House within 15 sitting days following the adoption of this order.”.

The debate continued.

The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 19, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

Interruption

At 11:49 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:01 p.m., the sitting resumed.

Government Orders

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Rodriguez (Minister of Transport), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-69, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 16, 2024, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage and five hours shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the bill; and

That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at third reading stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 825 -- Vote n^o 825)
YEAS: 175, NAYS: 147
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Ali Anand Anandasangaree Angus Arseneault Arya Ashton Atwin Bachrach Badawey Bains Baker Barron Battiste Beech Bendayan Bibeau Bittle Blair Blaney Blois Boissonnault Boulerice Bradford Brière Cannings Carr Casey Chagger Chahal Champagne Chatel Chen Chiang Collins (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) Collins (Victoria) Cormier Coteau Dabrusin Damoff Desjarlais Dhaliwal Dhillon Diab Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Dzerowicz Ehsassi El-Khoury Erskine-Smith Fillmore Fisher Fonseca Fortier Fragiskatos Fraser Fry Gaheer Gainey Garrison Gazan Gerretsen Gould Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hanley Hardie Hepfner Holland Housefather Hughes Hussen Hutchings Iacono Idlout Ien Jaczek Johns Jowhari Julian Kayabaga Kelloway Khalid Khera Koutrakis Kusmierczyk Kwan Lalonde Lambropoulos Lamoureux Lapointe Lattanzio Lauzon LeBlanc Lebouthillier Lightbound Long Longfield Louis (Kitchener—Conestoga) MacAulay (Cardigan) MacDonald (Malpeque) MacGregor MacKinnon (Gatineau) Maloney Martinez Ferrada Masse Mathyssen May (Cambridge) May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) McDonald (Avalon) McGuinty McKay McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) McLeod McPherson Mendès Mendicino Miao Miller Morrice Morrissey Murray Naqvi Ng Noormohamed O'Connell Oliphant O'Regan Petitpas Taylor Powlowski Qualtrough Robillard Rodriguez Rogers Romanado Rota Sahota Sajjan Saks Samson Sarai Scarpaleggia Schiefke Serré Sgro Shanahan Sheehan Sidhu (Brampton East) Sidhu (Brampton South) Singh Sorbara Sousa St-Onge Sudds Tassi Taylor Roy Thompson Trudeau Turnbull Valdez Van Bynen van Koeverden Vandal Vandenbeld Virani Weiler Wilkinson Yip Zahid Zarrillo Zuberi Total: -- 175
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Aitchison Albas Allison Arnold Baldinelli Barlow Barrett Barsalou-Duval Beaulieu Bergeron Berthold Bérubé Bezan Blanchette-Joncas Block Bragdon Brassard Brock Brunelle-Duceppe Calkins Caputo Carrie Chabot Chambers Chong Cooper Dalton Dancho Davidson DeBellefeuille Deltell Desbiens Desilets Doherty Dowdall Dreeshen Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Ellis Epp Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Falk (Provencher) Fast Ferreri Findlay Fortin Gallant Gaudreau Généreux Genuis Gill Gladu Godin Goodridge Gourde Gray Hallan Hoback Jeneroux Jivani Kelly Khanna Kitchen Kmiec Kram Kramp-Neuman Kurek Kusie Lake Lantsman Larouche Lawrence Lehoux Lemire Leslie Lewis (Essex) Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) Liepert Lloyd Lobb Maguire Majumdar Martel Mazier McCauley (Edmonton West) McLean Melillo Michaud Moore Morantz Morrison Motz Muys Nater Normandin Patzer Paul-Hus Pauzé Perkins Perron Poilievre Rayes Redekopp Reid Rempel Garner Richards Roberts Rood Ruff Savard-Tremblay Scheer Schmale Seeback Shields Shipley Simard Sinclair-Desgagné Small Soroka Steinley Ste-Marie Stewart Strahl Stubbs Thériault Therrien Thomas Tochor Tolmie Trudel Uppal Van Popta Vecchio Vidal Vien Viersen Vignola Villemure Vis Vuong Wagantall Warkentin Waugh Webber Williams Williamson Zimmer Total: -- 147
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Freeland Plamondon Total: -- 2

The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-69, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 16, 2024, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments;

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 161).

Group No. 1

Motion No. 1 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 81.

Motion No. 2 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 82.

Motion No. 3 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 83.

Motion No. 4 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 84.

Motion No. 5 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 85.

Motion No. 6 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 86.

Motion No. 7 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 87.

Motion No. 8 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 88.

Motion No. 9 of Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 89.

Motion No. 10 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 90.

Motion No. 11 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 91.

Motion No. 12 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 92.

Motion No. 13 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 93.

Motion No. 14 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 94.

Motion No. 15 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 95.

Motion No. 16 of Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 96.

Motion No. 17 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 97.

Motion No. 18 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 98.

Motion No. 19 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 99.

Motion No. 20 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 100.

Motion No. 21 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 101.

Motion No. 22 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 102.

Motion No. 23 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 103.

Motion No. 24 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 104.

Motion No. 25 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 105.

Motion No. 26 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 106.

Motion No. 27 of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 107.

Motion No. 28 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 108.

Motion No. 29 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 109.

Motion No. 30 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 110.

Motion No. 31 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 111.

Motion No. 32 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 147.

Motion No. 33 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 148.

Motion No. 34 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 150.

Motion No. 35 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 151.

Motion No. 36 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 152.

Motion No. 37 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 153.

Motion No. 38 of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 154.

Motion No. 39 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 173.

Motion No. 40 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 174.

Motion No. 41 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 175.

Motion No. 42 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 176.

Motion No. 43 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 177.

Motion No. 44 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 180.

Motion No. 45 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 181.

Motion No. 46 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 184.

Motion No. 47 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 185.

Motion No. 48 of Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 186.

Motion No. 49 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 198.

Motion No. 50 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 199.

Motion No. 51 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 200.

Motion No. 52 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 201.

Motion No. 53 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 202.

Motion No. 54 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 203.

Motion No. 55 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 204.

Motion No. 56 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 205.

Motion No. 57 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 206.

Motion No. 58 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 207.

Motion No. 59 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 208.

Motion No. 60 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 209.

Motion No. 61 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 210.

Motion No. 62 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 211.

Motion No. 63 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 212.

Motion No. 64 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 213.

Motion No. 65 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 214.

Motion No. 66 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 215.

Motion No. 67 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 216.

Motion No. 68 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 217.

Motion No. 69 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 218.

Motion No. 70 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 219.

Motion No. 71 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 220.

Motion No. 72 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 221.

Motion No. 73 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 222.

Motion No. 74 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 223.

Motion No. 75 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 224.

Motion No. 76 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 225.

Motion No. 77 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 226.

Motion No. 78 of Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 227.

Motion No. 79 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 269.

Motion No. 80 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 270.

Motion No. 81 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 271.

Motion No. 82 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 272.

Motion No. 83 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 273.

Motion No. 84 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 274.

Motion No. 85 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 275.

Motion No. 86 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 276.

Motion No. 87 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 277.

Motion No. 88 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 278.

Motion No. 89 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 279.

Motion No. 90 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 280.

Motion No. 91 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 281.

Motion No. 92 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 282.

Motion No. 93 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 283.

Motion No. 94 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 284.

Motion No. 95 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 285.

Motion No. 96 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 286.

Motion No. 97 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 287.

Motion No. 98 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 288.

Motion No. 99 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 289.

Motion No. 100 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 290.

Motion No. 101 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 291.

Motion No. 102 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 292.

Motion No. 103 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 293.

Motion No. 104 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 294.

Motion No. 105 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 295.

Motion No. 106 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 296.

Motion No. 107 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 297.

Motion No. 108 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 298.

Motion No. 109 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 299.

Motion No. 110 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 300.

Motion No. 111 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 301.

Motion No. 112 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 302.

Motion No. 113 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 303.

Motion No. 114 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 304.

Motion No. 115 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 305.

Motion No. 116 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 306.

Motion No. 117 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 307.

Motion No. 118 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 308.

Motion No. 119 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 309.

Motion No. 120 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 310.

Motion No. 121 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 311.

Motion No. 122 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 312.

Motion No. 123 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 313.

Motion No. 124 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 314.

Motion No. 125 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 315.

Motion No. 126 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 316.

Motion No. 127 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 317.

Motion No. 128 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 318.

Motion No. 129 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 319.

Motion No. 130 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 322.

Motion No. 131 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 323.

Motion No. 132 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 324.

Motion No. 133 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 325.

Motion No. 134 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 326.

Motion No. 135 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 327.

Motion No. 136 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 328.

Motion No. 137 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 329.

Motion No. 138 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 330.

Motion No. 139 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 331.

Motion No. 140 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 332.

Motion No. 141 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 333.

Motion No. 142 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 336.

Motion No. 143 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 337.

Motion No. 144 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 338.

Motion No. 145 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 339.

Motion No. 146 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 442.

Motion No. 147 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 443.

Motion No. 148 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 445.

Motion No. 149 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 446.

Motion No. 150 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 447.

Motion No. 151 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 448.

Motion No. 152 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 449.

Motion No. 153 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 450.

Motion No. 154 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 461.

Motion No. 155 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 462.

Motion No. 156 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 463.

Motion No. 157 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 464.

Motion No. 158 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 465.

Motion No. 159 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 466.

Motion No. 160 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 467.

Motion No. 161 of Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 468.

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Statements By Members

Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements.

Oral Questions

Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions.

Deferred Recorded Divisions

Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division at report stage of Bill C-40, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to make consequential amendments to other Acts and to repeal a regulation (miscarriage of justice reviews), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with amendments.

Group No. 1

The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Van Popta (Langley—Aldergrove), seconded by Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), — That Bill C-40 be amended by deleting the short title.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 826 -- Vote n^o 826)
YEAS: 118, NAYS: 206
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Aitchison Albas Allison Arnold Baldinelli Barlow Barrett Berthold Bezan Block Bragdon Brassard Brock Calkins Caputo Carrie Chambers Chong Cooper Dalton Dancho Davidson Deltell d'Entremont Doherty Dowdall Dreeshen Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Ellis Epp Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Falk (Provencher) Fast Ferreri Gallant Généreux Genuis Gladu Godin Goodridge Gourde Gray Hallan Hoback Jeneroux Jivani Kelly Khanna Kitchen Kmiec Kram Kramp-Neuman Kurek Kusie Lake Lantsman Lawrence Lehoux Leslie Lewis (Essex) Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) Liepert Lloyd Lobb Maguire Majumdar Martel Mazier McCauley (Edmonton West) McLean Melillo Moore Morantz Morrison Motz Muys Nater Patzer Paul-Hus Perkins Poilievre Redekopp Reid Rempel Garner Richards Roberts Rood Ruff Scheer Schmale Seeback Shields Shipley Small Soroka Steinley Stewart Strahl Stubbs Thomas Tochor Tolmie Uppal Van Popta Vecchio Vidal Vien Viersen Vis Vuong Wagantall Warkentin Waugh Webber Williams Williamson Zimmer Total: -- 118
NAYS -- CONTRE Alghabra Ali Anand Anandasangaree Angus Arseneault Arya Ashton Atwin Bachrach Badawey Bains Baker Barron Barsalou-Duval Battiste Beaulieu Beech Bendayan Bergeron Bérubé Bibeau Bittle Blair Blanchette-Joncas Blaney Blois Boissonnault Boulerice Bradford Brière Brunelle-Duceppe Cannings Carr Casey Chabot Chagger Chahal Champagne Champoux Chatel Chen Chiang Collins (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) Collins (Victoria) Cormier Coteau Dabrusin Damoff DeBellefeuille Desbiens Desilets Desjarlais Dhaliwal Dhillon Diab Dong Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Dzerowicz Ehsassi El-Khoury Erskine-Smith Fillmore Fisher Fonseca Fortier Fortin Fragiskatos Fraser Fry Gaheer Gainey Garon Garrison Gaudreau Gazan Gerretsen Gill Gould Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hanley Hardie Hepfner Holland Housefather Hughes Hussen Hutchings Iacono Idlout Ien Jaczek Johns Joly Jowhari Julian Kayabaga Kelloway Khalid Khera Koutrakis Kusmierczyk Kwan Lalonde Lambropoulos Lamoureux Lapointe Larouche Lattanzio Lauzon LeBlanc Lebouthillier Lemire Lightbound Long Longfield Louis (Kitchener—Conestoga) MacAulay (Cardigan) MacDonald (Malpeque) MacGregor MacKinnon (Gatineau) Maloney Martinez Ferrada Masse Mathyssen May (Cambridge) May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) McDonald (Avalon) McGuinty McKay McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) McLeod McPherson Mendès Mendicino Miao Michaud Miller Morrice Morrissey Murray Naqvi Ng Noormohamed Normandin O'Connell Oliphant O'Regan Perron Petitpas Taylor Powlowski Qualtrough Rayes Robillard Rodriguez Rogers Romanado Rota Sahota Sajjan Saks Samson Sarai Savard-Tremblay Scarpaleggia Schiefke Serré Sgro Shanahan Sheehan Sidhu (Brampton East) Sidhu (Brampton South) Simard Sinclair-Desgagné Singh Sorbara Sousa Ste-Marie St-Onge Sudds Tassi Taylor Roy Thériault Therrien Thompson Trudeau Trudel Turnbull Valdez Van Bynen van Koeverden Vandal Vandenbeld Villemure Virani Weiler Wilkinson Yip Zahid Zarrillo Zuberi Total: -- 206
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Freeland Plamondon Total: -- 2
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2 to 20 were also negatived on the same division.

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Ms. Martinez Ferrada (Minister of Tourism and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec) for Mr. Virani (Minister of Justice), seconded by Ms. Tassi (Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario), moved, — That the bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 827 -- Vote n^o 827)
YEAS: 206, NAYS: 118
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Ali Anand Anandasangaree Angus Arseneault Arya Ashton Atwin Bachrach Badawey Bains Baker Barron Barsalou-Duval Battiste Beaulieu Beech Bendayan Bergeron Bérubé Bibeau Bittle Blair Blanchette-Joncas Blaney Blois Boissonnault Boulerice Bradford Brière Brunelle-Duceppe Cannings Carr Casey Chabot Chagger Chahal Champagne Champoux Chatel Chen Chiang Collins (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) Collins (Victoria) Cormier Coteau Dabrusin Damoff DeBellefeuille Desbiens Desilets Desjarlais Dhaliwal Dhillon Diab Dong Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Dzerowicz Ehsassi El-Khoury Erskine-Smith Fillmore Fisher Fonseca Fortier Fortin Fragiskatos Fraser Fry Gaheer Gainey Garon Garrison Gaudreau Gazan Gerretsen Gill Gould Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hanley Hardie Hepfner Holland Housefather Hughes Hussen Hutchings Iacono Idlout Ien Jaczek Johns Joly Jowhari Kayabaga Kelloway Khalid Khera Koutrakis Kusmierczyk Kwan Lalonde Lambropoulos Lamoureux Lapointe Larouche Lattanzio Lauzon LeBlanc Lebouthillier Lemire Lightbound Long Longfield Louis (Kitchener—Conestoga) MacAulay (Cardigan) MacDonald (Malpeque) MacGregor MacKinnon (Gatineau) Maloney Martinez Ferrada Masse Mathyssen May (Cambridge) May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) McDonald (Avalon) McGuinty McKay McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) McLeod McPherson Mendès Mendicino Miao Michaud Miller Morrice Morrissey Murray Naqvi Ng Noormohamed Normandin O'Connell Oliphant O'Regan Pauzé Perron Petitpas Taylor Powlowski Qualtrough Rayes Robillard Rodriguez Rogers Romanado Rota Sahota Sajjan Saks Samson Sarai Savard-Tremblay Scarpaleggia Schiefke Serré Sgro Shanahan Sheehan Sidhu (Brampton East) Sidhu (Brampton South) Simard Sinclair-Desgagné Singh Sorbara Sousa Ste-Marie St-Onge Sudds Tassi Taylor Roy Thériault Therrien Thompson Trudeau Trudel Turnbull Valdez Van Bynen van Koeverden Vandal Vandenbeld Villemure Virani Weiler Wilkinson Yip Zahid Zarrillo Zuberi Total: -- 206
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Aitchison Albas Allison Arnold Baldinelli Barlow Barrett Berthold Bezan Block Bragdon Brassard Brock Calkins Caputo Carrie Chambers Chong Cooper Dalton Dancho Davidson Deltell d'Entremont Doherty Dowdall Dreeshen Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Ellis Epp Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Falk (Provencher) Fast Ferreri Findlay Gallant Généreux Genuis Gladu Godin Goodridge Gourde Gray Hallan Hoback Jeneroux Jivani Kelly Khanna Kitchen Kmiec Kram Kramp-Neuman Kurek Kusie Lake Lantsman Lawrence Lehoux Leslie Lewis (Essex) Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) Liepert Lloyd Lobb Maguire Majumdar Martel Mazier McCauley (Edmonton West) McLean Melillo Moore Morantz Morrison Motz Muys Nater Patzer Paul-Hus Perkins Poilievre Redekopp Reid Rempel Garner Richards Roberts Rood Ruff Scheer Schmale Seeback Shields Shipley Small Soroka Steinley Stewart Strahl Stubbs Thomas Tochor Tolmie Uppal Van Popta Vecchio Vidal Vien Viersen Vis Wagantall Warkentin Waugh Webber Williams Williamson Zimmer Total: -- 118
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Freeland Plamondon Total: -- 2
Accordingly, the bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.

Motions

By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House:

(a) condemn the death sentence of Iranian musician and vocal critic of the Iranian regime, Toomaj Salehi;

(b) urge the government of Canada to impose targeted sanctions on the 31 judges, prosecutors, and investigators of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Courts included on the “TOOMAJ” list, who are responsible for sham trials, torture, and the inhumane treatment of Iranian protesters and political dissidents;

(c) condemn gender apartheid, violations of civil liberties, killings, intimidation, and acts of violence initiated by the Islamic Republic against the people of Iran; and

(d) reiterate its unconditional support for Iranians advocating for human rights and democracy as part of the Women, Life, Freedom movement.

Daily Routine Of Business

Tabling of Documents

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:

— Nos. 441-02430 and 441-02435 concerning the environment;

— No. 441-02456 concerning public safety;

— No. 441-02457 concerning taxation;

— No. 441-02458 concerning social affairs and equality;

— No. 441-02460 concerning health;

— No. 441-02461 concerning national defence and military operations;

— No. 441-02462 concerning justice;

— No. 441-02463 concerning the democratic process.

Motions

Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Gerretsen (Kingston and the Islands), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the orders of the day.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 828 -- Vote n^o 828)
YEAS: 173, NAYS: 147
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Ali Anand Anandasangaree Angus Arseneault Arya Atwin Bachrach Badawey Bains Baker Barron Battiste Beech Bendayan Bibeau Bittle Blair Blaney Blois Boissonnault Boulerice Bradford Brière Cannings Carr Casey Chagger Chahal Champagne Chatel Chiang Collins (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) Collins (Victoria) Cormier Coteau Dabrusin Damoff Davies Desjarlais Dhaliwal Dhillon Diab Dong Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Dzerowicz Ehsassi El-Khoury Erskine-Smith Fillmore Fisher Fonseca Fortier Fragiskatos Fraser Fry Gaheer Gainey Garrison Gazan Gerretsen Gould Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hanley Hardie Hepfner Holland Housefather Hussen Hutchings Iacono Idlout Ien Jaczek Johns Joly Jowhari Julian Kayabaga Kelloway Khalid Khera Koutrakis Kusmierczyk Kwan Lalonde Lambropoulos Lamoureux Lapointe Lattanzio Lauzon LeBlanc Lebouthillier Lightbound Long Longfield Louis (Kitchener—Conestoga) MacAulay (Cardigan) MacDonald (Malpeque) MacGregor MacKinnon (Gatineau) Maloney Martinez Ferrada Masse Mathyssen May (Cambridge) McDonald (Avalon) McGuinty McKay McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) McLeod McPherson Mendès Mendicino Miao Miller Morrissey Murray Naqvi Ng Noormohamed O'Connell Oliphant O'Regan Petitpas Taylor Powlowski Qualtrough Robillard Rodriguez Rogers Romanado Rota Sahota Sajjan Saks Samson Sarai Scarpaleggia Schiefke Serré Sgro Shanahan Sheehan Sidhu (Brampton East) Sidhu (Brampton South) Singh Sorbara Sousa St-Onge Sudds Tassi Taylor Roy Thompson Trudeau Turnbull Valdez Van Bynen van Koeverden Vandal Vandenbeld Virani Weiler Wilkinson Yip Zahid Zarrillo Zuberi Total: -- 173
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Aitchison Albas Allison Arnold Baldinelli Barlow Barrett Barsalou-Duval Beaulieu Bergeron Berthold Bérubé Bezan Blanchette-Joncas Block Bragdon Brassard Brock Brunelle-Duceppe Calkins Caputo Carrie Chabot Chambers Champoux Chong Cooper Dalton Dancho Davidson DeBellefeuille Deltell d'Entremont Desbiens Desilets Doherty Dowdall Dreeshen Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Ellis Epp Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Falk (Provencher) Fast Ferreri Gallant Garon Gaudreau Généreux Genuis Gill Gladu Godin Goodridge Gourde Gray Hallan Hoback Jeneroux Jivani Khanna Kitchen Kmiec Kram Kramp-Neuman Kurek Kusie Lake Lantsman Larouche Lawrence Lehoux Lemire Leslie Lewis (Essex) Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) Liepert Lloyd Lobb Maguire Martel May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) Mazier McCauley (Edmonton West) McLean Melillo Michaud Moore Morantz Morrice Morrison Motz Muys Nater Normandin Patzer Paul-Hus Pauzé Perkins Perron Poilievre Redekopp Reid Rempel Garner Richards Roberts Rood Ruff Savard-Tremblay Scheer Schmale Seeback Shields Shipley Simard Sinclair-Desgagné Small Soroka Steinley Ste-Marie Stewart Strahl Stubbs Thériault Therrien Thomas Tochor Tolmie Trudel Uppal Van Popta Vecchio Vidal Vien Viersen Vignola Villemure Vis Vuong Wagantall Warkentin Waugh Webber Williams Williamson Zimmer Total: -- 147
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Freeland Plamondon Total: -- 2

Government Orders

Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. MacKinnon (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at second reading stage of the bill; and

That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at second reading stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.

Requests for the Extension of Sitting Hours

Pursuant to order made Wednesday, February 28, 2024, Ms. Petitpas Taylor (Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence) requested that the ordinary hour of daily adjournment on Tuesday, June 18, 2024, be 12:00 a.m. and this request was deemed adopted.

Government Orders

Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House resumed the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion in relation to C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act.

The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 829 -- Vote n^o 829)
YEAS: 173, NAYS: 146
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Ali Anand Anandasangaree Angus Arseneault Arya Atwin Bachrach Badawey Bains Baker Barron Battiste Beech Bendayan Bibeau Bittle Blair Blaney Blois Boissonnault Boulerice Bradford Brière Cannings Carr Casey Chagger Chahal Champagne Chatel Chen Chiang Collins (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) Collins (Victoria) Cormier Coteau Dabrusin Damoff Davies Desjarlais Dhaliwal Dhillon Diab Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Dzerowicz Ehsassi El-Khoury Erskine-Smith Fillmore Fisher Fonseca Fortier Fragiskatos Fraser Fry Gaheer Gainey Garrison Gazan Gerretsen Gould Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hanley Hardie Hepfner Holland Housefather Hughes Hussen Hutchings Iacono Idlout Ien Jaczek Johns Joly Jowhari Julian Kayabaga Khalid Khera Koutrakis Kusmierczyk Kwan Lalonde Lambropoulos Lamoureux Lapointe Lattanzio Lauzon LeBlanc Lebouthillier Lightbound Long Longfield Louis (Kitchener—Conestoga) MacAulay (Cardigan) MacDonald (Malpeque) MacGregor MacKinnon (Gatineau) Maloney Martinez Ferrada Masse Mathyssen May (Cambridge) McDonald (Avalon) McGuinty McKay McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam) McLeod McPherson Mendès Mendicino Miao Miller Morrissey Murray Naqvi Ng Noormohamed O'Connell Oliphant O'Regan Petitpas Taylor Powlowski Qualtrough Robillard Rodriguez Rogers Romanado Rota Sahota Sajjan Saks Samson Sarai Scarpaleggia Schiefke Serré Sgro Shanahan Sheehan Sidhu (Brampton East) Sidhu (Brampton South) Singh Sorbara Sousa St-Onge Sudds Tassi Taylor Roy Thompson Trudeau Turnbull Valdez Van Bynen van Koeverden Vandal Vandenbeld Virani Weiler Wilkinson Yip Zahid Zarrillo Zuberi Total: -- 173
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Aitchison Albas Allison Arnold Baldinelli Barlow Barrett Barsalou-Duval Bergeron Berthold Bérubé Bezan Blanchette-Joncas Block Bragdon Brassard Brock Brunelle-Duceppe Calkins Caputo Carrie Chabot Chambers Champoux Chong Cooper Dalton Dancho Davidson DeBellefeuille Deltell Desbiens Desilets Doherty Dowdall Dreeshen Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) Ellis Epp Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Falk (Provencher) Fast Ferreri Findlay Fortin Gallant Garon Gaudreau Généreux Genuis Gladu Godin Goodridge Gourde Gray Hallan Hoback Jeneroux Jivani Kelly Khanna Kitchen Kmiec Kram Kramp-Neuman Kurek Kusie Lake Lantsman Larouche Lawrence Lehoux Lemire Leslie Lewis (Essex) Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk) Liepert Lloyd Lobb Maguire Majumdar Martel May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) Mazier McCauley (Edmonton West) McLean Melillo Michaud Moore Morantz Morrice Morrison Motz Muys Nater Patzer Paul-Hus Pauzé Perkins Perron Poilievre Rayes Redekopp Reid Rempel Garner Richards Roberts Rood Ruff Savard-Tremblay Scheer Schmale Seeback Shields Shipley Simard Sinclair-Desgagné Small Soroka Steinley Ste-Marie Stewart Strahl Stubbs Thériault Therrien Tochor Tolmie Trudel Uppal Van Popta Vecchio Vidal Vien Viersen Villemure Vis Vuong Wagantall Warkentin Waugh Webber Williams Williamson Zimmer Total: -- 146
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Freeland Plamondon Total: -- 2

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 161).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Quorum

The attention of the Speaker was drawn to the lack of a quorum and, fewer than 20 members having been counted, pursuant to Standing Order 29(3), the bells were rung to call in the members.

After one minute, a quorum was found.

Government Orders

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 161).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

Questions on the Order Paper

By unanimous consent, Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-2619, Q-2624, Q-2632, Q-2633, Q-2635, Q-2639, Q-2641, Q-2643, Q-2646 and Q-2647 on the Order Paper.

By unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return:

Q-2620 — — With regard to federal housing investments for Vancouver Island, since February 1, 2006, broken down by year: (a) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of non-profit or community housing and how many units were developed; (b) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of cooperative housing and how many units were developed; and (c) how much federal funding was provided to support the construction of purpose-built rental housing and how many units were developed? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2620.

Q-2621 — — With regard to the statement by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada in the House of Commons chamber on April 18, 2024 that, “In the budget, we have already announced that we are going to increase the maximum sentences for auto theft”, for each auto theft offence: (a) how many people have been convicted of each of the related offences since January 1, 2016, broken down by year and offence; (b) of those convicted in (a), how many offenders received the maximum sentence, broken down by year and offence; and (c) how many offenders have received the mandatory six months imprisonment for a third offence? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2621.

Q-2622 — — With regard to government patronage, contracts and funding provided to the individuals who signed the document entitled "An Open Letter from Economists on Canadian Carbon Pricing": (a) which of the individuals who signed the document have received government contracts since November 4, 2015; (b) what are the details of all contracts in (a), including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) manner in which it was awarded (sole-sourced versus competitive bid); (c) what are the details of all grants or contributions issued to the signatories or the institutions they represent since November 4, 2015, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) recipient, (iii) amount, (iv) purpose of the grant or contribution; and (d) which of the signatories has received an Order in Council appointment from the government or have served on any type of government advisory body since November 4, 2015, including, for each, the (i) name of the individual, (ii) body or organization for which they were appointed or served, (iii) position? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2622.

Q-2623 — — With regard to the trip to Washington, D.C. by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry on April 27 and 28, 2024: (a) what was the minister's detailed itinerary on the trip; and (b) what are the details of each meeting attended by the minister on the trip, including the (i) date, (ii) time, (iii) purpose, (iv) list of attendees? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2623.

Q-2625 — — With regard to Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care Agreements, broken down by province or territory and by year, since October 1, 2019: what was the (i) total number of early learning and child care spaces available during the fiscal year, broken down by age group of child and type of setting, (ii) number of net new spaces created during the fiscal year, broken down by age group of child and type of setting, (iii) total number of inclusive spaces created or converted, broken down by age group of child and type of setting, (iv) average daily parental out-of-pocket fee for regulated child care spaces at the end of each fiscal year, (v) number of children 0 to K receiving fee subsidies, broken down by families receiving partial and full subsidies, (vi) number or proportion of child care service providers who provide services that are adapted to the needs of children with disabilities and children needing enhanced or individual supports, (vii) number and percentage of staff working in regulated child care programs who fully met the province's certification and educational requirements, (viii) annual public expenditure on training and professional development of the early childhood workforce, (ix) indicator data related to the wages of the early childhood workforce according to the categories of certification, including any wage enhancements, top-ups or supplements? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2625.

Q-2626 — — With regard to the 2023 Canadian federal worker strike: (a) what was the total amount mistakenly paid out to striking employees; and (b) what is the amount that has not been collected back by the government? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2626.

Q-2627 — — With regard to sole-sourced contracts entered into by the government related to products or services for ministers or their offices, including the Office of the Prime Minister, since January 1, 2019, broken down by each minister: what are the details of each such contract, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of goods or services? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2627.

Q-2628 — — With regard to expenditures related to the Cabinet retreat which took place in Montréal, from January 21 to 23, 2024, including expenses incurred by the Privy Council Office as well as by other departments or agencies, and including travel expenses incurred by ministers, ministerial staff, and others: (a) what are the total expenditures related to the retreat incurred to date; (b) what is the breakdown of the expenditures by type of expense (accommodation, hospitality, audio-visual, etc.); (c) what are the details of all expenditures in excess of $1,000, including, for each, the (i) amount, (ii) vendor, (iii) description of the goods or services provided; and (d) what are the details of all travel expenses incurred by ministers and their staff, broken down by individual, including, for each, (i) the title, (ii) the amount spent on airfare, (iii) the amount spent on other transportation, (iv) the amount spent on accommodation, (v) the hotel or venue name, (vi) the amount spent on meals or per diems, (vii) other expenses, broken down by type? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2628.

Q-2629 — — With regard to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC): how much advertising revenue did the CBC receive from government departments, agencies, and other Crown corporations during the 2023-24 fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2629.

Q-2630 — — With regard to expenditures on public relations or media training, or similar type of services for ministers or their offices, including the Office of the Prime Minister, since March 1, 2022, and broken down by minister: what are the details of each such expenditure, including the (i) date of the contract, (ii) amount, (iii) vendor, (iv) individual providing the training, (v) summary of the services provided, including the type of training, (vi) person who received the training, (vii) date of the training? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2630.

Q-2631 — — With regard to planned funding by the government related to "safe" or "safer" supply programs: how much does the government plan on spending on such programs, broken down by department, agency, and initiative in the current fiscal year and in each of the next five fiscal years? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2631.

Q-2634 — — With regard to the Royal Canadian Navy's Halifax-class frigates: (a) what is the number of (i) sea days, (ii) non-sea days, that each frigate has had for each of the last 48 months, broken down by month and by frigate; (b) what is the breakdown of the reasons for non-sea days, including the number of days each month that each frigate was not at sea for each of the reasons; and (c) what is the percentage of frigate fleet readiness each month for the last 48 months, broken down by month for the (i) total fleet, (ii) Pacific fleet, (iii) Atlantic fleet? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2634.

Q-2636 — — With regard to government expenditures related to preparations for committee appearances by ministers, government officials, or representatives of any government department, agency, Crown corporation or other government entity, or for appearances by any former official, since January 1, 2019: what are the details of each expenditure, including the (i) date of the contract, (ii) vendor, (iii) description of goods or services, (iv) date of the committee appearance, (v) name and title of the individual or individuals appearing at committee, (vi) name of the committee, (vii) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2636.

Q-2637 — — With regard to government dealings with Pollara Strategic Insights (PSI) since January 1, 2020: (a) what are the details of all contracts signed between government departments and agencies and PSI, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) description of goods or services, (iv) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid), (v) topics of research or polling covered by the contract, if applicable; (b) what are the details of each poll conducted by PSI for the government, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) questions asked, (iii) results; and (c) what are the details of all meetings held between government officials, ministers or ministerial staff and PSI owner Don Guy, including, for each, the (i) list of attendees, (ii) date, (iii) location, (iv) purpose of the meeting? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2637.

Q-2638 — — With regard to government dealings with economists Jim Stanford, Andrew Sharpe, Mostafa Askari, Mel Cappe, Marc Lévesque formerly of the Public Sector Pension Investment Board, Don Drummond, Kevin Milligan, Stephen Gordon, Andrew Leach, Paul Beaudry, Pierre Fortin, and Mike Moffat, since November 4, 2015: (a) which of the economists above have received government contracts; (b) what are the details of all contracts with these economists, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) manner in which it was awarded (sole-sourced versus or competitive bid); (c) what are the details of all grants or contributions issued to these economists, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) recipient, (iii) amount, (iv) purpose of the grant or contribution; and (d) which of these economists have received an Order in Council appointment from the government or have served on any type of government advisory body since November 4, 2015, including, for each, the (i) name of the individual, (ii) body or organization for which they were appointed or served, (iii) position, (iv) start and end dates? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2638.

Q-2640 — — With regard to firearms which were prohibited as a result of the May 1, 2020, Order in Council SOR/2020-96: (a) how many have been (i) turned in, (ii) seized, (iii) confiscated, (iv) otherwise obtained by the government broken down by how it was obtained; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by those firearms which were previously in the possession of individuals versus businesses; and (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by make and model? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2640.

Q-2642 — — With regard to Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada's Northern Abandoned Mine Reclamation Program: (a) how much has been spent to date on the Giant Mine, in total and broken down by the (i) purpose, (ii) recipient, of the funding; (b) how much is allotted to each purpose and recipient in (a), in total and broken down by (i) purpose, (ii) recipient; and (c) what are the details of all consultant contracts for the Giant Mine and the Giant Mine Oversight Board, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of the goods and services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid), (vi) start and end dates, if applicable? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2642.

Q-2644 — — With regard to the review by Health Canada (HC), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), or the National Advisory Committee on Immunization, of a pre-print study posted on October 15, 2023 of which six authors are associated with the US Food and Drug Administration that found "a new signal was detected for seizures-convulsions after BNT162b2 (2-4 years) and mRNA1273 COVID-19 vaccinations (2-5 years),": (a) which federal health agency, organization, committee or department(s) or outsourced contracted firm is responsible for reviewing or identifying studies such as the pre-print titled "Safety of Monovalent BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax) COVID- 19 Vaccines in US Children Aged six months to 17 years;"; (b) has any federal health agency, organization, committee, department(s) or outsourced contracted firm reviewed or been made aware of the forementioned study or learned about the new safety signal of seizures/convulsions among children following monovalent COVID-19 vaccine; (c) if the answer to (b) is affirmative, has HC or any federal health agency, organization or committee issued any statement to the Canadian public or any communication to the provinces or the medical community to create awareness of this new safety signal; (d) if the answer to (c) is affirmative, what was the statement or communication provided; (e) if the answer to (c) is negative, why not; (f) how many episodes of seizures-convulsions have been reported in children under 17 years in Canadian Adverse Events following Immunization Surveillance System records, from (i) May 1, 2021 to April 30, 2023, (ii) May 1, 2018 to April 30, 2020; (g) what provincial and territory data is the federal government relying upon to monitor risk of seizures and convulsions in this cohort in real time; (h) how far out is the government monitoring this data (e.g. 28 days post-vaccine, up to 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, beyond 12 months post-COVID-19 immunization); (i) what are the Canadian government's threshold values for marking the likelihood of a vaccine serious adverse event as transitioning from an extremely rare, to a rare occurrence, and from a rare to a common occurrence; (j) what is the threshold whereby a safety signal of seizures or convulsions would shut down the mRNA vaccine program in children under the age of 17 years; (k) why are children's seizures-convulsions not listed on HC's webpage denoted to children's side-effects which was last updated on October 27, 2023; (l) with real-time monitoring, what other safety signals has HC, the PHAC or any other federal agency or department discovered post-mRNA vaccine injection for (i) children under age 5 years, (ii) children 6-17 years, (iii) persons 18-25 years, (iv) persons 26-35 years; (m) is HC receiving any data directly from provincial datasets to monitor increased usage of provincial health systems by Canadian children post-vaccination; (n) has any federal health agency or entity such as the Canadian Institute for Health Information or outsourced contractor tracked the number of episodes of myocarditis and pericarditis in young persons under the age of 35, post-vaccination, using billing or ICD-10 data from physicians and hospitals across Canada both before and after the COVID-19 injections had commenced; (o) if the answer to (n) is affirmative, (i) for what period of time post-immunization are they tracked, (ii) is the rate of myocarditis and pericarditis in persons under 35 years following the roll-out of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines greater or less than the baseline rates of myocarditis and pericarditis from 2016-2019; (p) if there were deviations from the baseline found in (o)(ii), by how much did this occur and by which method has the determination of any difference, or lack thereof, been made; (q) if the answer to (n) is negative, why is this data not being tracked; and (r) when examining the risk-of-harm to benefit ratio of the COVID-19 mRNA products and when considering the combination of serious adverse events such as seizures-convulsions, myocarditis and pericarditis in young persons, what is the combined threshold of serious adverse events by which mRNA products would no longer be available to (i) children under the age of 5 years, (ii) children 6-17 years old, (iii) persons 18-25 years old, (iv) persons 26-35 years old, and who determines these thresholds, when, and based on what data? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2644.

Q-2645 — — With regard to Correctional Service Canada, broken down by year since 2008: what is the capacity of federal institutions and the number of those incarcerated (i) in total, (ii) by region, (iii) by correctional institution? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2645.

Q-2648 — — With regard to Health Canada (HC), the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) and the reporting processes of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and the implementation of the Brighton Collaboration Case Definitions of AEFIs: (a) in what ways does HC’s Canada Vigilance Program (CVP) differ from the PHAC’s Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System (CAEFISS) reporting system; (b) what purpose does it serve for Canada to have two reporting systems; (c) how, if at all, is the CVP and CAEFISS data amalgamated; (d) regarding HC’s relationship to the Brighton Collaboration (BC), (i) does one exist, and, if so, when did HC or the PHAC start using the BC criteria as a requirement for AEFI recognition, (ii) what is the BC’s purpose in the vaccine space in Canada; (e) regarding the implementation of the BC criteria, (i) when was it communicated to health care practitioners, (ii) how was it communicated; (f) were there any definitions of AEFIs that were changed after January 1, 2019 by (i) the BC, (ii) HC, (iii) the PHAC, (iv) the National Advisory Committee on Immunization; (g) if the answer to (f) is affirmative, (i) which ones were changed and by which agency, (ii) how were they changed, (iii) why were they changed; (h) is HC aware of the entities, such as the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, which partner with the BC; (i) if the answer to (h) is affirmative, what are those entities and corporations along with their inherent conflicts of interest (COI) in the vaccine space; (j) what or who are the other funding and non-funding entities who partner with the BC; (k) is HC aware of those individuals who constitute the BC’s Board of Directors and those who have been trained at the BC, including the members of the Advisory Committee on Causality Assessment; (l) if the answer to (k) is affirmative, (i) what percentage of those individuals are working, have worked, or have consulted for a pharmaceutical company, (ii) how many work in Canada; (m) of the individuals identified in (l) as Canadians, (i) what are their names, (ii) what are their conflicts of interest, (iii) what positions do they hold in other entities; (n) how much does the Government of Canada, and any entity related to the Government of Canada, provide monetarily to the BC; and (o) is the BC associated, either directly or indirectly, with any vaccine manufacturers or related organizations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2648.

Q-2649 — — With regard to the Canada Border Service Agency's (CBSA) releasing detainees, who would otherwise be held in custody pending deportation, due to a lack of detention capacity: (a) how long has the government known about the problem; (b) how many meetings has the government had on this issue; (c) what steps has the government taken to address this issue; and (d) how many detainees does CBSA project will have to be released due to lack of capacity? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2649.

Q-2650 — — With regard to the government’s approach to the Chinese state owned CRRC Corporation Limited: (a) has the government identified any threats to national security from CRRC, and, if so, what are the details of each; (b) has the government identified any safety or performance issues with the operation of CRRC rolling stock in Canada, and, if so, what are the details of each; (c) since January 1, 2016, and broken down by year, how many projects involving CRRC have been approved by Transport Canada; and (d) since Canada joined the Asian Infrastructure Bank on March 19, 2018, is the government aware of (i) any CRRC projects that received funding from the Asian Infrastructure Bank, (ii) any other funds received by CRRC from the Asian Infrastructure Bank, and, if so, what are the details of each? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2650.

Government Orders

And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 161).

The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.

At 10:36 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.

The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2 to 31, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 32 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 33, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 34 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 35 to 37, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 38 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 39 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 40 and 41, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 42 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 43, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 44 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 45, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 46 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 47 and 48, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 49 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 50 to 78, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 79 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 80 to 129, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 130 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 131 to 141, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 142 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 143 to 145, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 146 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 147, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 148 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 149 to 153, was deferred.

The question was put on Motion No. 154 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 155 to 161, was deferred.

Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded divisions were further deferred until Tuesday, June 18, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs), seconded by Ms. Saks (Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health), — That Bill C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs;

And of the amendment of Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), seconded by Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following:

“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, as the bill delays the next federal election so that more departing members of Parliament can collect taxpayer-funded pensions, a measure that is particularly offensive at a time when Canadians are struggling due to the NDP-Liberal government’s inflation, carbon tax and housing costs.”.

The debate continued.

Messages from the Senate

A message was received from the Senate as follows:

— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint it that the Senate has passed Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code and the Canada Industrial Relations Board Regulations, 2012, without amendment.

Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House

Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid before the House as follows:

— by the Speaker — Minutes of Proceedings of the Board of Internal Economy of the House of Commons for May 30, 2024, pursuant to Standing Order 148(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8527-441-51.

— by the Speaker — Report of Committee Activities and Expenditures for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, pursuant to Standing Order 121(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8527-441-52.

— by the Speaker — Costing note from the Parliamentary Budget Officer on Bill C-69, pursuant to the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S., 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 79.2(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1119-120. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance)

— by Ms. Anand (President of the Treasury Board) — Report of the Treasury Board on official languages in federal institutions for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, pursuant to the Official Languages Act, R.S., 1985, c. 31 (4th Supp.), s. 48. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-570-04. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Official Languages)

— Mr. Guilbeault (Minister of Environment and Climate Change) — Document from the government concerning the government’s response to the Parliamentary Budget Officer’s information request IR0776, in response to the motion adopted by the House on Thursday, June 13, 2024. — Sessional Paper No. 8530-441-40.

— by Mr. Guilbeault (Minister of Environment and Climate Change) — Report of Operations under the International River Improvements Act for the year 2023, pursuant to the International River Improvements Act, R.S., 1985, c. I-20, s. 51. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-168-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development)

— by Mr. Guilbeault (Minister of Environment and Climate Change) — Report on the administration of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2023, pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, S.C. 1999, c. 33, sbs. 342(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-601-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development)

— by Ms. Saks (Minister of Mental Health and Addictions) — Report of the Second Legislative Review of the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act, pursuant to the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act, S.C. 1997, c. 13, sbs. 60.1(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1303-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Health)

Midnight

Adjournment Proceedings

At midnight, pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed.

After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted.

Accordingly, at 12:17 a.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until later today at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).