House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
41st PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 82 Wednesday, May 7, 2014 2:00 p.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
National Anthem |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Tabling of Documents |
Mr. Kenney (Minister of Employment and Social Development and Minister for Multiculturalism) laid upon the Table, — List of occupations according to the National Occupation Classification (NOC 2006) on positive Labour Market Opinions (LMOs) for the economic region of Windsor and associated areas (English text only). — Sessional Paper No. 8530-412-6.
|
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— Nos. 412-2026, 412-2031 to 412-2051, 412-2152, 412-2178, 412-2180, 412-2181, 412-2351, 412-2357, 412-2362, 412-2363, 412-2376, 412-2379, 412-2381, 412-2408 to 412-2410 and 412-2415 to 412-2417 concerning the Canada Post Corporation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-1-11;
|
— Nos. 412-2027 to 412-2030 concerning sexual orientation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-76-2;
|
— No. 412-2318 concerning the Canada Pension Plan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-45-05;
|
— No. 412-2320 concerning Old Age Security benefits. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-31-12;
|
— Nos. 412-2336 to 412-2340 concerning land use. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-55-03.
|
Motions |
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the Orders of the Day. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 112 -- Vote no 112) | |
YEAS: 142, NAYS: 126 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Clement Komarnicki Rempel Total: -- 142 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Allen (Welland) Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Hyer Pacetti Total: -- 126 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Government Orders |
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-23, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts, as reported by the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs with amendments. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions: |
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 54, 56, 57, 61, 62, 64 to 85, 88, 89, 91, 96 to 99 and 101 to 145. |
Group No. 1 |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 2. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 3. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 5 with the following:
|
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 4. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 5. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 5, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing line 6 on page 6 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing line 20 on page 6 with the following:
|
|
(c) by replacing line 22 on page 6 with the following:
|
|
(d) by replacing line 25 on page 6 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 5, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing line 11 on page 7 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing line 16 on page 7 with the following:
|
|
(c) by replacing line 21 on page 7 with the following:
|
|
(d) by replacing line 24 on page 7 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 5.1, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 8 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 6. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 7. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 12, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 7, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 9 the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 13, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 9 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 8. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 10. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 18. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 19. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 20. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 21. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 22. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 25. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 26. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 30. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 31. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 32. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 37. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 27, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 39. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 28, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 41. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 29, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 43. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 30, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 48. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 31, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 49. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 52. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 53. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 54. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 56. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 56, be amended by deleting line 9 on page 32. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 57. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 58. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 39, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 59. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 62. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 64. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 67. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 43, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 67.1. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 69. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 73. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 46, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 77, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 49 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 77, be amended by adding after line 20 on page 49 the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 77, be amended by adding after line 20 on page 49 the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-23 be amended by adding after line 27 on page 51 the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 50, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 80. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 81. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 82. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 83. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 84. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 56, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 85. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 57, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 86. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 61, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 87. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 62, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 88. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 89. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 65, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 90. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 66, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 91. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 67, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 92. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 68, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 93. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 69, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 94. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 70, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 94.1. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 71, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 95. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 72, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 96. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 73, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 97. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 74, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 97, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing line 30 on page 195 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing line 4 on page 196 with the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 75, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 98. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 76, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 99. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 77, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 100. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 78, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 101. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 79, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 102. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 80, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 103. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 81, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 104. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 82, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 105. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 83, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 106. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 84, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 107. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 85, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 108. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 88, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 109. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 89, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 110. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 91, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 111. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 96, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 112. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 97, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 113. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 98, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 114. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 99, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 115. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 101, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 116. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 102, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 117. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 103, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 118. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 104, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 119. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 105, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 120. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 106, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 121. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 107, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 122. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 108, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 123. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 109, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 124. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 110, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 125. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 111, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 126. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 112, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 127. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 113, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 128. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 114, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 129. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 115, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 130. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 116, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 131. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 117, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 132. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 118, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 133. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 119, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 134. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 120, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 135. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 121, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 136. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 122, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 137. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 123, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 138. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 124, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 139. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 125, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 140. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 126, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 141. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 142. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 143. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 144. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 145. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 131, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 146. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 132, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 147. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 133, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 148. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 134, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 149. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 135, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 150. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 136, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 151. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 137, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 152. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 138, — That Bill C-23, in Clause 152, be amended by adding after line 11 on page 242 the following:
|
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 139, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 153. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 140, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 154. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 141, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 155. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 142, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 156. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 143, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 157. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 144, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Clause 158. |
Mr. Scott (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), moved Motion No. 145, — That Bill C-23 be amended by deleting Schedule 1. |
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Notice of Motion |
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the report stage and third reading stage of Bill C-23, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts. |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-23, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts, as reported by the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs with amendments; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 54, 56, 57, 61, 62, 64 to 85, 88, 89, 91, 96 to 99 and 101 to 145). |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Business of Supply |
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville), seconded by Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan), — That the House recognize that the current Temporary Foreign Worker Program is broken, and call on the government to implement measures to significantly reduce the intake of Temporary Foreign Workers over time and return the program back to its original purpose, which should include: (a) an immediate and full review of the program by the Auditor General; (b) the disclosure of Labour Market Opinion applications and approvals for Temporary Foreign Workers; (c) a tightening of the Labour Market Opinion approval process to ensure that only businesses with legitimate needs are able to access the program; and (d) the implementation of stronger rules requiring that employers applying to the program demonstrate unequivocally that they exhausted all avenues to fill job vacancies with Canadian workers, particularly young Canadians. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 113 -- Vote no 113) | |
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Davies (Vancouver East) Jacob Nicholls Total: -- 129 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clement Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rickford Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Private Members' Business |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Ms. James (Scarborough Centre), seconded by Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), — That Bill C-479, in Clause 6, be amended by |
|||
(a) replacing line 9 on page 5 with the following:
|
|||
(b) replacing line 18 on page 5 with the following:
|
|||
(c) replacing line 1 on page 6 with the following:
|
|||
(d) replacing lines 4 and 5 on page 6 with the following:
|
|||
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|||
(Division No. 114 -- Vote no 114) | |||
YEAS: 275, NAYS: 0 |
|||
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Cullen Kellway Poilievre Total: -- 275 |
|||
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—Westdale), seconded by Mr. Van Kesteren (Chatham-Kent—Essex), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage with a further amendment. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 115 -- Vote no 115) | |
YEAS: 274, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Cullen Kenney (Calgary Southeast) Preston Total: -- 274 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage with a further amendment and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst), seconded by Ms. Laverdière (Laurier—Sainte-Marie), — That Bill C-208, An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act (understanding the official languages), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 116 -- Vote no 116) | |
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 144 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Davies (Vancouver East) Jacob Nicholls Total: -- 129 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clarke Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Richards Total: -- 144 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. MacKenzie (Oxford), seconded by Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River), — That Bill C-483, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (escorted temporary absence), as amended, be concurred in at report stage. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 117 -- Vote no 117) | |
YEAS: 274, NAYS: 1 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Cullen Kellway Preston Total: -- 274 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE May Total: -- 1 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), — That Bill C-567, An Act to amend the Access to Information Act (transparency and duty to document), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 118 -- Vote no 118) | |
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 142 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) Jacob Nunez-Melo Total: -- 133 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Ablonczy Clement Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Rickford Total: -- 142 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Goldring (Edmonton East), seconded by Mr. Payne (Medicine Hat), — That, in the opinion of the House, one nationally standardized “point in time” should be recommended for use in all municipalities in carrying out homeless counts, with (a) nationally recognized definitions of who is homeless; (b) nationally recognized methodology on how the count takes place; and (c) the same agreed-upon criteria and methodology in determining who is considered to be homeless. (Private Members' Business M-455) |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 119 -- Vote no 119) | |
YEAS: 268, NAYS: 5 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Ablonczy Crockatt Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's) Preston Total: -- 268 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Fortin Hyer May Patry Total: -- 5 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:10 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, pursuant to Standing Order 81(4)(a), the question was deemed to have been withdrawn. |
Government Orders |
Business of Supply |
At 7:30 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 81(4)(a), the House resolved itself into a Committee of the Whole for the consideration of all Votes related to TRANSPORT in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015. |
At 11:30 p.m., the Committee rose. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(4)(a), the considered Votes were deemed reported. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the Table as follows: |
— by Mr. Baird (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Report of the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission, together with the Auditors' Report, for the year ended December 31, 2013, pursuant to the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission Act, S.C. 1964-65, c. 19, s. 7. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-229-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development)
|
— by Mr. Baird (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan for 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 and of the Operating and Capital Budgets for 2013-2014 of the National Capital Commission, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-412-821-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development)
|
Petitions Filed with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were filed as follows: |
— by Mr. Trost (Saskatoon—Humboldt), two concerning the grain industry (Nos. 412-2672 and 412-2673);
|
— by Mr. Goguen (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 412-2674).
|
Adjournment |
Accordingly, at 11:30 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |