House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
39th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 143 Monday, April 30, 2007 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
Private Members' Business |
At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Bell (Vancouver Island North), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That a special committee of the House be created to continue the work on electoral reform as outlined in the 43rd Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs from the 38th Parliament and to make further recommendations on strengthening and modernizing the democratic and electoral systems; that the membership of the special committee be established by the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs and the membership report of the special committee be presented to the House within five sitting days after the adoption of this motion; that substitutions to the membership of the special committee be allowed, if required, in the manner provided by Standing Order 114(2); that the special committee have all of the powers granted to standing committees by Standing Order 108; that there be a maximum length for speeches by members of the special committee of 10 minutes on any single item; that the special committee be authorized to hold hearings across Canada; that the special committee be allowed to look into creating a citizens’ consultation group and issue an interim report to the House on this matter within six weeks of the special committee being struck; and that the special committee table its final report in the House of Commons no later than March 1, 2008. (Private Members' Business M-262) |
The debate continued. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, May 2, 2007, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business. |
Government Orders |
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights of Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Criminal Code in order to implement the United Nations Convention against Corruption. |
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Criminal Code in order to implement the United Nations Convention against Corruption, be deemed to have been read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at the report stage and deemed read a third time and passed. |
Government Orders |
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum penalties for offences involving firearms) and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with amendments. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions: |
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 20. |
Group No. 1 | |
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring the long title as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring the Preamble as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 1 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 2 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 7 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 10 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 11 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 13 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 17 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 18 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-10, be amended by restoring Clause 19 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 12, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 20 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 13, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 21 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 22 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 23 as follows:
|
Mr. Cannon (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Bernier (Minister of Industry), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 24 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 26 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 27 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 29 as follows:
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-10 be amended by restoring Clause 30 as follows:
|
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 3, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 1 of Bill C-10 be amended by substituting the following for the portion of subsection 84(5) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion: |
“(5) In determining, for the purposes of any of subsections 85(3), 95(2), 99(2), 100(2) and 103(2), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 4, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 2 of Bill C-10 be amended by substituting the following for paragraphs 85(3)(b) and (c) contained in that Motion: |
“(b) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of three years.”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 9, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 17 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 239(1)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 239(2) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 10, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 18 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 244(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years; and”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 244(3) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(3) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (2)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 11, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 19 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 272(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 272(3) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(3) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (2)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 12, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 20 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 273(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 273(3) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(3) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (2)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 13, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 21 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 279(1.1)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 279(1.2) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(1.2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1.1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 14, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 22 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 279.1(2)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 279.1(2.1) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(2.1) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (2)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 15, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 23 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 344(1)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 344(2) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
Mr. Moore (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved the following amendment to Motion No. 16, — That the Motion proposing to restore Clause 24 of Bill C-10 be amended: |
(a) by substituting the following for subparagraphs 346(1.1)(a)(ii) and (iii) contained in that Motion:
|
“(ii) in the case of a second or subsequent offence, seven years;”
|
(b) by substituting, in the English version, the following for the portion of subsection 346(1.2) before paragraph (a) contained in that Motion:
|
“(1.2) In determining, for the purpose of paragraph (1.1)(a), whether a convicted person has committed a second or subsequent offence, if the person was earlier convicted of any of the following offences, that offence is to be considered as an earlier offence:”
|
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 391-1241 concerning the issuing of visas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-49-06;
|
— Nos. 391-1242, 391-1403 and 391-1404 concerning the income tax system. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-6-10;
|
— Nos. 391-1246, 391-1274, 391-1295, 391-1307 and 391-1308 concerning a national child care program. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-5-13;
|
— Nos. 391-1249, 391-1250 and 391-1271 concerning the Canada Post Corporation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-29-07;
|
— No. 391-1251 concerning passports. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-94-01;
|
— Nos. 391-1259, 391-1265, 391-1272 and 391-1314 concerning the Canada Labour Code. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-60-06;
|
— Nos. 391-1260 and 391-1321 concerning the tax system. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-87-02;
|
— No. 391-1277 concerning the Employment Insurance program. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-39-04;
|
— No. 391-1279 concerning caregivers. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-95-01;
|
— Nos. 391-1289 and 391-1324 to 391-1326 concerning immigration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-391-3-23.
|
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Mr. Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville), from the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented the Eighth Report of the Committee (Bill C-279, An Act to amend the DNA Identification Act (establishment of indexes), with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-391-222. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 37 and 39) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville), from the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented the Ninth Report of the Committee (subject matter of Bill C-279, An Act to amend the DNA Identification Act (establishment of indexes)). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-391-223. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 39 and 40) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's), from the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented the Fourth Report of the Committee, “Ensuring a Sustainable and Humane Seal Harvest”. — Sessional Paper No. 8510-391-224. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 7 to 9, 13, 20, 22, 24, 26, 29, 33, 35 to 39, 41 to 43 and 46 to 49) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Tweed (Brandon—Souris), from the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented the Fourth Report of the Committee (speed limit for trains in Montmagny). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-391-225. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 46) was tabled. |
|
Mr. Allison (Niagara West—Glanbrook) laid upon the Table, — Report of the Centennial Flame Research Award for the year 2006, pursuant to the Centennial Flame Research Award Act, S.C. 1991, c. 17, sbs. 7(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-391-326-01. (16th report of the Committee)
|
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore), seconded by Ms. Bell (Vancouver Island North), Bill C-434, An Act to amend the Income tax Act (in-home care of relatives), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore), seconded by Ms. Bell (Vancouver Island North), Bill C-435, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (no GST on the sale of home heating fuels), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore), seconded by Ms. Bell (Vancouver Island North), Bill C-436, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (no GST on funeral arrangements), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, in relation to its study on the role of a public broadcaster in the 21st century, six members of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage be authorized to travel to St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador and Montréal, Quebec from May 23 to 25, 2007, and that the necessary staff do accompany the Committee. |
|
Ms. Ratansi (Don Valley East), seconded by Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South), moved, — That the 16th Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, April 18, 2007, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 32) |
Debate arose thereon. |
At 6:15 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Tuesday, May 1, 2007, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake), one concerning immigration (No. 391-1436);
|
— by Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North), one concerning the issuing of visas (No. 391-1437);
|
— by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), one concerning poverty (No. 391-1438).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister for Democratic Reform) presented the answer to question Q-110 on the Order Paper. |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum penalties for offences involving firearms) and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with amendments; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 20). |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Business of Supply |
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, April 26, 2007, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Layton (Toronto—Danforth), seconded by Ms. Black (New Westminster—Coquitlam), — Whereas, |
|
(1) all Members of this House, whatever their disagreements about the mission in Afghanistan, support the courageous men and women of the Canadian Forces; |
|
(2) the government has admitted that the situation in Afghanistan can not be won militarily; |
|
(3) the current counter-insurgency mission is not the right mission for Canada; |
|
(4) the government has neither defined what ‘victory’ would be, nor developed an exit strategy from this counter-insurgency mission; |
|
therefore this House condemns this government and calls for it to immediately notify NATO of our intention to begin withdrawing Canadian Forces now in a safe and secure manner from the counter-insurgency mission in Afghanistan; and calls for Canada to focus its efforts to assist the people of Afghanistan on a diplomatic solution, and re-double its commitment to reconstruction and development. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 166 -- Vote no 166) | |
YEAS: 28, NAYS: 225 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Angus Chow Godin McDonough Total: -- 28 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Abbott Demers Khan Preston Total: -- 225 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Baird Casson Gourde |
Petitions Filed with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were filed as follows: |
— by Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore), two concerning federal programs (Nos. 391-1439 and 391-1440).
|
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:04 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:22 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |