Order Paper AT PROROGATION Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Introduction of Private Members' Bills

No. 1

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act (programming provided by the Corporation)”.

No. 2

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (prohibition against oil tankers in Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound)”.

No. 3

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Business Development Bank of Canada Act and the Canada Student Loans Act (student loan system more supportive of students)”.

No. 4

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to prevent the use of the Internet to distribute pornographic material involving children”.

No. 5

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to promote the teaching of aboriginal history and culture in Canada's schools”.

No. 6

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (interest rates on debts owed) and to make a consequential amendment to the Income Tax Regulations”.

No. 7

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Canadian Autism Awareness Day”.

No. 8

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Appreciation Day”.

No. 9

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act (marriage after the age of sixty years)”.

No. 10

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (qualification for and entitlement to benefits)”.

No. 11

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the labelling of bottled water”.

No. 12

January 26, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda)”.

No. 13

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Wheat Board Act (members of the board)”.

No. 14

January 26, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deductibility of expense of tools provided as a requirement of employment)”.

No. 15

January 28, 2009 — Mr. Volpe (Eglinton—Lawrence) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Motor Vehicle Safety Act (electronic stability control)”.

No. 16

January 29, 2009 — Mr. Mark (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a Memorial Wall for Canada's fallen soldiers and peacekeepers”.

No. 17

January 29, 2009 — Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (no interest on repayments)”.

No. 18

January 29, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sports betting)”.

No. 19

January 30, 2009 — Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (benefits for illness, injury or quarantine)”.

No. 20

February 2, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Access to Information Act (improved access)”.

No. 21

February 2, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief against educational or other institution)”.

No. 22

February 23, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (telephone, fax and Internet service to campaign offices)”.

No. 23

February 23, 2009 — Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deduction for medical doctors in underserviced areas)”.

No. 24

February 23, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (sponsorship of relative)”.

No. 25

March 2, 2009 — Mr. Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (elimination of statutory release) and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.

No. 26

March 5, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (military dependants)”.

No. 27

March 5, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (mutual fund trust accounting principles)”.

No. 28

March 6, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consent)”.

No. 29

March 23, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to limit the use of phosphorus in dishwasher detergent”.

No. 30

March 23, 2009 — Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code (use of hand-held cellular telephone while operating a motor vehicle)”.

No. 31

March 31, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a day to honour Canada’s marine industry”.

No. 32

April 16, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — Bill entitled “An Act to designate the second day of April as Canadian Autism Awareness Day”.

No. 33

April 16, 2009 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (minimum wage)”.

No. 34

April 28, 2009 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish National Ovarian Cancer Month”.

No. 35

April 28, 2009 — Mr. Silva (Davenport) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish Pierre Elliott Trudeau Day”.

No. 36

June 5, 2009 — Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (amphetamines)”.

No. 37

September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 (equity investments)”.

No. 38

September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985 and the Income Tax Act (pension contribution holidays)”.

No. 39

September 10, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (employer-sponsored pension plans)”.

No. 40

September 16, 2009 — Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — Bill entitled “An Act regarding the inclusion of the Queen Charlotte Islands as a prescribed northern zone under the Income Tax Act”.

No. 41

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting a National Food Day”.

No. 42

September 24, 2009 — Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act (annual report)”.

No. 43

October 7, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting the review of the National Building Code of Canada, 2005, to provide the greatest degree of protection to firefighters”.

No. 44

October 8, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Library and Archives of Canada Act (establishment of the National Portrait Gallery)”.

No. 45

October 19, 2009 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — Bill entitled “An Act to bring the Food and Drug Regulations in line with the Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality”.

No. 46

October 29, 2009 — Mrs. Beaudin (Saint-Lambert) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Financial Administration Act (federal spending power)”.

No. 47

November 3, 2009 — Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (deductibility of RESP contributions)”.

No. 48

November 26, 2009 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish criteria and conditions in respect of funding for post-secondary education programs in order to ensure the quality, accessibility, public administration and accountability of those programs”.

No. 49

November 26, 2009 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — Bill entitled “An Act respecting motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards”.

No. 50

December 8, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (nanotechnology)”.

Motions

No. 1

February 12, 2009 — Mrs. Freeman (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 2

February 23, 2009 — Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 3

February 25, 2009 — Mr. Murphy (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Monday, February 23, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 4

February 26, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, February 26, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 5

March 9, 2009 — Mr. Lessard (Chambly—Borduas) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented on Monday, March 9, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 6

March 12, 2009 — Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 7

March 19, 2009 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 8

March 25, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Tobique—Mactaquac) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 9

March 25, 2009 — Mr. Weston (Saint John) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 10

March 31, 2009 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Wednesday, March 25, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 11

March 31, 2009 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology, presented on Tuesday, March 31, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 12

April 27, 2009 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 13

April 27, 2009 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 14

May 6, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 15

May 14, 2009 — Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development, presented on Thursday, May 14, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 16

May 14, 2009 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 17

May 25, 2009 — Mr. Blais (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 18

May 25, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 19

May 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, May 13, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 20

May 26, 2009 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Wednesday, March 11, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 21

May 26, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, February 12, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 22

May 26, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Monday, May 4, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 23

June 10, 2009 — Mr. Lee (Scarborough—Rouge River) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 24

June 15, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 25

June 16, 2009 — Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — That the Third Report of the Standing Joint Committee on the Library of Parliament, presented on Tuesday, June 16, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 26

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 12, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 27

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 28

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 29

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 30

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 31

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Official Languages, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 32

June 18, 2009 — Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — That the Second Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence, presented on Wednesday, June 17, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 33

September 10, 2009 — Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 34

September 10, 2009 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 35

September 14, 2009 — Mr. Rodriguez (Honoré-Mercier) — That the First Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Thursday, April 23, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 36

September 15, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Thursday, June 25, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 37

October 19, 2009 — Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South) — That the 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 38

October 19, 2009 — Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South) — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Friday, June 12, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 39

October 19, 2009 — Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, presented on Monday, October 19, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 40

October 20, 2009 — Ms. Demers (Laval) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Tuesday, October 20, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 41

October 20, 2009 — Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Tuesday, October 20, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 42

October 20, 2009 — Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Tuesday, October 20, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 43

October 20, 2009 — Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — That the Eighth Report of the Standing Committee on Status of Women, presented on Tuesday, October 20, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 44

October 22, 2009 — Mr. St-Cyr (Jeanne-Le Ber) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, May 6, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 45

November 19, 2009 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, November 19, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 46

November 23, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, September 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 47

November 23, 2009 — Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, September 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 48

November 24, 2009 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Thursday, November 19, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 49

November 24, 2009 — Mr. Tweed (Brandon—Souris) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities (recommendation not to proceed further with Bill C-310, An Act to Provide Certain Rights to Air Passengers), presented on Tuesday, November 24, 2009, be concurred in.

To be added to the business of the House, at the expiry of the time provided for Private Members' Business, on a day fixed by the Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 97.1(2).

No. 50

November 25, 2009 — Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — That the 13th Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented on Wednesday, November 25, 2009, be concurred in.

Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, March 25, 2010, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

No. 51

November 27, 2009 — Mr. Rae (Toronto Centre) — That the Third Report of the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan, presented on Friday, November 27, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 52

December 1, 2009 — Mr. Holder (London West) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Monday, September 28, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 53

December 1, 2009 — Mrs. Davidson (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Fifth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Friday, September 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 54

December 1, 2009 — Mrs. Davidson (Sarnia—Lambton) — That the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Thursday, November 26, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 55

December 2, 2009 — Mrs. Lavallée (Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert) — That the Third Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Wednesday, December 2, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 56

December 7, 2009 — Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented on Wednesday, December 2, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 57

December 7, 2009 — Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — That the 12th Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Wednesday, November 18, 2009, be concurred in.

Debate — limited to 3 hours, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2).

Voting — not later than the expiry of the time provided for debate.

No. 58

December 7, 2009 — Mrs. Crombie (Mississauga—Streetsville) — That the 22nd Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, December 3, 2009, be concurred in.

Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 2, 2010, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

No. 59

December 7, 2009 — Mr. Lee (Scarborough—Rouge River) — That the 22nd Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, December 3, 2009, be concurred in.

Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Thursday, April 2, 2010, whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.

No. 60

December 8, 2009 — Mr. Rodriguez (Honoré-Mercier) — That the Fourth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage, presented on Tuesday, December 8, 2009, be concurred in.

Concurrence motion — may not be moved before either a comprehensive response has been tabled or Wednesday, April 7, 2010 whichever shall come first, pursuant to Standing Order 109.