House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
41st PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 191 Tuesday, December 4, 2012 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 411-2188 concerning the fishing industry. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-4-16;
|
— Nos. 411-2203, 411-2211 and 411-2226 concerning international agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-121-01;
|
— Nos. 411-2231 and 411-2232 concerning natural gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-105-04;
|
— Nos. 411-2239 and 411-2240 concerning asbestos. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-1-18.
|
Motions |
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the Orders of the Day. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 522 -- Vote no 522) | |
YEAS: 143, NAYS: 125 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Adams Clarke Leitch Seeback Total: -- 143 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Allen (Welland) Côté Hsu Nash Total: -- 125 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment; |
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1, 3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32, 34 to 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 61, 63 to 65, 74, 78, 83, 84, 95 to 97, 99 to 106, 108 to 116, 131, 136, 138 to 140, 142 to 147, 151, 153, 155, 157 to 160 and 162). |
Group No. 1 |
Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
Motion No. 3 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 2. |
Motion No. 7 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 3. |
Motion No. 9 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 4. |
Motion No. 11 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 5. |
Motion No. 18 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 6. |
Motion No. 22 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 7. |
Motion No. 25 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 8. |
Motion No. 26 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 9. |
Motion No. 29 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 12 and 13 on page 14. |
Motion No. 30 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:
|
Motion No. 32 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 10. |
Motion No. 34 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 11. |
Motion No. 35 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 12. |
Motion No. 36 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 13. |
Motion No. 37 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 14. |
Motion No. 38 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 15. |
Motion No. 40 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 16. |
Motion No. 42 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 17. |
Motion No. 44 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 18. |
Motion No. 46 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 19. |
Motion No. 48 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 20. |
Motion No. 50 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 21. |
Motion No. 52 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 22. |
Motion No. 61 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 23. |
Motion No. 63 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 24. |
Motion No. 64 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 25. |
Motion No. 65 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 26. |
Motion No. 74 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 27. |
Motion No. 78 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the following:
|
Motion No. 83 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 14 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39. |
Motion No. 84 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39 with the following:
|
Motion No. 95 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 28. |
Motion No. 96 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 29. |
Motion No. 97 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 30. |
Motion No. 99 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 31. |
Motion No. 100 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 32. |
Motion No. 101 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 34. |
Motion No. 102 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 36. |
Motion No. 103 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 37. |
Motion No. 104 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 38. |
Motion No. 105 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 39. |
Motion No. 106 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 40. |
Motion No. 108 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 41. |
Motion No. 109 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 42. |
Motion No. 110 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 43. |
Motion No. 111 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 44. |
Motion No. 112 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 45. |
Motion No. 113 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 46. |
Motion No. 114 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 47. |
Motion No. 115 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 48. |
Motion No. 116 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 49. |
Motion No. 131 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 50. |
Motion No. 136 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 51. |
Motion No. 138 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 52. |
Motion No. 139 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 53. |
Motion No. 140 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 54. |
Motion No. 142 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 55. |
Motion No. 143 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 56. |
Motion No. 144 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 58. |
Motion No. 145 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 59. |
Motion No. 146 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 60. |
Motion No. 147 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 62. |
Motion No. 151 of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 134 with the following:
|
Motion No. 153 of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 134 with the following:
|
Motion No. 155 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 63. |
Motion No. 157 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 64. |
Motion No. 158 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 65. |
Motion No. 159 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 67. |
Motion No. 160 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 68. |
Motion No. 162 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 69. |
The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1. |
At 12:14 p.m., pursuant to Order made Monday, December 3, 2012, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 3, 22, 25, 26, 34 to 38, 61, 63 to 65, 95, 96, 99 to 106, 108 to 110, 114, 115, 139, 142 to 147, 155, 157 to 160 and 162, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 7 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 9, 11, 18, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 74, 97, 111 to 113, 116, 131, 136, 138 and 140, was deferred. |
Group No. 2 |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 163, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 99. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 164, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 100. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 165, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 101. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 166, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 102. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 167, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 103. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 168, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 104. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 169, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 105. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 170, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 106. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 171, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 107. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 172, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 108. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 173, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 109. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 174, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 110. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 175, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 111. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 176, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 112. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 177, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 113. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 178, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 114. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 179, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 115. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 180, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 116. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 181, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 117. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 182, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 118. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 183, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 119. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 184, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 120. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 185, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 121. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 186, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 122. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 187, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 123. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 188, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 124. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 189, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 125. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 190, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 126. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 191, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 127. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 192, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 128. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 193, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 129. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 194, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 130. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 195, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 131. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 196, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 132. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 197, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 133. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 198, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 134. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 199, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 135. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 200, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 136. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 201, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 137. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 202, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 138. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 203, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 139. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 204, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 140. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 205, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 141. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 206, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 142. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 207, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 143. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 208, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 144. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 209, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 145. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 210, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 146. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 211, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 147. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 212, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 148. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 213, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 149. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 214, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 150. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 215, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 151. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 216, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 152. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 217, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 153. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 218, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 154. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 219, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 155. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 220, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 156. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 221, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 157. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 222, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 158. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 223, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 159. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 224, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 160. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 225, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 161. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 226, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 162. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 227, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 163. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 228, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 164. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 229, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 165. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 230, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 166. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 231, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 167. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 232, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 168. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 233, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 169. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 234, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 170. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 235, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 171. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 236, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 172. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 237, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 173. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 240, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 174. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 242, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 175. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 243, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 27 on page 204 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 245, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 176. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 246, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 177. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 248, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 178. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 249, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 179. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 253, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 208 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 254, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 208 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 278, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 180. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 279, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 181. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 280, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 182. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 281, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 183. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 282, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 184. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 286, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 206. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 287, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 207. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 288, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 208. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 289, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 209. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 292, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 219. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 293, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 220. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 294, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 221. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 295, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 222. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 296, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 223. |
Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), moved Motion No. 297, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 26 on page 239. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 299, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 224. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 300, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 225. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 302, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 226. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 303, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 227. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 304, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 228. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 305, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 229. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 306, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 230. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 307, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 231. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 308, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 232. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 309, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 233. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 310, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 234. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 311, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 235. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 312, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 236. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 313, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 237. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 314, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 238. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 315, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 239. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 316, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 240. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 317, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 241. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 318, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 242. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 319, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 243. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 320, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 244. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 321, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 245. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 322, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 246. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 323, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 247. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 324, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 248. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 325, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 249. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 326, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 250. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 327, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 251. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 328, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 252. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 329, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 253. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 330, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 254. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 331, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 255. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 332, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 256. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 333, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 257. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 334, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 258. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 335, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 259. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 336, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 260. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 337, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 261. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 338, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 262. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 339, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 263. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 340, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 264. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 341, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 265. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 344, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 266. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 345, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 346, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 347, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 267. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 348, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 268. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 349, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 269. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 350, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 270. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 351, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 271. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 352, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 272. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 353, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 273. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 354, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 274. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 355, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 274, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 262 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 356, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 275. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 357, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 276. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 361, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 277. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 362, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 278. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 363, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 279. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 364, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 279, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing line 3 on page 265 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing lines 8 to 15 on page 265 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 365, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 280. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 366, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 281. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 368, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 282. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 369, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 283. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 370, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 284. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 371, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 285. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 372, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 286. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 373, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 287. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 374, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 288. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 375, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 289. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 376, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 290. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 377, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 291. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 378, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 292. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 379, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 293. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 380, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 294. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 381, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 295. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 382, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 296. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 383, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 297. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 384, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 298. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 385, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 302, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 8 on page 271 with the following:
|
Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), moved Motion No. 386, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 307. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 389, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 308. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 390, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 272 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 392, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 393, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 273 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 394, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 273 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 395, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 309. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 396, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 397, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 273 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 398, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 310. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 399, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 311. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 400, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 273 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 401, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 311, be amended by adding after line 33 on page 273 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 402, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 312. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 404, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 313. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 405, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 24 on page 274. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 407, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 314. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 409, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 315. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 410, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 316. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 411, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 317. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 415, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 419, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 318. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 422, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 423, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 279 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 426, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 279 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 428, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 280 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 438, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 319. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 440, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 320. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 442, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 321. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 443, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 30 on page 288. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 445, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 446, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 11 and 12 on page 290 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 448, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after line 24 on page 290 the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 449, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 36 on page 290 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 454, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 43 on page 291. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 455, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 322. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 456, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 323. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 457, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 324. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 458, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 325. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 459, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 326. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 460, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 327. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 461, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 328. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 463, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after line 12 on page 294 the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 464, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 329. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 465, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 330. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 466, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 467, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 332. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 469, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 333. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 470, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 334. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 471, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 335. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 472, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 336. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 473, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 337. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 474, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 338. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 475, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 339. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 476, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 340. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 477, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 341. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 478, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 342. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 479, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 343. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 480, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 344. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 481, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 345. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 482, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 346. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 483, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 347. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 484, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 348. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 485, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 349. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 486, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 350. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 487, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 351. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 488, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 352. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 489, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 353. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 490, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 354. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 491, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 355. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 492, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 356. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 493, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 357. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 494, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 358. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 495, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 309 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 497, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 309 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 498, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 359. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 499, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 309 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 500, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 309 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 501, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 359, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 309 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 502, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 360. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 503, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 361. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 504, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 362. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 505, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 310 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 506, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 363. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 507, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 310 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 508, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 363, be amended by replacing line 40 on page 310 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 509, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 364. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 510, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 311 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 511, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 364, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 311 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 512, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 365. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 513, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 366. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 514, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 367. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 515, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 368. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 516, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 369. |
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 517, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 313 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 518, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 314 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 519, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 314 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 520, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing line 40 on page 314 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing line 44 on page 314 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 521, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 315 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 522, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended |
|
(a) by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 316 with the following:
|
|
(b) by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 316 with the following:
|
Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), moved Motion No. 523, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 316 with the following:
|
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 524, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 370. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 525, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 371. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 526, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 372. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 527, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 373. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 528, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 374. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 529, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 375. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 530, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 376. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 531, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 377. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 532, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 378. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 533, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 379. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 534, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 380. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 535, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 381. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 536, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 382. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 537, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 383. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 538, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 384. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 539, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 385. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 540, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 386. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 541, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 387. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 542, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 388. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 543, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 389. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 544, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 390. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 545, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 391. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 546, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 392. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 547, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 393. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 548, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 394. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 549, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 395. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 550, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 396. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 551, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 397. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 552, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 398. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 553, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 399. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 554, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 400. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 555, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 401. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 556, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 402. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 557, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 403. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 558, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 404. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 559, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 405. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 560, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 406. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 561, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 407. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 562, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 408. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 563, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 409. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 564, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 410. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 565, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 411. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 566, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 412. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 567, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 413. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 568, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 425. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 569, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 426. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 570, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 427. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 571, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 428. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 572, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 429. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 573, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 430. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 574, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 431. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 575, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 432. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 577, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 433. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 578, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 434. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 579, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 435. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 580, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 436. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 581, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 437. |
Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), moved Motion No. 582, — That Bill C-45, in Clause 437, be amended by deleting lines 25 to 34 on page 341. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 583, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 438. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 586, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 439. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 587, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 440. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 588, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 441. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 589, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 442. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 590, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 443. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 591, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 444. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 592, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 445. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 594, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 446. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 595, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 447. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 596, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 448. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 597, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 449. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 598, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 450. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 599, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 451. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 600, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 452. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 601, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 453. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 602, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 454. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 603, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 455. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 604, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 456. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 605, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 457. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 606, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 458. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 607, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 459. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 608, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 460. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 610, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 461. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 611, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 462. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 612, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 463. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 613, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 464. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 614, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 465. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 615, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 466. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 616, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 467. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 617, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 468. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 618, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 469. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 619, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 470. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 620, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 471. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 621, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 472. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 622, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 473. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 623, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 474. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 624, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 475. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 625, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 476. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 626, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 477. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 627, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 478. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 628, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 479. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 629, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 480. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 630, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 481. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 631, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 482. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 632, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 483. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 633, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 484. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 634, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 485. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 635, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 486. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 636, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 487. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 637, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 488. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 638, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 489. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 639, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 490. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 640, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 491. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 641, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 492. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 642, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 493. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 643, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 494. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 644, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 495. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 645, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 496. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 646, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 497. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 647, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 498. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 648, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 499. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 649, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 500. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 650, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 501. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 651, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 502. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 652, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 503. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 653, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 504. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 654, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 505. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 655, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 506. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 656, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 507. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 657, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 508. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 658, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 509. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 659, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 510. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 660, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 511. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 661, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 512. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), moved Motion No. 662, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 513. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), moved Motion No. 663, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 514. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), moved Motion No. 664, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 515. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved Motion No. 665, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 516. |
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), moved Motion No. 666, — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 1. |
Motion No. 667 was not proceeded with. |
The question was put on Motion No. 163 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 164 to 219, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 220 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 221 to 229, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 230 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 231 to 236, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 237 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 240, 242, 245, 246 and 248, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 249 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 278 to 282, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 286 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos 287 to 289, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 292 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 293 to 296, 299, 300 and 302 to 308, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 309 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 310 to 339, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 340 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 341, 344, 347 and 348, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 349 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 350 to 354, 356, 357, 361 to 363, 365, 366 and 368 to 384, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motions Nos. 385 and 386 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded divisions were deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 389 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 395, 398, 399, 402, 404 and 407, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 409 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 410 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 411, 419, 438, 440, 442, 455 to 461, 464 to 467 and 469 to 486, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 487 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 488 to 494, 498, 502 to 504, 506, 509, 512 to 516 and 524 to 564, was deferred. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Order made Monday, December 3, 2012, Members made statements in accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 31. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Order made Monday, December 3, 2012, the House proceeded to Oral Questions in accordance with the provisions of Standing Order 30(5). |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to Order made Monday, December 3, 2012, the House resumed the putting of the questions on the Motions in Group No. 2 at the report stage of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures. |
The question was put on Motion No. 565 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 566 and 567, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 568 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 569 to 575, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 577 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 578 to 581, 583, 586 to 592, 594 to 608 and 610 to 612, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 613 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motions Nos. 614 to 663, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 664 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which will also apply to Motion No. 665, was deferred. |
The question was put on Motion No. 666 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment. |
Group No. 1 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 1. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 523 -- Vote no 523) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 156 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Daniel Lauzon Rickford Total: -- 156 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3, 22, 25, 26, 34 to 38, 61, 63 to 65, 95, 96, 99 to 106, 108 to 110, 114, 115, 139, 142 to 147, 155, 157 to 160 and 162 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 29 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 12 and 13 on page 14. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 29 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 524 -- Vote no 524) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Lake Ritz Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 30 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 30 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 525 -- Vote no 525) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 148 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Lake Ritz Total: -- 148 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 151 of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 134 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 151 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 526 -- Vote no 526) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Daniel Lauzon Ritz Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motion No. 153 was also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 7 of Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 3. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 7 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 527 -- Vote no 527) | |
YEAS: 38, NAYS: 243 |
|
YEAS — POUR Andrews Dion Hyer Pacetti Total: -- 38 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Clement Kenney (Calgary Southeast) Preston Total: -- 243 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 9, 11, 18, 32, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 74, 97, 111 to 113, 116, 131, 136, 138 and 140 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 78 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 78 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 528 -- Vote no 528) | |
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 148 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 134 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Clement Lake Richards Total: -- 148 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 83 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 14 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 83 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 529 -- Vote no 529) | |
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 244 |
|
YEAS — POUR Andrews Dion Hsu McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) Total: -- 37 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Cleary Kellway Perreault Total: -- 244 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 84 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 38 to line 11 on page 39 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 84 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 530 -- Vote no 530) | |
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 242 |
|
YEAS — POUR Andrews Dion Hsu McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) Total: -- 37 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Côté Kenney (Calgary Southeast) Quach Total: -- 242 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
Group No. 2 | |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 163 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 99. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 163 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 531 -- Vote no 531) | |
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 132 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Lauzon Saxton Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 164 to 219 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 220 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 156. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 220 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 532 -- Vote no 532) | |
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 133 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Del Mastro Leitch Saxton Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 221 to 229 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 230 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 166. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 230 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 533 -- Vote no 533) | |
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Harris (St. John's East) Nantel Total: -- 133 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Del Mastro Leitch Saxton Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 231 to 236 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 237 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 173. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 237 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 534 -- Vote no 534) | |
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 148 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hassainia Nash Total: -- 132 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Leitch Schellenberger Total: -- 148 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 240, 242, 245, 246 and 248 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 243 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 27 on page 204 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 243 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 535 -- Vote no 535) | |
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 148 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hassainia Nash Total: -- 129 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Leitch Schellenberger Total: -- 148 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 249 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 179. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 249 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 536 -- Vote no 536) | |
YEAS: 98, NAYS: 178 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hughes Nunez-Melo Total: -- 98 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Daniel Lamoureux Richards Total: -- 178 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 278 to 282 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 253 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 208 the following:
|
||||
The question was put on Motion No. 253 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||||
(Division No. 537 -- Vote no 537) | ||||
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 147 |
||||
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 129 |
||||
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Daniel Lebel Ritz Total: -- 147 |
||||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 254 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after line 17 on page 208 the following:
|
||
The question was put on Motion No. 254 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||
(Division No. 538 -- Vote no 538) | ||
YEAS: 130, NAYS: 144 |
||
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hughes Nunez-Melo Total: -- 130 |
||
NAYS -- CONTRE Adler Del Mastro Leitch Saxton Total: -- 144 |
||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 286 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 206. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 286 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 539 -- Vote no 539) | |
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Murray Total: -- 129 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adler Del Mastro Leitch Saxton Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 287 to 289 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 292 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 219. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 292 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 293 to 296, 299, 300 and 302 to 308 were also negatived on the same division. |
|
(Division No. 540 -- Vote no 540) | |
YEAS: 126, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cuzner Hyer Nunez-Melo Total: -- 126 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Daniel Leef Ritz Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 293 to 296, 299, 300 and 302 to 308 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 297 of Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 26 on page 239. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 297 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 541 -- Vote no 541) | |
YEAS: 35, NAYS: 238 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Hyer Murray Total: -- 35 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Côté Komarnicki Raitt Total: -- 238 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 309 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 233. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 309 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 542 -- Vote no 542) | |
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nantel Total: -- 125 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lebel Richards Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 310 to 339 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 340 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 264. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 340 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 543 -- Vote no 543) | |
YEAS: 119, NAYS: 144 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cullen Hsu Nunez-Melo Total: -- 119 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lebel Rickford Total: -- 144 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 341, 344, 347 and 348 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 345 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 345 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 544 -- Vote no 544) | |
YEAS: 122, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hassainia Nunez-Melo Total: -- 122 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lemieux Schellenberger Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 346 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by adding after line 6 on page 260 the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 346 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 545 -- Vote no 545) | |
YEAS: 97, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Christopherson Hassainia Nash Total: -- 97 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lemieux Schellenberger Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 349 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 269. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 349 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 546 -- Vote no 546) | |
YEAS: 126, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Coderre Harris (St. John's East) Nash Total: -- 126 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Clement Leitch Ritz Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 350 to 354, 356, 357, 361 to 363, 365, 366 and 368 to 384 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 355 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 274, be amended by adding after line 38 on page 262 the following:
|
||||
The question was put on Motion No. 355 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||||
(Division No. 547 -- Vote no 547) | ||||
YEAS: 128, NAYS: 145 |
||||
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Harris (St. John's East) Murray Total: -- 128 |
||||
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Clement Leitch Ritz Total: -- 145 |
||||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 364 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 279, be amended |
||
(a) by replacing line 3 on page 265 with the following:
|
||
The question was put on Motion No. 364 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||
(Division No. 548 -- Vote no 548) | ||
YEAS: 126, NAYS: 146 |
||
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Hyer Pacetti Total: -- 126 |
||
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Daniel Leung Shea Total: -- 146 |
||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 385 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 302, be amended by replacing lines 4 to 8 on page 271 with the following:
|
||
The question was put on Motion No. 385 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||
(Division No. 549 -- Vote no 549) | ||
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 146 |
||
YEAS — POUR Andrews Cullen Hsu Nicholls Total: -- 125 |
||
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Daniel Leung Shea Total: -- 146 |
||
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 386 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 307. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 386 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 550 -- Vote no 550) | |
YEAS: 5, NAYS: 262 |
|
YEAS — POUR Bellavance Fortin Hyer May Total: -- 5 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Crowder Kellway Rae Total: -- 262 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 389 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 308. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 389 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 395, 398, 399, 402, 404 and 407 were also negatived on the same division. |
|
(Division No. 551 -- Vote no 551) | |
YEAS: 123, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS — POUR Andrews Cuzner Hughes Pacetti Total: -- 123 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Clement Leef Schellenberger Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 395, 398, 399, 402, 404 and 407 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 390 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 272 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 390 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 552 -- Vote no 552) | |
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 231 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Cuzner Goodale McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) Total: -- 37 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Cleary Kenney (Calgary Southeast) Quach Total: -- 231 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 392 to 394, 396, 397, 400 and 401 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 405 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by deleting lines 15 to 24 on page 274. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 405 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 553 -- Vote no 553) | |
YEAS: 126, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Crowder Hughes Nicholls Total: -- 126 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Clarke Lebel Saxton Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 409 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 315. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 409 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 554 -- Vote no 554) | |
YEAS: 100, NAYS: 170 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hughes Nicholls Total: -- 100 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Cuzner Komarnicki Reid Total: -- 170 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 410 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 316. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 410 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 555 -- Vote no 555) | |
YEAS: 130, NAYS: 143 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Crowder Hsu Nunez-Melo Total: -- 130 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Clement Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Richards Total: -- 143 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 411, 419, 438, 440, 442, 455 to 461, 464 to 467 and 469 to 486 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 415 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after line 22 on page 277 the following:
|
||
The question was put on Motion No. 415 and it was negatived on the following division: |
||
(Division No. 556 -- Vote no 556) | ||
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 147 |
||
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 133 |
||
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lauzon Saxton Total: -- 147 |
||
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
||
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 422, 423, 426, 428, 443, 445, 446, 448, 449, 454 and 463 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 487 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 351. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 487 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 557 -- Vote no 557) | |
YEAS: 120, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hyer Nicholls Total: -- 120 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Daniel Lebel Saxton Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 488 to 494, 498, 502 to 504, 506, 509, 512 to 516 and 524 to 564 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 495 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 309 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 495 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 558 -- Vote no 558) | |
YEAS: 116, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Hsu Nash Total: -- 116 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Daniel Lebel Saxton Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 497 and 499 to 501 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 505 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 310 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 505 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 559 -- Vote no 559) | |
YEAS: 113, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Gravelle Mulcair Total: -- 113 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Clement Lauzon Rickford Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 507, 508, 510 and 511 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 517 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 313 with the following:
|
|
The question was put on Motion No. 517 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 560 -- Vote no 560) | |
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Côté Groguhé Mulcair Total: -- 115 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Clement Lauzon Rickford Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 518 to 523 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 565 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 411. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 565 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 561 -- Vote no 561) | |
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Harris (St. John's East) Murray Total: -- 125 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Leef Schellenberger Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 566 and 567 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 568 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 425. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 568 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 562 -- Vote no 562) | |
YEAS: 130, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS — POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nash Total: -- 130 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Adams Davidson Leef Schellenberger Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 569 to 575 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 577 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 433. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 577 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 563 -- Vote no 563) | |
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hsu Nash Total: -- 132 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Leef Ritz Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 578 to 581, 583, 586 to 592, 594 to 608 and 610 to 612 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 582 of Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), seconded by Mr. Bellavance (Richmond—Arthabaska), — That Bill C-45, in Clause 437, be amended by deleting lines 25 to 34 on page 341. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 582 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 564 -- Vote no 564) | |
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 240 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Andrews Dion Hsu McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) Total: -- 37 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Crowder Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings) Quach Total: -- 240 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 613 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 464. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 613 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 614 to 663 were also negatived on the same division. |
|
(Division No. 565 -- Vote no 565) | |
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 147 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 133 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Devolin Lizon Seeback Total: -- 147 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 614 to 663 were also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 664 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 515. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 664 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 566 -- Vote no 566) | |
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nash Total: -- 132 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Davidson Lizon Shea Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Motion No. 665 was also negatived on the same division. |
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 666 of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), — That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 1. |
|
The question was put on Motion No. 666 and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 567 -- Vote no 567) | |
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 153 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 133 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Adams Clement Lauzon Rickford Total: -- 153 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 568 -- Vote no 568) | |
YEAS: 155, NAYS: 133 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Adams Daniel Leef Saxton Total: -- 155 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Allen (Welland) Cotler Hassainia Nantel Total: -- 133 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Messages from the Senate |
A message was received from the Senate as follows: |
— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House that the Senate has passed Bill C-313, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (non-corrective contact lenses), without amendment.
|
|
A message was received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following Bill to which the concurrence of the House is desired: |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 10:04 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 10:23 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |