House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
41st PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 50 Monday, November 21, 2011 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayers |
Private Members' Business |
At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs of Bill C-215, An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act (deletion of deduction from annuity). |
Mr. Stoffer (Sackville—Eastern Shore), seconded by Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. |
Government Orders |
The Order was read for the third reading of Bill C-13, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011 budget as updated on June 6, 2011 and other measures. |
Mr. MacKay (Minister of National Defence) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Ambrose (Minister of Public Works and Government Services and Minister for Status of Women), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, Members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Bill C-351, An Act respecting a Canadian Autism Day, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Bill C-352, An Act to amend the Statistics Act (National Office for Fire and Emergency Response Statistics), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway), seconded by Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek), Bill C-353, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act and the Income Tax Act (extra-energy-efficient products), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified correct by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), one concerning poverty (No. 411-0165), one concerning genetic engineering (No. 411-0166) and one concerning asbestos (No. 411-0167);
|
— by Mr. Cotler (Mount Royal), one concerning Tibet (No. 411-0168);
|
— by Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor), one concerning transportation (No. 411-0169).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-164 and Q-174 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: |
Q-166 — Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) — With regard to the hiring of consultants and contractors by the Department of National Defence in fiscal year 2010-2011, how many individuals who were hired under contract also received payments for (i) a Canadian Forces pension, (ii) a federal Public Service pension? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-166.
|
|
Q-168 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to the engines (propulsion system) for the 65 F-35 fighter jets purchased by Canada for future use by the Canadian Forces: (a) does the estimated $9 billion acquisition cost for the 65 F-35 fighter jets include the engines for all 65 F-35 fighter jets; (b) if the government’s response to part (a) is yes, for each of the 65 F-35 fighter jets, (i) which engine, including the manufacturer’s name, was used in the calculation of the estimated acquisition price for the 65 F-35 fighter jets, (ii) what is the estimated cost for each engine used for the calculation of the estimated acquisition price, (iii) has the estimated cost for each engine used for the calculation of the estimated acquisition price increased or decreased since the original calculation and, if so, by how much, (iv) what is the estimated cost for sustainment over a 20-year period for each engine used in the calculation of the estimated acquisition price, (v) how many engine choices or options were made available to the Department of National Defence (DND) for calculating the estimated acquisition price, (vi) what are the names of the engine manufacturers with regard to the government's answer in part (b)(v), (vii) with regard to the government's answer in part (b)(v), when were the engine choices or options made available to DND for calculating the estimated acquisition price; (c) if the government’s response to part (a) is no, for each of the 65 F-35 fighter jets, (i) what is the estimated purchase cost, above the $9 billion acquisition price, for each engine, (ii) what is the estimated cost for sustainment over a 20-year period for each engine; (iii) which engine and manufacturer was used with regard to the government’s answer in parts (c)(i) and (c)(ii); (d) have any engine options or choices been presented to DND or the government for final approval; (e) if the government’s response to part (d) is yes, (i) how many options have been presented, (ii) when where the options presented, (iii) what are the engine options, (iv) what are the names of the companies who have proposed the engines, (v) where are their Canadian head office locations; and (f) if the government’s response to part (d) is no, (i) has DND requested any options or choices with regard to the engines for the 65 F-35 fighter jets purchased by Canada, (ii) when will the engine choices or options be presented, (iii) which manufacturers are allowed or are capable of presenting engine choices or options to DND, (iv) what is the deadline for presenting the engine choices or options to DND, (v) what is the deadline for the government to submit its engine choice to the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-168.
|
|
Q-169 — Mr. LeBlanc (Beauséjour) — With regard to grants and contributions under $25,000 granted by the department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade since January 1, 2006, what are: (a) the names of the recipients; (b) the amounts of the grants or contributions per recipient; (c) the dates of the grants or contributions were issued; (d) the dates of length of funding; and (e) the descriptions of the purpose of each grant or contribution? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-169.
|
Government Orders |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Ambrose (Minister of Public Works and Government Services and Minister for Status of Women), — That Bill C-13, An Act to implement certain provisions of the 2011 budget as updated on June 6, 2011 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass. |
The debate continued. |
At 6:15 p.m., pursuant to Order made Wednesday, November 16, 2011, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 62 -- Vote no 62) | |
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 127 |
|
YEAS — POUR Ablonczy Clement Kerr Rickford Total: -- 153 |
|
NAYS — CONTRE Allen (Welland) Côté Harris (St. John's East) Nantel Total: -- 127 |
|
PAIRED — PAIRÉS Nil — Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed. |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 6:47 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:15 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |