House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 329 Tuesday, June 11, 2024 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid before the House, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 441-02417 concerning citizenship and immigration; |
— No. 441-02423 concerning fisheries; |
— No. 441-02426 concerning health. |
Motions |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Duguid (Winnipeg South), moved, — That the House do now proceed to the orders of the day. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 807 -- Vote no 807) | |
YEAS: 170, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Diab Khalid Qualtrough Total: -- 170 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dowdall Lehoux Savard-Tremblay Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Khera Vecchio Total: -- 2 |
Government Orders |
The order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-69, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 16, 2024, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance with amendments. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions: |
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 161. |
Group No. 1 |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 81. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 82. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 83. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 84. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 85. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 86. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 87. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 88. |
Mr. Gourde (Lévis—Lotbinière), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 89. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 90. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 91. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 12, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 92. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 13, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 93. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 94. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 95. |
Mrs. Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 96. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 97. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 98. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 99. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 100. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 101. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 102. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 103. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 104. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 105. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 106. |
Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 27, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 107. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 28, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 108. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 29, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 109. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 30, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 110. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 31, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 111. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 32, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 147. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 33, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 148. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 34, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 150. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 35, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 151. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 36, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 152. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 37, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 153. |
Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 38, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 154. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 39, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 173. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 40, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 174. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 41, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 175. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 42, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 176. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 43, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 177. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 44, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 180. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 45, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 181. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 46, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 184. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 47, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 185. |
Mr. Baldinelli (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 48, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 186. |
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 49, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 198. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 50, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 199. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 51, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 200. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 52, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 201. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 53, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 202. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 54, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 203. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 55, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 204. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 56, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 205. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 57, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 206. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 58, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 207. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 59, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 208. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 60, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 209. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 61, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 210. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 62, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 211. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 63, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 212. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 64, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 213. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 65, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 214. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 66, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 215. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 67, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 216. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 68, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 217. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 69, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 218. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 70, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 219. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 71, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 220. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 72, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 221. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 73, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 222. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 74, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 223. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 75, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 224. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 76, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 225. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 77, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 226. |
|
|
Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette), seconded by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), moved Motion No. 78, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 227. |
|
|
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 79, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 269. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 80, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 270. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 81, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 271. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 82, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 272. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 83, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 273. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 84, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 274. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 85, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 275. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 86, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 276. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 87, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 277. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 88, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 278. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 89, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 279. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 90, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 280. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 91, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 281. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 92, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 282. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 93, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 283. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 94, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 284. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 95, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 285. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 96, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 286. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 97, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 287. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 98, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 288. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 99, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 289. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 100, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 290. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 101, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 291. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 102, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 292. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 103, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 293. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 104, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 294. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 105, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 295. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 106, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 296. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 107, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 297. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 108, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 298. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 109, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 299. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 110, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 300. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 111, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 301. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 112, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 302. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 113, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 303. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 114, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 304. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 115, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 305. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 116, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 306. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 117, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 307. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 118, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 308. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 119, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 309. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 120, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 310. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 121, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 311. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 122, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 312. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 123, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 313. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 124, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 314. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 125, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 315. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 126, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 316. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 317. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 318. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 319. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 322. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 131, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 323. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 132, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 324. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 133, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 325. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 134, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 326. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 135, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 327. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 136, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 328. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 137, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 329. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 138, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 330. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 139, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 331. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 140, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 332. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 141, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 333. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 142, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 336. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 143, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 337. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 144, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 338. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 145, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 339. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 146, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 442. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 147, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 443. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 148, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 445. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 149, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 446. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 150, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 447. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 151, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 448. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 152, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 449. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 153, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 450. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 154, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 461. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 155, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 462. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 156, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 463. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 157, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 464. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 158, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 465. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 159, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 466. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 160, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 467. |
Mr. Hallan (Calgary Forest Lawn), seconded by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), moved Motion No. 161, — That Bill C-69 be amended by deleting Clause 468. |
Debate arose on the motions in Group No. 1. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Business of Supply |
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Villemure (Trois-Rivières), seconded by Ms. Bérubé (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou), — That the House: |
|
(a) take note of the Special Report on Foreign Interference in Canada’s Democratic Processes and Institutions of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians;
|
|
(b) express concern that certain elected officials may be wittingly or unwittingly working in the interests of foreign powers; and
|
|
(c) request the terms of reference of the foreign interference commission (the Hogue Commission) to be expanded to allow it to investigate Canada’s federal democratic institutions, including members of the House of Commons elected in the 43rd and 44th Parliaments as well as Senators.
|
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 808 -- Vote no 808) | |
YEAS: 320, NAYS: 2 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dowdall Lake Roberts Total: -- 320 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) Morrice Total: -- 2 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Khera Vecchio Total: -- 2 |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs), seconded by Mr. Beech (Minister of Citizens’ Services), — That Bill C-20, An Act establishing the Public Complaints and Review Commission and amending certain Acts and statutory instruments, be now read a third time and do pass. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 809 -- Vote no 809) | |
YEAS: 323, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dowdall Lambropoulos Roberts Total: -- 323 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Khera Vecchio Total: -- 2 |
|
Accordingly, the bill was read the third time and passed. |
Government Orders |
Ways and Means |
The order was read for consideration of a ways and means motion to introduce An Act to amend the Income Tax Act and the Income Tax Regulations (Sessional Paper No. 8570-441-25), notice of which was laid before the House on Monday, June 10, 2024. (Ways and Means No. 25) |
Ms. Freeland (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of National Defence), moved, — That the motion be concurred in. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 810 -- Vote no 810) | |
YEAS: 208, NAYS: 118 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Desilets Khalid Plamondon Total: -- 208 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Lewis (Essex) Scheer Total: -- 118 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Khera Vecchio Total: -- 2 |
|
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. MacKinnon (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mrs. Valdez (Minister of Small Business), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-40, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, to make consequential amendments to other Acts and to repeal a regulation (miscarriage of justice reviews), not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage and five hours shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the bill; and |
That, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at report stage and at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration at third reading stage of the said bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion. |
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 811 -- Vote no 811) | |
YEAS: 170, NAYS: 152 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Alghabra Dhillon Khalid Qualtrough Total: -- 170 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dowdall Lehoux Rood Total: -- 152 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Khera Vecchio Total: -- 2 |
Private Members' Business |
At 6:03 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Collins (Victoria), seconded by Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke), — That Bill C-332, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (coercive control of intimate partner), be now read a third time and do pass. |
The debate continued. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 12, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to order made Thursday, May 30, 2024, a report submitted to the Clerk of the House on Tuesday, June 11, 2024, was deemed presented to the House as follows: |
Mr. McKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam), from the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented the 13th report of the committee (Bill C-70, An Act respecting countering foreign interference, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-464. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 109 to 114) was tabled. |
Petitions Filed with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were filed as follows: |
— by Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope), one concerning public safety (No. 441-02547); |
— by Mr. Morrison (Kootenay—Columbia), one concerning the environment (No. 441-02548). |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Messages from the Senate |
A message was received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following bill to which the concurrence of the House is desired: |
Adjournment Proceedings |
The House resumed consideration of the question “That this House do now adjourn”. |
After further debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:30 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |