House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 371 (Unrevised) Tuesday, November 19, 2024 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Introduction of Private Members' Bills |
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway), seconded by Mr. Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), Bill C-419, An Act to establish a national strategy for universal eye care, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House. |
Motions |
Mr. Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot), seconded by Mr. Perron (Berthier—Maskinongé), moved, — That the 21st report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, October 30, 2024, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 75) |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), seconded by Mr. Rogers (Bonavista—Burin—Trinity), moved, — That this question be now put. |
Debate arose thereon. |
At 1:29 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), one concerning foreign affairs (No. 441-02856), one concerning citizenship and immigration (No. 441-02857) and one concerning civil and human rights (No. 441-02858); |
— by Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East), one concerning foreign affairs (No. 441-02859); |
— by Mr. Morrice (Kitchener Centre), one concerning transportation (No. 441-02860); |
— by Mr. Kram (Regina—Wascana), two concerning foreign affairs (Nos. 441-02861 and 441-02862); |
— by Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni), one concerning civil and human rights (No. 441-02863); |
— by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), one concerning transportation (No. 441-02864). |
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-3003, Q-3010, Q-3019, Q-3024, Q-3026, Q-3031, Q-3033 and Q-3036 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-2999 — Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent) — With regard to government funding for Équiterre, since November 4, 2015, broken down by department or agency: (a) what are the details of each instance where the government provided funding to Équiterre, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) type of funding (grant, loan, contract, etc.), (iv) details of the funding agreement, (v) purpose of the funding; and (b) for each funding instance that was in the form of a contract, was the contract awarded through a sole-sourced or competitive bid process? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2999.
|
|
Q-3000 — Mrs. Wagantall (Yorkton—Melville) — With regard to government assistance available to clients of the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP) of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada: (a) what is the duration of the program from a client’s date of arrival in Canada to its end; (b) what are the criteria for determining the duration of the program for each client; (c) what are the criteria required for extending the duration of the program, and for how long can it be extended; (d) what are the criteria for determining the allowance amount for each client; (e) what is the total possible amount of the monthly allowance per client category; (f) what is the total possible amount of monthly allowance under the employment incentive policy of the RAP program per client category; (g) what is the total amount to which RAP recipients are entitled per month through the child tax benefit per client category; (h) what is the total amount to which recipients are entitled per month through the RAP housing top-up allowance per client category; (i) what is the total amount of the start-up allowance entitled to clients of the program, broken down by client category; and (j) what are the minimum and maximum allowances of other sources of income available to RAP clients, broken down by client category and type of income? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3000.
|
|
Q-3001 — Mr. Small (Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame) — With regard to federally-funded salmon hatcheries in British Columbia, the Maritimes and Newfoundland and Labrador: (a) how many federally-funded salmon hatcheries are currently in operation in (i) British Columbia, (ii) the Maritimes, (iii) Newfoundland and Labrador; (b) what has been the yearly amount of federal funding spent on hatcheries, broken down by each of the last five years, in (i) British Columbia, (ii) the Maritimes, (iii) Newfoundland and Labrador; (c) how many salmon smolts were released in total from these hatcheries, broken down by each of the last five years, in (i) British Columbia, (ii) the Maritimes, (iii) Newfoundland and Labrador; (d) for each of the next five years, how many additional hatcheries are planned for (i) British Columbia, (ii) the Maritimes, (iii) Newfoundland and Labrador; (e) for each of the next five years, how many additional salmon smolts will be released in (i) British Columbia, (ii) the Maritimes, (iii) Newfoundland and Labrador; and (f) for each of the next five years, how much additional spending will be required for the additional hatcheries, broken down by each of the regions in (d)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3001.
|
|
Q-3002 — Mr. Small (Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame) — With regard to information held by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans on Northern cod, Greenland halibut and redfish: (a) for Northern cod, what is the average catch rate (i) per net per hour in a 5.5 inch mesh in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization's (NAFO) areas 2J, 3K and 3L in kilograms, (ii) per hook used in NAFO areas 2J, 3K and 3L in kilograms, broken down by area in each of the last five years, based on fish harvester logbook submissions; (b) for Greenland halibut, what (i) is the average catch rate per net per hour in NAFO areas 2J, 3K and 3L in gill nets broken down by area in each of the last five years, (ii) percentage of migratory area is within Canadian waters compared to NAFO waters outside Canada's 200 mile limit, (iii) percentage of the quota is issued to the Canadian fleet vs NAFO allocation, (iv) has the biomass been for each of the last five years for the stock inside and outside Canada's 200 mile limit; and (c) for redfish, what is the biomass in NAFO areas 2J and 3K in each of the last seven years, broken down by area and year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3002.
|
|
Q-3004 — Mr. McCauley (Edmonton West) — With regard to the government providing financial aid to the Palestinian Territories (Gaza): (a) what is the total amount of financial aid given to the Palestinian Territories (Gaza) (i) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, (ii) between January 1, 2023, and September 30, 2023, (iii) since October 1, 2023; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by specific federal program through which the aid was administered; (c) what are the details of each grant, including the (i) website where the grant is applicable online, (ii) date of the application, (iii) department or agency administering the aid or grant, (iv) purpose of the federal aid or grant provided to the Palestinian Territories (Gaza), (v) date of the provision of aid, (vi) recipient, (vii) file number; (d) was federal aid given directly to the Palestinian Territories (Gaza) or a third-party organization, and, if so, how much was given to each; and (e) if aid was given to third-party organizations, what (i) are the names of each organization, (ii) are the dates on which the aid or grant was provided, (iii) is the rationale for selecting each organization, (iv) is the total amount given to each organization, (v) reporting obligations were required from each organization on the use of the aid, if any? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3004.
|
|
Q-3005 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill—Keewatinook Aski) — With regard to the government's response to Order Paper question Q-2695 concerning individuals who were made to repay or whose COVID-era benefits such as the Canada Emergency Response Benefit, the Canada Emergency Student Benefit, the Canada Recovery Benefit, the Canada Recovery Caregiving Benefit, the Canada Recovery Sickness Benefit or the Canada Worker Lockdown Benefit were clawed back by the CRA: (a) what is the number of individuals with a COVID-19 benefit "repayment or clawback", broken down by (i) income group, (ii) province or territory of residence; and (b) what is the total number of individuals who were affected and the total amount which was repaid or clawed back by the government? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3005.
|
|
Q-3006 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — With regard to the government’s refocused spending initiatives in departments and agencies, broken down by item and year: what programs and initiatives from the (i) Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, (ii) Department of National Defence, (iii) Department of Veterans Affairs, (iv) Department of Health, (v) Public Health Agency of Canada, are expected to see funding refocused? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3006.
|
|
Q-3007 — Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets) — With regard to board of directors' meetings at the Canada Infrastructure Bank in which a declaration, conflict, potential perception of conflict, abstention or recusal was noted in the meeting minutes from December 1, 2022, to April 30, 2024: what are the details of each instance noted in the meeting minutes, broken down by director, including (i) the decision in question, (ii) the amount of funding tied to the decision, (iii) the name of the entity receiving funding related to the decision, (iv) the name of the board member for whom a declaration, conflict, potential perception of conflict, abstention or recusal was noted, (v) the reason for which the declaration, conflict, potential perception of conflict, abstention or recusal was divulged by the board member, (vi) whether the board member held a private interest in the decision? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3007.
|
|
Q-3008 — Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets) — With regard to on-the-water and dockside enforcement patrols carried out by Fisheries and Oceans Canada enforcement officers in lobster fishing areas 34 and 35 from July 1, 2024, to September 20, 2024: what are the details of each patrol, including the (i) date it occurred, (ii) number of enforcement officers present, (iii) duration, (iv) lobster fishing areas covered, (v) number of tickets with fines issued, (vi) number of arrests, (vii) number of individuals detained, (viii) number of lobster traps confiscated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3008.
|
|
Q-3009 — Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets) — With regard to firefighter garments held, or purchased, by the government: (a) how many firefighter garments purchased by the government since 2015 contain per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) or finishes; (b) what are the details of each purchase in (a), including the (i) year of the purchase, (ii) company name of the supplier, (iii) company name of the producer, (iv) location of the producer, (v) total number of garments purchased, (vi) total cost of the purchased garments; (c) how many firefighter garments that contain PFAS or finishes have been disposed of by the government at any point since 2018; and (d) for each disposal in (c), what was the (i) total number of garments disposed of, (ii) method of disposal, (iii) entity or vendor that disposed of the garments, (iv) date of the disposal, (v) location of the entity responsible for the disposal? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3009.
|
|
Q-3011 — Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies) — With regard to the Giant Mine remediation project: (a) how much of the over $800 million that Public Services and Procurement Canada has received for the project has been spent (i) internally, (ii) on outside contractors, (iii) on consultants; (b) what are the names of the consultants in (a)(iii) and their organizations; and (c) how much has been spent to date on the project, in total and broken down by (i) purpose, (ii) recipient of the funding, (iii) date of the expenditure? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3011.
|
|
Q-3012 — Mr. Zimmer (Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies) — With regard to the new General Purpose Sleeping Bag System (GPSBS) contracted by the Department of National Defence: (a) what are the details of the contract, including how much money was allocated for the (i) development, (ii) manufacturing, (iii) distribution, of the GPSBS; (b) which companies were contracted with regard to the GPSBS, broken down by the (i) contracting parties, (ii) value of the contract, (iii) nature or description of the work, (iv) start and end dates; (c) in which country were the GPSBS products manufactured; (d) how many of these GPSBS were manufactured in total; and (e) how many of these GPSBS were distributed to the Canadian Armed Forces? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3012.
|
|
Q-3013 — Mr. Kitchen (Souris—Moose Mountain) — With regard to employment at the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) since January 1, 2019: (a) how many new jobs or full-time equivalent positions have been created at the PHAC, broken down by year; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by (i) type of position, (ii) location, (iii) Treasury Board classification level, or occupational group level, and associated salary range; (c) has the PHAC eliminated any positions, and, if so, what is the breakdown by year of how many jobs or full-time equivalent positions were eliminated; and (d) what is the breakdown of (c) by (i) type of position, (ii) location, (iii) Treasury Board classification level, or occupational group level, and associated salary range? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3013.
|
|
Q-3014 — Mr. Maguire (Brandon—Souris) — With regard to the production and printing of passports in Manitoba since 2015: (a) how many passport printers are active in Manitoba; (b) where are the printers in (a) located; (c) what is the total number of passports printed in Manitoba, broken down by year, at each location; (d) how many printer breakdowns have occurred, broken down by year, at each location; (e) on average, for how long did breakdowns disrupt printing operations; and (f) how many passport applications have been received at the Gatineau-Hull Service Canada Centre and Passport Services from Manitoba? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3014.
|
|
Q-3015 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — With regard to federal health care investments, since October 1, 2021: (a) how many personal support workers have been trained as a result of federal funding, broken down by province or territory and by year; and (b) broken down by province or territory, what is the total number of personal support workers (i) currently working, (ii) earning at least $25 an hour as a result of federal investments, (iii) earning under $25 an hour? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3015.
|
|
Q-3016 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — With regard to the Canadian Dental Care Plan, broken down by federal electoral district: what is the total number of oral health care providers who participate in the Canadian Dental Care Plan? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3016.
|
|
Q-3017 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — With regard to the Trans Mountain Corporation’s management of the Trans Mountain pipeline and related spill hazards: (a) is the Trans Mountain Corporation prepared to contain diluted bitumen that will both float and sink depending upon conditions; (b) where will beach clean-up workers come from; (c) will the workers in (b) be trained for clean-up of hazardous materials; (d) is there a plan to protect citizens who want to assist in clean-up; (e) when will the fiber optic spill detection system be fully operational; (f) what length of the pipeline will not be equipped with dual leak detection at the time in (e); (g) where are the sections in (f) located along the pipeline; (h) how will the sections of the pipeline without dual-leak detection be monitored; (i) regarding Transport Canada's suggestion that, in the event of a spill in Burrard Inlet or English Bay, some people may require evacuation, what plans are in place to care for them; (j) how many people in the potential evacuation zone (i) have asthma or other chronic lung conditions, (ii) cannot tolerate fumes from a diluted bitumen spill, (iii) will need special care due to other disability during an evacuation; (k) how many evacuees are expected in the case of a marine spill; (l) has there been an assessment of local hospitals’ capacity to handle casualties, including burn victims; (m) has there been an assessment of local emergency fire and rescue services' capacity to respond to such an event; (n) are response exercises being performed regularly, and, if so, how often; (o) do the fire services, who would be called in the event of tanker contents catching fire, have previous experience fighting the kind of wildland fires and structural conflagrations that would follow a large ignition in Burrard Inlet; and (p) have any studies been completed to confirm the feasibility of cleaning up diluted bitumen when spilled in various marine environments, and, if so, what are the details, including the (i) date of publishing, (ii) summary of its contents and conclusion? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3017.
|
|
Q-3018 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — With regard to the Trans Mountain pipeline in British Columbia (BC): (a) in the event of a diluted bitumen tanker spill requiring evacuations, does Transport Canada have guidelines for a response plan that would allow the BC Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) to protect human health in BC; (b) can the federal government confirm the legal, environmental and human health liabilities that will affect the province as a result of the pipeline’s operations; (c) what support is the federal government offering BC to ensure a response plan is in place in the event of a spill; (d) was the federal review of the Trans Mountain pipeline harmonized with the BC EAO's process, specifically in relation to human health and spill response; (e) if the review in (d) was completed, what steps were taken during this process; (f) were the steps in (d) documented and are the results available; and (g) is the federal government aware of the reason the pipeline operations have moved forward, sending diluted bitumen and increased tanker traffic ten-fold, despite the BC government not approving the final environmental certificate on marine response? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3018.
|
|
Q-3020 — Mr. Van Popta (Langley—Aldergrove) — With regard to entities that owe tax to the CRA for unpaid excise tax on cannabis: (a) how many have filed for creditor protection or bankruptcy, broken down by year since the legalization of cannabis; (b) how much excise tax has been written off, in total, and broken down by the province or territory of the entity owing tax; and (c) for each entity which owed unpaid excise tax on cannabis and had their amount owing written off by the CRA, what are the details, including the (i) name of the entity, (ii) location, (iii) amount written off, (iv) date of the write-off, (v) reason for the write-off? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3020.
|
|
Q-3021 — Mr. Lawrence (Northumberland—Peterborough South) — With regard to government spending allocated towards port infrastructure projects in Canada since 2019, broken down by year and by department, agency, or other entity which provided the funding: (a) what was the total amount of funding provided to each port, including, for each, the (i) port's name, (ii) amount of funding, (iii) project description or purpose of the funding; and (b) for each instance in (a) where the funding was for a specific project, what was the (i) location, (ii) description, (iii) cost breakdown of the federal funding contribution and all other known funding contributions, (iv) total project cost? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3021.
|
|
Q-3022 — Mr. Williamson (New Brunswick Southwest) — With regard to on-the-water and dockside enforcement patrols carried out by Fisheries and Oceans Canada enforcement officers in lobster fishing areas 38, 37 and 36 from July 1, 2024, to September 20, 2024: what are the details of each patrol, including the (i) date it occurred, (ii) number of enforcement officers present, (iii) duration, (iv) lobster fishing areas covered, (v) number of tickets with fines issued, (vi) number of arrests, (vii) number of individuals detained, (viii) number of lobster traps confiscated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3022.
|
|
Q-3023 — Mr. Kram (Regina—Wascana) — With regard to Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada's Northern Abandoned Mine Reclamation Program: (a) what has the government identified as the particular (i) engineering, (ii) geological, (iii) environmental, (iv) social, challenges of the Faro Mine remediation project; (b) what has the government identified as the (i) environmental, (ii) economic, (iii) social, costs and impacts of not undertaking remediation of the Faro Mine site; (c) what is the projected budget of the Faro Mine remediation (i) for the complete remediation, (ii) broken down by year until the project is completed; (d) have the consultants contracted by the government to date recommended any ongoing site maintenance after the projected remediation completion date of 2036-37; (e) what, if any, is the estimated duration of ongoing post-completion site maintenance; (f) what are the estimated annual costs for post-completion maintenance; (g) what were the total expenditures on (i) consultants, (ii) construction and maintenance, (iii) materials, each year from 2020-21 to 2024-25; (h) what are the details of all consulting contracts signed related to the program, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) issues consulted on, (vi) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid); (i) has the government held any public consultations on the program since January 1, 2020, and, if so, what are the details of each consultation, including (i) the date, (ii) the location, (iii) the form (town hall meeting, online questionnaire, etc.), (iv) who conducted it, (v) the total associated expenditures, broken down by type of expense, (vi) the summary of the feedback received from the consultation; and (j) how many people does the government estimate are currently affected (i) directly, (ii) indirectly, by the mine site? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3023.
|
|
Q-3025 — Ms. Idlout (Nunavut) — With regard to contaminated sites and waste sites in Nunavut: (a) what is the full list of all contaminated sites and waste sites for which the Government of Canada is responsible, broken down by (i) location, (ii) responsible federal department or agency, (iii) date on which the site was first added to the inventory of sites, (iv) priority level, (v) stage or status of remediation; and (b) what are the processes, formulae, methods, and any other considerations involved in the (i) determination of a site’s priority level, (ii) reassessment of a site’s priority level, including any factors that trigger reassessment and any timelines associated with regular reassessment? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3025.
|
|
Q-3027 — Mr. Barlow (Foothills) — With regard to the carbon tax or price on carbon: (a) what were the annual costs to administer the (i) collection of the carbon tax, (ii) rebate program, during the 2023-24 fiscal year; (b) how many employees or full-time equivalents were assigned to work on the (i) collection of the carbon tax, (ii) rebate program, during the 2023-24 fiscal year; and (c) what are the projected costs to administer the (i) collection of the carbon tax, (ii) rebate program, broken down by year between now and 2030? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3027.
|
|
Q-3028 — Mr. Davidson (York—Simcoe) — With regard to government employees and full-time equivalents at the executive (EX) level or higher: (a) what was the number of such employees during the (i) 2015-16, (ii) 2023-24, fiscal year, in total and broken down by department, agency, or Crown corporation; and (b) what was the amount paid in salaries and other financial compensation to such employees during the (i) 2015-16, (ii) 2023-24, fiscal year, in total and broken down by department, agency, or Crown corporation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3028.
|
|
Q-3029 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to usage of the government's fleet of Challenger aircraft, since April 1, 2024: what are the details of the legs of each flight, including the (i) date, (ii) point of departure, (iii) destination, (iv) number of passengers, (v) names and titles of the passengers, excluding security or Canadian Armed Forces members, (vi) total catering bill related to the flight, (vii) volume of fuel used, or an estimate, (viii) amount spent on fuel? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3029.
|
|
Q-3030 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to usage of the government's fleet of Airbus and Polaris aircraft since April 1, 2024: what are the details of the legs of each flight, including the (i) date, (ii) point of departure, (iii) destination, (iv) number of passengers, (v) names and titles of the passengers, excluding security or Canadian Armed Forces members, (vi) total catering bill related to the flight, (vii) volume of fuel used, or an estimate, (viii) amount spent on fuel, (ix) type of aircraft? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3030.
|
|
Q-3032 — Mr. Seeback (Dufferin—Caledon) — With regard to the processing of applications at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC): (a) how many employees or full-time equivalents have been processing applications at IRCC, broken down by month since January 1, 2024; (b) how many applications were processed by IRCC, broken down by month since January 1, 2024; and (c) what is the daily target or quota of processed applications for those IRCC employees who process applications? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3032.
|
|
Q-3034 — Mr. Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands) — With regard to government dealings with Brookfield Asset Management and Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions: (a) what measures, if any, are in place to ensure that Brookfield and its subsidiaries do not receive any special or favourable treatment when it comes to government procurement as a result of Mark Carney’s appointment as an advisor to the Prime Minister; (b) are measures in place to remove the names of companies who submitted a bid from documents that go to those who award government contracts to ensure that government procurement managers or ministers who make procurement decisions do not give favourable treatment to Brookfield, and, if not, why not; and (c) on what date did each measure in (a) and (b) come into effect? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3034.
|
|
Q-3035 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — With regard to contracts and agreements that the government has with Brookfield Asset Management, Brookfield Global Integrated Solutions, or any subsidiary of Brookfield, since November 4, 2015, and broken down by department, agency, or Crown corporation: what are the details of all contracts or agreements, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) original amount of the contract, (iv) current or final amount of the contract, (v) description of the goods or services provided, (vi) manner in which the contract was awarded (competitive-bid or sole sourced)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3035.
|
|
Q-3037 — Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre) — With regard to the implementation and enforcement of the Canada Labour Code’s Workplace Harassment and Violence Prevention Regulations, broken down by year and by individual department, agency, Crown corporation, including Canada Post, and federally regulated business: (a) how many notices of occurrence have been reported, and what is the breakdown of the notices by gender, ethnicity, and age; (b) how many assurances of compliance have been reported; (c) what is the number and individual value of fines that have been issued by Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) for failure to comply with the Workplace Harassment and Violence Prevention Regulations; and (d) what are the criteria used by ESDC to determine when to issue a fine for non-compliance? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3037.
|
|
Q-3038 — Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre) — With regard to the Canadian Dental Care Plan, broken down by federal electoral district since the program’s inception: (a) what is the total number of applications (i) received, (ii) approved; and (b) how many people have been enrolled in the Canadian Dental Care Plan, broken down by age group and by Disability tax credit certificate status? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-3038.
|
Question of Privilege |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That the government's failure of fully providing documents, as ordered by the House on June 10, 2024, be hereby referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs; |
And of the amendment, as amended, of Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), seconded by Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets), — That the motion be amended by adding the following: |
“provided that it be an instruction to the committee:
|
(a) that the following witnesses be ordered to appear before the committee, separately, for two hours each:
|
(i) the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry,
|
(ii) the Clerk of the Privy Council,
|
(iii) the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, who respected the order of the House and deposited unredacted documents,
|
(iv) Paul MacKinnon, the former Deputy Secretary to the Cabinet (Governance),
|
(v) the Auditor General of Canada,
|
(vi) the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police,
|
(vii) the Deputy Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada,
|
(viii) the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel of the House of Commons,
|
(ix) the Acting President of Sustainable Development Technology Canada,
|
(x) a panel consisting of the Board of Sustainable Development Technology Canada; and
|
(b) that it report back to the House no later than the 30th sitting day following the adoption of this order.".
|
The debate continued. |
Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), seconded by Mr. Falk (Provencher), moved the following subamendment, — That the amendment be amended by adding the following: |
“, except that the order for the committee to report back to the House within 30 sitting days shall be discharged if the Speaker has sooner laid upon the table a notice from the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel confirming that all government institutions have fully complied with the order adopted on June 10, 2024, by depositing all of their responsive records in an unredacted form”.
|
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House, Bill S-13, An Act to amend the Interpretation Act and to make related amendments to other Acts, be disposed of as follows: |
(a) the bill be deemed to have been read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights immediately after the adoption of this order;
|
(b) a minister be ordered to appear before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights in relation to the bill for one hour, no later than Friday, November 29, 2024, and, immediately after, the bill shall be deemed considered and reported without amendment; and
|
(c) at the opening of the next sitting day following the minister’s appearance at the committee, the bill shall be deemed concurred in without amendment at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
|
Naming of a member |
The Speaker named Ms. Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill) for disregarding the authority of the Chair and, pursuant to Standing Order 11(1)(a), ordered the member to withdraw from the House for the remainder of today's sitting. |
|
The Speaker named Mr. Barrett (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes) for disregarding the authority of the Chair and, pursuant to Standing Order 11(1)(a), ordered the member to withdraw from the House for the remainder of today's sitting. |
|
The Speaker named Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets) for disregarding the authority of the Chair and, pursuant to Standing Order 11(1)(a), ordered the member to withdraw from the House for the remainder of today's sitting. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Concurrence in Committee Reports |
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Monday, April 25, 2022, be concurred in; (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 74) |
|
And of the amendment of Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: |
|
“the second report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Monday, April 25, 2022, be not now concurred in, but that it be recommitted to the committee for further consideration, with a view to studying the economic and anti-reconciliatory barriers posed by fraudulent bids and applications for procurement opportunities set aside for Indigenous businesses, including those from non-Indigenous-owned companies, provided that, for the purposes of this study:
|
|
(a) the following be ordered to appear as witnesses, for at least two hours each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024,
|
|
(i) the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages,
|
|
(ii) the Minister of Indigenous Services,
|
|
(iii) the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations,
|
|
(iv) the Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant,
|
|
(v) Arianne Reza, Deputy Minister of Public Services and Procurement,
|
|
(vi) Catherine Poulin, Assistant Deputy Minister, Departmental Oversight Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services;
|
|
(b) Felix Papineau and Shawna Parker, individuals currently or formerly associated with Global Health Imports, shall each be ordered to appear as witnesses, separately, for at least one hour each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024; and
|
|
(c) it be an instruction that the committee,
|
|
(i) hold at least four other meetings to receive evidence from Indigenous partners, stakeholders and experts, proposed by the members of the committee,
|
|
(ii) report its findings to the House by Friday, January 31, 2025.”;
|
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the subamendment of Mr. Lloyd (Sturgeon River—Parkland), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That the amendment be amended by adding, in paragraph (c), the following: |
|
“(iii) give priority to this study, subject only to its order of reference concerning Bill C-61, An Act respecting water, source water, drinking water, wastewater and related infrastructure on First Nation lands,
|
|
(iv) have the first priority for the use of House resources for committee meetings, subject to any special orders previously adopted, for the studies referred to in subparagraph (iii)”.
|
|
The question was put on the subamendment and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 883 -- Vote no 883) | |
YEAS: 173, NAYS: 146 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Desilets Lake Rood Total: -- 173 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Alghabra Dubourg Lalonde Qualtrough Total: -- 146 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the amendment, as amended, of Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), seconded by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: |
|
“the second report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Monday, April 25, 2022, be not now concurred in, but that it be recommitted to the committee for further consideration, with a view to studying the economic and anti-reconciliatory barriers posed by fraudulent bids and applications for procurement opportunities set aside for Indigenous businesses, including those from non-Indigenous-owned companies, provided that, for the purposes of this study:
|
|
(a) the following be ordered to appear as witnesses, for at least two hours each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024,
|
|
(i) the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages,
|
|
(ii) the Minister of Indigenous Services,
|
|
(iii) the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations,
|
|
(iv) the Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant,
|
|
(v) Arianne Reza, Deputy Minister of Public Services and Procurement,
|
|
(vi) Catherine Poulin, Assistant Deputy Minister, Departmental Oversight Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services;
|
|
(b) Felix Papineau and Shawna Parker, individuals currently or formerly associated with Global Health Imports, shall each be ordered to appear as witnesses, separately, for at least one hour each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024; and
|
|
(c) it be an instruction that the committee,
|
|
(i) hold at least four other meetings to receive evidence from Indigenous partners, stakeholders and experts, proposed by the members of the committee,
|
|
(ii) report its findings to the House by Friday, January 31, 2025,
|
|
(iii) give priority to this study, subject only to its order of reference concerning Bill C-61, An Act respecting water, source water, drinking water, wastewater and related infrastructure on First Nation lands,
|
|
(iv) have the first priority for the use of House resources for committee meetings, subject to any special orders previously adopted, for the studies referred to in subparagraph (iii).”.
|
|
The question was put on the amendment, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 884 -- Vote no 884) | |
YEAS: 174, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Desjarlais Larouche Sauvé Total: -- 174 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Alghabra Drouin Kusmierczyk Petitpas Taylor Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the main motion, as amended, of Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), seconded by Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), — That the second report of the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs, presented on Monday, April 25, 2022, be not now concurred in, but that it be recommitted to the committee for further consideration, with a view to studying the economic and anti-reconciliatory barriers posed by fraudulent bids and applications for procurement opportunities set aside for Indigenous businesses, including those from non-Indigenous-owned companies, provided that, for the purposes of this study: |
|
(a) the following be ordered to appear as witnesses, for at least two hours each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024,
|
|
(i) the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages,
|
|
(ii) the Minister of Indigenous Services,
|
|
(iii) the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations,
|
|
(iv) the Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Quebec Lieutenant,
|
|
(v) Arianne Reza, Deputy Minister of Public Services and Procurement,
|
|
(vi) Catherine Poulin, Assistant Deputy Minister, Departmental Oversight Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services;
|
|
(b) Felix Papineau and Shawna Parker, individuals currently or formerly associated with Global Health Imports, shall each be ordered to appear as witnesses, separately, for at least one hour each, at dates and times to be fixed by the Chair of the committee, but no later than Tuesday, December 17, 2024; and
|
|
(c) it be an instruction that the committee,
|
|
(i) hold at least four other meetings to receive evidence from Indigenous partners, stakeholders and experts, proposed by the members of the committee,
|
|
(ii) report its findings to the House by Friday, January 31, 2025,
|
|
(iii) give priority to this study, subject only to its order of reference concerning Bill C-61, An Act respecting water, source water, drinking water, wastewater and related infrastructure on First Nation lands,
|
|
(iv) have the first priority for the use of House resources for committee meetings, subject to any special orders previously adopted, for the studies referred to in subparagraph (iii).
|
|
The question was put on the main motion, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 885 -- Vote no 885) | |
YEAS: 173, NAYS: 144 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Desilets Lantsman Rood Total: -- 173 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Alghabra Drouin Kusmierczyk Powlowski Total: -- 144 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, the report was referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs. |
|
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot), seconded by Mr. Perron (Berthier—Maskinongé), — That the 21st report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Wednesday, October 30, 2024, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 75) |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Rogers (Bonavista—Burin—Trinity), — That this question be now put. |
|
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 886 -- Vote no 886) | |
YEAS: 317, NAYS: 0 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Doherty Lake Richards Total: -- 317 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Nil--Aucun |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 61(2), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 887 -- Vote no 887) | |
YEAS: 171, NAYS: 145 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Desjarlais Lantsman Ruff Total: -- 171 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Alghabra Drouin Kusmierczyk Powlowski Total: -- 145 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Messages from the Senate |
A message was received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following bill to which the concurrence of the House is desired: |
Question of Privilege |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable); |
And of the amendment, as amended, of Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), seconded by Mr. Perkins (South Shore—St. Margarets); |
And of the subamendment of Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), seconded by Mr. Falk (Provencher). |
The debate continued. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), a paper deposited with the Clerk of the House was laid before the House as follows: |
— by Ms. Freeland (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance) — Report of the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2024, pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, S.C. 2000, c. 17, sbs. 71(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-802-04. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) |
Petitions Filed with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, a petition certified by the Clerk of Petitions was filed as follows: |
— by Mr. Bains (Steveston—Richmond East), one concerning transportation (No. 441-02865). |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 6:11 p.m., by unaminous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 6:32 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |