House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 78 Tuesday, May 31, 2022 10:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
The clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Speaker. |
Whereupon, Mr. d'Entremont (West Nova), Deputy Speaker and Chair of Committees of the Whole, took the chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the Parliament of Canada Act. |
Prayer |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Tabling of Documents |
The Deputy Speaker laid upon the table, — Reports of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons (Spring 2022), pursuant to the Auditor General Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-17, sbs. 7(5). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-64-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 108(3)(g), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts) |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: |
— No. 441-00395 concerning health; |
— No. 441-00400 concerning justice. |
Presenting Reports from Committees |
Mr. Blois (Kings—Hants), from the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food, presented the fourth report of the committee, "Main Estimates 2022-23: Vote 1 under Canadian Dairy Commission, Vote 1 under Canadian Grain Commission and Votes 1, 5 and 10 under Department of Agriculture and Agri-Food". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-84. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 20) was tabled. |
|
Mrs. Zahid (Scarborough Centre), from the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented the eighth report of the committee, "Differential Treatment in Recruitment and Acceptance Rates of Foreign Students in Quebec and in the Rest of Canada". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-85. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 2 to 5, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, 20, 22 and 24) was tabled. |
|
Ms. Zarrillo (Port Moody—Coquitlam), from the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, presented the second report of the committee, "Disability Support Benefits". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-86. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response. |
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 19) was tabled. |
Presenting Petitions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 36, petitions certified by the Clerk of Petitions were presented as follows: |
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the democratic process (No. 441-00509);
|
— by Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby), one concerning animals (No. 441-00510);
|
— by Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), one concerning social affairs and equality (No. 441-00511).
|
Questions on the Order Paper |
Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-461 to Q-463, Q-475 and Q-477 on the Order Paper. |
|
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-464 — Mr. Carrie (Oshawa) — With regard to data held by the government related to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine: (a) on what date and how was the government informed of the clinical trial data of the vaccine that was published on November 4, 2021, in the New England Journal of Medicine; (b) on what date and how was the government informed of the adverse reactions and side effects of the vaccine as mentioned in the documents released in accordance with the order made by Justice Mark Pittman of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas on January 6, 2022; and (c) is the government aware of any additional data that will be released by Pfizer this year, and if so, what are the details, including the (i) date the government became aware of the data, (ii) date the data will become public, (iii) summary of data findings? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-464.
|
|
Q-465 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — With regard to the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS), broken down by province or territory, region, and constituency, and by year from 2017 until now: (a) how many Canadians received the GIS; and (b) of those Canadians receiving the GIS, how many (i) received the maximum amount, (ii) of their spouses received the allowance benefit for couples, (iii) lost the benefit because they filed their income taxes late? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-465.
|
|
Q-466 — Mr. Small (Coast of Bays—Central—Notre Dame) — With regard to Fisheries and Oceans Canada's Conservation and Protection Program, broken down by year since 2015: (a) how many charges, citations, or other type of enforcement action were taken through the program, broken down by type of enforcement action (criminal charges, ticket, etc.), and by type of illegal activity (fishing without a license, illegally caught species, multiple charges, etc.); and (b) of the instances in (a) where charges were laid, what is the breakdown by final judicial outcome (charges dropped, conviction, case still ongoing, etc.)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-466.
|
|
Q-467 — Mr. Shields (Bow River) — With regard to the government's position on farmers using Bovaer to reduce methane emissions from livestock: (a) why has the government not yet approved Bovaer for agriculture use in Canada; (b) has the government conducted any studies related to the potential level of methane reduction that could be achieved in Canada with the approval and use of Bovaer, and, if so, what are the details, including the findings of any such studies; (c) what is the timeline within which a decision on the approval of Bovaer will be made; (d) does the government have an explanation for why the European Union was able to make a decision on Bovaer years ahead of the Canadian government, and, if so, what is the explanation; (e) has the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food taken any specific measures to expedite the decision on whether or not to approve Bovaer, and, if not, why not; and (f) if the response in (e) is affirmative, what are the specific details of each measure taken, including the (i) date of the measure, (ii) specific measure taken? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-467.
|
|
Q-468 — Mrs. Gray (Kelowna—Lake Country) — With regard to the Canada Digital Adoption Program: (a) how many and which vendors applied to administer the (i) "Grow Your Business" stream, (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology" stream; (b) what metrics and criteria were used by the department when determining which applicants in (a)(i) and (a)(ii) would become administrators, broken down by stream; (c) what is the dollar value of the contracts provided to Magnet to administer the "Boost Your Business Technology" stream; (d) which vendors were awarded the contracts to administer the "Grow Your Business" stream; (e) what is the dollar value of the contracts provided to each of the vendors in (d); (f) what is the number of students hired, as of April 5, 2022, via the (i) "Grow Your Business" stream, (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology" stream; and (g) what is the number of businesses which have applied, as of April 5, 2022, to the (i) "Grow Your Business" stream, (ii) "Boost Your Business Technology" stream? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-468.
|
|
Q-469 — Mr. Warkentin (Grande Prairie—Mackenzie) — With regard to the government paying social media influencers to promote the government's messaging, broken down by department or agency: (a) who in each department or agency decides which influencers to (i) hire, (ii) pay; (b) what is the manner in which influencers can apply to get paid to promote the government's messaging; (c) how many applications related to (b) have been received since January 1, 2021; (d) of the applicants in (c), how many were awarded a contract or payment from the government; (e) are there any specific criteria that government-paid influencers must meet, and, if so, what are the details; (f) are the influencers prohibited or in any way censored from publicly voicing their disagreement with any government policies or messaging, and, if so, what are the details of the prohibition; (g) what specific policies are in place regarding the use of social media influencers; and (h) on what date did each policy in (g) come into effect? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-469.
|
|
Q-470 — Ms. Gazan (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to the funding announced in budget 2021 and in the Fall Economic Statement 2020 to support Indigenous women and 2SLGBTQQIA+ people: (a) how much of the $36.3 million has been spent to enhance and support Indigenous women and 2SLGBTQQIA+ organizations; (b) of the funding in (a), which organizations received funding and how much was received; (c) how much of the $49.3 million allocated for the implementation of Gladue Principles has been spent; and (d) how much of the $8.1 million to develop justice agreements with Indigenous communities has been spent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-470.
|
|
Q-471 — Ms. Gazan (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to the funding announced in budget 2021 to measure progress and provide accountability on the government supports for Indigenous women, girls and 2SLGBTQQIA+ people: (a) what mechanisms have been implemented; (b) how much of the $20.3 million has been allocated; and (c) of the funding in (b), how much have Indigenous partners received, broken down by organization, institution, or governing body? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-471.
|
|
Q-472 — Ms. Gazan (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to the development of a comprehensive violence prevention strategy announced in the Fall Economic Statement 2020: (a) how much of the $724.1 million announced has been spent; and (b) broken down by province and territory, how many shelters (i) have been newly opened, (ii) are currently in construction, (iii) are planned, but the construction has not begun? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-472.
|
|
Q-473 — Ms. Gazan (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to federal government funding for fiscal years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22, allocated within the constituency of Winnipeg Centre: what is the total funding amount, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) department or agency, (iii) initiative, (iv) amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-473.
|
|
Q-474 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — With regard to government funding for fiscal years 2019-20 to 2021-22 allocated within the constituency of South Okanagan—West Kootenay: what is the total funding amount, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) department or agency, (iii) initiative, (iv) amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-474.
|
|
Q-476 — Mr. Cannings (South Okanagan—West Kootenay) — With regard to the government's commitment in budget 2021 on interchange fees for small and medium-sized businesses: (a) what stakeholders did government representatives meet with since April 19, 2021, with the objective of (i) lowering the average overall cost of interchange fees, (ii) ensuring that small businesses benefit from pricing that is similar to large businesses, (iii) protecting existing reward points of customers; and (b) on what dates were the meetings referenced in (a) held? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-476.
|
|
Q-478 — Mr. Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot) — With regard to Canadian mining companies operating abroad and accused of violations, as well as the government and Canadian embassies: (a) do Canadian embassies have a mandate to ensure that Canadian companies are respecting and advocating for human rights, and, if so, what are the full details and implications of these actions; (b) do embassy staff keep a record of all requests regarding (i) services and support provided to companies, (ii) support from human rights advocates; (c) do allegations and accusations of human rights violations have an impact on embassies’ consideration of requests for support or services from Canadian companies, and, if so, what is this impact; (d) have there been cases where embassies have refused to provide support to companies because of allegations of potential violations, and, if so, what are these cases; (e) what institutional mechanisms can Canadian embassy staff turn to when they become aware of human rights or environmental violations committed by Canadian companies abroad, especially companies that have benefited from embassy services or support in the past; and (f) has the government been made aware of human rights and environmental violations by Canadian companies abroad in the case of Goldcorp, as reported in the Hill Times article of March 30, 2022, and, if so, what actions have been taken to address these violations, with regard to (i) Canadian companies abroad, (ii) the affected groups? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-478.
|
|
Q-479 — Mrs. Goodridge (Fort McMurray—Cold Lake) — With regard to Service Canada centres located in flood plains or flood zones: (a) how many Service Canada centres are located in a flood plain or flood zone; (b) what is the location of all such centres, including the street address; (c) for each location in (b), is there a contingency plan to be used during a flood, and, if so, what is the plan; and (d) for each location in (b), has an alternate location outside of the flood plain been designated to be used as a temporary Service Canada centre during a flood, and, if so, what is the location? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-479.
|
|
Q-480 — Mr. Tochor (Saskatoon—University) — With regard to expenditures and other transactions made by the government using the Treasury Board object code 3213 (Losses of money) or any similar code related to the loss of money: (a) what are the details of all such transactions since fiscal year 2018-19, broken down by department, agency, or other government entity, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, including whether the amount represents the amount of government expenditure or the amount of payment being received by the government, (iii) summary of what took place, (iv) description of the items or services involved; and (b) what was the total value of transactions related to (a), broken down by fiscal year since 2018-19? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-480.
|
|
Q-481 — Mr. Tochor (Saskatoon—University) — With regard to expenditures and other transactions made by the government using the Treasury Board object code 3214 (Deficits and write-offs not elsewhere specified), or any similar code: (a) what are the details of all such transactions since fiscal year 2018-19, broken down by department, agency, or other government entity, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount being written off, (iii) reason for the write-off, (iv) description of the items or services being written off; and (b) what was the total value of transactions related to (a), broken down by fiscal year since 2018-19? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-481.
|
|
Q-482 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — With regard to meetings between senior government officials (those at the assistant deputy minister level or higher) and the former Unifor President, Jerry Dias, or events attended by both a cabinet minister and Mr. Dias, since January 1, 2016, broken down by each official: (a) on how many days did each official meet with or attend an event where Mr. Dias was present, including private meetings and informal events that are not listed on the lobbying registry or any official government itinerary; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by year; and (c) what are the details of all such meetings or events, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) type of meeting or event (in-person meeting, virtual meeting, government announcement, etc.), (iii) agenda items, if known, (iv) known list of attendees, (v) summary of what took place, (vi) government officials that were in attendance? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-482.
|
|
Q-483 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — With regard to meetings between cabinet ministers or their staff and the former Unifor President, Jerry Dias, or events attended by both a cabinet minister and Mr. Dias, since January 1, 2016, broken down by minister: (a) on how many days did each minister meet with or attend an event where Mr. Dias was present, including private meetings and informal events that are not listed on the lobbying registry or any official government itinerary; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by year; and (c) what are the details of all such meetings or events, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) type of meeting or event (in-person meeting, virtual meeting, government announcement, etc.), (iii) agenda items, if known, (iv) known list of attendees, (v) summary of what took place, (vi) ministers and exempt staff members that were in attendance? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-483.
|
|
Q-484 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — With regard to meetings between the Prime Minister and the former Unifor President, Jerry Dias, or events attended by both the Prime Minister and Mr. Dias, since January 1, 2016: (a) on how many days did the Prime Minister meet with or attend an event where Mr. Dias was present, including private meetings and informal events that are not listed on the Prime Minister's official itinerary; (b) what is the breakdown of (a) by year; and (c) what are the details of all such meetings or events, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) type of meeting or event (in-person meeting, virtual meeting, government announcement, etc.), (iii) agenda items, if known, (iv) known list of attendees, (v) summary of what took place? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-484.
|
|
Q-485 — Mr. Chambers (Simcoe North) — With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), real estate transactions and a report in the Toronto Star on May 30, 2019, about tax evasion in the real estate markets in Ontario and British Columbia: (a) how many Canadians (individuals, companies or corporations) have been identified as having evaded taxes through real estate transactions; (b) how many non-Canadians (individuals, companies or corporations) have been identified as having evaded taxes through real estate transactions; (c) of the Canadians identified in (a), how many of them are being, or have been, reviewed by the CRA; (d) of the non-Canadians identified in (b), how many of them are being, or have been, reviewed by the CRA; (e) how many (i) audits, (ii) reassessments or related compliance actions, have been undertaken against the Canadians identified in (a) by the CRA; (f) of the audits in (e)(i), how many (i) have been closed, (ii) are still ongoing; (g) how many (i) audits, (ii) reassessments or related compliance actions, have been undertaken against the non-Canadians identified in (b) by the CRA; (h) of the audits in (g)(i), how many (i) have been closed, (ii) are still ongoing; (i) how many identified (i) Canadians, (ii) non-Canadians, have availed themselves of the Voluntary Disclosure Program with the CRA; (j) how many identified (i) Canadians, (ii) non-Canadians, have settled with the CRA; (k) how much money has the CRA assessed as a result of investigating these cases, broken down by the amount in (i) unpaid taxes, (ii) interest, (iii) fines, (iv) penalties; (l) how much of the money has been collected; (m) how many of these cases (i) are under appeal, (ii) remain open, (iii) have been closed, i.e. the full amount of taxes, interest, fines and penalties have been collected; (n) how many tax evasion charges have been laid; and (o) how many convictions have been recorded? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-485.
|
|
Q-486 — Ms. Collins (Victoria) — With regard to federal transfers through the Low Carbon Economy Fund from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022: (a) how much funding has been allocated, broken down by (i) grants and contributions, (ii) province and territory; (b) how much has actually been transferred since April 1, 2021, broken down by (i) grants and contributions, (ii) province and territory; and (c) for each transfer payment identified in (b), what is the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-486.
|
|
Q-487 — Ms. Collins (Victoria) — With regard to the $8 billion Net Zero Accelerator initiative of the Strategic Innovation Fund: (a) how many potential applicants have submitted a statement of interest to date, broken down by (i) small and medium-sized businesses, (ii) large businesses, (iii) province and territory, (iv) potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; (b) how much has been spent to date, broken down by (i) business name, (ii) province and territory; and (c) of the funding in (b), what is the cost per tonne of greenhouse gas emission reductions for each applicant funded? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-487.
|
|
Q-488 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regard to the press release dated April 4, 2022, “Government of Canada announces affordable high-speed Internet to help connect low-income families and seniors”: (a) which participating Internet service providers (ISP) will be providing services under Connecting Families 2.0 to rural areas as defined by Statistics Canada; (b) how many eligible households whom received a letter from the government will not be able to participate in Connecting Families 2.0 due to not having a participating ISP service in their geographic area; (c) how many and which census divisions with rural areas will have (i) no participating ISP servicing the area, (ii) less than 50 per cent of the census division serviced by a participating ISP, (iii) less than 25 per cent of the census division serviced by a participating ISP; (d) in the federal electoral district of Bruce-Grey-Owen Sound, which census subdivisions or municipalities will have no participating ISPs; (e) how will the government increase participating ISPs servicing rural areas; and (f) how will the government ensure that this program provides equal access to the social and economic advantages of affordable internet to both rural and urban low income Canadians? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-488.
|
Business of Supply |
The order was read for the consideration of the business of supply. |
Mr. Blanchette-Joncas (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), seconded by Mr. Therrien (La Prairie), moved, — That: |
(a) the House denounce all forms of discrimination;
|
(b) in the opinion of the House,
|
(i) research is necessary for the advancement of science and society in general,
|
(ii) access to the Canada Research Chairs Program must be based on the candidates’ skills and qualifications; and
|
(c) the House call on the government to review the program's criteria to ensure that grants are awarded based on science and not based on identity criteria or unrelated to the purpose of the research.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Deferred Recorded Divisions |
Concurrence in Committee Reports |
Pursuant to order made Thursday, November 25, 2021, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman), seconded by Mr. Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil), — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 31, 2022, be concurred in; (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 9) |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. Vis (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
|
|
"the third report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, March 31, 2022, be not now concurred in, but that it be recommitted to the committee for further consideration, provided that:
|
|
(a) the committee be instructed to
|
|
(i) make every effort possible to receive evidence from Ben Chin, Rick Theis and Amitpal Singh, the witnesses who did not comply with the House's order of Thursday, March 25, 2021, to appear before the committee,
|
|
(ii) consider further the concerns expressed in the report about the member for Waterloo's failure "in her obligation to be accurate with a committee",
|
|
(iii) report back within 60 sitting days; and
|
|
(b) the committee be empowered to order the attendance of the member for Waterloo, from time to time, as it sees fit.".
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 109 -- Vote no 109) | |
YEAS: 114, NAYS: 205 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dreeshen Lehoux Rood Total: -- 114 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Davies Kayabaga O'Regan Total: -- 205 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 110 -- Vote no 110) | |
YEAS: 169, NAYS: 153 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Davies Kram Rayes Total: -- 169 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Drouin Kusmierczyk Petitpas Taylor Total: -- 153 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to order made Thursday, November 25, 2021, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Rodriguez (Minister of Canadian Heritage), seconded by Mrs. St-Onge (Minister of Sport and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec), — That Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. |
|
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
|
|
“Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada, be not now read a second time but that the order be discharged, the bill withdrawn, and the subject matter thereof referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.”.
|
|
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 111 -- Vote no 111) | |
YEAS: 117, NAYS: 206 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Dreeshen Lehoux Roberts Total: -- 117 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag DeBellefeuille Kayabaga Petitpas Taylor Total: -- 206 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
Pursuant to order made Monday, May 30, 2022, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 112 -- Vote no 112) | |
YEAS: 207, NAYS: 116 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag DeBellefeuille Kayabaga Perron Total: -- 207 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dreeshen Lehoux Rood Total: -- 116 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Nil--Aucun |
|
Accordingly, Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. |
Business of Supply |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Blanchette-Joncas (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), seconded by Mr. Therrien (La Prairie), in relation to the business of supply. |
The debate continued. |
Motions |
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House, following Private Members’ Business on Wednesday, June 1, 2022, a motion to concur in the fourth report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Monday, May 30, 2022, be deemed moved and seconded, at the conclusion of the three hours provided for the debate or when no member rises to speak, whichever is earlier, all questions necessary to dispose of the motion be deemed put and a recorded division be deemed requested and deferred until Thursday, June 2, 2022, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions, and during the debate, no quorum calls, dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent shall be received by the Chair. |
Business of Supply |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Blanchette-Joncas (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), seconded by Mr. Therrien (La Prairie), in relation to the business of supply. |
The debate continued. |
At 6:11 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 81(16), the Deputy Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to order made Thursday, November 25, 2021, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 1, 2022, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Private Members' Business |
At 6:13 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Carr (Winnipeg South Centre), seconded by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), — That Bill C-235, An Act respecting the building of a green economy in the Prairies, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology. |
The debate continued. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to order made Thursday, November 25, 2021, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 1, 2022, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid upon the table as follows: |
— by the Speaker — Report of the Parliamentary Budget Officer entitled "Supplementary Estimates (A) 2022-23", pursuant to the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S. 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 79.2(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-1119-40. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) |
— by Mr. Alghabra (Minister of Transport) — Report on Transportation in Canada for the year 2021, pursuant to the Canada Transportation Act, S.C. 1996, c. 10, sbs. 52(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-79-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) |
— by Mr. Mendicino (Minister of Public Safety) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, "Request for Government Response to the Sixth Report from the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-4), presented to the House on Monday, January 31, 2022. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-4. |
— by Ms. Ng (Minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development) — Summaries of the Corporate Plan and Budgets for 2022-23 to 2026-27 of the Business Development Bank of Canada, pursuant to the Financial Administration Act, R.S. 1985, c. F-11, sbs. 125(4). — Sessional Paper No. 8562-441-833-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology)
|
— by Ms. Tassi (Minister of Public Services and Procurement) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the first report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, "Report 1, Procuring Complex Information Technology Solutions of the 2021 Reports of the Auditor General of Canada" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-441-13), presented to the House on Tuesday, February 8, 2022. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-441-13. |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 6:59 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 7:27 p.m., the Deputy Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |