:
I call the meeting to order this morning.
Welcome, everyone, to meeting 83 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. The committee is meeting today to study the main estimates 2023-24 and to have a briefing with the on his mandate letter.
Before we start, let's welcome Geneviève Desjardins, who will be our new clerk and is taking over from Mike.
We welcome Ms. Lantsman this morning. Thank you.
The rest of us are in place.
As you all know, the Honourable , Minister of Canadian Heritage, is appearing today.
Thank you, Minister, for joining us this morning. You've brought with you officials from the Department of Canadian Heritage to help out.
We have Isabelle Mondou, deputy minister. It's good to see you again
For Thomas Owen Ripley, associate assistant deputy minister for cultural affairs, the bike-riding should be good in Ottawa these days.
Last is Eric Doiron, chief financial officer. Eric, thank you for joining us.
Let's get started with opening remarks from the minister for 10 minutes.
The floor is yours, Minister.
:
Mr. Chair and members of the committee, thank you for inviting me to speak with you about priorities included in my mandate letter and the Main Estimates for the Department of Canadian Heritage.
As you said, Mr. Chair, with me today are Ms. Isabelle Mondou, Deputy Minister; Mr. Thomas Owen Ripley, Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, whom you know very well; and Mr. Éric Doiron, Chief Financial Officer of my department, who will also be able to answer some of your questions.
I often say how proud I am to be the Minister of Canadian Heritage. In fact, I had asked to come back, but you know how it works. The could have said no. In the end, I came back because I think it's an extremely important department for Canada's social fabric. To be honest, it's not the easiest job in Ottawa. We have a very ambitious program, but I think we're all proud to contribute to promoting and defending our culture and who we are as Canadians. Our culture and all those who work in the sector deserve our support. I'm thinking of our artists, our creators, our independent producers, our museums, all those who work in the arts and culture sector.
All parliamentarians, my team, my department's officials and I all work extremely hard to implement all these priorities. Many have already been achieved and others are underway. Among other things, I'm talking about supporting our cultural industries, protecting the rights of our artists, encouraging The production of books and music, museums, theatres, homegrown programs and films. We must also support Indigenous people's efforts to revitalize their languages, promote their cultures and tell their stories in their own way. All Canadians need to see themselves in what they watch and listen to. We must protect our news media industry and make sure our laws reflect our digital world which, as you know, is undergoing profound changes.
[English]
My mandate letter, as you can see, contains many ambitious commitments, probably more than ever. There are definitely more than there were the first time I was Minister of Canadian Heritage. One of the most important, at least to me, but probably to a lot of you too, is to modernize our broadcasting system to make sure it reflects the reality of how the industry works today, because things have changed in the past quite a lot. We're doing this to make sure our industry succeeds. We want our people to succeed and we want to make sure that our artists and creators and producers have all the opportunities they deserve.
Over a year ago, I introduced our Online Streaming Act. Recently it received royal assent, and I think we should feel proud of that. We may not agree on everything, but I think it's a huge step.
It's been a long process. We all know that. We examined the bill; we debated it; we improved it. Even if it was tough, parliamentarians worked hard to make this bill into law. It's the law of the land. It's the first time it has changed since 1991, so I want to acknowledge the collaboration of parliamentarians, witnesses and all those who participated, including all of you.
[Translation]
The Online Streaming Act was the first success in a long series of actions we're going to take to level the playing field for everyone. When I say everyone, I'm talking as much about digital platforms as our broadcasters, newspapers and media outlets.
There's another step which I think is absolutely fundamental and unavoidable in this series of actions, and that's Bill . Access to reliable, quality news is the foundation of our democracy. It's one of the pillars of our democracy. The work of our journalists and newsrooms has value, and platforms must recognize and contribute to it. It's essential for democracy in our country.
Currently, a Senate committee is studying Bill . I hope things will keep moving along smoothly. There were some good conversations and I think things are moving along well. Our news community needs it. As soon as the bill passes, it will help ensure the viability of our local and independent media.
Collectively, regardless of our party banner or where we come from, our job is to stand up for them, for a free, independent, nonpartisan and professional press. Every single one of us must make the effort, because Canadians expect us to protect local journalism and have independent, free, reliable and nonpartisan press. We must make this effort together.
Coming back to the rest of the mandate, we've accomplished a great deal. I'm thinking specifically of support we provided to artists and the cultural sector during the pandemic. It was at the top of my mandate letter. It all happened while we were in the middle of the pandemic. There were tremendous concerns in the sector. It was at the heart of our actions.
We supported the entire sector throughout the pandemic, but the sector was there for us too. I'm sure you'll agree with what I'm about to say. It was hard to be isolated, not to talk to each other, to be on our own. Imagine if we hadn't had books, music and television. Itwould have been a thousand times harder. While we were there for the cultural sector, it was there for all of us too.
[English]
I say it all the time. I just can't imagine a world without culture, languages, stories, TV shows, books, our museums and our music. I'm happy to see that because of the initiatives we put together through the pandemic, nine out of 10 recipients told us that our recovery fund helped them stay in business.
That's not all. Over a year ago—and you probably remember this—in May of last year, we held a national summit with cultural leaders from across the country, with people coming from everywhere. Hundreds of people came to talk here in Ottawa about the future of the sector. That was another very important moment. We met and reflected on the needs of the sector. Since then, we've seen our artists return to the stage, our venues fill up and our museums welcome visitors again. All of this is absolutely great to see.
Do you know what? The reality is that the credit goes to the cultural community, because they're the ones who did the job. We provided the funds and we had programs here and there, but they're the ones who worked hard to get back to prepandemic levels of activity.
We were there for them and we were committed to supporting the recovery all the way. A lot has been done, but you will definitely agree that a lot remains to be done also. There's so much work to do.
That brings me to the next topic that I'm here to talk about today, which is my department and portfolio budgets.
[Translation]
For the coming year, Main Estimates for the Department of Canadian Heritage will be $1.9 billion. That includes $202.9 million in operating expenditures and $1.7 billion in grants and contributions. That's an adjustment of $244.3 million compared to the previous year, simply because we’re coming back to our pre-pandemic priorities.
[English]
A good example of that is our creative export strategy, which supports the competitiveness of our creative industries at the international level, and we just renewed it for three years.
There is also an increase of $74.2 million in 2023-24 to support the efforts of indigenous communities to reclaim, revitalize, maintain and strengthen their languages. In the 2022 budget, money was also provided to foster a more inclusive arts training sector and to continue to support the postpandemic recovery of the arts sector.
It's important because it shows that we were there during the crisis, during the pandemic, that we're still there today, that we've been there for all Canadians and that we kept our promise to leave no one behind.
[Translation]
We will continue to be there.
Once again, thank you for your work, your dedication, your analyses and your reports. I'm here to work with you to see what we can do together to help the people we represent.
I'm now ready to take your questions.
Thank you very much.
:
Thank you, Chair. I appreciate that.
Thank you, Minister, for being here.
To the other witnesses, thank you for being here. I appreciate your time, your energy and your efforts, especially throughout the pandemic.
The artists, the creators and the producers are the ones sharing our stories, and they're our stories. During the pandemic, Canadians turned to artists to make sense of what was happening in our lives and to connect.
Minister, if you don't mind, I would like to start by talking about how we're modernizing our broadcasting industry. We know that Canadian creators need support to continue to develop Canadian music and all forms of art in the world of streaming, like our film industry, our music industry and our stories, and Canada needs to continue to support those emerging creators. With the passing of Bill , the Online Streaming Act, foreign-owned broadcasting companies will have to contribute financially to our cultural system, the same as our domestic broadcasters have been doing for years and years, so Bill C-11 is a big win for our Canadian artists and Canadian culture.
I was wondering if you could expand on what happens. How is that going to affect and help our art scene, now that the bill has passed? What difference will it make for our Canadian artists?
:
Bill , I would say, is a major step, because that act had not been modernized since 1991. I always joke about it, saying that I had black hair at the time, but it was true. Also, if you look back, you'll remember that we would go to Blockbuster to rent movies. We didn't have Internet in our homes and we would listen to music on our Walkman. That was the last time the bill was modernized. Streamers didn't exist at the time.
We were working until recently with legislation that was drafted even before the existence of the Internet in our houses, before it was commonly used, so it was an important step, and there was a lot of work behind Bill . You guys had it here for a long time, and it was in the Senate. I think it has a record for the bill that spent the most time in a committee in the Senate in the history of the country, so I think it's been well studied.
I think it's a beautiful compromise. Is it a perfect bill? No, but I think it's a beautiful compromise that is largely supported by the music industry, the film industry and the television industry. Why? It creates a level playing field, and it's going to ask the streamers that....
You know, I always say it, because we do love them. I do. This morning I was working out and I was watching The Mandalorian on Disney. I have Netflix. I have a lot of them, and they make a lot of money, which is good. I'm happy that they make money, but if they come here and they make that much money, they also have an obligation to play by the rules and support the creation of Canadian content.
In the same way that conversations were more difficult a couple of years ago, things have changed. The streamers understand that. You have not seen a lot of resistance recently from the streamers, because they get it. They're playing ball with the government, not only here but in other countries, so there will be more money for music, there will be more money for television and there will be more money for movie creation. I think that's great news for Canadians.
:
I think it's very sad because of the importance of our public broadcaster.
CBC/Radio-Canada played and is still playing a fundamental role in our country in the same way that the BBC and others do in other countries. It has a clear mandate to support language minorities across the country—francophones outside Quebec and anglophones in Quebec. We see the coverage and quality of what they do internationally and how they've helped Canadians understand the world throughout decades. It has among the best information there is when things happen outside the borders of our country.
My first reaction is to say that it's very sad.
The second reaction is that I'm not sure they understand what they're saying, because CBC/Radio-Canada is one. It has the same president, the same work, the same structure, the same head office, the same offices. The same cameras are used. The same microphones are used. The same “anything rooms” are used. Quite often the same journalists are used.
Quite often I will give an interview in French, and then the journalists will switch and ask me the same questions in English, or the opposite if they start in English. When do you stop paying that person? If that same journalist is asking you a question in French and then switches to English, do you stop paying the salary of that person because you say, “No, in English you're not going to be paid. We're not going to support you”?
It doesn't make any sense, because CBC also has to respect the law on official languages.
The opposition is also sending the message to the anglophone minority in Quebec that we don't care about them. Francophones outside of Quebec can have the services of Radio-Canada, but anglophones in Quebec will not have access to CBC, which comes to the same sentiment that I had at the beginning. I find it very sad.
Thank you, Minister and our other guests, for being here today.
Minister, just a couple of days ago I was at the sold-out fundraiser for the Art Gallery of Hamilton, which I'm sure you know is one of the biggest and best art galleries in all of the country. People were lined up down the street, dying to get in once they reopened during the pandemic.
I also recently visited a couple of TV shows that are being filmed in Hamilton. That's an industry that didn't shut down at all during the pandemic. All are very grateful for the supports from your department. I have also met with people who put on local festivals in Hamilton, who are also grateful for supports.
However, not everybody has recovered entirely from the pandemic. It's still difficult. Crowds have changed. People don't plan anymore. They don't buy their tickets to an event until the very last minute. It's very hard for music producers, for example, to know how many people or how much they can pay to put on their event. Everything has changed.
Could you reflect on that for us a little?
You mentioned that one of the first things you did in this session as minister was to hold a national seminar on the arts, culture and heritage. Tell us what you've heard from artists lately. What does the future of the arts look like in Canada?
:
That's a big question. I'm not sure any of us has the full answer to that. We understand there are many challenges.
One of the things we got out of that summit.... It was a huge success, by the way. We had 400 people from all over the country, and hundreds of people were on the screen. A big topic of discussion and debate was the fragility of many of our workers. The arts and culture sector was one of the hardest hit during the pandemic, especially the live arts.
If you think about it, you had venues and maybe you had a gig where you would play the guitar. Let's say Mr. Louis had a gig, and he was playing at a certain venue. The venue would say, “No, sorry; there are COVID rules. You're not playing.” The COVID rules then changed, and then it was, “Oh, by the way, yes, you can play next week.” The rules kept changing. We lost many people because these people who had contracts here and there were also parents. They also had to pay the mortgage or the rent, put food on the table, clothe their kids and all of that. Because of that instability, we lost many people.
We have to look at ways to offer more stability to that sector. Can we do stuff, for example, through EI? How can we also help the venues to encourage people to come back? We've put in place some of those programs. For a while, people were still concerned about COVID and going into a room full of people. People are a bit more reassured now, but not fully. It brings supplementary challenges, so you discuss live events and the future of television and movies at the same time. The way to approach this is to have an inclusive approach.
We have programs with the live sector. We have Bill for our culture sector. We have Bill for media and newsrooms. The most important thing is to listen and to learn from the people on the ground. I'm only the minister, right? We have some tools as a department, and some money, and definitely goodwill to change and help, but the people who know are the people doing the stuff on the ground.
:
First of all, I want to thank you, Mr. Louis, for your contributions, not only on this committee but in different conversations. You're an artist, and I have a lot to learn from you. I think we have a lot to learn from you. You know your stuff probably more than all of us, so thank you very much for what you've done.
It's the same as Ms. Hepfner's knowing the media sector extremely well, and it's been extremely helpful to have her with us to prepare Bill .
Probably the most important thing was just seeing each other at that summit. Remember, that was in the middle of the pandemic. It was a year ago in the month of May. It was cute to see our faces on screens, but the fact is that we gathered 400 people from all over the country, specialists in museums, music, movies, television and books. It was simply amazing to have the human contact and the chance to share our point of view and our best experiences. There were things that were done in B.C. that we could learn from, and other things that were done in Quebec that we could learn from. I think it was the perfect forum to share those experiences and the challenges of the future.
I was discussing earlier today the fragility of the sector, the job situation and the instability. How can we help these people who want to follow their passion so that they don't have to leave their jobs and go work in a restaurant or anywhere else? I know they're all good jobs, but they're not doing what they love, what their passion is, so how can we help them? How can we offer more support, comfort and stability to a mother who is a ballet dancer but doesn't have the stability required to pay the mortgage, the rent, and this and that?
I think that it was very welcomed by all the sectors. I think all of us learned quite a lot, and that also helped us put in place some of the programs that followed to help in terms of support during the pandemic.
:
Shall we do as we did earlier, Mr. Chair?
Minister, earlier, my colleague Mr. Shields raised an important point, which I'd like to come back to. It's something I raise as often as I can, and that's federal government-bought advertising in the media. I talked about this in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022. We're now in 2023 and I'm still talking about it, since nothing has been done.
The advertising that the federal government buys is mainly bought on Google, Facebook and social media. We're in an era where the government tries to work with these web giants, but ends up fighting them to contribute. Small media outlets are absorbing phenomenal revenue losses while tens of millions of dollars are invested in the web giants—Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft.
When we ask questions, we're told that each department manages its advertising budget envelope, that it's the agencies that choose where the money is directed, that the goal is to reach as many people as possible and, of course, that it ends up in the pockets of these web giants.
It would be nice, Minister, if we could stop passing the buck from one department to another and have someone in government say that enough is enough and that investing in advertising with these web giants doesn't make sense. This money, these tens of millions of dollars invested every year, must go into the pockets of our small media. The latter are crying out for help. Every week, another one closes its doors. There are also newsrooms that are no longer able to provide a quality service.
Today, I'd like you to commit to stop investing in these web giants and invest in Quebec and Canadian media. They are struggling and need the money.
Do you agree with me? Will you do something about it? I'd love to see that.
I'm going to make an arbitrary decision.
We have 22 minutes before the hour. Minister and department officials, if you don't mind, we would like to do a short fourth round, because you have committed to us until one o'clock.
Here's what I'm going to do. I'm going to give the Conservatives and Liberals five minutes each and the NDP and the Bloc two and half minutes each.
That's what we'll do, and then we have some voting on the main estimates.
An hon. member: It should be five minutes for everyone.
An hon. member: C'est inéquitable.
The Vice-Chair (Mr. Kevin Waugh): Both of you have received generous time from Mr. Waugh today.
Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
The Vice-Chair (Mr. Kevin Waugh): Anyway, let's go with five minutes.
It will be Ms. Lantsman for the Conservatives.
:
That's a very good question, Mr. Housefather, but I don't have an answer. In fact, I don't understand what the official opposition is trying to do.
As I mentioned earlier, CBC/Radio-Canada is an institution. The funds that are allocated go to the entire institution. There's a president, a board of directors, a senior management team. It has shared offices across the country. Very often, the same journalist will ask me a question in French and say:
[English]
“Can you repeat the same thing in English, please?”, or she'll maybe ask a different question in English, but that is the same person, so what do you do with that person? Do you pay that person only when she's asking questions in French and not in English?
[Translation]
When you cross the street to do an interview at CBC/Radio‑Canada, the security guards at the entrance are the same. The infrastructure and editing studios are the same. I don't understand what the opposition is trying to do.
That's the first thing, Mr. Housefather. You're going to understand what I'm going to say very well.
A fundamental right is being taken away from the English-speaking minority in Quebec. CBC/Radio‑Canada is there for French-speaking minorities outside Quebec. What the opposition is saying today is that we don't care about the English-speaking minority in Quebec and that they're going to take away access to news in their language from our public network, CBC/Radio‑Canada.
:
No. I would like to come back to a few points that I think are very important.
First, we talked about advertising earlier and I just want to remind you of a few facts. We had a bit of a laugh at the end of my speaking period, but I just want to tell you how important it is, because our media talk to us about it regularly. It's something we find very difficult to explain to ourselves. I intend to talk to you about it again very soon.
I also want to talk to you about this committee's report to revive culture following the pandemic. I think we can agree that we're pretty much back to a situation where people can go back to attending shows safely. There are still fears, however, and efforts still need to be made; the various stakeholders in the cultural industry are asking us to do so, particularly the smaller festivals, as I mentioned earlier.
Recommendation 9 of our report, Minister, urged the federal government to “make significant efforts to encourage Canadians to return to live arts, culture, heritage and sporting events.” This is a category of events to which small festivals correspond quite well, and large ones too for that matter, I'm sure we agree.
Despite this, I note a decrease of about $25 million for the Canada Arts Presentation Fund, another $9.5 million for the Canada Music Fund, a decrease of $7.7 million for the Building Communities Through Arts and Heritage program and another $6.9 million for the Canada Cultural Spaces Fund.
It seems to me that this doesn't quite address the recommendation we made.
Vote 1—Payments to the Council..........$364,238,813
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Corporation for operating expenditures..........$1,173,123,435
ç
Vote 5—Payments to the Corporation for working capital..........$4,000,000
ç
Vote 10—Payments to the Corporation for capital expenditures..........$110,046,000
(Votes 1, 5 and 10 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN MUSEUM FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Museum for operating and capital expenditures..........$25,458,013
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN MUSEUM OF HISTORY
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Museum for operating and capital expenditures..........$73,251,251
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN MUSEUM OF IMMIGRATION AT PIER 21
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Museum for operating and capital expenditures..........$8,111,694
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN MUSEUM OF NATURE
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Museum for operating and capital expenditures..........$27,718,568
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN RACE RELATIONS FOUNDATION
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Foundation..........$9,000,000
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
ç
Vote 1—Program expenditures..........$9,896,828
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
DEPARTMENT OF CANADIAN HERITAGE
ç
Vote 1—Operating expenditures..........$202,886,911
ç
Vote 5—Grants and contributions..........$1,707,891,504
(Votes 1 and 5 agreed to on division)
LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES OF CANADA
ç
Vote 1—Operating expenditures..........$147,786,024
ç
Vote 5—Capital expenditures..........$40,537,795
(Votes 1 and 5 agreed to on division)
NATIONAL ARTS CENTRE CORPORATION
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Corporation for operating expenditures..........$46,416,148
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
ç
Vote 1—Program expenditures..........$66,490,205
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
NATIONAL GALLERY OF CANADA
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Gallery for operating and capital expenditures..........$37,778,278
ç
Vote 5—Payment to the Gallery for the acquisition of objects for the collection and related costs..........$8,000,000
(Votes 1 and 5 agreed to on division)
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the Museum for operating and capital expenditures..........$29,933,096
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
ç
Vote 1—Payments to the corporation to be used for the purposes set out in the Telefilm Canada Act..........$151,908,479
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
NATIONAL BATTLEFIELDS COMMISSION
ç
Vote 1—Program expenditures..........$11,337,820
(Vote 1 agreed to on division)
The Vice-Chair (Mr. Kevin Waugh): Shall I report the main estimates to the House?
Some hon. members: Agreed.
An hon. member: On division.
The Vice-Chair (Mr. Kevin Waugh): Thank you very much.
Thank you very much, Minister and department officials.
The meeting is adjourned.