TRAN Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
The committee resumed clause-by-clause consideration on Clause 122 of the Bill.
(a) by replacing line 6 on page 78 with the following:
“107.1 (1) If there is a”
(b) by adding after line 28 on page 78 the following:
“(6) For greater certainty, for the judicial review of an order made under subsection (1), the correctness standard applies to determine whether there was a risk of imminent harm to national security, national economic security or competition that constitutes a significant threat to the safety and security of persons, goods, ships or port facilities or the security of supply chains.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Xavier Barsalou-Duval and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Damien C. Kurek, Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Dan Muys — 5;
NAYS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Joyce Murray, Churence Rogers — 6.
“(1.1) The power under subsection (1) to make an order, and any powers, duties or functions conferred or imposed by or under such an order, must not be exercised or performed for the purpose of terminating a strike or lock-out or imposing a settlement in a labour dispute.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Taylor Bachrach and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Damien C. Kurek, Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Joyce Murray, Dan Muys, Churence Rogers — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Clause 122, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Damien C. Kurek, Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Joyce Murray, Dan Muys, Churence Rogers — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Damien C. Kurek moved, — That the committee call upon Senators who are delaying the passage of the legislation to stop playing political games with the livelihoods of Canadian farmers, recognize the decision of the elected House of Commons, and pass Bill C-234 into law without further delay.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair ruled the motion inadmissible as it is out of the mandate of the committee.
A point of order was raised as to the procedural acceptability of the decision of the Chair on ruling the motion not admissible.
Whereupon, Damien C. Kurek appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Joyce Murray, Churence Rogers — 7;
NAYS: Damien C. Kurek, Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Dan Muys — 4.
Accordingly, the Chair's decision was sustained as the question was not negatived.
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
Clause 123 carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Joyce Murray, Churence Rogers — 7;
NAYS: Damien C. Kurek, Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Dan Muys — 4.
Debate arose thereon.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
A point of order was raised as to the decision of the Chair in fact relates to parliamentary privilege.
Whereupon, Mark Strahl appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Taylor Bachrach, Vance Badawey, Xavier Barsalou-Duval, Angelo Iacono, Annie Koutrakis, Joyce Murray, Churence Rogers — 7;
NAYS: Chris Lewis, Leslyn Lewis, Dan Muys, Mark Strahl — 4.
Accordingly, the Chair's decision was sustained as the question was not negatived.
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
On Clause 124,
Debate arose thereon.
At 6:47 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 6:58 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At 7:28 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 7:39 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At 9:00 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 9:12 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At 10:24 p.m., the sitting was suspended.
At 10:33 p.m., the sitting resumed.
At 11:32 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.