CHPC Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Minutes of Proceedings
Thomas Owen Ripley answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
“(2.4) This Act does not apply to an online undertaking whose revenues in Canada from paid subscriptions and embedded advertising do not exceed $150,000,000 annually.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“(2.4) This Act does not apply to an online undertaking whose revenues in Canada from paid subscriptions and embedded advertising do not exceed $100,000,000 annually.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“(2.4) This Act does not apply to an online undertaking whose revenues in Canada from paid subscriptions and embedded advertising do not exceed $50,000,000.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“(2.4) This Act does not apply to an online undertaking whose revenues in Canada from paid subscriptions and embedded advertising do not exceed $25,000,000.”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“enhance the vitality of official language minority communities and to support and”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Tim Louis and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis, John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
Clause 2, as amended, carried on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7;
NAYS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4.
On Clause 3,
John Nater moved, — That Bill C-11, in Clause 3, be amended(a) by replacing lines 7 to 9 on page 4 with the following:
“(a) the Canadian broadcasting system shall be effectively”
(b) by replacing lines 11 to 15 on page 4 with the following:
“(a.1) foreign broadcasting undertakings may provide broadcasting services to Canadians by means of online undertakings provided they do so in a manner that is consistent with the objectives of the broadcasting policy for Canada;”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“(a) the Canadian broadcasting system shall be effectively owned and controlled by Canadians, and it is recognized that it includes foreign broadcasting undertakings that provide programming to Canadians;”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Martin Champoux and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7;
NAYS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4.
“(2.1) Paragraph 3(1)(d) of the Act is amended by adding the following after subparagraph (i):
(i.1) reflect and be responsive to the preferences and interests of its audiences,
(i.2) to the extent possible, rely on market forces to ensure that Canadians obtain the programming of their choice,”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
“(2.1) Subparagraph 3(1)(d)(ii) of the Act is replaced by the following:
(ii) encourage the development of Canadian expression by providing a wide range of programming that reflects Canadian attitudes, opinions, ideas, values and artistic creativity, by displaying Canadian talent in entertainment programming and by offering information and analysis concerning Canada and other countries from a Canadian point of view, and foster an environment that encourages the development and export of Canadian programs globally,”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis, John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
“(iii.11) provide opportunities to Black and other racialized persons in Canada by taking into account their specific needs and interests, namely, by supporting the production and broadcasting of original programs by and for Black and other racialized communities,”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Peter Julian and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis, John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
“original French language programs,”
By unanimous consent, after debate, the question was put on the amendment of Anthony Housefather and it was agreed to.
“served, including with respect to the languages in use within those communities and to their ethnocultural and Indigenous composition, and the high engagement and involvement in community broadcasting by members of those communities, including with respect to matters of public concern,”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Lisa Hepfner and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis, John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 11;
NAYS: — 0.
“(iii.6) provide opportunities to Canadians from racialized communities and of diverse ethnocultural backgrounds to produce programs and broadcasting undertakings, including programs that reflect the diverse lived experiences of Canadians and that express the cultural and historically significant stories of Canadians from racialized communities and diverse ethnocultural backgrounds,”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Martin Champoux, John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 5;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 6.
“(iii.6) support the production and broadcasting of programs in a diversity of languages that reflect racialized communities and the diversity of the ethnocultural composition of Canadian society, including through broadcasting undertakings that are carried on by Canadians from racialized communities and diverse ethnocultural backgrounds,
(iii.7) provide opportunities to Canadians from racialized communities and diverse ethnocultural backgrounds to produce and broadcast programs by and for those communities,”
By unanimous consent, after debate, the question was put on the amendment of Michael Coteau and it was agreed to.
“(3.1) Paragraph 3(1)(d) of the Act is amended by adding the following after subparagraph (iv):
(v) seek to protect the health and well-being of children by preventing the broadcasting to children of programs that include sexually explicit content, and
(vi) prevent the broadcasting of programs that include sexually explicit content depicting violence, sexism, racism, degrading treatment and torture;”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of John Nater and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: John Nater, Rachael Thomas, Tim Uppal, Kevin Waugh — 4;
NAYS: Chris Bittle, Martin Champoux, Michael Coteau, Lisa Hepfner, Anthony Housefather, Peter Julian, Tim Louis — 7.
At 5:56 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.